<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
		<title>Barbara Boxer: In The News</title>
		<link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com</link>
		<description>News Clips</description>
		<language>en-us</language>
		<pubDate>Fri, 12 Mar 2010 05:55:46 -0800</pubDate>
		<managingEditor>info@barbaraboxer.com</managingEditor>
		<webMaster>info@barbaraboxer.com</webMaster>
                
		<ttl>40</ttl>

  <item>
    <title>Senate approves $138-billion spending bill</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0299</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-benefits11-2010mar11,0,1522368.story"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Kim Geiger&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reporting from Washington - After months of wrangling, the Senate on Wednesday approved a $138-billion spending bill that would extend jobless benefits, help states pay for Medicaid and continue a bundle of tax measures designed to stimulate the economy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The measure -- which must still be reconciled with a version passed in the House -- also extends tax cuts for college tuition, the program that helps laid-off workers keep their job-based health insurance, and tax breaks for research and development that have long been important to the nation's high-tech industries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In addition, the bill delays a threatened 21% cutback in the payments doctors receive for treating Medicare patients.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-benefits11-2010mar11,0,1522368.story"&gt;Read the entire article in the LA Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0299</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>'Calling for death to a country or individual is unacceptable'</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0295</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0310/Calling_for_death_to_a_country_or_individual_is_unacceptable.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Ben Smith&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Politico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When you go into Obama-campaign style "Fight the Smears" mode, it's generally a pretty good idea to be sure the charges against you are, in fact, not provably true.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As Josh Gerstein wrote last week, the story of Sami Al-Arian, the Florida professor who pled guilty of supporting Palestinian Islamic Jihad in 2006, has been roiling the GOP Senate Primary there, with Tom Campbell under fire from rivals for his departures from the party's staunch support for Israel.&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;The problem: Just hours after the debate ended, The Investigative Project put online a letter from Campbell that defended Arian and made reference to that same O'Reilly interview.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/blogs/bensmith/0310/Calling_for_death_to_a_country_or_individual_is_unacceptable.html"&gt;Read the entire article in Politico.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0295</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Tom Campbell letter stokes controversy over ties to jihadist</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0298</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_14643078?nclick_check=1"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Mike Zapler&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Silicon Valley Mercury News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON &amp;mdash; Republican U.S. Senate candidate Tom Campbell is facing a potentially crippling controversy over his past defense of a fired Florida professor with ties to terrorists and his inconsistent statements regarding what he knew and when about the man's actions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dogged for weeks by criticism over his defense of Sami Al-Arian, who later pleaded guilty to aiding terrorists, Campbell has denied knowing about the man's incendiary past, which included nods to Islamic jihad and calls for "death to Israel." He also said that his dealings with Al-Arian occurred before the Sept. 11 terror attacks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But Campbell, who was then a Stanford law professor, wrote a letter on Al-Arian's behalf months after the Sept. 11 attacks that casts doubt on his claims of ignorance about Al-Arian's radicalism.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_14643078?nclick_check=1"&gt;Read the entire article in the Mercury News.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0298</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. aid sought for California drought</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0297</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/03/09/1853273/us-aid-sought-for-california-drought.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Michael Doyle&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fresno Bee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The aid will flow to fruit and vegetable farmers who work in the 24 California counties that have been designated as primary disaster areas because of drought. These include many Central Valley counties, among them Kings and Merced. Fresno and Tulare counties were not among those designated last September as primary disaster areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Though the amendment does not specify California as a recipient, the state is expected to receive a high percentage of the specialty-crop funding because it dominates the nation's fruit and vegetable production.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Growers in California have experienced significant crop losses due to an extended period of drought, and these funds will help many get through these tough times," Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/03/09/1853273/us-aid-sought-for-california-drought.html"&gt;Read the entire article in the Fresno Bee.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0297</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Letter on Muslim radical roils GOP Senate race</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0294</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-senate9-2010mar09,0,7419294.story"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Seema Mehta&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Terrorism and the Middle East are continuing to roil the Republican Senate contest after a letter written by former congressman Tom Campbell emerged that appeared to contradict statements Campbell and his aides had made about his dealings with a radical Muslim professor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The professor, Sami Al-Arian, contributed to Campbell's unsuccessful campaign in 2000 for the U.S. Senate. On Sept. 26, 2001, when he was teaching at the University of South Florida, Al-Arian gave an interview to Fox TV host Bill O'Reilly in which he conceded that he had said, "Jihad is our path. Victory to Islam. Death to Israel. Revolution. Revolution until victory. Rolling to Jerusalem."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Those statements quickly generated a furor and the university moved to discipline Al-Arian. Campbell, by then a law professor at Stanford University, wrote a letter to Judy Genshaft, the president of the University of South Florida, protesting any punishment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-senate9-2010mar09,0,7419294.story"&gt;Read the entire article in the LA Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0294</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Packard heir slams GOP Senate candidate, former Hewlett-Packard chief Fiorina</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0292</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/03/packard-heir-slams-gop-senate-candidate-former-hewlettpackard-chief-fiorina.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Seema Mehta&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times PolitiCal Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Republican Senate hopeful Carly Fiorina touts her business resume, particularly her years as chief executive of Hewlett-Packard, as the reason GOP voters should nominate her to face Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But this morning, an heir to one of the company&amp;rsquo;s founders issued a slashing rebuttal, arguing that Fiorina nearly drove the technology firm into the ground.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;I know a little bit about Carly Fiorina, having watched her almost destroy the company my grandfather founded,&amp;rdquo; wrote Arianna Packard, the granddaughter of David Packard, in a letter posted on www.redstate.com.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fiorina is in a tough three-way GOP race to take on Sen. Barbara Boxer. Her tenure at Hewlett-Packard&amp;nbsp; was controversial, with Portfolio magazine crowning her one of the 20 worst American chief executives of all time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/03/packard-heir-slams-gop-senate-candidate-former-hewlettpackard-chief-fiorina.html"&gt;Read the entire post at the LA Times PolitiCal blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0292</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Women's History Month Celebrates Women in the Military</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0296</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.uso.org/2010/03/08/womens-history-month-celebrates-women-in-the-military/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;USO Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sgt. 1st Class Juanita Wilson (shown at right) accepted a Senate Resolution to recognize the accomplishments of women in the military on Capitol Hill last Thursday, at a Joint Services Women&amp;rsquo;s History Month Observance.&amp;nbsp; The resolution &amp;ndash; introduced by Sen. Barbara Boxer of California &amp;ndash; aims to do five things: &amp;ldquo;to acknowledge the contributions of women in the military, celebrate the role women play, recognize the unique challenges women face, to strengthen programs for women and to honor women veterans.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As reported by the Army News Service, &amp;ldquo;&amp;lsquo;I wouldn&amp;rsquo;t have thought that six years down the road, someone would be thinking about me,&amp;rsquo; Wilson said of her surprise at being asked to accept the resolution.&amp;nbsp; Boxer&amp;rsquo;s office said the senator introduced the resolution because she wanted to highlight the accomplishments, contributions, and sacrifices of women like Wilson in the military.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This Wednesday, surviving members of the Women Airforce Service Pilots, or WASP , program will be honored with a special WASP Congressional Gold Medal, created just last year by Congress and President Obama.&amp;nbsp; Fewer than 300 WASPs are still alive, making this ceremony particularly poignant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.uso.org/2010/03/08/womens-history-month-celebrates-women-in-the-military/"&gt;Read the entire article at the USO Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0296</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Stimulus money for California transit</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0293</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/03/05/stimulus-money-for-california-transit/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Josh Richman&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Contra Costa Times Political Blotter&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood today announced $83.9 million in American Recovery and Reinvestment Act funds for transit improvements in California.&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;And U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said &amp;ldquo;(t)hese critical investments will put Californians to work on transit projects that will ease congestion, improve air quality and speed Californians on their way to work and school.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ibabuzz.com/politics/2010/03/05/stimulus-money-for-california-transit/"&gt;Read the entire post at the Contra Costa Times Political Blotter.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0293</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>While Rivals Tangle, DeVore Abides</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0291</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/joe-mathews/6573-while-rivals-tangle-devore-abides"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ENTIRE ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Joe Mathews&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fox &amp;amp; Hounds&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Carly Fiorina, calling in while her rivals were at the debate in person, sounded scratchy and tired (at least over my Internet connection). Her campaign team, for all its operational successes, needs to do more work on the candidate herself. She managed the terrible trick of managing to sound defensive even when she was attacking.&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;- Tom Campbell was OK. He made a game effort to square his record with the right&amp;rsquo;s current, evangelical-inspired conviction that Israel is the world&amp;rsquo;s most important country. But I&amp;rsquo;m not sure he was convincing as a deliverer of red meat&amp;mdash;particularly when he suggested that terrorists should be treated like 19th century pirates and hanged. If he really believes that, I&amp;rsquo;ll buy him lunch the next time I run into him at Chapman University in Orange (where I sometimes teach).&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;- The clear winner of the encounter was Chuck DeVore. For one, the debate gave him a rare chance to get some attention. And he didn&amp;rsquo;t blow it. He talked about his own story and biography, in a way that made this listener want to know more. His deep voice sounded great on radio, and he demonstrated the gift, essential for conservatives these days, of sounding reasonable even while saying unreasonable things.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/joe-mathews/6573-while-rivals-tangle-devore-abides"&gt;Read the entire post at Fox and Hounds Daily.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0291</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer's Sneak Attack on Banker Bonuses</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0289</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2010/03/04/barbara-boxers-sneak-attack-on-banker-bonuses/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Michael Corkery&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Wall Street Journal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hell hath no fury like an incumbent Senator in a tough re-election fight.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Exhibit A: Sen. Barbara Boxer, a Democratic Senator facing a serious Republican challenge, is calling for a vote on a bill she introduced that would impose a new tax on Wall Street bonuses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The tax, which would go toward paying back bail out money, would be applied to any bonus amount above $400,000 received by employees of banks that received more than $5 billion in U.S. government assistance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said on the floor of the Senate this morning, &amp;ldquo;that I believe reflects fairness and justice and the America way.&amp;rdquo; It is co-sponsored by Democrat James Webb of Virginia, who has tended to take a more centrist approach toward fiscal policy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/deals/2010/03/04/barbara-boxers-sneak-attack-on-banker-bonuses/"&gt;Read the entire article in the Wall Street Journal.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0289</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>LaHood: Transportation principles coming within 90 days; Boxer on board </title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0290</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-10977-Jacksonville-Transportation-Examiner~y2010m3d4-LaHood-Transportation-principles-coming-within-90-days-Boxer-on-board"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Leo King&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Jacksonville Transportation Examiner&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Obama administration will unveil its principles for a new multi-year transportation bill within the next 90 days, Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood told reporters yesterday at a conference in Washington sponsored by the American Association of State Highway and Transportation Officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bond Buyer (http://www.bondbuyer.com/) reported today The Senate also will get cracking on its own multi-year bill, building on existing House legislation, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said during a hearing yesterday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The administration&amp;rsquo;s principles for reauthorization of the Safe, Accountable, Flexible, Efficient Transportation Equity Act: a Legacy for Users, or SAFETEA-LU, which expired Sept. 30, would precede actual White House legislation, which is expected next year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.examiner.com/x-10977-Jacksonville-Transportation-Examiner~y2010m3d4-LaHood-Transportation-principles-coming-within-90-days-Boxer-on-board"&gt;Read the entire article in the Jacksonville Transportation Examiner.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0290</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title> Senate ends impasse, approves jobless aid extension</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0283</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-senate-bunning3-2010mar03,0,633684.story"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by James Oliphant&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reporting from Washington - Senate leaders Tuesday night resolved an impasse over emergency aid to the jobless that had driven a wedge into Republican ranks and given Democrats a political weapon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The deal overcame the continued objections of a single senator, Republican Jim Bunning of Kentucky, who for days had held up short-term extensions of unemployment and COBRA benefits over concerns that the bill would increase the federal deficit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To pacify Bunning, Senate Democrats agreed to allow a floor vote on an amendment to offset the cost of the bill. The amendment did not survive a procedural objection.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-senate-bunning3-2010mar03,0,633684.story"&gt;Read the entire article in the Los Angeles Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0283</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer, Feinstein sign on to 'don't ask' repeal </title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0288</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/the_swarm/2010/03/boxer-feinstein-sign-on-to-don.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Foon Rhee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sacramento Bee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California's two U.S. senators are among about a dozen who introduced a bill today to end "don't ask, don't tell," the 17-year-old policy that prevents gay Americans from serving openly in the armed forces.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I look forward to ending the discriminatory Don't Ask Don't Tell policy as soon as possible," Sen. Barbara Boxer said in a statement. "We cannot afford to lose the service of dedicated and honorable military personnel, which is happening right now."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Every American should have the opportunity to serve their country, regardless of race, sex, creed, or sexual orientation," Senator Dianne Feinstein added.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/the_swarm/2010/03/boxer-feinstein-sign-on-to-don.html"&gt;Read the entire article in the Sacramento Bee.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0288</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Calls grow for throttle safeguard</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0284</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-toyota-hearing3-2010mar03,0,4259968.story"&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Jim Puzzanghera and Ken Bensinger&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At the hearing, senators slammed the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration -- overseen by LaHood's department -- for not identifying serious safety problems with Toyota vehicles earlier, saying that the agency does not have enough technical expertise to handle increasingly complex auto electronics systems and questioning whether government officials are too cozy with the industry they oversee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and three other senators questioned whether two former NHTSA officials who went to work for Toyota influenced the government's slow response.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LaHood said they complied with legal prohibitions on contacting the agency on issues they had worked on at the agency, but said he would welcome a rule preventing NHTSA employees from going to work for automakers until at least two years after leaving the agency.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-toyota-hearing3-2010mar03,0,4259968.story"&gt;Read the entire article in the Los Angeles Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0284</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate Starts Work on New Transport Bill, With House Version as a Guide</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0287</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2010/03/03/senate-starts-work-on-new-transport-bill-with-house-version-as-a-guide/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Elana Schor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Streetsblog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Senate today took its first steps towards voting on a new long-term federal transportation bill, with environment committee chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) vowing to take up a successor to the 2005 infrastructure law before 2011 and indicating she would use the House's already-introduced version as a framework.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer described today's hearing in her panel as "the kickoff" of the upper chamber's drafting of new legislation governing U.S. road, transit, bridge, port, and rail policy. "Our intention is to hold a series of hearings and write the bill while you are still here and while Senator [George] Voinovich [R-OH] is still here," she told Sen. Kit Bond (R-MO), who will retire at the end of the year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Such willingness to consider a new infrastructure bill before the Obama administration's preferred timeframe of next spring could help thaw the frosty relations between Boxer's panel and the House transportation committee, where chairman Jim Oberstar (D-MN) has raged against upper-chamber inaction for months.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://sf.streetsblog.org/2010/03/03/senate-starts-work-on-new-transport-bill-with-house-version-as-a-guide/"&gt;Read the full post at Streetsblog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0287</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Book: HP eyed Fiorina as dad ruled on case</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0282</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/33802.html#ixzz0h7bdXu5c"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Josh Gerstein&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Politico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina was negotiating for a lucrative job as CEO of Hewlett-Packard Co. a decade ago at the same time her father wrote a significant appeals court opinion that the high-tech industry had aggressively lobbied for, a new book reports.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In July 1999, Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals Judge Joseph Sneed, Fiorina&amp;rsquo;s father, issued a ruling that made it far more difficult for class-action lawyers to file securities lawsuits. Breaking with two other courts of appeals, Sneed said a legal reform Congress passed in 1995 at the urging of high-tech executives besieged by such suits meant plaintiffs needed solid evidence of wrongdoing before they went to court.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Seventeen days later, Fiorina was named as the CEO of Hewlett-Packard with a compensation packaged valued at the time at between $80 million and $90 million.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0310/33802.html#ixzz0h7bdXu5c"&gt;Read the entire article in Politico.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0282</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Mining ban bill in both houses</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0285</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.the-signal.com/news/article/25444/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Natalie Everett&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Santa Clarita Valley Signal&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For two decades, residents worried that a proposed massive mining operation would cover the Santa Clarita Valley's streets and highways with traffic and fill the air with pollution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Now, those fears are one step closer to being laid to rest.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., introduced legislation Tuesday to squelch Cemex Inc.'s proposed massive mine in Soledad Canyon, joining a similar effort by Congressman Howard "Buck" McKeon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill could resolve a 20-year-old mining dispute between the city of Santa Clarita and Cemex.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.the-signal.com/news/article/25444/"&gt;Read the entire article in The Signal.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0285</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>G.O.P. Aims for California, but Rifts Arise</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Mar 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0286</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/us/politics/02senate.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Adam Nagourney&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BURBANK, Calif. &amp;mdash; If Republicans are to have a serious chance of capturing control of the Senate in November, they are going to have to win in traditionally Democratic states like California, where Senator Barbara Boxer, a three-term Democrat, is showing signs of vulnerability.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But before Republicans get a clear shot at Mrs. Boxer, they will have to overcome deep divisions within their own party &amp;mdash; divides that reflect both the grass-roots energy surging through the conservative movement and the tensions between the party&amp;rsquo;s moderate and conservative wings.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There are certainly more vulnerable Democratic Senate seats in the country, but early polls in California suggest that Mrs. Boxer is facing what could be the toughest election of her career. Her difficulties in a state that has for 20 years proved reliably Democratic in national elections suggests how the pendulum has swung against Democrats in just a year. Her potential problems are a function more of this political climate than of any position or vote she has taken. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2010/03/02/us/politics/02senate.html"&gt;Read the entire article in The New York Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0286</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Lone senator blocks unemployment benefit extensions</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0281</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/26/senate.jobless.benefits/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Ted Barrett&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;CNN.com&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Retiring Sen. Jim Bunning, R-Kentucky, led a spirited Senate debate with Democrats over the issue -- at one time cursing at another senator on the floor. Bunning said he doesn't oppose extending the programs -- he just doesn't want to add to the deficit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to two Democratic aides on the Senate floor Thursday night, Bunning muttered "tough s---" as Sen. Jeff Merkley, D-Oregon, criticized Bunning's stance on the package.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;An aide to Merkley said the senator didn't hear the remark. A spokesman for Bunning said he was aware of the reports about the senator's language but didn't have a comment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Friday, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-California, sent Bunning a letter asking him to "stand down immediately" from his stance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Unemployment insurance is a lifeline to the long-term unemployed whose families have been hit very hard by this recession," she said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://edition.cnn.com/2010/POLITICS/02/26/senate.jobless.benefits/"&gt;Read the entire post at CNN.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0281</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: Passage of Travel Promotion Act Will Create Jobs, Reduce Deficit </title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0280</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bignews.biz/?id=846029&amp;amp;keys=Senator-BarbaraBoxer-TravelPromotionAct-CreateJobs"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;submitted by Phillip Davies&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;BigNews.biz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) praised the passage of the Travel Promotion Act, bipartisan legislation that will create thousands of jobs and generate economic growth through a nationally coordinated travel promotion campaign to attract more international visitors to the United States. The bill was passed last night by a vote of 78 to 18.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Tourism is a huge economic driver in California, which is the nation&amp;rsquo;s most-visited state,&amp;rdquo; Senator Boxer said. &amp;ldquo;This legislation will create thousands of jobs in California and across the country by promoting our country as a destination for international visitors. The bill will not only spur economic growth, it will reduce the deficit by $425 million over a decade.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The average overseas visitor puts over $4,000 into the economy, but since the attacks of September 11, 2001, overseas travel to the United States has decreased, even as worldwide travel increased. In 2009, there were nearly 2.4 million fewer international visitors than in 2000, which resulted in an estimated $214 billion lost in direct visitor spending and hundreds of thousands of lost jobs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bignews.biz/?id=846029&amp;amp;keys=Senator-BarbaraBoxer-TravelPromotionAct-CreateJobs"&gt;Read the entire piece at BigNews.biz&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0280</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>California Senator Quizzes Salazar on his Deadly Wild Horse Fiasco</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0279</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://rtfitch.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/california-senator-quizzes-salazar-on-his-deadly-wild-horse-fiasco/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Steven Long&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Straight From the Horse's Heart&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON, DC, (Horseback) &amp;ndash; California&amp;rsquo;s Sen. Barbara Boxer released a letter demanding answers from Interior Secretary Ken Salazar regarding the embattled Bureau of Land Management. It&amp;rsquo;s Wild Horse and Burro Program is under fire after the deaths of scores of horses in a mid-winter &amp;ldquo;gather&amp;rdquo; in Nevada&amp;rsquo;s Calico Mountains.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The horses were stampeded into holding pens after a grueling chase by a roaring helicopter over rockey ground in freezing weather. Two foals died after losing their hooves in an excruciating lingering death.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dear Secretary Salazar:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I am writing to thank you for your recent attention to the Bureau of Land Management&amp;rsquo;s (BLM&amp;rsquo;s) Wild Horse and Burro Program and to seek information that would help me evaluate your proposed reforms to this program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wild horses and burros are majestic symbols of the American west and are beloved by many people for their remarkable intelligence, grace, beauty, and power. Unfortunately, these charismatic animals have also been at the center of great controversy for many decades.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://rtfitch.wordpress.com/2010/02/26/california-senator-quizzes-salazar-on-his-deadly-wild-horse-fiasco/"&gt;Read the entire post at the Straight From the Horse's Heart.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0279</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Tom Campbell's Israel problem</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0278</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-campbell27-2010feb27,0,7036626.story"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Editorial&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tom Campbell, the moderate California Republican who hopes to challenge Sen. Barbara Boxer in November, might make a good U.S. senator, or he might not. We don't know yet because the campaign is just getting underway, and subjects from healthcare to taxes to immigration to foreign policy will all be part of the debate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But at the moment, the participants are stuck on one subject: Israel. Bloggers on the American Spectator and Commentary websites have attacked Campbell, saying his record as a congressman in the 1990s suggests he is insufficiently committed to the Jewish state -- and soft on terrorism. On Thursday, predictably, his GOP rivals weighed in. Carly Fiorina said she was "deeply troubled" by what she'd learned, and Chuck DeVore's campaign called Campbell "a friend to our foes."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This kind of thing is hardly unusual in American politics. Everyone knows that Israel is a third rail -- that Jewish, evangelical and Republican votes, among others, can turn on it. But the topic has become more polarized than ever. One extreme argues that politicians must support Israel unreservedly; the other points to a sinister "Israel lobby" with disproportionate influence that can make and break candidates at will.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/opinion/editorials/la-ed-campbell27-2010feb27,0,7036626.story"&gt;Read the entire editorial in the Los Angeles Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0278</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>CA SEN Candidates Fight Over Israel</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0277</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/02/ca_sen_candidat.php"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Beth Sussman&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Hotline On Call&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;CA SEN candidates were embroiled today in a back-and-forth that began as an attack on ex-Rep. Tom Campbell's (R) record on Israel, but ended up focusing on ex-HP CEO Carly Fiorina (R) mgr. Marty Wilson allegedly referring to Campbell as an "anti-Semite."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wilson denies making the comment, but the Campbell camp insists the comment is proof that the Fiorina camp's demeanor should be seriously questioned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to &lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-senate-israel25-2010feb25,0,6642209.story"&gt;a Los Angeles Times article&lt;/a&gt; published today, ex-CA Sec/State Bruce McPherson called Wilson to tell him he planned to endorse Campbell. Wilson allegedly called Campbell an "anti-Semite." McPherson said in the article that he knows Campbell is "a strong supporter of the state of Israel."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://hotlineoncall.nationaljournal.com/archives/2010/02/ca_sen_candidat.php"&gt;Read the entire article at Hotline On Call.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0277</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Federal water plan to be unveiled </title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0276</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/02/25/1837673/federal-water-plan-to-be-unveiled.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Michael Doyle and Mark Grossi&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fresno Bee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON -- The Obama administration is expected today to unveil an ambitious-sounding package of irrigation deliveries, water transfers, farm-loan guarantees and other programs targeting the parched San Joaquin Valley.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Crafted amid intense political pressure, the package is supposed to alleviate farmers' distress while still protecting fish. It comes as state water managers say this year's Sierra snowpack is on track to reach normal levels after three years of drought.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Some key California lawmakers said late Thursday that they were pleased by the effort, though others still want more detail.&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;The comprehensive package is expected to accompany what is normally a routine water allocation announcement, where the federal Bureau of Reclamation declares how much water farms and cities can expect. Last February, the bureau announced farmers south of the Sacramento-San Joaquin Delta would receive nothing. That later increased to 10% of historic deliveries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.fresnobee.com/2010/02/25/1837673/federal-water-plan-to-be-unveiled.html"&gt;Read the entire article at the Fresno Bee.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0276</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fiorina uses Scott Brown's mug in Web ad, without endorsement or permission</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 22 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0274</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_14445234?"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Mike Zapler&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Silicon Valley Mercury News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON &amp;mdash; Is Scott Brown, the newly minted U.S. senator and Republican Party savior, backing Carly Fiorina for Senate?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The answer is no. But you might be forgiven for thinking he is after watching Fiorina's new Web ad featuring Brown's mug in one frame, then hers in the next, with the caption, "Thank You Massachusetts. Now on to California. Join the Path to Victory."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Weeks after Fiorina took the Web by storm with the "demon sheep" video castigating rival Tom Campbell for not being fiscally conservative enough, the former Hewlett-Packard CEO and first-time political candidate is again stirring controversy with a new Internet ad.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_14445234?"&gt;Read the full article in the Mercury News.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0274</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>LaHood Talks TIGERS and Stimulus, While Boxer Pledges Support for 30 in 10</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 19 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0275</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/19/lahood-talks-tigers-and-stimulus-while-boxer-pledges-support-for-30-in-10/#more-33681"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Damien Newton&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;LA Streetsblog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, most of the news was made not at the press conference, but back at Metro headquarters for the Town Hall meeting.&amp;nbsp; Boxer outlined a timeline for the reathorization of the Federal Transportation Trust Fund and vowed to do all she could to accelerate transit projects in L.A. County to, in the words of Mayor Villaraigosa, "vindicate the will of the people."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I hear you. I get it. I'm all over it."&amp;nbsp; With those ten words U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer embraced local efforts to complete all Measure R transit projects within the next ten years and turned Denny Zane and the Move L.A. Coalition into the most influential transit group in Southern California.&amp;nbsp; Zane was the central figure in creating the "30 in 10" plan and promoting it, most recently at a press event this morning.&amp;nbsp; Boxer noted that there are some laws already on the books that could help move projects faster than Measure R's current thirty year timetable, and that if other laws need to be changed, she would do all she could to help make those changes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://la.streetsblog.org/2010/02/19/lahood-talks-tigers-and-stimulus-while-boxer-pledges-support-for-30-in-10/#more-33681"&gt;Read the entire report at LA Streetsblog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0275</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: Jobs bill 'critical' to infrastructure projects</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0272</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/81741-boxer-jobs-bill-critical-to-infrastructure-projects"&gt;LINK TO THE FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by J. Taylor Rushing&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Hill&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) on Wednesday called the stripped-down jobs bill that the Senate will consider next week "critical" to state and local infrastructure projects, and that she expects a bipartisan vote of approval.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a conference call with reporters, Boxer praised the $15 billion bill unveiled last week by Majority Leader Harry Reid (D-Nev.).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reid rejected a larger bill that had been crafted by Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and ranking member Charles Grassley (R-Iowa), opting instead for a smaller, simpler bill. Reid blocked GOP amendments to the bill and has scheduled a cloture vote for 5 p.m. Monday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill &amp;mdash; the Hiring Incentives to Restore Employment (HIRE) Act &amp;mdash; extends the federal Highway Trust Fund, which is currently scheduled to expire at the end of the month, and also extends the Build America Bonds program to allow lower bonding rates for state and local governments. Boxer said the lower bond rates will preserve one million jobs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/blog-briefing-room/news/81741-boxer-jobs-bill-critical-to-infrastructure-projects"&gt;Read the entire article in The Hill.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0272</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer files papers to run for reelection</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0271</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-boxer19-2010feb19,0,5607226.story"&gt;LINK TO THE FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Seema Mehta&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer formally filed for reelection Thursday, a move that kicked off a challenging battle for the three-term Democrat amid a national backlash against incumbents and the party controlling the White House and Congress.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I only have one goal, to get California back on track by creating jobs and making life better for the people that I represent. That is what I have always done, and that is what I will always do," Boxer said at the Riverside County Registrar of Voters' office. "It will be tough, regardless of who my eventual opponent will be, but we're ready, and we're excited."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, 69, filed her paperwork in Riverside County because she moved from the Bay Area to Rancho Mirage in 2006. Afterward, she greeted supporters at a nearby Mexican restaurant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"If you help me . . . nothing's going to stop us on Nov. 7, no matter what the pundits are predicting," Boxer told them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-boxer19-2010feb19,0,5607226.story"&gt;Read the entire article in the Los Angeles Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0271</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Road and Transit Groups Join Boxer to Push for Senate Jobs Bill</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0273</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/02/17/road-and-transit-groups-join-boxer-to-push-for-senate-jobs-bill/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO THE FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Elana Schor&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;DC Streetsblog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Representatives from Washington's road and transit lobbies joined Senate environment committee chairman Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today to call for swift passage of job-creation legislation that is slated for a vote in the upper chamber of Congress on Monday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Faced with the prospects of a GOP filibuster, Senate Democrats have taken up a pared-down jobs bill that features a $20 billion rescue of the nation's cash-strapped highway trust fund and an expansion of Build America Bonds, a popular infrastructure financing program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Ensuring these are included in the very first jobs package is so essential," Boxer told reporters today. "We just don't have time to wait for an extension of the highway trust fund."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://dc.streetsblog.org/2010/02/17/road-and-transit-groups-join-boxer-to-push-for-senate-jobs-bill/"&gt;Read the entire article in DC Streetsblog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0273</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Anthem Blue Cross Rate Hikes - Sen. Barbara Boxer's Letter to Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown </title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0270</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pacificprogressive.com/2010/02/anthem-blue-cross-rate-hikes-sen-barbara-boxers-letter-to-atty-gen-jerry-brown-.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Pacific Progressive&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Boxer has been fighting for the right of middle class families to have affordable health coverage.&amp;nbsp; The recent request by Anthem Blue Cross for a 39% rate hike was appalling to many, including Sen. Boxer. Here is her letter to California Attorney General Jerry Brown.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;Dear Attorney General Brown:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I was very disturbed to hear that Anthem Blue Cross is raising rates by as much as 39 percent. I understand that the company has also notified their customers that it may be increasing prices several times each year, rather than once a year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California families are struggling to hang onto their health insurance through this economic downturn and I ask that you investigate the rate increases proposed by Anthem Blue Cross to determine whether or not the company has broken state law.&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pacificprogressive.com/2010/02/anthem-blue-cross-rate-hikes-sen-barbara-boxers-letter-to-atty-gen-jerry-brown-.html"&gt;Read the full letter at Pacific Progressive.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0270</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Feinstein, Boxer call for delay on plans to expand Central Valley landfill</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0262</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-toxic10-2010feb10,0,1473846.story"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ENTIRE ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Louis Sahagun&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reporting from Kettleman City, Calif. - California's two U.S. senators on Tuesday called for a moratorium on plans to expand the state's largest toxic waste landfill pending the completion of investigations into birth defects in the nearby farm workers' community of Kettleman City.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Both Democrats also pledged to secure an estimated $4 million needed to upgrade the community's drinking water system, which contains elevated levels of arsenic, a naturally occurring element in California soils that also is used in pesticides, herbicides, insecticides and metal alloys.&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, joined Feinstein in suggesting that the facility not be expanded "until we have more conclusive results on the potential health impacts on the local community."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-toxic10-2010feb10,0,1473846.story"&gt;Read the entire article in the LA Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0262</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fiorina: California's inability to declare bankruptcy a 'technicality'</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0269</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/2010/02/carly-fiorina-s.html"&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Jack Chang&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sacramento Bee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Republican U.S. Senate candidate Carly Fiorina said Wednesday that she knew states are prohibited by federal law from declaring bankruptcy despite her comments the day before that bankruptcy "should always be considered" as an answer to California's fiscal problems.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Fiorina also called the fact that California can't declare bankruptcy a "technicality." Her comments Tuesday, made in the city of Colton, has spurred speculation about whether she was familiar with the federal law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Riverside Press-Enterprise quoted Fiorina saying, ""Whether that is the right approach now, I don't know. I think bankruptcy, as a possibility, at the very least focuses the mind on what has to be done to salvage a situation."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When asked by The Bee on Wednesday whether she knew states couldn't declare bankruptcy, Fiorina answered, "Sure, I knew, but what cold comfort is that to all these California voters who may not know that technicality but who are sitting here knowing that by any common-sense definition, this state can't pay its bills.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/2010/02/carly-fiorina-s.html"&gt;Read the entire article in the Sacramento Bee.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0269</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fiorina: Technology can reduce 'out-of-control' spending</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0268</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/80533-carly-fiorina-technology-can-reduce-out-of-control-government-spending"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Bob Cusack&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Hill&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In an interview with Glenn Beck on Fox News, Fiorina said, "Technology can help. I'm from the technogy industry. Let us put every agency budget up on Internet for every citizen to see. People would be outraged."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This would "give the people the information," Fiorina said, and would cut down on "out-of-control government spending."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;However, it is common practice for goverment agencies to post their budgets on the Internet.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/hillicon-valley/technology/80533-carly-fiorina-technology-can-reduce-out-of-control-government-spending"&gt;Read the entire article in The Hill&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0268</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Lawmakers seek probes of Anthem Blue Cross</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0263</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/09/MNV91BV35Q.DTL"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ENTIRE ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Victoria Colliver&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Angry lawmakers turned up the heat on Anthem Blue Cross on Tuesday, calling for federal and state investigations into the California health insurer's decision to increase rates by as much as 39 percent for thousands of policyholders statewide.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, led the way by scheduling a Feb. 24 special hearing on the increases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Democratic Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein also weighed in Tuesday, with Boxer urging state Attorney General Jerry Brown to investigate the proposed rate increases and Feinstein asking state Sen. President Pro-Tem Darrell Steinberg, D-Sacramento, to introduce legislation to regulate rates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/02/09/MNV91BV35Q.DTL"&gt;Read the entire article in the San Francisco Chronicle.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0263</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Right Turn on the Left Coast?</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0267</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://townhall.com/Common/PrintPage.aspx?g=f7b1c7b9-2881-48b4-94fa-eff00ed5f793&amp;amp;t=c"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ENTIRE ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by George Will&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;TownHall&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Campbell leads Fiorina 30 to 25 in the Field Poll, with 39 percent undecided. A third candidate, Chuck DeVore, a state assemblyman from Southern California (Orange County), had just 6 percent, but might be the nominee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California's electorate is about 45 percent Democratic, 31 percent Republican, 20 percent "decline to state" and about 5 percent affiliated with minor parties. The June primary will be open to Republicans and "decline to states," but probably about 15 percent of those unaffiliated voters who will participate in the primary will request Republican ballots. So, incandescent conservatives among California's 5.2 million Republicans are apt to determine the Senate nominee. The most conservative candidate is DeVore, 47, an aerospace executive and lieutenant colonel in the Army Reserve.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last year, Campbell supported Proposition 1A, which would have extended for two years the largest state tax increase in U.S. history. This lost 2-to-1; it lost in every county and even in this collectivist city. Campbell also favored increasing the gas tax by 32 cents. Fiorina has cited the "cap-and-trade" legislation of John Kerry D-Mass., and Lindsey Graham, R-S.C., as praiseworthy bipartisanship. DeVore has no such deviations from conservative orthodoxy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://townhall.com/Common/PrintPage.aspx?g=f7b1c7b9-2881-48b4-94fa-eff00ed5f793&amp;amp;t=c"&gt;Read the entire article at Townhall.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0267</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer vows help for those with bad water</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0261</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydesert.com/article/20100209/NEWS08/2090320/1015/news08/Boxer-vows-help-for-those-with-bad-water"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Marcel Honor&amp;eacute;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Desert Sun&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Elected officials have pledged to help provide safe, clean drinking water to thousands of residents in the eastern Coachella Valley following a Desert Sun report that revealed widespread arsenic-tainted groundwater in the area.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finding the millions of dollars needed to fix the potentially hazardous problem could prove to be an uphill battle, however.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;I will continue all my efforts to make drinking water safe,&amp;rdquo; U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer said Friday. &amp;ldquo;In the 21st century, no one should have to fear there is arsenic in their drinking water.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydesert.com/article/20100209/NEWS08/2090320/1015/news08/Boxer-vows-help-for-those-with-bad-water"&gt;Read the entire article in The Desert Sun.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0261</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Carly touts the prediction of Dick Morris, "worst pundit in America"</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0264</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=56949&amp;amp;tsp=1#ixzz0f8gkrAbW"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ENTIRE ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Carla Marinucci&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco Chronicle Politics blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GOP U.S. Senate candidate Carly Fiorina today is ever-so-proudly touting pollster Dick Morris' prediction: that she will win her 2010 race -- and beat incumbent Democrat Barbara Boxer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Not only did Dick Morris predict I can defeat Barbara Boxer on "The Sean Hannity Show,'' Fiorina gushed to supporters in a fundraising email today. "He repeated it in "On The Record" With Greta Van Susteren!"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dick Morris? The guy who's been called the "worst pundit in America?"&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Morris, you may recall, wrote that savvy political best-seller -- "Condi V. Hillary, the Next Great Presidential Race.''&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That's right: he confidently predicted the 2008 contest for the White House would come down to two women - and Condi Rice would win.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=56949&amp;amp;tsp=1#ixzz0f8gkrAbW"&gt;Read the entire article in the San Francisco Chronicle Politics blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0264</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fiorina suggests California consider bankruptcy</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 09 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0266</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/02/fiorina-suggests-california-declare-bankruptcy.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ENTIRE ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Seema Mehta&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times PolitiCal Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Republican U.S. Senate candidate Carly Fiorina suggested that the state of California should consider declaring bankruptcy, apparently unaware that states cannot do that under federal bankruptcy law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The comments were first reported Tuesday in the Riverside Press-Telegram. Fiorina, the former head of Hewlett-Packard, hosted a business roundtable at a cement plant in Colton, Calif., and a businessman asked her if the state should consider filing for bankruptcy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I think it should always be considered," Fiorina replied. "Whether that is the right approach now, I don't know. I think bankruptcy, as a possibility, at the very least focuses the mind on what has to be done to salvage a situation."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under federal law, municipalities can declare bankruptcy, as Orange County notably did in 1994. But states do not have the same ability. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/02/fiorina-suggests-california-declare-bankruptcy.html"&gt;Read the entire article in the LA Times PolitiCal blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0266</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>ABC Sunday Talk Show Prediction: Chuck DeVore Wins GOP Senate Race</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0260</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/breaking-news/chuck-devore-george-will-conse/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;R. Scott Moxley&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;OC Weekly Navelgazing Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Today on ABC's "This Week with George Stephanopoulos" program, prominent conservative columnist George F. Will predicted that Irvine's Chuck DeVore will win the California Republican Party nomination for U.S. Senate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Will made the prediction during a panel discussion about the controversial "demon sheep" television attack ad Republican candidate Carly Fiorina launched recently against the third major Republican in the race: Tom Campbell. Fiorina is attempting to portray herself as the bonafide conservative in the contest. DeVore wasn't mentioned in the ad and hadn't even been named during the show's discussion until Will blurted out his prediction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"[DeVore's] the conservative in the race," Will said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.ocweekly.com/navelgazing/breaking-news/chuck-devore-george-will-conse/"&gt;Read the full post at the Navelgazing Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0260</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fiorina's demon sheep ad destroys real debate</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 07 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0259</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_14344582?nclick_check=1"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Editorial Board&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Jose Mercury News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lost in the guffaws is the video's fundamental meanness. It is unfair and misleading. We're disappointed to see Fiorina sink to this level. What's the point of running as a political outsider if you're going to get down in the mud with the hacks?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Californians know their state is in crisis and their nation deeply troubled. Already turned off by politicians, they abhor these kinds of simplistic hits.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sometimes these ads make an impression and work anyway. This one might, although right now it appears the laugh is on Fiorina.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But even when they do work, they feed the impression that politics is sleazy. Ultimately they undercut the power of good people to effect change when they win office. This one certainly undercuts the hope that Fiorina might shun politics as usual.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_14344582?nclick_check=1"&gt;Read the full editorial in the San Jose Mercury News.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0259</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer Tours Fremont Solar Plant</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0258</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ktvu.com/news/22476653/detail.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;KTVU&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FREMONT, Calif. --&amp;nbsp; U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-CA, planned to tour a new solar manufacturing plant in Fremont Friday afternoon and discuss green jobs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Solyndra Inc. recently received a $535 million federal loan guarantee from the U.S. Department of Energy to build the plant, according to the company. The company already operates a similar plant in Fremont, but the new one will be about double the size.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The company has estimated the new facility will create about 3,000 temporary construction jobs and 1,000 long-term production jobs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ktvu.com/news/22476653/detail.html"&gt;Read the full article at KTVU.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0258</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer says what Main Street wants is a new tax on bonuses</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0255</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/02/barbara-boxer-says-what-main-street-wants-is-a-new-tax.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Richard Simon&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Seizing on public anger over Wall Street bonuses, U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) today introduced legislation to impose a hefty tax on bonuses paid by companies receiving a large federal bailout.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"When I go home and people say to me, 'Senator, it's time for Main Street to get some fairness,'" Boxer said at a Capitol Hill news conference in introducing the Taxpayer Fairness Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, who's up for reelection, proposed a 50% tax on bonuses in excess of $400,000 for employees of firms that received more than $5 billion in federal bailout funds. Only bonuses received in 2009 would be affected.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/02/barbara-boxer-says-what-main-street-wants-is-a-new-tax.html"&gt;Read the entire post at the LA Times PolitiCal blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0255</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer, Webb target Wall Street bonuses</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0254</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/79751-boxer-webb-take-aim-at-wall-street-bonuses"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by J. Taylor Rushing&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Hill&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Jim Webb (D-Va.) unveiled a bill Thursday to tax extravagant bonuses paid out by financial firms that have benefited from taxpayer assistance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Taxpayer Fairness Act would apply only to Wall Street firms and banks that received at least $5 billion from the 2008 Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP). Specifically, it would impose a 50 percent excise tax on any 2009 bonuses paid to employees at those firms that received a salary greater than $400,000. The tax would apply to the portion of the bonus that exceeds that figure &amp;mdash; which Boxer and Webb picked because it matches President Barack Obama&amp;rsquo;s salary. Employees&amp;rsquo; base pay would be unaffected.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;There is an outcry out there,&amp;rdquo; said Boxer. &amp;ldquo;People are hurting from the residual effects of Wall Street &amp;hellip; This bill is symbolic, but it&amp;rsquo;s real.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/79751-boxer-webb-take-aim-at-wall-street-bonuses"&gt;Read the entire article in The Hill.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0254</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Barbara Boxer wants to tax Wall Street bonuses</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0265</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2010/02/04/senator-barbara-boxer-wants-tax-wall-street-bonuse/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ENTIRE ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Kitty Felde&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;KPCC&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer joined fellow Democrat Jim Webb of Virginia to introduce a bill that would tax bonuses at financial firms that received $5 billion or more from the Troubled Asset Relief Program. Boxer says the government would impose a 50 percent fee on bonuses over $400,000. That&amp;rsquo;s the equivalent of Barack Obama&amp;rsquo;s salary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"So if you get a bonus that is more than the president of the United States makes," she says, "you have to pay this Taxpayer Fairness Fee."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer says Washington can use the extra infusion of cash. She estimates about $10 billion could be raised from the fee at a time when Washington is looking for deficit reduction. "It&amp;rsquo;s symbolic," she says, "but it&amp;rsquo;s also real." &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2010/02/04/senator-barbara-boxer-wants-tax-wall-street-bonuse/"&gt;Read the entire article and listen to the report at KPCC.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0265</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Surprise caller interrupts Fiorina radio interview</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0256</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/02/suprise-caller-interrupts-fiorina-radio-interview.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;amp;utm_medium=twitter"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Seema Mehta&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times PolitiCal Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A routine interview on KFI-AM [640] with Republican Senate candidate Carly Fiorina turned tense this afternoon when hosts John and Ken announced they had a caller who wanted to ask Fiorina a question.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Guess who it was? Orange County Assemblyman Chuck DeVore, also a candidate for the GOP nomination to unseat incumbent Sen. Barbara Boxer. John and Ken are known to be fans of DeVore, and said he could ask a clearly surprised Fiorina one question.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;DeVore immediately accused her of flip-flopping on her positions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;You&amp;rsquo;re saying good things now that you didn&amp;rsquo;t say in the past,&amp;rdquo; DeVore said. &amp;ldquo;How do you suppose we get on KFI and debate and let the voters decide?&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/02/suprise-caller-interrupts-fiorina-radio-interview.html?utm_source=twitterfeed&amp;amp;utm_medium=twitter"&gt;Read the entire post at the PolitiCal Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0256</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>US lawmakers target global violence against women</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 04 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0257</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jRpBuor-hgNVqywGTLUsMFCOjIcQ"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;AFP&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON &amp;mdash; US lawmakers introduced landmark legislation Thursday to make combatting violence against women and girls worldwide -- notably in places like Haiti and Afghanistan -- central to US foreign policy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Every day, too many women and girls across the globe endure horrific acts of violence. They are disfigured by acid, raped and beaten, or they are denied the opportunity to see a doctor," said Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer, a key backer of the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The nations with the worst track record in preventing violence against women are also the most unstable and are breeding grounds for terrorism," said Democratic Representative Bill Delahunt, another supporter.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/afp/article/ALeqM5jRpBuor-hgNVqywGTLUsMFCOjIcQ"&gt;Read the entire article via AFP.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0257</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer to Obama: Help small banks now</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0253</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2010/02/03/boxer-to-obama-help-small-banks-now/29489/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Dena Bunis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Orange County Register Total Buzz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid did call on Sen. Barbara Boxer who asked Obama if he could use an executive order to put in place his $30 billion plan to help community banks loan money to small businesses. Boxer&amp;rsquo;s race is one of those both parties are looking at closely but hasn&amp;rsquo;t risen to the level of a full court press from either side.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;California is hurting,&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; Boxer said. &amp;ldquo;They really want to see a fighting spirit in us.&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer suggested to Obama that he use TARP money for the bank proposal &amp;ndash; either money the big banks that got bailed out have paid back or unused TARP funds. Doing it that way, she believes, would be more immediate than waiting for legislation to pass, if it could.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2010/02/03/boxer-to-obama-help-small-banks-now/29489/"&gt;Read the entire post at Total Buzz.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0253</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Repeal In Sight, "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" Opponents Seek Redress, Apology For Ousted Veterans</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 02 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0252</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/site/?q=node/7411"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Dan Aiello&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;California Progress Report&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While many members of congress supported the compromise believing it would keep gays and lesbians in the military from being investigated and kicked out, at least one California Senator at the time, wasn&amp;rsquo;t fooled. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) offered&amp;nbsp; prophetic opposition to DADT.&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We know that gays and lesbians have served in the military with distinction,&amp;rdquo; stated Boxer. &amp;ldquo;The question is whether we will codify a policy of deceit that forces honest men and women to lie in order to serve their country. The policy contained in this bill is a policy of outright discrimination, which flies in the face of the very American values that the military is sworn to defend.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In her opposition, Boxer employed the words of former Senate Armed Services Chairman Barry Goldwater, a principled conservative who applied his &amp;ldquo;government out of our lives and away from our liberties&amp;rdquo; philosophy equally. Boxer found common ground in a Goldwater op-ed contending a ban of loyal Americans from serving their nation in the Armed Forces because of their sexual orientation, &amp;ldquo;was just plain un-American,&amp;rdquo; wrote the Arizona statesman. Though Boxer was on the losing end of the debate, her position appears to have withstood the test of time far better than those who supported the legislation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.californiaprogressreport.com/site/?q=node/7411"&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Read the full post at California Progress Report.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0252</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fiorina, targeting Boxer, is still cultivating her base</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0251</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-fiorina1-2010feb01,0,3925194.story"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Seema Mehta&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reporting from San Diego - As Senate candidate Carly Fiorina spoke to a standing-room-only meeting of local Republicans here, she hit familiar points -- her rise to become leader of Hewlett-Packard, her "common sense" approach to fixing the nation's economy and her pledge to give incumbent Barbara Boxer the fight of her life.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Amid all the fiscal talk, Fiorina dropped in a line about her conservative social beliefs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Barbara Boxer has never faced a candidate like me. . . . I will not permit her, for example, just to assume that all the women of California will vote for her," Fiorina told hundreds of people crowded in a hotel ballroom. "I say this as a proud pro-life conservative who believes marriage is between a man and a woman."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The fact that Fiorina felt compelled to detail her views on abortion and same-sex marriage underscores one of her greatest challenges as she seeks the Republican nomination: The party's most faithful voters are not convinced she is one of them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-fiorina1-2010feb01,0,3925194.story"&gt;Read the entire article in the Los Angeles Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0251</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What Obama's budget plan may mean for California</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Feb 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0250</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-budget-california2-2010feb02,0,5340760.story"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Richard Simon&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reporting from Washington - California stands to receive more than $1 billion from President Obama's budget plan to help cover healthcare for the poor and the cost of jailing illegal immigrants.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The budget proposal includes $25 billion in additional Medicaid funds for states, of which California is projected to receive $1.5 billion. States received a funding boost in the economic stimulus bill that Congress passed one year ago. Obama's budget plan would extend the funding through mid-2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The proposal also includes $330 million to help states pay for jailing illegal immigrants. The money has long been a priority for California officials, who argue that local and state taxpayers should not have to bear the burden of Washington's failure to control America's borders. California's expected $90-million share would represent a fraction of the nearly $1 billion the state probably will spend this year on incarcerating illegal immigrants.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A spokesman for Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said a bipartisan group of senators would be working to increase that funding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-budget-california2-2010feb02,0,5340760.story"&gt;Read the entire article in the Los Angeles Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0250</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fiorina, DeVore Spin PPIC Senate Poll</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0249</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/john-wildermuth/6347-fiorina-devore-spin-ppic-senate-poll"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by John Wildermuth&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fox &amp;amp; Hounds Daily&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The survey by the Public Policy Institute of California found Tom Campbell, the newcomer to the Senate race, with 27 percent support, followed by Fiorina at 16 percent and DeVore at 8 percent.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer beat each of the Republicans in head-to-head match-ups, leading by four percentage points against Campbell and eight over both Fiorina and DeVore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But those numbers mean very different things to the different candidates.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Campbell&amp;rsquo;s people say both the PPIC poll and the Field Poll last week pretty much confirm their internal polling, which they say shows the former San Jose congressman leading by an even larger margin.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&amp;rsquo;s Fiorina and DeVore, however, who really torture the numbers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Not surprisingly, Fiorina&amp;rsquo;s release on the results doesn&amp;rsquo;t mention that she&amp;rsquo;s now running second in a race she led until Campbell moved over from the governor&amp;rsquo;s race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/john-wildermuth/6347-fiorina-devore-spin-ppic-senate-poll"&gt;Read the entire post at Fox &amp;amp; Hounds Daily.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0249</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>California to get $2.25 billion in high-speed rail funding</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0247</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-high-speed-rail28-2010jan28,0,2948055.story"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Richard Simon&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reporting from Washington - California will receive $2.25 billion, the largest amount for any state, in federal economic stimulus funds to develop a high-speed rail line running from Anaheim to San Francisco -- a big boost for the long-discussed project aimed at accelerating the state's economic recovery.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Overall, the Obama administration plans to distribute $8 billion for work on 13 rail corridors. Those include a Midwest line from Chicago to St. Louis and one in Florida running from Tampa to Orlando.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Trains on the proposed Anaheim-to-San Francisco line, which is projected to cost about $42 billion, would whisk passengers the 400 or so miles in no more than 2 hours, 40 minutes. The project would take a decade to complete, with extensions to San Diego and Sacramento planned.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-high-speed-rail28-2010jan28,0,2948055.story"&gt;Read the full article in the Los Angeles Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0247</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Casey, Boxer Discuss Job Creation, Infrastructure Investment</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0248</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&amp;amp;q=http://1490newsblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/casey-boxer-discuss-job-creation.html&amp;amp;ct=ga&amp;amp;cd=lp1lDtjl44c&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKPpRUMYUS5Yb2Mq8E7PCRIRSuHQ"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;posted by Anne Holliday&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;1490 NewsBlog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Washington, DC &amp;mdash; Senators Bob Casey and Barbara Boxer joined Leo Gerard of the United Steelworkers Union, Edward Wytkind of the AFL-CIO Transportation Trades Department and Dennis Slater of the Association of Equipment Manufacturers at a press conference this morning to discuss the importance of infrastructure investments as a method of putting Americans back to work.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last year, infrastructure companies, trade associations and labor unions banded together to support the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act. This year, the same coalition supports efforts to create jobs through infrastructure projects. Senate Democrats are currently working to develop and pass new initiatives that will spur job creation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senator Casey said: &amp;ldquo;With 560,000 Pennsylvanians and 15 million Americans out of work, job creation is our number one priority. Investments we have made in infrastructure have helped create jobs and build local communities. We must continue to respond to the struggles of the American people and implement strategies to put people back to work.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;This economic recovery is my main focus, and I look forward to working with Senators of both parties to move swiftly on job creation legislation,&amp;rdquo; said Senator Boxer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&amp;amp;q=http://1490newsblog.blogspot.com/2010/01/casey-boxer-discuss-job-creation.html&amp;amp;ct=ga&amp;amp;cd=lp1lDtjl44c&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNFKPpRUMYUS5Yb2Mq8E7PCRIRSuHQ"&gt;Read the entire report at the 1490 NewsBlog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0248</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>DeVore hopes to notch Massachusetts-style upset</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0243</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/26/MN5K1BLOQ2.DTL"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Joe Garofoli&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Orange County Assemblyman Chuck DeVore wants to be the Scott Brown of California - a conservative GOP state legislator who vaults to the U.S. Senate in a state dominated by Democratic voters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Like Brown, DeVore could tap into a network of Tea Party supporters and others who distrust President Obama and blame him for adding to the nation's spiraling debt. A Field Poll released today finds that 28 percent of registered California voters identify with the group.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This is the first time the poll has measured attitudes about the Tea Party movement, which began a year ago and gained stature after Brown's upset victory over Massachusetts Attorney General Martha Coakley, a Democrat, in last week's special election for the Senate seat that Sen. Edward Kennedy held for 46 years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/26/MN5K1BLOQ2.DTL"&gt;Read the full article in the San Francisco Chronicle.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0243</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Pushes for Focus on Women at Upcoming Afghanistan Conference</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0242</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?ID=12185"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Voice of America via Ms. Magazine&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) sent a letter to President Barack Obama Friday urging a stronger focus on Afghan women and girls at an international conference on Afghanistan to be held in London this week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In her letter, Boxer indicated deep concern that women are "not being viewed as an essential element" in the US's Afghanistan stabilization strategy. She said, "Just yesterday, the Department of State released its 'Afghanistan and Pakistan Regional Stabilization Strategy,' a detailed, thirty-page document [that] only makes one small reference to Afghan women. Most disturbing, it contains an entire section largely dedicated to reintegrating the Taliban, who are infamous for the atrocities they have committed against women...This is particularly alarming, because the future of Afghanistan is inextricably linked to the empowerment of Afghan women and girls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She continued and said, "It has been proven that women are inclined to use their successes to invest in their communities, to start small businesses, and to send their children to school. Giving women the tools to succeed is critical to Afghanistan's chance at a brighter and more secure future."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.msmagazine.com/news/uswirestory.asp?ID=12185"&gt;Read the entire article in Ms. Magazine.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0242</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer, pushing bigger child-care tax credit, gets boost from Obama</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0241</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=55974"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Richard Dunham&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco Chronicle Politics Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;President Obama today called for a more generous child-care tax credit for middle class American families, giving new hope to a proposal being pushed by Sens. Barbara Boxer of California and Kirsten Gillibrand of New York.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Obama today proposed nearly doubling the federal child care tax credit for families earning less than $85,000 and increasing it for families making less than $115,000.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The president's plan is likely to jump-start legislation authored by the Democratic senators called "the Right Start Child Care and Education Act."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=55974"&gt;Read the full post at the SF Chronicle Politics Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0241</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Flushed from win in Kennedy's state, GOP eyes Boxer's seat</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0244</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.vcstar.com/news/2010/jan/25/flushed-from-win-in-kennedys-state-gop-eyes-seat/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Michael Collins&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ventura County Star&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON &amp;mdash; After pulling off a Massachusetts miracle, Republicans are plotting a California coup.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Republican Scott Brown&amp;rsquo;s improbable victory in a special election for the Senate seat liberal icon Ted Kennedy held for nearly 50 years has convinced national GOP leaders they are riding a tidal wave of voter dissatisfaction that could help them take down one of their prime targets, Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If a Republican can win in a liberal &amp;ldquo;blue&amp;rdquo; state like Massachusetts, the thinking goes, it can happen anywhere. And by anywhere, they mean California.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.vcstar.com/news/2010/jan/25/flushed-from-win-in-kennedys-state-gop-eyes-seat/"&gt;Read the full article in the Ventura County Star.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0244</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Still a disorganized 'tea party'</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0245</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-tea-parties25-2010jan25,0,2357102.story"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Kathleen Hennessey&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Reporting from Washington - When Matt Clemente went to a December meeting of "tea party" activists in Worcester, Mass., he was shocked to find the hall packed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"They were all talking about Scott Brown," he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That was when Clemente, a student at College of the Holy Cross, realized Brown wasn't just another Republican running a long-shot campaign for the seat held by liberal Sen. Edward M. Kennedy since 1962. He actually had a chance to win, and the conservative activists who had been organizing around the country against the healthcare overhaul, bank bailouts and increased government regulation could put him over the top if they could get organized in time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nation-and-world/la-na-tea-parties25-2010jan25,0,2357102.story"&gt;Read the full article in the Los Angeles Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0245</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Stop looking to feds to cure California's budget crisis</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0246</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hiltzik25-2010jan25,0,1273857.column"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Michael Hiltzik&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Schwarzenegger and the legislative leaders made a pilgrimage to Washington on this theme last week. The governor's claim was that the state receives only 78 cents back for every dollar of federal tax we generate, so somehow we're "subsidizing" the states that get more and incurring red ink in Sacramento in the process. The economics of the state budget deficit being of great interest to individual taxpayers and business owners alike, it's proper to subject this claim to some scrutiny.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whether there's even factual grounds for the governor's claim is subject to debate. His number dates from 2005, and the formula underlying it has been criticized for supposedly overestimating tax payments. (The Washington-based Tax Foundation, which created the formula, defends its methodology.)&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last week, U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer shot back that while California may indeed have been a "donor state" in the past, at the moment it's a recipient state to the tune of about $1.45 in inflow for every dollar in federal taxes paid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hiltzik25-2010jan25,0,1273857.column"&gt;Read the full article in the Los Angeles Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0246</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Opposition To Bernanke Growing In Wake Of Mass. Vote</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0236</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/21/bernanke-vote-opposition_n_431315.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Ryan Grim&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Democrat Barbara Boxer has become the latest senator to oppose the nomination of Ben Bernanke to a second term as Chairman of the Federal Reserve.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer's opposition, which she announced in an exclusive statement to the Huffington Post, is a blow to Bernanke. Boxer is no firebreather on economic issues, but considered a more mainstream Democrat from a state that was considered comfortably blue -- until Tuesday's special election in Massachusetts, that is.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I have a lot of respect for Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke. When the financial crisis hit in late 2008, he took some important steps to prevent what many economists believe could have been an even greater economic catastrophe," said Boxer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"However, it is time for a change -- it is time for Main Street to have a champion at the Fed. Dr. Bernanke played a lead role in crafting the Bush administration's economic policies, which led to the current economic crisis. Our next Federal Reserve Chairman must represent a clean break from the failed policies of the past."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2010/01/21/bernanke-vote-opposition_n_431315.html"&gt;Read the entire article at the Huffington Post.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0236</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer lauds pest-control funding</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 22 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0239</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://westernfarmpress.com/news/pest-control-funding-0122/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Western Farm Press&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., is lauding a U.S. Department of Agriculture announcement that California will receive nearly $13.4 million from the 2008 farm bill to improve agricultural pest detection and surveillance programs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Boxer introduced the Pest Detection and Surveillance Act in 2007 and successfully negotiated its key provisions into the 2008 farm bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m very pleased the USDA is carrying out legislation I introduced that became part of the farm bill.&amp;rdquo; Sen. Boxer said. &amp;ldquo;I proposed this legislation to help catch pest and disease infestations early at our ports of entry before they spread to our fields and orchards, hurting our farmers and our economy.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://westernfarmpress.com/news/pest-control-funding-0122/"&gt;Read the full article in the Western Farm Press.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0239</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer blasts bid to block EPA greenhouse gas rules</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0240</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=55747&amp;amp;tsp=1"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Jennifer Dlouhy&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco Chronicle Political Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Calling it a "direct assault on the health of the American people, Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., today blasted a Republican-led effort to curb the federal government's power to regulate greenhouse gas emissions blamed for global warming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At issue is a proposal by Sen. Sen. Lisa Murkowski, R-Alaska, that would effectively veto the Environmental Protection Agency's formal declaration last year that carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases endanger the public health and welfare. Thirty-five Republicans and three Democrats -- Ben Nelson of Nebraska, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Mary Landrieu of Louisiana -- are co-sponsoring the measure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This "is an unprecedented move by a United States senator and her cosponsors to overturn a health finding made by health experts and scientific experts in order to stand with the special interests," Boxer said during a speech on the Senate floor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=55747&amp;amp;tsp=1"&gt;Read the full article at the SF Chronicle Politics Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0240</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Supreme Court decision could affect Barbara Boxer race</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 21 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0229</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/2010/01/supreme-court-d.html#mi_rss=Latest%20News&amp;amp;v=twitter"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Kevin Yamamura&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Capitol Alert&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The U.S. Supreme Court ruling today overturning restrictions on independent spending by corporations and labor unions could have an immediate impact this year in California's U.S. Senate race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California state campaign finance rules already allow corporations and unions to give directly to independent expenditure campaigns without limits, so the court decision will have little impact on state contests.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the decision overturns federal rules requiring that corporations and unions establish political action committees, or PACs, to spend on elections. Bob Stern, president of the Center for Governmental Studies and an architect of California campaign finance rules, said the ruling should have a greater impact for corporations, who have access to more money and have been less adept than unions at navigating PAC rules in the past.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As we reported today, Republicans in California believe they have a shot at unseating Sen. Barbara Boxer in November and were emboldened by Scott Brown's victory Tuesday in Massachusetts. Boxer leads all three GOP hopefuls in head-to-head matchups, but she is hovering at or below the 50 percent mark. Conventionally, that's a sign that an incumbent is vulnerable, but Boxer has a history of modest support in early polling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/2010/01/supreme-court-d.html#mi_rss=Latest%20News&amp;amp;v=twitter"&gt;Read the entire article at Capitol Alert.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0229</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boston Massacre Has Implications for California</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0233</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/01/boston-massacre-has-implications-for-california/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Calbuzz&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Whatever the loss of Ted Kennedy&amp;rsquo;s U.S. Senate seat means for the Democrats nationally and for President Obama &amp;ndash; and they have no one to blame but themselves &amp;mdash; this historic and politically crippling massacre&amp;nbsp; (see &lt;a href="http://www.indecisionforever.com/2010/01/19/jon-stewart-on-the-massachusetts-senate-election/"&gt;Jon Stewart&amp;rsquo;s takedown&lt;/a&gt;, the best political analysis out there) carries huge potential implications for California.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While no one expects U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer to make the kind of rookie, dumbass, arrogant mistakes that Massachusetts Attorney Gen. Martha Coakley made (she&amp;rsquo;d better not suggest, for example, that Willie Mays played for the Dodgers)*, the election of Republican state legislator Scott Brown in a true-blue state like Massachusetts, suggests that anyone who looks or smells like an incumbent could be in trouble in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;No doubt, Republicans Hurricane Carly Fiorina and Caveman Chuck DeVore would have a harder time against the Democrat Boxer because as pro-life conservatives they&amp;rsquo;d have more trouble connecting to California independents.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.calbuzz.com/2010/01/boston-massacre-has-implications-for-california/"&gt;Read the entire article at Calbuzz.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0233</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer now vulnerable, state Republicans say</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0230</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14232504"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Josh Richman&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Oakland Tribune&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Republicans say Scott Brown's win in the Massachusetts special Senate election portends a conservative wave in November's midterm elections, and electoral doom for incumbent U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But Democrats cite big differences between the Bay State and the Golden State, and Boxer's challengers have a much tougher row to hoe than Brown did.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Republican Party Chairman Ron Nehring asked Tuesday whether Democrats "will finally start listening to the American people, who want taxes lowered, the debt retired, and government out of the way; or if they will continue to let the most radical elements of their party continue to determine the direction of the country. With Scott Brown's election, the opportunity to do the latter has just been cut short.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breaking-news/ci_14232504"&gt;Read the entire article at Oakland Tribune.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0230</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fiorina Scoffs at Boxer's Fund-raising</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0232</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/john-wildermuth/6263-fiorina-scoffs-boxer%E2%80%99s-fund-raising"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By John Wildermuth&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fox and Hounds Daily&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Any campaign press release typically should be read with many grains of salt readily available, but the latest blast from Republican Carly Fiorina&amp;rsquo;s Senate effort also should include a couple of asterisks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer&amp;rsquo;s campaign fired out a release Tuesday, patting themselves on the back for raising more than $1.8 million in the quarter ending Dec. 31, their best showing of the election cycle.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asterisk No. 1: Sure, Fiorina likely did double Boxer&amp;rsquo;s fund-raising (neither side will release their complete fourth quarter figures until later this month), but most of the thanks belongs to a $2.5 million check Fiorina wrote to her own campaign.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While Fiorina&amp;rsquo;s cash spends as well as anybody else&amp;rsquo;s, including it as part of a &amp;ldquo;look-how-great-our-fund-raising-is-going&amp;rdquo; celebration seems to miss &amp;ndash; or at least stretch &amp;ndash; the point.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://foxandhoundsdaily.com/blog/john-wildermuth/6263-fiorina-scoffs-boxer%E2%80%99s-fund-raising"&gt;Read the entire article at Fox and Hounds Daily.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0232</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Barbara Boxer says every state now 'in play' </title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0231</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/01/boxer-says-every-state-now-in-play.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Richard Simon&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times California Politics blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), after meeting privately in the U.S. Capitol with Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger and legislative leaders to discuss federal assistance for the state, told reporters that the lesson from Tuesday's special Senate election in Massachusetts is that she can't take anything for granted. Boxer is up for reelection this year and is being aggressively targeted by the GOP.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I think every state is now in play, absolutely,"' she said. "You have to make the case that you're the one that's on the people's side. And people have to get it."'&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Asked if Senate Democrats were to blame for the results in Massachusetts, where state Sen. Scott Brown scored a big win for Republicans by winning a longtime Democratic seat, Boxer said, "I would take it to the campaign itself. ... Never, ever, ever take an election for granted. &amp;hellip; People have to know you're in their corner, you're with them, you're on their side. You have to make the case. You can't presume." &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://latimesblogs.latimes.com/california-politics/2010/01/boxer-says-every-state-now-in-play.html"&gt;Read the entire article at the LA Times California Politics blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0231</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer may feel the heat after MA Sen race, but she's raising good money</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0237</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=55550"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Joe Garofoli&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco Chronicle Politics Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If Scott Brown wins Tuesday's Senate race in Massachusetts, eyes and dollars will head south -- to Florida's Senate race -- and west to California. But CA Sen. Barbara Boxer has been fundraising at a healthy clip, new figures out this morning show.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As we told you earlier, Boxer just enjoyed a strong fundraising quarter: $1.8 million in the last three months of 2009, the campaign just announced. That gives her $7.2 million in the bank at the end of the year. At this point in Boxer's 2004 race, she had $5 million cash on hand.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The campaign counts 4,000 new supporters making contributions for the first time. In the fourth quarter of the year, the campaign said it corraled 23,000 supporters, 90 percent of whom dropped contributed $100 or less on BB.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?entry_id=55550"&gt;Read the full post at the SF Chron Politics Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0237</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Subcommittee Takes On New Advocacy Role</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0238</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rollcall.com/issues/55_77/ci_foreign_relations/42333-1.html?CMP=OTC-RSS"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Tricia Miller&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Roll Call&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was an unusual occurrence: a Congressional hearing that turned highly emotional last May, leaving a mark on those involved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A joint effort of two Senate Foreign Relations subcommittees, the hearing focused on violence against women in the conflict zones of Sudan and the Democratic Republic of the Congo. John Prendergast, the co-founder of the Center for American Progress&amp;rsquo; Enough Project, which seeks to stop political violence against civilians in Africa, testified that day.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The entire hearing for me was very emotional,&amp;rdquo; Boxer recalled in an e-mail last week. &amp;ldquo;But the memory that sticks with me is of Chouchou Namegabe Nabintu, a journalist from the DRC, breaking down in tears and asking, &amp;lsquo;But why? Why such atrocities? Why do they fight their war on women&amp;rsquo;s bodies?&amp;rsquo;&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After the hearing Boxer joined Sens. Russ Feingold (D-Wis.) and Jeanne Shaheen (D-N.H.) in making recommendations for stemming the violence to Clinton. They included distinct suggestions for dealing with each country and a broader list of ways to work with both countries. One of those ideas has nearly come to pass. At the end of September, Clinton chaired a United Nations session during which members unanimously agreed to appoint a special representative to coordinate efforts to end sexual violence in conflict zones. The individual is expected to be appointed early in 2010.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.rollcall.com/issues/55_77/ci_foreign_relations/42333-1.html?CMP=OTC-RSS"&gt;Read the full article in Roll Call.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0238</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Tight Massachusetts race alarms California Dems</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0235</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/18/MNU81BJRM1.DTL"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Carla Marinucci, Joe Garofoli, Chronicle Political Writirs&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The possible loss of a U.S. Senate seat in Massachusetts has Democrats on edge 3,000 miles away in California, where party activists fear a GOP upset today could trigger a conservative wave and swamp health care reform and the 2010 midterm elections.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Regardless of the outcome ... this should be a gigantic wake-up call to the Democratic Party - that we're not connecting with the needs, the aspirations and the desires of real people right now," said San Francisco Mayor Gavin Newsom.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With Republican Scott Brown poised to defeat Democrat Martha Coakley in the Massachusetts race to succeed the late Edward Kennedy, Democrats at the annual Martin Luther King community breakfast in San Francisco were buzzing about the impacts of such an upset: an end to the party's 60-vote supermajority and a possible mortal blow to the health care legislation championed by President Obama.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2010/01/18/MNU81BJRM1.DTL"&gt;Read the entire article in the San Francisco Chronicle.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0235</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer seeking grants in job-creation bill</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0228</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_14174326"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Andrew Edwards&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Bernardino County Sun&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SAN BERNARDINO - U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer said during a Tuesday appearance that she will seek a new round of federal dollars to help police departments bolster their staffing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The spending would be laid out in a pending jobs bill. Boxer discussed the legislation after meeting with Inland Empire police chiefs at San Bernardino Police headquarters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The U.S. Department of Justice has already awarded millions in police hiring grants to the San Bernardino Police Department and five other city police forces in San Bernardino County. Departments have already started using the money to hire new cops.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I wanted to let them know that we're not done. There are other jobs bills that we're looking at right now because this economic recovery is too slow," Boxer said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_14174326"&gt;Read the entire article at the San Bernardino Sun.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0228</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer touts stimulus jobs on SR 905</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 2010 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0234</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jan/11/boxer-touts-stimulus-jobs-sr-905/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;John Marelius&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Diego Union-Tribune&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer visited a freeway construction site near the U.S.-Mexico border on Monday, citing it as visible proof that the federal economic stimulus program is creating jobs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer and several local officials watched as graded the site of the widening and expansion of State Route 905, just east of I-805.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;All of us are so happy to see this project come alive, and I know that it wouldn&amp;rsquo;t have come alive without the stimulus funding,&amp;rdquo; the California Democrat said. &amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;ve been told that directly. The funding just wasn&amp;rsquo;t there.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Caltrans expects the current phase of the SR 905 improvement project to create 1,400 jobs by the time it is completed in 2012.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.signonsandiego.com/news/2010/jan/11/boxer-touts-stimulus-jobs-sr-905/"&gt;Read the entire article in the San Diego Union-Tribune.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0234</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Funds from Defense Bill Passed Saturday Being Used in the Southland</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 20 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0226</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kesq.com/Global/story.asp?S=11706589"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;KESQ.COM News Services&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill, which awaits the president's signature, would extend unemployment benefits set to expire at the end of the year for two months and tax credits aimed at helping people afford health insurance, Boxer said in a prepared release.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Southern California appropriations included in the bill were:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- $4.8 million for research aimed at developing clean-burning military vehicles at Pasadena's National Automotive Center;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- $3.2 million for UCLA to help institute Web-based programs aimed at training Department of Defense social workers;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- $2.88 million for Cal State Long Beach for developing foreign- language programs in Arabic, Mandarin, Korean, Persian and Russian;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- $2 million for research at Cedars-Sinai aimed at improving combat medicine and surgery;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- $1.6 million for UCLA to support a program aimed at helping public health authorities respond to bio-emergencies;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-- and $1 million for USC's Institute for Creative Technologies in Marina del Rey, where researchers are working on brain-imaging techniques aimed at helping diagnose and treat post-traumatic stress disorder.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kesq.com/Global/story.asp?S=11706589"&gt;Read the entire article at KESQ&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0226</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer and Feinstein both support key drug vote</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 16 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0227</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?blogid=14&amp;amp;entry_id=53645"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Carolyn Lochhead&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;SFGate Politics Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein both supported the only really bipartisan amendment in the entire Senate health legislation, one by Sen. Byron Dorgon, D-N.D., to allow drug reimportation from Canada and other countries where drug companies acquiesce to price controls and sell their drugs at a steep discount to the prices they charge Americans.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The amendment would have saved consumers tens of billions of dollars, and the federal government about $20 billion over a decade. It was strongly opposed by the drug industry and Senators from states with big pharmaceutical industries. It also was opposed by President Obama, who had supported it as a Senator, and campaigned against high drug prices. But the White House made a deal with Pharma to oppose the amendment in exchange for a wispy promise by by the drug industry to hold down drug costs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, Republicans are trying to leverage faux health care votes against Boxer. The National Republican Senatorial Committee accused Boxer of voting "in favor of a tax hike on middle-class Californians" when she opposed a poison-pill GOP amendment intended to kill the legislation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/blogs/nov05election/detail?blogid=14&amp;amp;entry_id=53645"&gt;Read the entire article at the SFGate Politics Blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0227</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer led abortion curb defeat in health bill</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 08 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0225</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2009/12/08/boxer-led-abortion-curb-defeat-in-health-bill/26687/"&gt;LINK TO FULL POST&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Dena Bunis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;OC Register&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer spent much of her day on the Senate floor managing the successful effort of pro-choice Democrats to keep lawmakers from restricting the access to abortions in the health reform bill they are debating.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Senate voted 55-45 to table the motion by Democratic Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska to include the same language in the Senate bill as was added to the House-passed health reform bill several weeks ago.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The amendment would have banned any insurance company&amp;nbsp; that receives&amp;nbsp; federal dollars from offering health plans with abortion coverage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The provision, Boxer said,&amp;nbsp; would be the &amp;ldquo;biggest rollback of a woman&amp;rsquo;s right to choose in decades.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://totalbuzz.freedomblogging.com/2009/12/08/boxer-led-abortion-curb-defeat-in-health-bill/26687/"&gt;Read the entire post at the OC Register.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0225</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>California senators fight for money to reimburse hospitals for caring for the poor</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 Dec 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0223</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2009/12/01/california-senators-fight-money-reimburse-hospital/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Kitty Felde&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;KPCC&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Hospitals that treat the uninsured already get some help from Washington. Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer of California says it&amp;rsquo;s called DISH &amp;ndash; or disproportionate share.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"That&amp;rsquo;s funds that go to hospitals that treat folks who don&amp;rsquo;t have any insurance and still won&amp;rsquo;t," Boxer says. "The real indigents."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The health care bill passed by the House gradually reduces the amount of DISH money paid to hospitals for indigent care as more and more Americans are covered by health insurance.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the Senate bill, the DISH reductions are greater and come faster. California&amp;rsquo;s other Democratic Senator Dianne Feinstein says that&amp;rsquo;s bad news for the Golden State&amp;rsquo;s large public hospitals that treat large numbers of poor patients.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2009/12/01/california-senators-fight-money-reimburse-hospital/"&gt;Read the entire article and listen to the report at KPCC.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0223</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer calls Obama's emissions target "credible"</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 25 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0224</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/69545-boxer-calls-obamas-emissions-target-qcredibleq"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Ben Geman&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Hill&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) had kind words today for the 2020 emissions target the U.S. will offer in Copenhagen next month, even though it's less ambitious than the level in Senate climate legislation she is co-sponsoring.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The White House today said Obama will attend the Copenhagen international climate talks, and that the U.S. will propose cutting nationwide greenhouse gas emissions by 17 percent below 2005 levels by 2020.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The goal he announced today, in the range of 17 percent, reflects the work that was done in the House of Representatives and in the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. It is realistic, it's smart, and it's credible," Boxer said in a prepared statement. Boxer chairs the Environment Committee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The 17 percent figure is contained in the House-approved climate bill, but the Senate plan would require a 20 percent reduction. Boxer's committee approved that plan 11-1 earlier this month with no GOP members participating.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/blogs/e2-wire/677-e2-wire/69545-boxer-calls-obamas-emissions-target-qcredibleq"&gt;Read the entire article at The Hill.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0224</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sens. Boxer, Inhofe make push for short-term transportation bill extension</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0222</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/68195-boxer-inhofe-make-push-for-transportation-"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Jim Snyder&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Hill&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Two senators at odds on climate legislation are joining forces to push for a short-term extension of the highway bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;One of the best ways to spur job creation and economic recovery is through infrastructure investment,&amp;rdquo; Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and James Inhofe (R-Okla.), the chairwoman and ranking member of the Environment and Public Works Committee, respectively, wrote in a letter to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid (D) of Nevada and Minority Leader Mitch McConnell (R) of Kentucky.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;That is why a longer-term extension of the surface transportation program is so important to maintaining our nation&amp;rsquo;s vital bridges, roads, public transportation and other related infrastructure, restoring our economy and creating good jobs for American workers.&amp;rdquo; &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/homenews/senate/68195-boxer-inhofe-make-push-for-transportation-"&gt;Read the entire article at The Hill.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0222</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: Senate Has Votes To Block Stupak Amendment</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0219</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/10/boxer-senate-has-votes-to_n_352064.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Sam Stein&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Huffington Post&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of Congress's foremost champions of abortion rights said on Monday that the Senate did not have the votes to add a more restrictive anti-abortion amendment to health care reform legislation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said that 60 votes would be needed to strip the current health care bill of its abortion-related language and replace it with a version resembling that passed by the House of Representatives on Saturday. And, in an interview with the Huffington Post, the California Democrat predicted that pro-choice forces in the Senate would keep that from happening.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"If someone wants to offer this very radical amendment, which would really tear apart [a decades-long] compromise, then I think at that point they would need to have 60 votes to do it," Boxer said. "And I believe in our Senate we can hold it."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/11/10/boxer-senate-has-votes-to_n_352064.html"&gt;Read the full article at the Huffington Post.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0219</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bill would ease San Joaquin Valley water swaps</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0217</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/78431.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Michael Doyle&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;McClatchy Newspapers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;WASHINGTON -- San Joaquin Valley farmers could swap water more easily under a bill floated Thursday before a Senate panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The four-page water transfer legislation is far less ambitious than an $11 billion water bond package approved Wednesday by the California Legislature. For now, though, it may reflect the leading federal contribution to addressing the state's water woes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The Valley can't wait for a long-term solution," Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein said. "The one thing we can do now, in the short term, is facilitate (water) transfers."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"This is about getting water where it's needed, when it's needed," Boxer said. "It's common sense."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/78431.html"&gt;Read the entire article at McClatchy.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0217</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate panel approves climate change bill despite GOP boycott</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0218</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/11/05/senate.climate.change/index.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;CNN.com&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Democrats on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee voted 10-1 to send the measure to the full chamber.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Because of the Republican boycott of the committee hearing that began Tuesday, the panel was unable to amend the bill. Committee rules require at least two minority party members to be present to conduct regular business, including amending bills. However, an exception allowed the committee to vote on the overall bill as long as a majority of its members were present.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer of California, the committee chairwoman, noted the panel has held dozens of hearings on the issue and compiled more than 300,000 pages of analysis, and that she had taken the unprecedented step of scheduling a session with EPA experts to answer any questions by committee members. However, the Republicans skipped the EPA briefing on Tuesday afternoon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.cnn.com/2009/POLITICS/11/05/senate.climate.change/index.html"&gt;Read the entire article at CNN.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0218</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer pushes more funding, health care for small business</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 31 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0216</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/business-headlines/ci_13679753?nclick_check=1"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Chris Metinko&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Oakland Tribune&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"We've gone through some dark times and are going through some dark times," Boxer said after touring Blue Bottle Coffee Co. in the Jack London Square district. "Now we need to jump-start this recovery."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To do just that, Boxer said government needs to help and nurture small businesses, which have created 64 percent of new jobs in the country over the last 15 years. Boxer pushed what she called her four-point plan to help small business succeed. The main component was increasing access to credit so such businesses can grow. Boxer and fellow Democrat Sen. Jeff Merkley from Oregon have introduced legislation to help assist community banks in extending credit to small businesses in an effort to spur on economic growth. The new plan, called the Bank on Our Communities Act, would allocate Troubled Asset Relief Program funds to community banks, as well as allow those institutions to raise private capital and increase their lending to small businesses and consumers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The plan would dedicate up to $15 billion for a community credit renewal fund. The money would be available to banks with up to $5 billion in assets and agree to undergo a stress test &amp;mdash; a two-year, forwarding-looking review to determine the capital needed to keep lending during harsh economic times and generate new lending. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/business-headlines/ci_13679753?nclick_check=1"&gt;Read the entire article at MercuryNews.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0216</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer, Feinstein pushing for public option</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0214</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/026532.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Rob Hotakainen&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sacramento Bee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As the Senate prepares to debate a massive health care overhaul, California Democratic Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein are pushing hard for a public option, which would allow the federal government to compete with private insurers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The two senators are included in a group of 30 who wrote a letter earlier this month to Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, asking that a public option be included in the Senate bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The senators got their wish today, when Reid announced that the Senate bill will indeed include a public option. Democratic House Speaker Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco says the final House bill will include a public option, too.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/static/weblogs/capitolalertlatest/026532.html"&gt;Read the entire post at CapitolAlert.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0214</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer, Feinstein laud hate crimes measure passage</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 25 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0213</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_13639047"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Compiled by Benjamin Demers&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Daily Bulletin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein on Thursday praised final Senate passage of legislation to strengthen the abilities of federal, state and local law enforcement to investigate and prosecute hate crimes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Hate crimes are particularly offensive because they are propelled by bias, ignorance and bigotry," said Boxer, a Democrat. "These crimes do not just ... inflict harm on one victim, but they also instill fear in entire communities. And no person - simply because of who they are - should ever have to live in fear."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Matthew Shepard and James Byrd, Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act passed as an amendment to the Defense Authorization bill in July. It adds gender, sexual orientation, disability and gender identity to the list of protected categories under federal hate crimes laws. The measure also provides additional federal support to state and local authorities investigating and prosecuting hate crimes, according to a news release from Boxer's office.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailybulletin.com/ci_13639047"&gt;Read the entire article at the Daily Bulletin.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0213</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer lauds passage of anti-gay hate crimes measure</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0212</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thecalifornian.com/article/20091022/NEWS01/91022015/1002/Sen.+Boxer+lauds+passage+of+anti-gay+hate+crimes+measure+"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Californian&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., today praised final Senate passage of legislation to strengthen the ability of federal, state and local law enforcement to investigate and prosecute hate crimes against people based on gender, gender identity, sexual orientation or disability.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senator Boxer said, &amp;ldquo;Hate crimes are particularly offensive because they are propelled by bias, ignorance and bigotry. These crimes do not just to inflict harm on one victim, but they also instill fear in entire communities. And no person &amp;ndash; simply because of who they are &amp;ndash; should ever have to live in fear.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Matthew Shepard Local Law Enforcement Hate Crimes Prevention Act passed as an amendment to the Defense Authorization bill in July. It adds gender, sexual orientation, disability and gender identity to the list of protected categories under federal hate crimes laws. The measure also provides additional federal support to state and local authorities investigating and prosecuting hate crimes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thecalifornian.com/article/20091022/NEWS01/91022015/1002/Sen.+Boxer+lauds+passage+of+anti-gay+hate+crimes+measure+"&gt;Read the entire article at The Californian.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0212</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate OKs Central Valley water transfer measure</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0211</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.centralvalleybusinesstimes.com/stories/001/?ID=13343"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Central Valley Business Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The U.S. Senate has given final approval to the Energy and Water Appropriations bill, which includes an amendment by California U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein that will allow for water transfers to help agricultural communities in the Central Valley that have been hard hit by three years of drought.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The legislation now goes to President Obama for his signature.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;This measure is a critical first step toward improving water management to help ease the water crisis in the San Joaquin Valley,&amp;rdquo; says Ms. Boxer. &amp;ldquo;The legislation will enable water transfers between the east and west sides of the valley, offering some much-needed relief to agricultural communities that are suffering from drought conditions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.centralvalleybusinesstimes.com/stories/001/?ID=13343"&gt;Read the entire article at Central Valley Business Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0211</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer plans hearing on toxic school drinking water</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0209</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/10/05/state/n155915D38.DTL&amp;amp;tsp=1"&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Garance Burke&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Associated Press &lt;/em&gt;via&lt;em&gt; San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The head of the U.S. Senate Environment Committee said Wednesday that legislators will hold hearings to address toxic drinking water in the nation's schools following an Associated Press probe into the widespread problem.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer called for the hearings to be held in Washington this year after an AP investigation revealed unsafe levels of lead, bacteria and pesticides have surfaced in the water supplies at thousands of schools.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the last decade, contaminants have been found in drinking fountains and school pipes in all 50 states in small towns and inner cities. But the problem has gone largely unmonitored by the federal government, even as the number of water safety violations has multiplied.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, who chairs the Committee on Environment and Public Works that oversees the Environmental Protection Agency, has seized on the issue as a top priority, and has asked EPA officials to explain what actions they will take to protect school children from polluted water.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/10/05/state/n155915D38.DTL&amp;amp;tsp=1"&gt;Read the full article at the San Francisco Chronicle.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0209</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Climate Bill Would Ease Energy Costs, Senator Says</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0210</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/01/AR2009100103908.html?hpid=sec-politics"&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Juliet Eilperin&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senate Democrats will initially devote 70 percent of the pollution allowances in their new climate measure to making it easier for people to pay their energy bills, Senate Environment and Public Works Chairman Barbara Boxer said in an interview to be aired Sunday on C-SPAN.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer (D-Calif.) introduced legislation this week with Senate Foreign Relations Chairman John F. Kerry (D-Mass.) aimed at limiting U.S. greenhouse gas emissions nationwide. It would force any facility emitting at least 25,000 tons of carbon dioxide a year to obtain pollution permits. The bill does not indicate how these pollution allowances would be allocated, but Boxer said on C-SPAN's "Newsmakers" program that Democrats are prepared to give away allowances to make carbon-intensive commodities such as electricity more affordable.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The vast majority of allowances will go to consumers to keep them whole," Boxer said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/10/01/AR2009100103908.html?hpid=sec-politics"&gt;Read the full article at The Washington Post.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0210</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer, Kerry Launch Campaign to Pass Senate Cap-And-Trade Bill </title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0205</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/09/30/30greenwire-boxer-kerry-launch-campaign-to-pass-senate-cap-29235.html"&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;by Darren Samuelsohn&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sens. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), John Kerry (D-Mass.) and nine Senate supporters kicked off the autumn global warming debate today with a campaign-style rally releasing their comprehensive climate bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"We know clean energy is the ticket to strong, sustainable economic growth," Boxer, the chairwoman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, said at the Capitol Hill event, in front of a large American flag and three dozen or so military veterans, business leaders and environmentalists.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Ultimately, this bill is about keeping Americans safe," added Kerry, the chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Kerry-Boxer bill (pdf), the "Clean Energy Jobs and American Power Act," comes in at 821 pages, starting with a mandate by 2020 to curb the nation's greenhouse gas emissions by 20 percent from 2005 levels. It omits many details, leaving negotiations with Democrats and Republican moderates to fill in the blanks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the measure offers specifics on several critical issues, ranging from incentives for natural gas and nuclear power to how Congress can promote tree planting and sustainable farming practices as alternative compliance options for industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill's sponsors also sought to change the legislative lingo surrounding the bill, dropping references to "cap and trade." Instead, Boxer and Kerry released a summary of their bill that labeled greenhouse gas trading provisions as a "Pollution Reduction and Investment" program. Boxer also touted a proposal allocating emission allowances that is aimed at fiscal conservatives who think past climate proposals cost too much.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The bill does not add one penny to the deficit," Boxer said. "We're very excited about that."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The unveiling of the Senate climate bill comes almost three months after House passage of H.R. 2454, a comprehensive climate and energy bill that is a centerpiece of President Obama's domestic agenda.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a prepared statement, Obama today praised Boxer and Kerry "for their leadership on comprehensive energy reform."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"With the draft legislation they are announcing today, we are one step closer to putting America in control of our energy future and making America more energy independent," Obama said. "My administration is deeply committed to passing a bill that creates new American jobs and the clean energy incentives that foster innovation. I commend Senators Boxer and Kerry for their work and look forward to signing comprehensive energy legislation that addresses this urgent challenge."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senior Obama administration officials are scheduled to meet later today with local elected officials from Maryland, Montana, North Dakota and Ohio who were in Washington to see the bill unveiled.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;House Speaker Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), who was instrumental in moving the House climate bill before the July Fourth recess, called the Kerry-Boxer measure "a strong foundation for Senate action on our clean energy future."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I look forward to working with my Senate colleagues to deliver to the President a comprehensive clean energy and climate bill as soon as possible to ensure the success of the Copenhagen negotiations," Pelosi said in a statement, referring to a major U.N. climate summit slated for the Denmark capitol in December.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0205</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Teamsters Commend Kerry, Boxer for Recycling Program in Climate Change Bill</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0206</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/teamsters-commend-kerry-boxer-for-recycling-program-in-climate-change-bill-63111332.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;PR Newswire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON, Oct. 1 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- Teamsters General President Jim Hoffa today praised Sens. John Kerry, D-Mass., and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., for introducing climate legislation that would expand states' recycling networks. Hoffa also urged inclusion of strong provisions to prevent foreign competitors from getting an unfair advantage over U.S. manufacturers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill recognizes recycling as a climate strategy that uses less energy and reduces greenhouse gas emissions from landfills. It provides money for a "State Recycling Program" that would increase and improve states' recycling efforts. Studies show that recycling creates 10 times as many jobs per ton of waste as landfills and incinerators.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"We need to get this country running on clean energy to jumpstart our economy," Hoffa said. "This bill promotes two things that will help make America a leader again: recycling and good-paying jobs."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.prnewswire.com/news-releases/teamsters-commend-kerry-boxer-for-recycling-program-in-climate-change-bill-63111332.html"&gt;Read the full release at PR Newswire&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0206</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Barbara Boxer: Airline Passenger Bill of Rights Is Coming</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0203</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/middleseat/2009/09/22/sen-barbara-boxer-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights-is-coming/"&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Scott McCartney&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Wall Street Journal Blog&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Airline meltdowns&amp;ndash;such as a regional jet stranded overnight with 47 people on board last month&amp;ndash;have made passengers&amp;rsquo; rights legislation popular in Congress and likely to pass, even over airline industry objections, Sen. Barbara Boxer said Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Every day they (airlines) prove to us how much we need this legislation,&amp;rdquo; said Sen. Boxer (D-Calif.), a co-sponsor of a passengers&amp;rsquo; rights bill that includes forcing airlines to allow passengers off planes after three hours of sitting, if passengers want.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Boxer&amp;rsquo;s bill would require airlines to provide food, water and bathrooms to passengers stranded on flights either unable to take off or unable to access a gate for disembarking. It lets pilots decide whether it&amp;rsquo;s safe to give passengers the opportunity to get off a plane every three hours, and waives the requirement if a captain reasonably expects to take off within 30 minutes after the three-hour threshhold is reached. The legislation is now included in the reauthorization bill for the Federal Aviation Administration, enhancing its chances of passage. But the House version of the legislation doesn&amp;rsquo;t include a three-hour cap, and a conference committee will have to decide on forcing airlines to allow passengers to deplane if they choose.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blogs.wsj.com/middleseat/2009/09/22/sen-barbara-boxer-airline-passenger-bill-of-rights-is-coming/"&gt;Read the entire article at the Wall Street Journal blog.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0203</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Readies for Climate Bill Introduction, Mid-Oct. Markup</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0204</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/09/21/21climatewire-boxer-readies-for-climate-bill-introduction-83505.html?pagewanted=all"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Darren Samuelsohn of ClimateWire&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Senate climate debate has largely been in standby mode since June, but Environment and Public Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) is ready to kick-start the process with the release next week of a draft bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sources off Capitol Hill say they expect Boxer to start legislative hearings during the week of Oct. 5, with a tentative markup penciled in for the week of Oct. 12.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Of course, much depends on the fate of the Senate health care bill, just how quick U.S. EPA can turn around an economic analysis of Boxer's legislation and whether the chairwoman wants to satisfy key moderates on her panel, which include Sens. Max Baucus (D-Mont.) and Arlen Specter (D-Pa.).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/09/21/21climatewire-boxer-readies-for-climate-bill-introduction-83505.html?pagewanted=all"&gt;Read the entire article at the New York Times.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0204</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Barbara Boxer the force behind upcoming energy bill</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 07 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0201</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&amp;amp;q=http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_boxer07.466f3c2.html&amp;amp;ct=ga&amp;amp;cd=gSldScB7uT4&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfSBloQDlRdTe1aIL3B8FIvAwp4w"&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Ben Goad&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Press-Enterprise&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON - U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer is preparing to introduce climate-change legislation that would significantly alter the course of the nation's energy policy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Passage of the bill would represent a defining moment -- both for the effort to curb global warming through pollution limits and for Boxer herself as she readies for what could be a tough 2010 re-election bid.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The California Democrat and part-time Riverside County resident will attempt to shepherd the bill through a conflicted Senate by the end of the year, when world leaders are scheduled to hold climate-change talks at a United Nations summit in Copenhagen. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;...&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I'm convinced that a really good bill will be the launching pad for a great economic boom in our country," she said. "The country that does this is going to lead the 21st century economically."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/url?sa=X&amp;amp;q=http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_S_boxer07.466f3c2.html&amp;amp;ct=ga&amp;amp;cd=gSldScB7uT4&amp;amp;usg=AFQjCNHfSBloQDlRdTe1aIL3B8FIvAwp4w"&gt;Read the entire artlice at the Press Enterprise&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0201</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator: Funding needed to cut high wildfire risk</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0202</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gNirrGO3UeJug3__BuGV2m6TzUIQD9AG1M680"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Michael R. Blood&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;AP&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LOS ANGELES &amp;mdash; Sen. Barbara Boxer wants more federal money devoted to reducing wildfire danger in the highest-risk areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The California Democrat says overgrown chaparral poses a menacing wildfire threat in many areas of drought-stricken California. The massive wildfire burning north of Los Angeles is being fueled by dry, decades-old brush.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer says the U.S. Forest Service should be using its funds to thin or clear those overgrown areas, especially when they are near homes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gNirrGO3UeJug3__BuGV2m6TzUIQD9AG1M680"&gt;Read the entire AP article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0202</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Bill could beef up S.J. law enforcement</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0198</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090903/A_NEWS/909030327/-1/NEWSMAP"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Christian Burkin&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Recordnet&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;FRENCH CAMP - At the Sheriff's Office on Wednesday afternoon, Sen. Barbara Boxer met with area law enforcement leaders to talk about stimulus money and its shortage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She also brought a bit of good news for Stockton: A bill has been introduced in Congress that would give cities such as Stockton, where the violent crime rate is high, a larger share of federal dollars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"That was very good news to my ears," Stockton Police Chief Blair Ulring said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill, the Enhanced Violent Crime Community Policing Act of 2009, would amend the Omnibus Crime Control and Safe Streets Act of 1968 to provide money to hire up to 10 percent more law enforcement officers in areas where the violent crime rate is high.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.recordnet.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20090903/A_NEWS/909030327/-1/NEWSMAP"&gt;Read the entire article at Recordnet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0198</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer vows to try to get more bucks for cops</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0199</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mantecabulletin.com/news/article/6719/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Glenn Kahl&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Manteca Bulletin&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Manteca is getting $1.5 million in federal stimulus funds to keep four officers in place.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer met with San Joaquin County law enforcement leaders Wednesday to tell them the money coming to Stockton, Lodi, Manteca, and the county will hopefully be just the start.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;I&amp;rsquo;m satisfied this isn&amp;rsquo;t enough &amp;ndash; we have to do more,&amp;rdquo; Boxer told three area police chiefs and San Joaquin County Sheriff Steven Moore at a Wednesday afternoon press conference at the Sheriff&amp;rsquo;s headquarters in French Camp.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer was referring to new funding in support of the officers on the beat in the Central Valley through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act geared to protect area communities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mantecabulletin.com/news/article/6719/"&gt;Read the entire article at The Manteca Bulletin&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0199</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator: Funding needed to cut high wildfire risk</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0200</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gNirrGO3UeJug3__BuGV2m6TzUIQD9AG1M680"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Michael R. Blood&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Associated Press&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LOS ANGELES &amp;mdash; Sen. Barbara Boxer wants more federal money devoted to reducing wildfire danger in the highest-risk areas.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The California Democrat says overgrown chaparral poses a menacing wildfire threat in many areas of drought-stricken California. The massive wildfire burning north of Los Angeles is being fueled by dry, decades-old brush.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer says the U.S. Forest Service should be using its funds to thin or clear those overgrown areas, especially when they are near homes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gNirrGO3UeJug3__BuGV2m6TzUIQD9AG1M680"&gt;Read the full article from the Associated Press&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0200</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Lawmakers to seek $390M for Lake Tahoe restoration</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Sep 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0197</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/california/ci_13254207?nclick_check=1"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Associated Press&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. lawmakers from California and Nevada plan to introduce legislation authorizing $390 million over the next eight years for environmental restoration efforts at Lake Tahoe.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Dianne Feinstein said at the 2009 Lake Tahoe Forum earlier this summer that the money is needed for efforts to protect the lake.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The California Democrat will get support in sponsoring the legislation from Republican Sen. John Ensign and Democratic Sen. Harry Reid, both of Nevada, and Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer of California.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/california/ci_13254207?nclick_check=1"&gt;Read the full article from the AP in the Mercury News.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0197</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Kaiser's System Seen as Model for the Nation</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0195</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kcbs.com/Kaiser-s-System-Seen-as-Model-for-the-Nation/5078202"&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;KCBS&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;OAKLAND, Calif. (KCBS)&amp;nbsp; -- Senator Barbara Boxer got an up-close look at a cutting edge medical records system in Oakland Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kaiser Permanente patients are linked electronically to their doctors and the entire Kaiser system through a sophisticated computerized medical records network.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Veterans Administration has a similar system.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;And Boxer said the US could save a fortune, not to mention countless lives, if such a system were universal nationwide.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"This model is a very important model because everyone benefits when we prevent disease," Senator Boxer said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kcbs.com/Kaiser-s-System-Seen-as-Model-for-the-Nation/5078202"&gt;Read the full article at KCBS&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0195</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer tours Riverside County hospital</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 24 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0194</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pe.com/localnews/healthcare/stories/PE_News_Local_S_webboxer.28e8e81.html"&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;by Lora Hines&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Press-Enterprise&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer today said she believes Congress will pass a health care bill this year but it's too soon to know what it will include.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, D-Calif., made her prediction after briefly touring and meeting staff and other local public health care providers at Riverside County Regional Medical Center in Moreno Valley. The hospital is the county's public hospital.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said she visited the facility to determine what she could do to make sure it gets what it needs to treat its patients. Much of the hospital's annual $380 million comes from state and federal sources to treat uninsured and indigent patients. Boxer said she didn't talk to any patients.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pe.com/localnews/healthcare/stories/PE_News_Local_S_webboxer.28e8e81.html"&gt;Read the entire article at The Press-Enterprise&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0194</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Passenger Bill of Rights: What it Means for Travelers and Airlines.</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0221</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/jetcheck/archives/176234.asp"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Jonathan Heckman&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Seattle P-I&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA) and Olympia J. Snowe (R-ME) expressed their outrage concerning Continental Airlines Flight 2816, the flight that left 47 passengers stranded in a jet overnight in Rochester, MN. Both Senators sent out a press release publically asking for Congress to pass their Airline Passenger Bill of Rights quickly. Yet, a question looming in the back of my mind is, what exactly is the Passenger Bill of Rights?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the two Senators, the Airline Passengers Bill of Rights would:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Require airlines to provide passengers with food, potable water, comfortable cabin temperature and ventilation, and adequate restrooms while a plane is delayed on the ground.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Require airlines to offer passengers the option of safely deplaning once they have sat on the ground for three hours after the plane door has closed. This option would be provided every three hours the plane continues to sit on the ground.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Make airports and airlines develop contingency plans for delayed flights to be reviewed and approved by Department of Transportation (DOT). The bill also allows the DOT to fine air carriers and airports that do not submit or fail comply with contingency plans.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;- Direct the DOT to create a consumer complaint hotline so that passengers can alert the agency about delays. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://blog.seattlepi.com/jetcheck/archives/176234.asp"&gt;Read the entire article at SeattlePI.com&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0221</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer: "We Won't Walk Away From The Healthcare Debate"</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0220</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.blackvoicenews.com/content/view/43399/3/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO FULL ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;by Chris Levister&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Black Voice News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While jeers and taunts frequently drowned out Schiff, and a panel of medical experts, California Senator Barbara Boxer insists Democratic lawmakers are determined to press on with what is arguably the country&amp;rsquo;s most important policy discussion in decades.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;This is not a debate we are going to walk away from,&amp;rdquo; said Boxer. &amp;ldquo;We know a lot of people will come to these town hall meetings and start screaming. We need to hear what they have to say. Hopefully we can forge some common ground once they hear our positions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We welcome the debate.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.blackvoicenews.com/content/view/43399/3/"&gt;Read the entire article at Black Voice News.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0220</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer wants stronger CARS program</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0192</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/state&amp;amp;id=6944030"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span class="storyDateline"&gt;SACRAMENTO, CA (KGO)&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The "Cash for Clunkers" program is now depending on a jump start from the Senate to keep it running. During a visit to Northern California Saturday, Senator Barbara Boxer says the program is good, but it could be better.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"If I had written Cash for Clunkers I might have written it a little stronger," she said. "Because right now, you get rid of a car, it's only, you have to buy a new car that does four miles per gallon better. I think we could have done a little bit better."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=news/state&amp;amp;id=6944030"&gt;Read the full article at KGO.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0192</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer pledges support to Pajaro River levee project during Watsonville visit</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0193</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/centralcoast/ci_12975243"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Ariana Smith&lt;br /&gt;San Jose Mercury News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WATSONVILLE - Sen. Barbara Boxer pledged her support in getting funding to begin the flood control project on the Pajaro River levee, while speaking in Watsonville on Saturday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer promised that the levee project would be a top priority this year and in the years to come, and hopes construction will begin in the next two years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I know the fierceness of water. I know what it is to worry about your kids in school," Boxer said, "I will do all I can to make ensure that this project has the resources it needs to move forward."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This week, the Senate passed the Energy and Water Appropriation bill, which included $425,000 in funding for the Pajaro River project. So far, the money has helped support some environmental review and other pre-construction evaluations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/centralcoast/ci_12975243"&gt;Read the full article at the San Jose Mercury News.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0193</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Works to Provide Flexible Spending Accounts for Military Families</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0191</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://voip-phone-systems.tmcnet.com/news/2009/07/27/4293840.htm"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;TMCnet&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jul 27, 2009 (Congressional Documents and Publications/ContentWorks via COMTEX) -- Washington, DC - The U.S. Senate passed an amendment offered by U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) to help military families lessen out-of-pocket health care and child care expenses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer's amendment expresses the sense of the Senate that service members should have flexible spending accounts, a benefit currently available to Federal employees and many private-sector employees.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;These accounts allow individuals and families to set aside a portion of their income - before taxes - to help afford child care and health care expenses, such as insurance co-pays, eye glasses and braces. This can result in significant savings for families.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://voip-phone-systems.tmcnet.com/news/2009/07/27/4293840.htm"&gt;Read the full article at TMCnet&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0191</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>What Palin Got Wrong About Energy</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0190</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/23/AR2009072302633.html"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Barbara Boxer and John F. Kerry&lt;br /&gt;in &lt;em&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin put the global warming debate front and center last week with &lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/13/AR2009071302852.html"&gt;a plea to avoid&lt;/a&gt; the "personality-driven political gossip of the day" and focus more "on the gravity of . . . challenges" facing our country.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;We share her hopes for a substantive dialogue. But we want to put facts ahead of fiction and real debate ahead of rhetorical bomb-throwing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palin argues that "the answer doesn't lie in making energy scarcer and more expensive!" The truth is, clean energy legislation doesn't make energy scarcer or more expensive; it works to find alternative solutions to our costly dependence on foreign oil and provides powerful incentives to pursue cutting-edge clean energy technologies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Palin asserts that job losses are "certain." Wrong. The American Recovery and Reinvestment Act and American Clean Energy and Security legislation will create significant employment opportunities across the country in a broad array of sectors linked to the clean energy economy. Studies at the federal level and by states have demonstrated &lt;a href="http://www.pewtrusts.org/news_room_detail.aspx?id=53254"&gt;clean energy job creation&lt;/a&gt;. A &lt;a href="http://www.americanprogress.org/issues/2009/06/clean_energy.html"&gt;report&lt;/a&gt; by the Center for American Progress calculated that $150 billion in clean energy investments would create more than 1.7 million domestic and community-based jobs that can't be shipped overseas&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/07/23/AR2009072302633.html"&gt;Read the full article at The Washington Post&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0190</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Help on Its Way to Stranded Airline Passengers</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0189</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/07-21-2009/0005063814&amp;amp;EDATE="&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;From &lt;a href="http://www.flyersrights.org/"&gt;FlyersRights.org&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;via PRNewsire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON, July 21 /PRNewswire-USNewswire/ -- FlyersRights.org, America's leading consumer organization representing commercial airline passengers, this afternoon hailed action by the Senate Commerce Committee in sending to the floor a version of the FAA Reauthorization bill that includes the bipartisan Boxer-Snowe Airline Passengers Bill of Rights allowing passengers to de-plane from aircraft held on the tarmac for three hours or more.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"This is a great step forward for airline passengers, and the Commerce Committee should be congratulated," said Kate Hanni, Executive Director of FlyersRights.org, who was herself stranded on the tarmac for 9 hours in 2007 on American Airlines.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Besides requiring airlines to allow passengers the option to de-plane once they have sat on the ground for three hours, the legislation would require airlines to provide passengers with adequate food, drinkable water, working restrooms and comfortable cabin temperature and ventilation. Airports and the airlines they serve would be required to develop contingency plans for delayed flights, which would have to be reviewed and approved by the U.S. Department of Transportation, and could face fines for not submitting or complying with the plans. In addition, a "Consumer Complaint Hotline" would be established within the Department of Transportation so passengers can alert the agency to delays.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last year, according to the airlines' own statistics, there were 1,232 tarmac delays of 3 hours or more. The longest, of more than 10 hours' duration, involved Delta flight 1201 from Atlanta to Orlando on January 16, 2008. Passengers were denied food, water or temperature controls and reported receiving misleading messages about prospective takeoff times.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.prnewswire.com/DisplayReleaseContent.aspx?ACCT=104&amp;amp;STORY=/www/story/07-21-2009/0005063814&amp;amp;EDATE="&gt;Read the full article at PRNewsire&lt;/a&gt;.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0189</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer Courts Farmers to Seek 'Rare Opportunity' for Climate Bill</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0188</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/07/15/15climatewire-sen-boxer-courts-farmers-to-seek-rare-opport-66857.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Allison Winter of &lt;em&gt;ClimateWire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senate Environment and Public Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) vowed yesterday to include a major role for agriculture in her climate bill despite mounting criticism from some farm groups and Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At a hearing on the opportunities for agriculture in the climate bill, Boxer indicated she has no intention of stepping down as she fought back against critics of the bill. The powerful Senate chairwoman, who noted that she represents the top farm producing state, also tried to strike down any notion that the costs of the bill might be too high for agriculture.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"If we do nothing and argue over this to the point of stalling everything, the farmers in my state will be desperate, as they see more droughts and more warming," Boxer said. "This is a rare time, we have the confluence of a recession that is deep and global and the issue of climate change -- it creates an exceptional opportunity, if we can just get over our fearmongering and get over the naysayers."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Her remarks came as Republicans on the EPW Committee and the president of one of the largest farm lobbies, the American Farm Bureau Federation, criticized the House cap-and-trade bill (H.R. 2454), which Boxer has said will be her starting point for the Senate legislation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/cwire/2009/07/15/15climatewire-sen-boxer-courts-farmers-to-seek-rare-opport-66857.html"&gt;Read the full article at the New York Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0188</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate Panel Approves Highway Bill Extension</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0187</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/07/15/15greenwire-senate-panel-approves-highway-bill-extension-59242.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Josh Voorhees of &lt;em&gt;Greenwire&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Senate panel took the first legislative step today to extend the current highway and transit spending law, an effort that would postpone the next full, six-year authorization of the measure until the end of March 2011.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Environment and Public Works Committee voted 18-1 to extend funding for highways and other programs under the committee's jurisdiction. The bill authorizes a total of roughly $61.5 billion in spending for the next 18 months. The Senate Commerce and Banking committees, which oversee rail and transit provisions, respectively, will likewise need to pass their own extensions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EPW Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and ranking member James Inhofe (R-Okla.) were successful in their attempt to pass a "clean" extension, defeating any nontechnical changes to their bill, but said they would be open to possible amendments once the bill reaches the Senate floor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said her committee is committed to using the 18 months to draft a comprehensive, multiyear spending bill to replace the current authorization, which would expire at the end of September without the extension.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/07/15/15greenwire-senate-panel-approves-highway-bill-extension-59242.html"&gt;Read the full article at the New York Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0187</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sens. Feinstein, Boxer back Sotomayor as hearings begin</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0185</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydesert.com/article/20090714/NEWS0301/907140322/1006/news01/Sens.+Feinstein++Boxer+back+Sotomayor+as+hearings+begin"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;John Yaukey&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Desert Sun&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON &amp;mdash; Both California's senators strongly endorsed Supreme Court nominee Sonia Sotomayor on Monday during her Senate confirmation hearings amid concerns by some conservatives that she has made race-based comments indicating how she might rule.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., commented on the nominee's 17 years of experience on the federal bench and her extensive career in private practice and as a prosecutor in New York City fresh from Yale Law School.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;You have seen the law truly from all sides,&amp;rdquo; said Feinstein, a senior member of the Judiciary Committee, which must vote on Sotomayor's nomination before the full Senate can take it up. &amp;ldquo;You bring a deep and broad experience in the law to the Supreme Court.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., up for re-election in 2010 in a heavily Hispanic state, delivered a full-throated endorsement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;This is a historic day when we can realize that this American Dream is real, &amp;ldquo; she said. &amp;ldquo;In our state with 13 million Latinos, they are absolutely glued to this.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydesert.com/article/20090714/NEWS0301/907140322/1006/news01/Sens.+Feinstein++Boxer+back+Sotomayor+as+hearings+begin"&gt;Read the full story at The Desert Sun&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0185</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer raises big money for battle with Fiorina</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0186</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2009/07/13/boxer-bag-big-money-possible-battle-fiorina/"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Frank Stoltze&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;KPCC&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer raised nearly one-and-a-half million dollars during the second quarter. In a press release, she called the support &amp;ldquo;gratifying.&amp;rdquo; The Democratic senator is seeking a fourth six-year term.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A spokeswoman says Boxer&amp;rsquo;s conducted prodigious and early fundraising in preparation for a possible challenge from former Hewlett Packard CEO Carly Fiorina. The 54-year-old Republican says she&amp;rsquo;s &amp;ldquo;seriously considering&amp;rdquo; entering the race.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She has little political experience beyond her work as an economic advisor to Senator John McCain during last year&amp;rsquo;s presidential campaign. But Fiorina has extraordinary wealth that could make her a strong candidate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2009/07/13/boxer-bag-big-money-possible-battle-fiorina/"&gt;Listen to the full report at KPCC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0186</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Democrats Divide Over a Proposal to Tax Health Benefits</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0184</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/health/policy/09health.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By David M. Herszenhorn&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON &amp;mdash; An effort by Senator Max Baucus of Montana to develop compromise health care legislation has come under sharp assault by fellow Democrats who have urged him to abandon a plan to help pay for the bill by taxing some employer-provided health benefits.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A tax on generous employer-provided health plans is favored by Republicans and several centrist Democrats. But opinion polls show the idea to be generally unpopular, and several senators up for re-election in 2010, including the majority leader, Senator Harry Reid of Nevada, have said they oppose it.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Tuesday, Mr. Reid and other Democratic leaders asked Mr. Baucus, the chairman of the Finance Committee, to explore other options, sending him back to the drawing board yet again on what is perhaps the most controversial issue in the health care debate: how to pay the cost of insuring all Americans.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;To cover the 10-year, roughly $1 trillion price tag, lawmakers have been struggling to pull together a package of cost savings through greater efficiencies and new revenues. The savings includes $155 billion over 10 years promised by hospital groups in a deal announced at the White House on Wednesday and $80 billion previously pledged by drug makers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2009/07/09/health/policy/09health.html"&gt;Read the full article at The New York Times&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0184</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer's committee tackles climate change</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0183</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2009/07/07/barbara-boxers-committee-tackles-climate-change/"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kitty Felde&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;KPCC&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kitty Felde: Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer told fellow members of her Environment and Public Works Committee that fighting climate change can also battle a bad economy. Just look at California, she said, where investing in clean energy created more than 125,000 new jobs over a decade.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer: In California, which has been one of the hardest hit by the housing crisis and the financial crisis, the area that has out-performed every other has been the creation of clean energy jobs and businesses.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Felde: Three cabinet secretaries urged Boxer&amp;rsquo;s committee to pass a climate change bill this summer. Republicans say China and India aren&amp;rsquo;t interested in reducing their carbon emissions &amp;ndash; and they question whether U.S. action alone could lower the world&amp;rsquo;s temperature.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.scpr.org/news/2009/07/07/barbara-boxers-committee-tackles-climate-change/"&gt;Listen to the full report at KPCC&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0183</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Marine Highway for Oakland?</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0181</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kgoam810.com/article.asp?id=1396696&amp;amp;spid=15884"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;KGO&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Transportation Secretary Ray LaHood visited the Port of Oakland today, saying that transporting more goods by ship rather than with trucks will help protect the environment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking at the port, LaHood said, "A marine highway will get trucks off the road and clean up the air.''&lt;br /&gt;Cube Advertisement&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He called for the creation of a "ports czar'' who would help various ports work together.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;LaHood spoke to reporters after touring the Port of Oakland, and met with elected officials including U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, U.S. Rep. Barbara Lee, D-Oakland, and Oakland Mayor Ron Dellums.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said, "Our ports are our economic engines and we want to make sure they function well and are clean.''&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0181</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EPA gives California emissions waiver</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0182</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/features/green/bal-car-waiver-0630,0,3946031.story"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Jim Tankersley&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reporting from Washington -                                                                The &lt;a id="ORGOV000048" class="taxInlineTagLink" title="U.S. Environmental Protection Agency" href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/topic/environmental-issues/environmental-cleanup/u.s.-environmental-protection-agency-ORGOV000048.topic"&gt;Environmental Protection Agency&lt;/a&gt; granted California's request to impose tough restrictions on greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks -- reversing the Bush administration's position and opening the way for the state to take the lead on global-warming policy. Thirteen other states -- including Maryland -- are slated to adopt Calfornia's standards.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; California developed the standards in 2004 but was barred from implementing them.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; EPA officials say granting California the waiver from federal standards gives the state wide latitude to promulgate stricter rules, restoring a 40-year interpretation of the Clean Air Act.&lt;br /&gt; &lt;br /&gt; "It preserves California's role as a leader on clean air policy," particularly on motor vehicles, EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson said in an interview. "It feels good to know that we are able to move past -- address -- this issue, responding to the president's call."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.baltimoresun.com/features/green/bal-car-waiver-0630,0,3946031.story"&gt;Read the full story by following the link&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0182</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer Tours Richmond Job Training Center</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0180</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kcbs.com/Sen--Boxer-Tours-Richmond-Job-Training-Center/4709295"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;KCBS&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer praised an innovative green job training program in Richmond Tuesday, calling it a model for producing clean energy jobs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Two organizations, Richmond Build and Solar Richmond, have combined forces to train young workers in the emerging green industry.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"You've achieved a 90-percent job placement rate, which is pretty incredible," said Boxer. "Of course, we won't be happy until it's a hundred percent."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The job training program pays its workers $18.33 an hour, according to Michelle McGeoy, executive director of Solar Richmond. An estimated 140 trainees have completed the program since it began in 2006, she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0180</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer Introduces Violence Against Children Act</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0179</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_12699519" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Wesley G. Hughes and Mike Cruz&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Bernardino County Sun&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mynisha's Law is reborn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Major federal legislation that began with the tragic death by gunshot of San Bernardino's 11-year-old Mynisha Crenshaw was reintroduced Friday by U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer as a major element in the Violence Against Children Act.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A dozen members of a violent street gang calling itself PPHG, meaning "Pimps, Players, Hustlers and Gangsters" have been convicted in her death, and many of them were sent to state prison on charges ranging from murder to conspiracy and attempted murder in the wounding of Mynisha's then 15-year-old sister.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Mynisha's death continues to weigh heavily on me," said Boxer, a California Democrat, "and as I said at the time of her death, I won't forget her as we work to protect children from violence."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mynisha died Nov. 13, 2005, during Sunday dinner when her family's apartment was riddled in a hail of bullets from revenge-seeking gang members who were given the wrong address.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Her killing ignited a huge public outcry in San Bernardino against crime and violence. It manifested itself in candlelight vigils, hundreds of people taking part in peace walks and the creation of Mynisha's Circle, an organization of individuals, religious leaders, public officials and public agencies dedicated to solving societal problems that led to Mynisha's death.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When her legislation died without being signed into law by then-President George W. Bush, Boxer introduced Mynisha's law as standalone legislation in January, after the new Congress was seated, and wrapped it into the comprehensive Violence Against Children Act she introduced Friday. The earlier measure is still active, increasing its chances of making it into law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A staff member in Boxer's office would not speculate on either measure's likely success, but its chances would seem much better in the Democratic-controlled Congress and with President Barack Obama in the White House.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Deputy District Attorney Ron Webster, who prosecuted "the dirty dozen" gangsters, said, "The trial was a real challenge. We had people who were afraid to speak" because of gang intimidation. Speaking of Mynisha, Webster said, "It's so much worse when it's an uninvolved child. It's not tolerated by the community and it's not tolerated by us."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0179</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer on DOE Loans for Fuel Efficient Vehicles</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0178</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48754032-senator-boxer-on-doe-loans-for-fuel-efficient-vehicles"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;June 23, 2009 -- Washington, DC &amp;ndash; U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today lauded U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) Secretary Steven Chu&amp;rsquo;s announcement that San Carlos-based Tesla Motors will receive $465 million as part of the first loans made under DOE&amp;rsquo;s Advanced Technology Vehicles Manufacturingloan program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senator Boxer spoke with Secretary Chu earlier this year and pressed him to quicklyapprove loans under this program.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Tesla was awarded two loans: one to help finance a manufacturing facility for Tesla&amp;rsquo;s Model S, a full-size electric sedan with a fuel efficiency equivalent of more than 250 miles per gallon; and the other to support an integrated-manufacturing facility that will build battery packs and electric drive trains for Tesla as well as other car companies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DOE estimates these loans will help create 1,650 jobs in California &amp;ndash; 650 are expected to be created at the Bay Area facility and the remaining 1,000 in Southern California.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senator Boxer said, &amp;ldquo;I am so pleased that Secretary Chu agreed to my strong request to release these funds that have sat idle for far too long. This is a huge win for California. These loans will create jobs building the next generation of fuel efficient cars here in America, help wean our nation off of foreign oil, and reduce dangerous greenhouse gas emissions.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;For more information on the program and other awards announced today, visit DOE&amp;rsquo;s website.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0178</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sierra Club Announces Endorsement of Sen. Boxer for Reelection</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0177</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: justify;"&gt;Today, the Sierra Club announced that it has endorsed U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer for reelection in 2010.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: justify;"&gt;"Senator Boxer has been a leader to protect the environment for decades," said Allison Chin, President of the national Sierra Club. "As the Chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, she has even more clout to reduce the threat of global warming, promote green jobs and ensure that we have a safe and healthy environment for future generations."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: justify;"&gt;"The Sierra Club has been my partner on so many issues, from protecting wilderness to strengthening drinking water standards. &amp;nbsp;I'm proud to have their endorsement and look forward to engaging Sierra Club members in my campaign," said Senator Boxer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: justify;"&gt;The Sierra Club is one of the nation's leading environmental organizations, with more than 750,000 members nationwide. Headquartered in San Francisco, the Sierra Club has more than 170,000 members in California.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: justify;"&gt;The Sierra Club joins a broad coalition of organizations and individuals supporting Boxer, including firefighters, sheriffs, nurses, technology industry leaders, agricultural leaders and elected officials. &amp;nbsp; &amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="text-align: justify;"&gt;Boxer was first elected to the Senate in 1992. She is running for reelection to a fourth term in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0177</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer Pushes EPA to Reveal 'High Hazard' Coal Ash Sites</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0176</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/gwire/2009/06/12/12greenwire-sen-boxer-pushes-epa-to-reveal-high-hazard-coa-97781.html"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Eric Bontrager and Greenwire&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senate Environment and Public Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) is calling on U.S. EPA to reveal the confidential locations of dozens of coal ash impoundment sites considered dangerous.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking with reporters this morning, Boxer said EPA has determined that at least 44 of the hundreds of coal ash piles identified across the country pose a "high hazard," meaning they could threaten human life if they fail -- like an impoundment that collapsed at a Tennessee Valley Authority facility late last year. The agency collected the information on the locations from the utility companies that operate the ash disposal sites.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer said EPA is notifying and working with first responders this week while conducting evaluations at the sites to determine whether there is an imminent threat of failure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Boxer said EPA told her the agency could not reveal the location of these 44 sites, due to concerns from the Department of Homeland Security and the Army Corps of Engineers about national security, a decision Boxer finds unsettling.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"If these sites are so hazardous, and if the neighborhoods nearby could be harmed irreparably, then I believe it is essential to let people know," she said. "I think secrecy might lead to inaction."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer and her committee staff have been informed of the locations of the sites, and she was permitted to inform only the senators whose states have the high hazard sites about their locations, she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She told reporters she is sending a letter to EPA, DHS, and the Army Corps today asking whether the public disclosure of the hazardous coal ash waste sites is consistent with the treatment of other hazardous sites, noting that locations of Superfund sites, power plants and other sites are common knowledge.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"There's really no need to do this," Boxer said, pledging to hold more committee hearings on coal ash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Concern about the threat of another coal ash accident has been mounting since last year's TVA spill, in which a retention pond at the power utility's Kingston Fossil Plant collapsed and loosed 1.1 billion gallons of ash and sludge over Roane County, Tenn.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The spill is expected to cost more than $1 billion to clean up and has prompted a renewed call for tougher regulations on coal ash impoundments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;EPA Administrator Lisa Jackson has said the agency will propose coal ash regulations by the end of the year and will determine whether to reclassify byproducts of coal combustion as hazardous waste.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer dismissed suggestions that there may be a need for a bill to mandate tougher regulations on coal ash storage, because she was confident EPA would do it on its own.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"They don't need legislation if they do their job," she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0176</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>California Nurses Support Boxer</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0175</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The California Nurses Association today announced its endorsement of U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer for reelection in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Senator Boxer has been an outstanding advocate for nurses and patients, and for quality&amp;nbsp;health care for all Americans," said Rose Ann DeMoro, executive director of the California Nurses Association. "She understands the crucial role that nurses play in&amp;nbsp;keeping Americans healthy. Californians need Barbara Boxer in the Senate and we intend&amp;nbsp;to keep her there."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The California Nurses Association represents more than 80,000 nurses at 170 health care&amp;nbsp;facilities and is one of the fastest growing health care organizations in the country. "Nurses are on the frontlines of patient care every day. I'm proud to have their active&amp;nbsp;support in my reelection campaign," said Senator Boxer.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The California Nurses Association joins a broad coalition of organizations and&amp;nbsp;individuals supporting Boxer, including firefighters, sheriffs, technology industry leaders&amp;nbsp;and elected officials.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer was first elected to the Senate in 1992. She is running for reelection to a fourth&amp;nbsp;term in 2010.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0175</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Statement on the Murder of Dr. George Tiller</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0174</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://yubanet.com/opinions/Boxer-Statement-on-the-Murder-of-Dr-George-Tiller.php" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;YubaNet.com&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I send my condolences to Dr. Tiller's family, friends and patients who relied on him.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"The debate over abortion rights is very difficult and reaches deep into religion, philosophy and one's view of Roe v. Wade.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Everyone has the right to work for changes in the law. But to assault a health care worker, a patient or anyone else because of a disagreement about an issue, regardless of how contentious, brings all of humanity down into a dark pit of violence.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Such actions must not be tolerated.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Many women have attested to Dr. Tiller's steadfast advocacy for women's health care and reproductive rights. Even in the face of repeated acts of harassment and violence, he remained true to the law and worked to provide women with a safe place to turn.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"Today, we must renew our commitment to work together, across the religious and ideological spectrum, to find common ground and resolve our differences in a peaceful and responsible way."&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0174</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sheriffs Stand Up For Boxer</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0173</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;In recognition of her record of fighting to strengthen public safety, today a bipartisan group of sheriffs from across California endorsed U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer for re-election to the Senate in 2010.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I am so honored to have the early support of this group of sheriffs who have done so much for our state," said Senator Boxer.&amp;nbsp; "I look forward to continuing my work with sheriffs and other law enforcement leaders to keep Californians safe."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sheriffs endorsing Boxer today are:&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Tom Allman, Mendocino County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Lee Baca, Los Angeles County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Adam Christianson, Stanislaus County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Bill Cogbill, Sonoma County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Robert Doyle, Marin County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Michael Hennessey, San Francisco County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Mike Kanalakis, Monterey County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ray Loera, Imperial County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Steve Moore, San Joaquin County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Greg Munks, San Mateo County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Ed Prieto, Yolo County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; Phil Wowak, Santa Cruz County Sheriff&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"We need Senator Boxer in the Senate.&amp;nbsp; From train stations to our ports, she has been a real leader on homeland security," said Sheriff Baca. "Senator Boxer understands the importance of having a strong and fully funded program to incarcerate criminal aliens," added Sheriff Christianson. "Senator Boxer has a proven record of delivering funding for California counties in every part of the state," stated Sheriff Loera.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"You can tell Senator Boxer was once a County Supervisor. She's always been there when we needed a voice in Washington," said Sheriff Doyle. "I know Senator Boxer will keep fighting for federal assistance for sheriffs departments around the state as they work to deliver effective public safety programs," stated Sheriff Moore. "Senator Boxer has always come through for us when we needed help with the federal bureaucracy," observed Sheriff Prieto.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"When it comes to public safety, Senator Boxer is the strong ally we need in Washington," remarked Sheriff Munks. "Senator Boxer has been very responsive and supportive of very critical public safety needs. She understands that public safety is a cornerstone of our country and supports our goal of keeping communities safe by helping us keep cops on the street," commented Sheriff Allman. "Senator Boxer has been a champion for more funding for critical law enforcement needs for counties across the state," said Sheriff Cogbill.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I am happy to support Senator Boxer because she really understands the needs of sheriffs who are on the front lines in the fight to reduce gang violence," said Sheriff Wowak. "Senator Boxer has always stood with us as we have worked to keep the people of California safe," declared Sheriff Hennessey. "I support Senator Boxer because she has worked to make the federal government an effective partner with local law enforcement," noted Sheriff Kanalakis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After ten years in the House of Representatives, Senator Boxer was first elected to the Senate in 1992. She is running for reelection to a fourth term in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0173</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Feinstein, Boxer praise judicial nominee</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0172</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2009/may/27/feinstein-boxer-praise-judicial-nominee/"&gt;Link to Article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Michael Collins&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Ventura County Star&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON &amp;mdash; California Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein lauded President Obama&amp;rsquo;s choice of Sonia Sotomayor for a seat on the U.S. Supreme Court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer described Sotomayor, a federal appeals court judge with more than 15 years on the bench, as a &amp;ldquo;highly qualified woman&amp;rdquo; who will bring diversity to the court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;With eight men, one woman and no Hispanics currently sitting on the court, President Obama listened to voices like former Justice Sandra Day O&amp;rsquo;Connor in recognizing that diversity on the bench is essential,&amp;rdquo; Boxer said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer said Sotomayor is &amp;ldquo;an exemplary and compelling individual&amp;rdquo; who has a history of bipartisan support. She was first nominated to the bench by President George H.W. Bush and has been confirmed twice by the Senate with overwhelming support.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Judge Sotomayor&amp;rsquo;s life story serves as an inspiration, not just to every Hispanic and woman, but to every American, because in this country, if you work hard, you can reach your dreams,&amp;rdquo; Boxer said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Feinstein called Sotomayor &amp;ldquo;a very solid and tested woman&amp;rdquo; and noted she served as a New York City prosecutor before she was named to the federal bench.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Feinstein said that, while there will be those who will try to delay the nomination, &amp;ldquo;I believe it is important that she has a clear opportunity for a fair and open nomination process and that her nomination can move rapidly to the floor of the Senate and be confirmed.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara, said Sotomayor is &amp;ldquo;highly qualified, intelligent and experienced.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Her life story is a testament to the power of the America Dream and the ability of all Americans to achieve success through hard work and determination,&amp;rdquo; Capps said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0172</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: 'Back to Square One' for California's Same-Sex Couples</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0171</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://washingtonindependent.com/44449/boxer-back-to-square-one-for-californias-same-sex-couples"&gt;Link to Article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Mike Lillis&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Washington Independent&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following is Sen. Barbara Boxer&amp;rsquo;s (D-Calif.) response to today&amp;rsquo;s California Supreme Court decision upholding the state&amp;rsquo;s recently renewed ban on same-sex marriage.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Unfortunately, with this decision, I am concerned that we are back to square one on the issue of equal rights for same-sex couples. This ruling sets up a very unfair reality in California where some same-sex couples will have their marriages affirmed, while many more will be denied their fundamental rights. I remain committed to working actively with people across the state to make sure that same-sex couples have equal rights under the law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The emerging concern, as Boxer points out, is that the ruling will create a tiered class system of gay couples in California &amp;mdash; a sort-of layered arrangement in which one group is afforded the dignity of having their relationship recognized as legitimate and another which doesn&amp;rsquo;t. Not that grandfathering is an unusual concept in our society, but this grandfathering of civil rights &amp;mdash; while eliminating them for future generations &amp;mdash; is bound to be headed for a direct confrontation with the Constitution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0171</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Response to Sotomayor court choice spans spectrum</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0169</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usatoday.com/news/washington/judicial/2009-05-26-sotomayor-reaction_N.htm"&gt;Link to Article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By John Bacon&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;USA Today&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reaction to the Supreme Court nomination of federal appeals Judge Sonia Sotomayor on Tuesday spanned the spectrum of opinion, from rave reviews to thumbs down to let's wait and see.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Senate could decide this summer on the fate of President Obama's pick to replace retiring Justice David Souter. Many Republicans on Tuesday counseled patience and fair scrutiny.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele said Republicans "will reserve judgment on Sonia Sotomayor until there has been a thorough and thoughtful examination of her legal views.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Sen. John Cornyn, a Texas Republican and member of Judiciary Committee that will hold hearings on the nomination, said Sotomayor "must prove her commitment to impartially deciding cases based on the law, rather than based on her own personal politics, feelings, and preferences."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Another Republican judiciary member, Iowa Sen. Chuck Grassley, promised tough questioning on the role of the court.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Today the Senate can't just be a rubber stamp for President Obama's nominees," Grassley said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sotomayor drew plenty of support from Democrats. Manhattan District Attorney Robert Morgenthau was Sotomayor's boss when she served as a prosecutor from 1979 to 1984. Moganthau called her "an outstanding choice" who would be centrist much like Souter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He credited her "wisdom, intelligence, collegiality, and good character needed to fill the position for which she has been nominated.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"It is a credit to the President, and indeed to the United States, that an individual born in humble circumstances in the South Bronx can, simply by dint of talent and hard work, rise to be recognized as the right candidate for a seat on the highest Court in the land."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Vermont Democrat Patrick Leahy, chairman of the Judiciary Committee, said that "when confirmed," Sotomayor will serve "in the mold of Justice Souter, who understands the real-world impact of the Court's decisions, rather than the mold of the conservative activists who second-guess Congress, and who through judicial extremism undercut laws meant to protect Americans from discrimination."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sen. John Kerry, D-Mass., said Sotomayor blends "an excellent mind coupled with real world empathy but also passes Justice Potter Stewart's famous test of someone who is neither liberal nor conservative but simply a great judge."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer said "Sotomayor's life story serves as an inspiration, not just to every Hispanic and woman, but to every American, because in this country if you work hard, you can reach your dreams."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Wendy Long, counsel to the conservative Judicial Confirmation Network, called Sotomayor "a liberal judicial activist of the first order who thinks her own personal political agenda is more important than the law as written."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Long accused Sotomayor of excessive judicial activism and said the judge believes sex, race, and ethnicity should have an impact in decision making.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"She reads racial preferences and quotas into the Constitution, even to the point of dishonoring those who preserve our public safety," Long said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She also said Sotomayor has an "extremely high rate of her decisions being reversed," which long attributed to liberal activism.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Jay Sekulow, chief counsel of the conservative American Center for Law and Justice called the nomination an "aggressive decision that the president has made that's going to trigger a national debate on the issue of judicial activism and the role of the judiciary."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He added that the hefty Democratic majority would make it "very difficult to mount a successful challenge &amp;hellip; but we are 30 minutes into this, and it's just too early to tell."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0169</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer statement on House committee approval of Waxman-Markey bill</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0170</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sbsun.com/news/ci_12444521"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to Article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Bernadino County Sun&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, this past week made the following remarks on the House Energy and Commerce Committee's passage of H.R. 2454, "The American Clean Energy and Security Act."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The "vote in the House Energy and Commerce Committee is an historic step toward a new clean energy economy that creates millions of American jobs, breaks our dangerous dependence on foreign oil and reduces the pollution that causes global warming," Boxer said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"As soon as we return from recess, we will hold a series of briefings on the Waxman-Markey bill as we carry out our strategy for the Senate."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Waxman-Markey billwould limit greenhouse gases by putting a price on heat-trapping pollution.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0170</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senators Feinstein and Boxer Introduce Measure to Increase the Supply of Non-Drinking Water for California's Bay Area</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0168</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48752294-senators-feinstein-and-boxer-introduce-measure-to-increase-the-supply-of-non-dri#" target="_blank"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;AllAmericanPatriot.com&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Senators Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer (both D-Calif.) have reintroduced a bill to increase the supply of non-drinking water for California's Bay Area. Similar legislation was introduced by Senators Feinstein and Boxer in the 110th Congress.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically, the bill would help six Bay Area communities increase their municipal water supplies through innovative and much-needed water recycling projects. It would make six additional Bay Area recycled water projects eligible for a 25 percent federal cost-share, and increase the authorization levels for two more, totaling $38,075,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The activities authorized by the new legislation include installing new piping, storage tanks, and pump stations to convey the recycled water to a number of cities across the Bay Area. These projects collectively will save 2.6 billion gallons per year of regional water supply by providing a new water supply of clean treated wastewater for irrigation and industrial use. It will free up the amount needed to supply 24,225 households in the growing Bay Area region. And to the regional agencies, over 3,500 local green jobs will be supported by this legislation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"California is facing phenomenal water supply challenges that are affecting our economy, our communities and our environment. Our water infrastructure is woefully out of date. Drought, population growth, climate variability, ecosystem needs and a broken Delta are making it even more difficult to manage our water system and deliver reliable supplies," Senator Feinstein said. "Increasing the capability for, and use of, recycled water will help address California's cycles of drought and reduce dependence on water from the troubled Bay-Delta ecosystem. The adoption of water recycling technology is an invaluable conservation method which will result in 8,000 acre-feet of new and reliable water &amp;ndash; and reduce demand on fresh water from the Delta."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Providing a clean, safe and sufficient water supply is a tremendous challenge in California &amp;ndash; one that affects our cities, our agricultural economy and our natural resources," Senator Boxer said. "California is currently in the grip of an unprecedented drought, and our state's water supply will continue to be impacted by climate change. Recycled water represents a tremendous opportunity to improve the reliability and quality of water supplies for communities across California."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The following projects are included in the bill:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;ul&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Central Dublin Recycled Water Distribution and Retrofit Project&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Petaluma Recycled Water Project&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Central Redwood City Recycled Water Project&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Palo Alto Recycled Water Pipeline Project&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Ironhouse Sanitary District-Antioch Recycled Water Project&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Central Contra Costa Sanitary District-Concord Recycled Water Project&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;Antioch Recycled Water Project (project adjustment)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;South Bay Advanced Recycled Water Treatment Facility (project adjustment)&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Companion legislation was introduced in the House on May 14, 2009, by Representatives Anna Eshoo (D-Calif.), Mike Honda (D-Calif.), Zoe Lofgren (D-Calif.), Jerry McNerney(D-Calif.), George Miller (D-Calif.), Jackie Speier (D-Calif.), Pete Stark (D-Calif.), Ellen Tauscher (D-Calif.), and Lynn Woolsey (D-Calif.).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0168</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sonoma Coast Ocean Sanctuary Clears Senate Hurdle</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0167</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pressdemocrat.com/article/20090520/ARTICLES/905209875/1350?Title=Sonoma-Coast-ocean-sanctuary-clears-Senate-hurdle"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to Article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By Paul Payne&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Press Democrat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A national marine sanctuary bill from California&amp;rsquo;s two Democratic senators that would permanently ban off-shore oil drilling along the 76-mile Sonoma County coast and part of the Mendocino coast cleared a key committee Wednesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill from Sens. Barbara Boxer and Diane Feinstein would expand existing sanctuaries near the Gulf of the Farallones and the Cordell Bank by taking in an additional 2,100 square miles from Bodega Bay north to Point Arena.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It passed the Senate Commerce Committee despite Republican opposition and will go to the full Senate, where last year it was blocked by critics who said it would increase the country&amp;rsquo;s dependence on foreign oil. A companion bill from Rep. Lynn Woolsey was approved in the House last year and is now back in a House subcommittee for reconsideration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We stand a much better chance of passing a sanctuaries bill this year because the Senate is more Democratic and we have an administration that cares about preserving the health of our oceans,&amp;rdquo; said Michael Gravitz, a lobbyist for Environment America, who has been urging the legislation for more than two years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California has two other marine sanctuaries &amp;mdash; near the Channel Islands and at Monterey Bay. The Boxer-Feinstein measure would bring in a new area the size of Delaware, protecting the Russian and Gualala river estuaries and the nutrient-rich Bodega Canyon.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It comes after President George Bush &amp;mdash; in one of his last acts before leaving office &amp;mdash; lifted a 1990 ban on offshore oil drilling and proposed a series of lease sales, including one in an area off Mendocino County and others in Southern California.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Obama administration officials delayed action on the proposals and are developing their own energy strategy that could involve drilling for gas and oil and harnessing wind and waves.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In April, Interior Secretary Ken Salazar traveled to the Bay Area gauging public sentiment, which is heavily against offshore drilling. He said the administration will announce later this year if any coastal areas will be opened to oil development. He also cautioned that some drilling was necessary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The sanctuary measure would prevent oil rigs from appearing within 50 miles of the Sonoma coast and the southern tip of the Mendocino coast.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Gravitz said the region is one of the world&amp;rsquo;s most productive ecosystems, critical to sea life up to 300 miles away. Whales, turtles and nesting birds as far south as Monterey depend on its continued good health, which would be preserved under the legislation, Gravitz said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;In a way, it&amp;rsquo;s like protecting the headwaters of a stream,&amp;rdquo; Gravitz said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In addition to scientists, the bill is supported by the fishing industry because it poses no additional limits on commercial or recreational fishing. It is seen as a way to protect fish stocks and those who rely on them for their livelihood.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The measure also has had support from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, the State Lands Commission, the Coastal Commission and the counties of Marin, Sonoma, Mendocino, and San Francisco, according to news accounts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s my hope that we will be able to secure passage of this legislation by the full Senate in the coming weeks and months,&amp;rdquo; Feinstein said in a joint news release.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0167</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Obama to Issue Auto Emissions Standards Similar to Those California Wants</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0166</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.venturacountystar.com/news/2009/may/19/obama-to-issue-auto-emissions-standards-similar/"&gt;Link to Article&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Michael Collins&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Ventura County Star&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a move hailed by environmentalists, President Barack Obama will announce today that his administration is issuing tough new auto emissions standards that closely mirror those California has been trying to put in place for years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new rules, endorsed by California and the auto industry, would force carmakers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions in new cars and trucks by 30 percent by 2016 and will be paired with new federal fuel efficiency standards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It will mark the first time that limits on greenhouse gas emissions have been linked to federal fuel standards for cars and trucks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;It&amp;rsquo;s going to be nothing short of tectonic in terms of the shift in how we do things,&amp;rdquo; said Frank O&amp;rsquo;Donnell, executive director of the environmental group Clean Air Watch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger&amp;rsquo;s office confirmed Monday that he will be in Washington for today&amp;rsquo;s announcement, along with auto executives and various officials from other states.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;State Sen. Fran Pavley, D-Agoura Hills, who wrote California&amp;rsquo;s landmark emissions law, also was expected to be on hand for the announcement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California and 13 other states have been trying for years to get the federal government&amp;rsquo;s permission to let them impose the 30 percent rule, but their efforts had been blocked by the Bush administration.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The California Legislature passed tough new emissions rules for cars and trucks in 2002, but the state had been unable to implement them without a waiver from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. Under the Bush administration, the EPA refused to grant the waiver, saying the state did not have &amp;ldquo;compelling and extraordinary&amp;rdquo; conditions to set its own standards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But one week after taking office, Obama ordered the EPA to re-examine whether California and other states should be allowed to set their own standards.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By imposing a nationwide rule, the Obama administration managed to get California, other states and the auto industry to sign off on the tougher standards and will avoid a patchwork of rules the carmakers had argued would be difficult to meet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The new federal standard will move toward the 30 percent goal by 2016, starting with model years 2011 and beyond.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The proposal is expected to coordinate two separate standards for fuel efficiency and greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles, aiming for cars that achieve higher miles per gallon and have lower polluting air conditioning systems, said Roland Hwang, the vehicles policy director for the Natural Resources Defense Council. The environmental group has discussed the upcoming changes with the White House in recent weeks, he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Hwang said he expected the greenhouse gas standard would be set to an equivalent of nearly 35 miles per gallon for the vehicle fleet by 2016.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A 2007 energy law requires carmakers to meet at least 35 mpg by 2020, a 40 percent increase over the current standard of about 25 mpg. Passenger car requirements have remained unchanged at 27.5 mpg since 1985, drawing complaints from environmental groups that the government has been slow to push automakers to produce more fuel-efficient vehicles.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Obama administration&amp;rsquo;s new rules would require automakers to meet that 35 mpg standard four years earlier than required under the 2007 law.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Obama&amp;rsquo;s move also would effectively end litigation between states and automakers, who sought to block state-specific rules. The new federal rules would prompt automakers to drop their lawsuit.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One source said the EPA is expected to grant California its waiver, but the state would have to make some modifications to its rules to allow for compliance with the national standard.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Pavley called the federal-state agreement a &amp;ldquo;win win&amp;rdquo; for California and the nation.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;This cleans up our air, reduces dependence on foreign oil, and continues to allow California to lead the way on air quality, while at the same time encouraging a federal standard that will result in lower carbon emissions nationwide,&amp;rdquo; she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, who repeatedly battled the Bush administration over its refusal to grant California&amp;rsquo;s wavier, also welcomed the news.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;I am very pleased by the reports that the Obama administration has brought together the federal government, the state of California, and the auto industry behind new national automobile emissions standards that follow California&amp;rsquo;s lead,&amp;rdquo; said Boxer, D-Calif. and chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;This is good news for all of us who have fought long and hard to reduce global warming pollution, create clean energy jobs and reduce our dangerous dependence on foreign oil,&amp;rdquo; she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Rep. Lois Capps, D-Santa Barbara, called the new standards &amp;ldquo;historic&amp;rdquo; and said the agreement &amp;ldquo;confronts our nation&amp;rsquo;s addiction to oil head on.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;O&amp;rsquo;Donnell said the new national standards will mark a dramatic turnaround for the federal government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;For the last eight years prior to this administration, the federal government was actively fighting the state of California it its efforts to move forward on tougher emission standards,&amp;rdquo; he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;ldquo;Now what we are going to see is that California standard raising the bar nationally that will bring benefits not only to California but every state in the nation. It&amp;rsquo;s a real landmark move, and it&amp;rsquo;s an incredible sea change from the way things were being done by the Bush administration.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0166</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>That's 'Mrs. Boxer' to you</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0165</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0509/22664.html" target="_blank"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Patrick Gavin&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Politico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer has been in the U.S. Senate since 1992, so she's voted on enough issues that you might think you know everything there is to know about her.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But no picture of a politician is complete without POLITICO's AnswerThis, so the California Democrat agreed to put herself on the couch.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tell us your favorite joke.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I don&amp;rsquo;t know, but it&amp;rsquo;s definitely not a joke about short people.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;When's the last time you used profanity?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The last time I repeated a conversation I had with John Burton.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How many hours of sleep do you get (on average)?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Seven.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Describe your level of ambition.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It sounds clich&amp;eacute;, but being in the Senate and being chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee is it!&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;You're president of the United States for enough time to make only one executive decision. What is it?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Declare a zero-tolerance policy for crimes against children.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What's a common and accepted practice for Americans nowadays that you think we&amp;rsquo;ll look back on with regret?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Listening to Rush Limbaugh.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What is your favorite body part (on yourself) and why?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;My hair is a miracle. As my husband and I get older, his hair turns gray and mine turns blond!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What would you attempt to do if you knew that you could not fail?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Convince my friend Sen. Jim Inhofe that global warming is a grave danger to the planet.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On what types of products do you never go cheap?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Anything for my baby grandchildren.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Describe a few pet peeves of yours.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Republican filibusters. And when The New York Times calls me Ms. Boxer instead of Mrs. Boxer. I've been married for more than 40 years!&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;How often do you Google yourself?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Often. Google is a fantastic California company. Though sometimes I mistakenly get Google alerts about Oscar de la Hoya.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What do you know now that you wish someone had told you 10 years ago?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That Florida would decide the 2000 election. I would have made every Democrat I'd ever met move to Florida.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;What childhood event shaped or scarred you the most?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Witnessing African-Americans having to go to the back of the bus in Florida in the '50s both shaped and scarred me.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Would you rather live without music or without TV?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;TV. But I would miss "Curb Your Enthusiasm."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Would you rather be gossiped about or never talked about at all?&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;I hate gossip.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Think of one of your least favorite people in Washington and, without naming names, describe what makes that person so unappealing.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lack of a sense of humor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Let your mother know how much she means to you, in the form of a haiku.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Words in any form could never convey my love for my parents.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0165</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Congress introduces bill to honor Japanese-American vets</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 15 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0164</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.publicradio.org/columns/kpcc/kpccnewsinbrief/2009/05/congress-introduces-bill-to-ho.html" target="_blank"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Kitty Felde&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;KPCC, Southern California Public Radio&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;As Memorial Day approaches, Congress is taking steps to honor two of the most decorated combat units of the Second World War. These veterans fought for their country while their families spent the war in internment camps. KPCC&amp;rsquo;s Washington Correspondent Kitty Felde reports.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Kitty Felde&lt;/strong&gt;: After the Japanese navy bombed Pearl Harbor, more than 1,400 Japanese-American men in Hawaii volunteered to fight for the U.S. The 100th Infantry Battalion was sent to Italy, where it became known as the "Purple Heart Battalion."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nearly two out of three soldiers in the unit were killed. The Army was so impressed with the unit's fighting spirit, it recruited Japanese-Americans from California and other mainland states and formed the equally distinguished 442nd Regimental Combat Team.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This week, the House of Representatives unanimously approved a bill introduced by Democratic Congressman Adam Schiff of Burbank. It would award both units the Congressional Gold Medal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California Democrat Barbara Boxer introduced a companion bill in the Senate. Soldiers from these units have earned numerous awards for their valor, including 21 Medals of Honor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0164</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Fraternal Order of Police Endorses Boxer for Re-Election</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 14 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0163</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Citing her long record of support for law enforcement, the California State Lodge, Fraternal Order of Police announced today that they have endorsed U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer for reelection.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"We are proud to support Senator Boxer and her untiring fight to end the violence on our streets and illegal drugs in our communities that threaten the safety and security of every American," said Roger D. Mayberry, President of the California State Lodge, Fraternal Order of Police. "It is with great pleasure that we support her reelection to the Senate."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senator Boxer responded, "I am grateful for the support from the members of the Fraternal Order of Police who put their lives on the line every day to keep our streets safe. I look forward to continuing my work in the Senate to ensure that we do everything we can to improve public safety."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Fraternal Order of Police is the world&amp;rsquo;s largest organization of sworn law enforcement officers, with more than 325,000 members nationwide.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;After serving 10 years in the House of Representatives, Senator Boxer was first elected to the Senate in 1992. &amp;nbsp;She is running for reelection to a fourth term in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0163</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senators Boxer, Kit Bond trying to save Boeing C-17</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 12 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0162</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailybreeze.com/business/ci_12353817" target="_blank"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;DailyBreeze.com&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer and Kit Bond announced growing bipartisan support to save the Long Beach-built Boeing C-17.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer, D-Calif., and Bond, R-Mo., issued a statement saying 17 of their Senate colleagues signed onto a letter asking the Senate Appropriations Committee to find funding for the airlifter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A similar letter-writing effort led by local Reps. Laura Richardson, D-Long Beach, and Dana Rohrabacher, R-Huntington Beach, is underway in the House of Representatives. Defense Secretary Robert Gates has said the military has enough C-17s to meet its needs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0162</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pick a Woman, Snowe and Boxer tell Obama</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0161</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2009/05/11/pick-a-woman-snowe-and-boxer-tell-obama/" target="_blank"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;CNN Political Ticker&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sens. Barbara Boxer of California, a Democrat, and Olympia Snowe of Maine, a Republican, sent the following letter to President Obama Monday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The President&lt;br /&gt;The White House&lt;br /&gt;Washington, DC 20500&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dear Mr. President:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The announced retirement of United States Supreme Court Justice David Souter&amp;mdash;an outstanding jurist&amp;mdash;has left you with the crucial task of nominating someone for a lifetime appointment to our nation&amp;rsquo;s highest bench.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The most important thing is to nominate an exceptionally well-qualified, intelligent person to replace Justice Souter &amp;ndash; and we are convinced that person should be a woman.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Women make up more than half of our population, but right now hold only one seat out of nine on the United States Supreme Court. This is out of balance. In order for the Court to be relevant, it needs to be diverse and better reflect America.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mr. President, we look forward with great anticipation to your choice for the Supreme Court vacancy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/blockquote&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0161</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Statement of Senator Barbara Boxer on Propositions 1A and 1B</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0160</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;"California&amp;rsquo;s budget process is broken. It's time for California to join the vast majority of states and reform the two-thirds requirement for adopting the budget. However, until we make this crucial reform, I will be supporting Propositions 1A and 1B on the May 19 ballot. These two measures will help get California back on track, while protecting our investment in education."&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0160</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Firefighters Endorse Boxer</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0157</link>
    <description>&lt;h3&gt;California Firefighters Applaud Boxer's Record&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer has won the support of the California Professional Firefighters (CPF) in her bid to win reelection. &amp;nbsp;CPF represents more than 30,000 California career firefighters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"We need Senator Boxer in the Senate. &amp;nbsp;She understands the needs of first responders," said Lou Paulson, President of CPF. "With Senator Boxer's support, federal programs have provided critically needed safety equipment and training to protect the public and the health and safety of firefighters."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I am thrilled to have the support of California's firefighters, who put their lives on the line every day to keep us safe," Boxer said. "I look forward to continuing my work in the Senate to make sure that fire departments have the resources they need to respond to emergencies."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senator Boxer was first elected to the Senate in 1992 after serving 10 years in the House of Representatives. She is running for re-election to the Senate in 2010.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0157</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer applauds federal funding to fight wildfires</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0159</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydesert.com/article/20090505/NEWS01/90505044/Barbara+Boxer+applauds+federal+funding+to+fight+wildfires" target="_blank"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Keith Matheny&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Desert News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer today lauded Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack&amp;rsquo;s announcement that more than $31 million for hazardous fuels reduction will be available to California as part of the recently passed economic recovery package.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"My home state of California is home to 85 million acres of wildland and last year experienced some of the most devastating wildfires in our history, burning more than 1.4 million acres," said Boxer, a part-time Rancho Mirage resident.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"This week is Wildfire Awareness Week in California, and I am so pleased that this timely stimulus funding will invest in projects to reduce fire risk and help Californians protect our communities and public lands."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The funds are part of $223 million in the economic recovery package to reduce the volume of hazardous fuels on federal forests and grasslands and on lands owned by states, local governments and private organizations. Activities will include tree thinning, removal of competing vegetation, planting native species, and constructing new stream channels and ponds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The package calls for nearly $9 million for the San Bernardino-Riverside County Partners Fuels Project in the San Bernardino National Forest.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer introduced the Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement (FLAME) Act last year to establish a separate federal fund to help cover the costs of fighting catastrophic wildfires and to prevent those wildfires from draining funds meant for responsible lands management and hazardous fuels reduction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The FLAME Act passed in the House of Representatives on March 26. The legislation has since been reintroduced in the Senate, with Senator Boxer as an original co-sponsor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0159</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Applauds Funding for Wildfire Prevention</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0158</link>
    <description>&lt;h3&gt;White House Announces More than $31 million for California&lt;/h3&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Yubanet.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://yubanet.com/regional/Boxer-Applauds-Funding-for-Wildfire-Prevention.php" target="_blank"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today lauded Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack's announcement that more than $31 million for hazardous fuels reduction will be available to California as part of the recently passed economic recovery package. In addition, today's announcement includes almost $4 million in funding for hazardous fuels mitigation that will be shared by California and Nevada.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senator Boxer said, "My home state of California is home to 85 million acres of wildland and last year experienced some of the most devastating wildfires in our history, burning more than 1.4 million acres. This week is Wildfire Awareness Week in California, and I am so pleased that this timely stimulus funding will invest in projects to reduce fire risk and help Californians protect our communities and public lands."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Specifically, these funds are part of $223 million in the economic recovery package to reduce the volume of hazardous fuels on Federal forests and grasslands and on lands owned by States, local governments, private organizations. Activities will include thinning, removal of competing vegetation, planting native species, and constructing new stream channels and ponds.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senator Boxer introduced the Federal Land Assistance, Management and Enhancement (FLAME) Act in 2008 to establish a separate federal fund to help cover the costs of fighting catastrophic wildfires and to prevent those wildfires from draining funds meant for responsible lands management and hazardous fuels reduction. The FLAME Act passed in the House of Representatives on March 26, 2009. The legislation has since been reintroduced in the Senate, with Senator Boxer as an original co-sponsor.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senator Boxer said, "This funding in the Recovery Act starts to address the issue raised in my bill &amp;mdash; the critical need to prevent forest fires."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;According to the Department of Agriculture, the $31 million in California will be used as follows:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hazardous Fuels Reduction in Sierra Nevada Range $10,700,000&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;San Bernardino, Riverside County Partners Fuels Project in San Bernardino National Forest $8,973,000&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Regionwide Fuels Reduction/Urban Tree planting projects $6,012,000&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Lake Tahoe Basin Management Unit Partners Fuels Project $3,589,000&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Hazardous Fuels Reduction in the Humboldt- Toiyabe National Forest $1,711,000&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Airborne remote sensing/ fuels mapping in Orange County/ Riverside Counties to target fuels reduction projects $400,000&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0158</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Key Technology Leaders Line Up For Boxer</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0156</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;Tech Leaders for Boxer Co-Chairs Announced&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than a year before the 2010 primary, United States Senator Barbara Boxer has earned the early support of three prominent Silicon Valley technology leaders in her campaign for re-election.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Safra Catz, President and CFO of Oracle; John Chambers, Chairman and CEO of Cisco Systems; and John Doerr, partner at Kleiner Perkins Caufield &amp;amp; Byers each agreed to serve as co-chairs of the new Technology Leaders for Boxer committee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"We need Barbara Boxer in the Senate to help California technology companies stay competitive in the global marketplace. &amp;nbsp;She is a strong advocate for investment in education and job training to increase the capacity of our workforce. Senator Boxer understands the unique incentives that help our industry keep creating jobs," said Catz.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Senator Boxer has a deep understanding of the policy issues facing the technology industry. She is widely recognized in Silicon Valley as an effective leader on everything from research and development incentives to intellectual property protection," added Chambers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Senator Boxer understands the needs of Californians and the country. &amp;nbsp;She knows that economic recovery is our most important challenge and is leading the way to create green jobs, encourage new innovations and increase our productivity through investments in a new energy economy," noted Doerr.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I am proud to receive early support from these extraordinary Silicon Valley leaders," said Boxer. "California's technology industry is an economic engine for our state and a global leader in innovation. I am honored to have a vote of confidence from this bipartisan group in my re-election campaign."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Technology Leaders for Boxer will be reaching out to other Silicon Valley leaders to build support for Boxer's re-election. Boxer was first elected to the Senate in 1992 after serving 10 years in the House of Representatives and is running for re-election in 2010.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0156</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Capturing The Elusive Dog and Baby Blocs</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 27 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0151</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Hotline&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Announcing her bid for a fourth term, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D) is "warning" Dem supporters to get ready for a tough one. During the state party convention 4/25, said "she's ready for what could be her toughest race yet" against McCain Victory '08 chair/ex-HP CEO Carly Fiorina (R). Boxer said she expects attacks from special interests, but said "she's not afraid to stand up to anyone," including Dick Cheney (AP, 4/25).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;San Francisco Chronicle's Wildermuth writes, while most CAers thought she was "already running," and "her campaign website has been up and running for months," the formal announcement gave Boxer "a chance to plug her new line of campaign clothes." New Boxer swag included "Babies for Boxer" bibs and "neckware for dogs." Boxer: "You should buy new Boxer merchandise so you can be on the cutting edge of fashion."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer, a "fierce campaigner" also "warned" potential challengers: "I hope no one runs against me. ... You'll face a tough race and I'll win re-election. So think about it." ("Politics 101," 4/25).&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0151</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: Get ready for tough re-election bid</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 25 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0152</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2009/04/25/state/n130603D03.DTL" target="_blank"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By JUDY LIN, AP&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer on Saturday warned her Democratic supporters to prepare for a tough re-election campaign next year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer, announcing her bid for a fourth term during the California Democratic Party convention in Sacramento, told delegates to anticipate attacks by special interest groups.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Even though she easily won re-election in 1998 and 2004, Boxer has been a consistent target of Republicans because of her relatively liberal views. She attributed the animosity she generates from conservatives to being unafraid to stand up to anybody, including former Vice President Dick Cheney.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer, 68, said she will be ready for what could be her toughest race yet if former Hewlett-Packard Co. chief executive Carly Fiorina joins the race on the Republican ticket. Last month, Fiorina said she was "seriously considering" a run for office.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She has not spoken publicly about her intentions since then but news reports suggest her interest would be in Boxer's seat. The 54-year-old Republican was an economic adviser to GOP presidential nominee John McCain last year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Don't believe anyone who says that our race will be easy. Our races are never easy," Boxer told party delegates. "We don't know yet who our opponent will be, but we know it's going to be a hard race."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A spokeswoman for Fiorina, 54, declined comment Saturday. The one Republican who has announced a challenge to Boxer is state Assemblyman Chuck DeVore of Irvine.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DeVore, 46, a military officer and businessman, said he doesn't believe fundraising will be a problem since Boxer's fellow Democrats in the state Legislature were on the "verge of taxing hardworking Californians out of existence." DeVore said he looked forward to debating Boxer on California's most pressing issues.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;During a news conference after her speech, Boxer said she intends to win re-election no matter her opponent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"You are going to face a tough race, and I am going to get re-elected," Boxer said to her would-be competitors. "Well, that's my message for today, so think about it because it's going to be hard. It's going to be hard on me, but it's going to be hard on you."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The senator said she disagrees with Fiorina's position on salary caps for executives of companies receiving federal bailout money. Fiorina wrote in an opinion piece that President Barack Obama's plan to cap executive pay at $500,000 was shortsighted.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Instead, she proposed greater disclosure about bonuses and executive perks, including use of airplanes, cars and golf club memberships.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I don't agree with her answer, which is that the taxpayers have nothing at stake," Boxer said. "I believe if you're bust and you're broke and the taxpayers are keeping you alive, then until you pay us back, I believe you should not make more than the president of the United States."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The California Republican Party on Saturday sent an e-mail highlighting Boxer's vulnerabilities. It cited a recent Field Poll showing that 42 percent of registered voters surveyed believed she should be re-elected, while 43 percent said she should not be.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The same poll found her favorability rating at 59 percent.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer said she believes she has been an easy target of oil companies and polluting industries because of her unwillingness to compromise on preserving California's coastline.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The oil companies are not happy with me. That's very clear. And you know, the polluters, they have a lot of money," Boxer said. "That's the reason the special interests are very harsh on me. And they will be again."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;DeVore, who supports expanding drilling off the California coast, said technology has advanced since an oil spill off the coast of Santa Barbara nearly 40 years ago, making it safer to drill offshore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Unlike Barbara Boxer, I believe America needs to extract its own oil and gas, including Alaska and off the California coast," DeVore said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He said Boxer is wrong in her belief that tourism and offshore drilling cannot coexist. There is currently offshore drilling in California from leases granted before the state moratorium in 1981.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"There are six rigs off Huntington Beach and numerous off Santa Barbara. You would be hard-pressed to find a hotel room (in those places) during the tourist season," DeVore said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a press conference, Boxer also weighed in on the release of additional Bush-era documents authorizing the use of harsh interrogation practices.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She expressed support for creating an independent commission that would have the ability to grant immunity in figuring out who was responsible for authorizing the simulated drowning tactic known as waterboarding.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I believe in this country, and that means I believe in openness and democracy and the truth and getting the facts to the people," Boxer said. "I also believe that this isn't something you can walk away from. You can't just suddenly say when it's inconvenient, you don't pursue the law."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0152</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Reports More Than $4.6 Million On Hand For 2010 Senate Race</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 13 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0150</link>
    <description>&lt;p style="text-align: left;"&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;span style="font-size: small;"&gt;More than double the resources of past campaigns&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;div&gt;April 13, 2009&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Los Angeles&lt;/strong&gt; - Senator Barbara Boxer's re-election campaign will report more than $4.6 million in the bank, according to Federal Election Commission reports due to be filed on April 15. More than 30,000 donors have contributed to Boxer&amp;rsquo;s 2010 reelection campaign.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Boxer campaign will report $4,622,744 cash on hand, with contributions in the period of $887,483. The report covers contributions for the first quarter of 2009 that ended on March 31.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;More than 4,500 new donors gave to the 2010 campaign for the first time during this quarter. Ninety percent of donors to the Boxer campaign have given $100 or less.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I am so excited about the early support I have received from so many grassroots supporters," said Boxer. "It is inspiring to know I have so many people standing by me."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Boxer campaign continues to outpace its fundraising compared to previous Boxer campaigns. Six years ago, the Boxer campaign&amp;rsquo;s April 15, 2003 report reported $2,069,157 cash on hand, less than half of the current cash on hand total.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer was first elected to the United States Senate in 1992 and is currently seeking election to her fourth term in the Senate. She is the only Senator to chair two committees, the Environment and Public Works Committee and the Ethics Committee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0150</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>It's a home run for Eastern Sierra Wilderness Bill</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 03 Apr 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0153</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Catherine Billey&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Mammoth Times&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At long last, it's a home run for the Omnibus Public Land Management Act of 2009.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Passed by the House of Representatives on March 25 in a 285-140 vote after two go-rounds there and in the Senate, it was signed by President Obama on March 30.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Contained in the omnibus is the Eastern Sierra and Northern San Gabriel Wild Heritage Act sponsored by Congressman Howard P. "Buck" McKeon (R-Santa Clarita) and Senator Barbara Boxer (D) in a widely lauded bipartisan effort.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The act designates 472,007 acres of California public lands as wilderness, including in the Eastern Sierra and White Mountains. It also creates the first-ever dedicated winter recreation area near Bridgeport in northern Mono County by setting aside 11,000 acres for snowmobile use.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I thank President Obama for signing this important bill, which reflects a lot of bipartisan work and compromise to protect wild and scenic lands in California," Boxer said in a statement. She has pursued versions of a wilderness bill since the mid-1990's.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The final compromise is what you have before you now," McKeon told the Times. His bipartisan alignment with Boxer began in 2002, when he got Inyo and Mono counties as part of that year's reapportionment election.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I did not want to have a wilderness area created out of Washington," he explained of the bipartisan alliance. "I wanted local people to have input."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Long-time supporters Tim Alpers of Alpers Trout Farms in Mono County and Sally Miller of the Wilderness Society in Lee Vining were invited to Washington, D.C. to witness the presidential stroke of the pen.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"To see support for this bill come together so fast for the President's signature shows that this bill was the right action to take," said Alpers, whose local roots go back three generations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"It was an honor and a thrill to witness the signing of this historic legislation," Miller said of the largest wilderness protection measure to be signed into law in 15 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Local praise for the Wilderness Bill&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The late conservationist Andrea Mead Lawrence issued a statement in February, when the bill's passage in the House seemed imminent.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Congressman McKeon and Senator Boxer worked diligently to create the fundamental cooperative dynamic needed to make this bill a success. Their exemplary staff worked overtime to make sure they had a bill that accommodated 99 percent of everyone's point of view. "&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Wilderness is an antidote to the hustle and bustle of modern life," said James Wilson, owner of Wilson's Eastside Sports in Bishop. "We owe them our thanks."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Mono Market owner Chris Lizza in Lee Vining also weighed in, pointing to regional economic benefits. "The protections contained in this legislation provide that our most treasured asset &amp;ndash; the pristine, inviting wilderness located in our backyards &amp;ndash; continues to be our greatest attraction."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Opponents criticize cherry-stemmed roads&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Local opposition primarily came from the Advocates for Access to Public Lands (AAPL).&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"AAPL had resigned itself to passage a long time ago, but our hopes were still flickering," said president Greg Weirick after the House vote on March 25. "The silver lining in this is that wilderness organizations won't be back for more wilderness for some time."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;AAPL primarily objects to the cherry stemming of roads and believes that passage of the bill will lead to closures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But McKeon said that all the roads will remain open.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"All the roads that were cherry stemmed that people were using legally will continue to be open for legal usage," he told the Times. "The forest service has assured us that all of those roads will be maintained."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That's because his and Boxer's staff were able to successfully negotiate 150-foot rights of way on those roads.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I have no idea what would make AAPL happy, other than no bill at all," said McKeon Deputy Chief of Staff Bob Haueter.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Complicated legislative history&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Act has had a complicated legislative history. It was introduced as S.22 on Jan. 7 this year by Senator Jeff Bingaman (D-NM), Chairman of the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee after a similar bill &amp;ndash; the one championed by Boxer and McKeon &amp;ndash; died in the last session of Congress in October, 2008.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a rare Sunday legislative session on Jan. 11, the Senate took a 66-12 cloture vote to limit consideration of the measure and block a potential filibuster. Four days later, the Senate passed S.22 by 73-21, after which it moved to the House of Representatives.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;There, Speaker of the House Nancy Pelosi attempted to push the bill through on a suspension vote, where a two thirds majority is required, in order to limit debate. But that failed by just two votes on March 11 in a 282-144 vote. Suspension votes are usually reserved for bills that carry no controversy, and this one did.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;S.22 then went back to the Senate where it was grafted onto a commemorative battlefield bill, H.R. 146, on March 16 to make it more palatable when it did return to the House. And so, on March 25, it completed the diamond in the 285-140 home run vote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to the wilderness acreage created in California, President Obama signed into law on March 30 more than 700,000 acres of new wilderness across the United States, including Oregon's Mount Hood, the Rocky Mountain National Park in Colorado, and Zion National Park in Utah in the West.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before signing it into law, Obama called the bill an "extraordinary piece of legislation" and "another step towards fulfilling Teddy Rosevelt's vision.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Our lands have always provided great bounty," he said. "Americans both young and young at heart" can now enjoy the wilderness areas for generations to come.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0153</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer: In the Driver's Seat on Environmental Laws</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 31 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0155</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usnews.com/articles/news/energy/2009/03/31/barbara-boxer-in-the-drivers-seat-on-environmental-laws.html" target="_blank"&gt;LINK TO ARTICLE&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Alex Kingsbury&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California Sen. Barbara Boxer is one of the environmental movement's biggest legislative supporters. She's opposed drilling offshore and in ANWR and backed cleaner drinking water standards and corporate funding of toxic cleanups. Her perch atop the Committee on Environment and Public Works puts her in the driver's seat for a variety of green agenda items, some of which have already begun. For instance, the economic stimulus bill signed by President Obama included a measure to increase the efficiency of thousands of government buildings.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Winning support from a few key members across the aisle will be vital, a challenge made greater by the fact that some in the GOP question the science of global warming. But getting around that can sometimes be as simple as punting on questions of causation. Last year, Oklahoma Republican Sen. James Inhofe, a global warming skeptic, cosponsored a bill with Boxer tightening efficiency standards for federal buildings. Gaining his backing was as easy as ensuring that the bill's text didn't include the words carbon or global warming. Similar compromises might be in the offing when issues like the transportation bill come before Boxer's committee.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the approaching legislative calendar isn't filled with such obvious middle ground, and her success may hinge on selling the idea that reducing dependence on foreign oil is as much an economic and national security issue as an environmental one. Watch for Boxer to support legislation that extends California-style tailpipe emissions cuts and the regulation of other greenhouse gases under language in the Clean Air Act. Increasing the use of renewable fuels and devising a cap-and-trade system for CO2 are also legislative priorities.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0155</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Locals react to wilderness bill passage</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 30 Mar 2009 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0154</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By Mike Gervais&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;Inyo Register&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Eastern Sierra residents on both sides of the issue are speaking out about the controversial Eastern Sierra Wild Heritage Act now that the House and Senate have approved the bill and sent it on its way to President Barack Obama for a final seal of approval.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Throughout its many revisions, residents here in the Sierra have had diverse opinions on the merits and flaws in the bill, as have state and federal leaders.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It took months of diligent work from leaders of both parties, the U.S.. House of Representatives and the Senate to overcome procedural challenges on both sides of the Capitol and vote 285 to 140 to pass legislation in the House on Wednesday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The House of Representatives voted on the Omnibus Public Lands Management Act of 2009 after it was shot down in an early "confidence vote" on March 11.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The original bill (S. 22), the first environmentally related bill in the 111th Congress, was approved by the Senate 73-21 on Jan. 15. In a second vote on March 19, the Senate again overwhelmingly passed the bill as H.R. 146, sending it back to the House for consideration and approval on Wednesday..&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All of California's Democratic representatives supported the bill. House speaker Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco usually doesn't vote, but she said she backed the bill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;All of the state's Republicans voted against it except for Rep. Mary Bono Mack of Palm Springs and McKeon, who also sponsored bills to create wilderness areas in their districts. Rep. Gary G. Miller of Diamond Bar did not vote.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to reports, there was enough bipartisan support to keep the legislation alive through various changes of power up until now.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McKeon's Deputy Chief of Staff Bob Haueter described the working relationship between McKeon and coauthor Senator Barbara Boxer (D-California) as one built on mutual respect and a common goal, and noted that although the two rarely agree politically, they had many opportunities over the last several years to abandon their bipartisan partnership but did not.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Essentially, Haueter said, there were times when either legislator could have mustered enough support for different versions of the wilderness bill from their respective sides of the aisle &amp;ndash; without any concessions to the other &amp;ndash; but chose to stick to pursue the compromise anyway.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He explained that when McKeon originally introduced his bill, "his party" was in charge, and in 2006 when the Democrats took over the House and Senate, even though Republicans still held the White House, the Dems pretty much had the power.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Boxer, like McKeon before her, reached out to members of the opposition party. "She said, in the spirit of bipartisanship, let's get some compromise and work together," Haueter explained.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer "cut her bill in half and let us keep two crucial provisions" &amp;ndash; 50,000 acres of Wilderness Study Area releases and the Hoover Snowmobile Winter Recreation Area, Haueter said. "She understood how important those were to Mr. McKeon."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;When Obama was elected to the presidency in November and Boxer's party gained control of the White House too, "she could have said, &amp;lsquo;This is a brand-new session, we don't need any compromises at all,'" Haueter continued. "But instead she reached out again and said, &amp;lsquo;A deal's a deal.'"&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But there were still some who were unconvinced, and the bill continued to receive amendments and changes to garner enough support on both sides of the aisle to make it to the president's desk.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The legislation passed Wednesday is a combination of 160 land bills, including measures to strengthen the protection of Oregon's Mt. Hood; create a commission to plan for the 450th anniversary of the founding of St. Augustine, Fla.; and designating the River Raisin battlefield in Monroe, Mich. as a unit of the national park system.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Closer to home, the Wild Heritage Act aims to give the highest federal land protection designation to approximately 472,000 acres of wild land and four wild and scenic rivers totaling 73 miles near Santa Clarita and in the Eastern Sierra, including the White Mountains.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In Inyo County, the bill gives permanent protection to the ancient bristlecone pines, the John Muir Wilderness and the Owens River headwaters in Mono County.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bill also includes the Amargosa river, designating it as a Wild and Scenic River.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Once signed into law, this lands package will amount to the largest increase of public land added to the Wilderness Preservation System in 15 years.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Part of the compromise legislators worked out to pass the bill was the release of the Masonic Mountain, Mormon Meadow, Walford Springs and Granite Mountain wilderness study areas. There is a total of about 50,000 acres of wilderness study releases included in the bill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The bill also includes 7,680 of "winter recreation area" for snowmobile use and other activities near Bridgeport.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Bill Sauser, president of the Mammoth Lakes Snowmobile Association, lauded passage of McKeon's wilderness measure and said it is a great example of collaboration and community involvement.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Many in Inyo County, however, have denounced the bill on the grounds that much of the local land included in the legislation does not meet the mandates set forth in the 1964 Wilderness Act for wild land.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Inyo County Board of Supervisors, the non-profit group Advocates for Access to Public Lands (AAPL) and hundreds of residents have openly expressed opposition to the bill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some opponents have said the wilderness designation would push mining and prospecting out of the community, others have claimed that Inyo's economic life-source lies in recreation and motorized travel that will be outlawed with the wilderness and still more say that California has more than enough protected land with 14 million acres of wilderness, second only to Alaska.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition to the Board of Supervisors and AAPL, the Eastern Sierra Four-Wheel Drive Club, the Blue Ribbon Coalition, The California Association of Four-Wheel Drive Clubs and Eastern Sierra Quail Unlimited have been vocal in their opposition of the bill.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Reaction to the House's passage of the omnibus bill and its Wild Heritage Act has been widespread.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Following are some of the comments received by the Register in the wake of Wednesday's vote:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Representative Howard "Buck" McKeon&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The land in the Eastern Sierra and Northern San Gabriel Mountains areas are some of the most rugged and majestic in California and the country. My bill works to protect and designate that land as wilderness. The Eastern Sierra Northern San Gabriel Wild Heritage Act is the product of countless hours of community involvement. Senator Boxer and I worked together and met with virtually every local stakeholder and leader to reach a compromise. This package works for my district because it isn't Congress telling my district how to manage our land; this is my community &amp;ndash; my constituents &amp;ndash; asking Congress to approve a land use compromise developed and vetted back home in California."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Greg Weirick Advocates for Access to Public Lands President, Bishop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Congressman McKeon's claim that this was a bipartisan effort is patently false. Few folks who once voted for him here in the valley supported his crossing the aisle to gain liberal votes. McKeon's claims that he had any more than a token involvement in the shaping of the Bill are also false. Boxer knew exactly what she wanted from the Bill and what she would give up, long before McKeon joined her ranks.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;"AAPL deeply regrets the passage of the Eastern Sierra Wild Heritage Act, but the silver lining in it is the wilderness community will not be able to come back for more wilderness here for some years with any credibility. Time will tell if the cherry stemmed roads (allowing roads through wilderness) will be allowed to stay open, but we will not take any unreasonable closures lying down. In the meantime, the motorized community will be gearing up to better defend our cultural, historical, commercial and recreational rights to reasonable access to our cherished lands."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;Sally Miller, senior field representative for the Wilderness Society in Mammoth Lakes&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The Eastern Sierra and Northern San Gabriel regions are blessed with outstanding beauty and recreational opportunities. This legislation is a promise to future generations that these lands and rivers will remain forever wild."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Bill Sauser, Mammoth Lakes Snowmobile Association president&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The snowmobile community in Mono County is very supportive of Congressman McKeon and is grateful he included us in this project and fought for us," said Sauser. "It was a broad-based effort here in California where we all worked hard together, so it's good to see the bill coming to fruition."&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;David Lamfrom, National Parks Conservation Association California desert field representative&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;"&amp;hellip; Historic action has been taken to protect the Amargosa River. This ribbon of green amid one of the harshest environments on earth is now being recognized as a life-line for rare and endangered species, and as a critical source of water for Death Valley National Park and its gateway communities."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Rusty Gregory, chairman and CEO of Mammoth Mountain&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Congressman McKeon demonstrated considerable courage in sponsoring his wilderness bill. I agree with his support of the lands bill and I applaud his willingness to take a strong stand to preserve wilderness in the Sierra Nevada for the benefit of our regional economy and future generations."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;Vicki Bauer, board chair, Mono County Board of Supervisors&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"To reach compromise locally was hard work, so it is nice to know the federal government is listening to us," said Bauer. "I consider myself lucky to have watched this bill go from a 300 person local hearing to passage in the House."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Tim Alpers, Alpers Trout owner, Mono County&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I am pleased with the passage of this bill in that it preserves beautiful wild lands for future generations, protects water sheds crucial to the health of our fisheries, and provides high quality recreation opportunities for our visitors, which helps our local economy," Alpers said. "Passage of this bill represents long overdue protection for many priceless areas, including my area the Upper Owens River. Because of the unique and elegant design of this watershed, my grandfather, my father, as well as myself and many others have fought for long-term protection for one of the American public's greatest stream systems. It has been a pleasure to work with a great team including Congressman McKeon, Senator Boxer and our local jurisdictions, businesses, and individuals."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;James Wilson, Owner, Wilson's Eastside Sports, Bishop&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Congressman McKeon and Senator Boxer showed vision and perseverance in the creation of this bill, we owe them our thanks. Wilderness is an antidote to the hustle and bustle of modern life. This legislation provides the certainty of quiet, wildlife, and open spaces for our children and our economy."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Inyo County Board of Supervisors Chairperson Beverly Brown was unavailable to comment as of press time Friday.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;The omnibus bill is expected to be signed by the president early next week.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0154</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>The Senate discovers women</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0149</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Nicholas Kristof&lt;br /&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The U.S. Senate is taking a welcome step: empowering a subcommittee specifically charged with global women's issues. It's the first time a subcommittee has had that mandate, and it will be led by Barbara Boxer of California, who will surely use her voice and spotlight to do some good on these issues.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Here is the announcement from Senator Boxer's office:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p style="padding-left: 30px;"&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today announced that she will chair the Senate Foreign Relations Subcommittee on International Operations and Organizations, Human Rights, Democracy, and Global Women's Issues.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During Secretary of State Hillary Clinton's confirmation hearing, Boxer referred to a series of stories by New York Times columnist Nicholas Kristof that detailed violent attacks against women in Afghanistan and Asia. Boxer raised the need for a new commitment by the United States to ending violence and discrimination against women around the world, telling Clinton, "No woman or girl should ever have to live in fear or face persecution for being born female."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Clinton pledged that, "as Secretary of State, I view these issues as central to our foreign policy. Not as adjunct or auxiliary, or in any way lesser than all of the other issues we have to confront&amp;hellip; And it will be my hope to persuade more governments&amp;hellip; that we cannot have a free, prosperous, peaceful, progressive world if women are treated in such a discriminatory and violent way."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senator Boxer said, "I am very grateful to our new Chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, Senator John Kerry, for allowing me to focus part of my efforts on the worldwide status of women."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer continued, "This new subcommittee assignment offers a tremendous opportunity to shine the light of day on a very overlooked issue. Too often, we turn our eyes away as women are persecuted, abused and treated as second-class citizens. But even the most conservative historians have noted that when women are given the freedom to live up to their full potential, society as a whole flourishes. I look forward to working with my colleagues in the Congress and with Secretary Clinton to stamp out violence against women in the world."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Issues like trafficking and maternal mortality and sexual violence finally seem to be getting some traction. Eve Ensler has helped put a relentless spotlight on mass rape in the Congo, aid groups like CARE, Women for Women International and Vital Voices have been doing an outstanding job emphasizing the role that women can play in economic development, the "Elders" group is talking about taking on some of these issues, and there's discussion of a major international initiative against obstetric fistula. My own hope is that Michelle Obama grabs that issue. The new Senate subcommittee reflects all this progress and presumably under Senator Boxer will accelerate it.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0149</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Pushes Clean Energy Bill as Another Kind of Stimulus</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0147</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;by Renee Schoof&lt;br /&gt;McClatchy Newspapers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON &amp;mdash; Sen. Barbara Boxer on Tuesday announced that the Environment and Public Works Committee would draft a new climate bill that would help consumers avoid higher prices and create new jobs in clean energy, but also suggested it's unlikely Congress will pass climate legislation this year.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer outlined principles for the new bill, including provisions to set emissions reduction targets at levels scientists say will be needed to avoid dangerous climate disruption and to set up a "transparent and accountable" market for tradable emissions permits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The California Democrat said the bill could be drafted and made public in weeks or months, but gave herself a deadline of December for getting it passed by the committee and sent to the full Senate for debate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- story_feature_box.comp --&gt; &lt;!-- /story_feature_box.comp --&gt; &lt;!-- story_factbox.comp --&gt; &lt;!-- /story_factbox.comp --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer said the committee, which she leads, would pass the bill in time for an international meeting in Copenhagen, Denmark, in December to negotiate the final form of a new treaty with binding limits on all countries' emissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That still would leave the bill far from reaching President Barack Obama's desk, however. The full Senate would have to debate and pass it, and then differences would have to be worked out with a separate climate change bill that Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Calif., is drafting in the House of Representatives.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer's December deadline for her own committee's action suggested that she thinks the bill can't get enough support to pass this year, but that she wants to give other nations a clear idea of what the U.S. will at least be debating on how to impose its own mandatory limits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer urged the environmentalists and business leaders who support her bill &amp;mdash; and who packed a hearing room for her press conference about her basic principles for it _to rally support for it even before it takes shape.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The message has to be, don't allow talk of an economic recession to stop our work because in fact the surest way to create good jobs in this country is to mobilize for clean energy independence," she said. "If you want to fight this recession, do it by mobilizing to become energy independent with clean energy and really save this planet."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The basic approach is to set a limit on greenhouse gas emissions that would decline each year and require companies to buy tradable permits for the pollution they generate. The system would create incentives for companies to produce non-polluting energy such as wind and solar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer's principles, endorsed by the other Democrats on her committee but by none of its Republicans, called for reducing emissions to levels guided by scientific research to avoid global climate disruption. She didn't announce specific reduction figures.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She also called for giving an unspecified percentage of funds from the sale of pollution permits to consumers so that they wouldn't suffer economic losses while the nation makes a transition to nonpolluting energy.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Some of the money also would go to investments in clean energy technology and energy efficiency, help for workers and manufacturers in the transition period, support for wildlife and plants threatened by global warming, and aid for developing countries hard hit by climate change.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer said the bill also should create a level playing field by providing incentives and deterrents so that other countries also would reduce emissions.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Melissa Lavinson of California's PG&amp;amp;E Corp., the parent company of Pacific Gas &amp;amp; Electric, said at the briefing that her company was encouraged that the principles included steps to protect consumers, promote advanced technology and "engage the international community." Businesses needed to know these things in order to have certainty about making investments for future energy supplies, she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mcclatchydc.com/homepage/story/61407.html"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0147</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>California Senators lead charge for more public works spending</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 03 Feb 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0148</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Rob Hotakainen&lt;br /&gt;McClatchy Newspapers&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON &amp;mdash; California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer says members of Congress must focus on three things as they put together an economic stimulus plan: jobs, jobs and more jobs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And Democrat Sen. Dianne Feinstein, the state's senior senator, says Congress should spend less on tax cuts and more on public works.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;!-- story_feature_box.comp --&gt; &lt;!-- /story_feature_box.comp --&gt; &lt;!-- story_factbox.comp --&gt; &lt;!-- /story_factbox.comp --&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ideas abound as the Senate prepares to sign off on the largest federal spending plan in history, an $885 billion package intended to jolt the economy. California&amp;rsquo;s senators are using the state's staggering economy &amp;mdash; a 9.2 percent unemployment rate and 1.7 million people out of work &amp;mdash; to try to increase the state&amp;rsquo;s share of the money.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;It's now estimated to be as high as $64 billion, if you include the value of the tax cuts, which represent nearly 40 percent of the package. But the senators say the state would benefit more if Congress steered more money toward projects to improve the nation's highways, bridges, and water and sewer systems.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Speaking on the Senate floor Tuesday, Feinstein said Congress should spend more on "a massive program to build what is failing." If members added another $25 billion for highway, rail and water projects, they could create another 655,000 jobs nationwide, she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Joining Feinstein, Boxer told her colleagues that housing construction in California "has literally stopped in its tracks" and that Congress must respond quickly to a national crisis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"We have to get in front of the recession or it will become a depression," she said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;While Feinstein and Boxer were pressing their case on the Senate floor, Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger was on the phone with President Barack Obama. White House spokesman Robert Gibbs told reporters that Obama spoke to Schwarzenegger and two other GOP governors because they had signed a letter pledging their support. The White House says the plan will help governors avoid making cuts in services such as public safety.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Winning support for the stimulus bill from GOP senators was proving more difficult.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Minority Leader Mitch McConnell of Kentucky said the goal of Republicans will be to "pare it down."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;And Republican Sen. John Thune of South Dakota called the plan "an unprecedented spending spree" that would add to the nation&amp;rsquo;s record deficit. "A trillion dollars is a terrible thing to waste," he said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He said senators need to stop looking at the stimulus package as an abstraction.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"If you started spending a million dollars a day on the day that Christ was born and you spent a million dollars every single day up until today, you still wouldn't have spent a trillion dollars," Thune said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer told Thune she was "astounded" by the new fiscal concern shown by Republicans, noting that was absent when the party controlled Washington.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"This is a test of whether the Senate has a heart and a brain," Boxer said, adding that it would help ease the suffering of the unemployed and help kick-start the economy. She said Republicans opposing the economic stimulus plan run the risk of being labeled "the party of Herbert Hoover" for saying no to everything.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"What do they come up with again? Tax cuts for the wealthy," Boxer said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Meanwhile, a new analysis by the Center for American Progress showed that California could receive as much as $64 billion from the Senate bill, if you include the value of the tax cuts. And 12 percent &amp;mdash; or roughly $8 billion &amp;mdash; would be reserved to help balance the state budget, according to the group's analysis.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Senate is expected to vote on the stimulus bill later this week, after voting on a series of amendments.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On a procedural vote Tuesday, the Senate rejected a plan offered by Feinstein and Democratic Sen. Patty Murray of Washington that would have set aside another $18 billion for highway and rail projects and another $7 billion for weather projects.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0148</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer reports more than  $4.1 million on hand for 2010 Senate race</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Jan 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0144</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Close to 24,000 individuals have already contributed to U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer&amp;rsquo;s re-election campaign, resulting in more than $4.1 million in the bank.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Twenty-one months before Election Day, the Boxer campaign will report $4,132,935 cash on hand in the year-end Federal Election Commission report to be filed this week. Eighty-eight percent of individual donors to the Boxer campaign have given $100 or less. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"With this early support, we are ready for what promises to be a spirited campaign," said Boxer. "I am so proud that grassroots donations have always been the foundation of my campaigns."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Boxer campaign has far outpaced its fundraising compared to this point in previous campaigns. The 1996 year-end report stated $1,036,763 cash on hand and the 2002 year-end report had $1,392,803 cash on hand. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The FEC report being filed this week covers contributions for the last quarter of 2008 that ended on December 31. The Boxer campaign reported contributions of $658,703 in the period. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer was first elected to the United States Senate in 1992 after serving 10 years as a member of the House of Representatives from the Bay Area and six years as a Marin County Supervisor. Boxer is the only Senator to chair two committees, Ethics and Environment and Public Works. She is currently seeking election to her fourth term in the Senate.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0144</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Expects To Unveil Cap-And-Trade Measure This Week</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0143</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;by Darren Goode&lt;br /&gt;Congress Daily&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senate Environment and Public Works Chairwoman Barbara Boxer plans to unveil the outline of global warming legislation this week, while predicting President Obama will grant her state of California the ability to set its carbon dioxide limits for tailpipes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer will release principles regulating carbon dioxide from a variety of industrial sources through an emissions cap-and-trade bill, she said Monday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In November, she said she would offer a simpler cap-and-trade proposal than a plan that stalled on the Senate floor in the summer, while adhering to emissions goals Obama has endorsed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Democratic leaders have the difficult task of trying to push a bill requiring businesses to purchase emission credits during a recession.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;At a meeting with green group CEOs last week, several senators -- including Boxer, Energy and Natural Resources Chairman Jeff Bingaman, and Sens. Debbie Stabenow, D-Mich., and Ron Wyden, D-Ore. -- asked the groups to "express ourselves in a way that leads with jobs whenever we can," said one participant.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stabenow and nine other Democratic senators from manufacturing states sent a letter to Boxer and Majority Leader Reid in June with concerns about the bill's effect on their states' industries.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This concern resonated in a statement Sen. Carl Levin, D-Mich., made Monday after Obama announced EPA would review California's request for a waiver from the Clean Air Act to institute its own tailpipe standard.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Levin issued a statement saying he spoke recently with EPA Administrator Jackson and White House Council on Environmental Quality Chairwoman Nancy Sutley and "was personally assured that the EPA review does not begin with a foregone conclusion, and that the review will be thorough and objective." He added, "I sure hope that is true, because a separate California standard will not only create the 'confusing and patchwork set of standards' that President Obama today implied he wanted to avoid, but also, as the California standard is currently drafted, it is discriminatory against U.S.-made vehicles of the same efficiency as the imports."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer seemed assured EPA would allow her state to regulate tailpipe emissions. "We're going to get this waiver," she said. Domestic automakers, she said, would be given a hand in meeting the new requirement. But "if you turn away and hold out the back of your hand, then you'll lose," Boxer said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nationaljournal.com/congressdaily/cda_20090127_2707.php"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0143</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>California Scores Vindication, Environmental Win</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 Jan 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0146</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By SAMANTHA YOUNG&lt;br /&gt;The Associated Press&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;SACRAMENTO, Calif. -- California was handed a big environmental victory when President Barack Obama endorsed a key part of the state's greenhouse gas reduction plan.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He also gave a public boost to the Golden State, offering a clear sign that liberal-leaning California can expect a friendly relationship with his administration after eight years of clashes with former President George W. Bush.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"California has shown bold and bipartisan leadership through its effort to forge 21st century standards, and over a dozen states have followed its lead," Obama said Monday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The compliment came as the president announced that his team would revisit the Bush administration's decision to deny California permission to control tailpipe emissions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Obama's announcement on his seventh day in office delighted California officials who have criticized his predecessor for ignoring the state's long tradition of setting its own air standards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"For too long, Washington has been asleep at the wheel when it comes to the environment," Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger said. "Now California finally has a partner and an ally in Washington, in the White House."&lt;br /&gt;ad_icon&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Because California began regulating vehicle pollution before the federal government did, the state has special status under the Clean Air Act to implement tougher emission standards than those promulgated by the federal government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the state must first get a waiver from the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency. California was granted about 50 such waivers _ and never denied _ before seeking a waiver in 2005 to implement a landmark state law that would force automakers to cut greenhouse gas emissions by 30 percent in new cars and light trucks by 2016.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The auto regulations were to have been a major part of California's first-in-the-nation global warming law that aims to reduce greenhouse gases economy-wide by 25 percent _ to 1990 levels _ by 2020. Air regulators are counting on the auto emission reductions to meet about 18 percent of the state's proposed reductions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If California is granted an emissions waiver, other states can then choose to adopt California's standards or go with the federal ones. Thirteen states and the District of Columbia were ready to implement the California standards when, after months of delay and controversy, then-EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson announced in December 2007 that he was denying the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;That sparked outrage, investigations and lawsuits from California officials. Congressional investigations led by&amp;nbsp; Sen. Barbara Boxer and&amp;nbsp; Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, found that Johnson had overruled the unanimous recommendations of career scientists at the agency.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said Obama's order was "a vindication for common sense."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although Obama's directive to his new EPA administrator Lisa Jackson _ who began her first week on the job Monday _ doesn't amount to giving the state the waiver, California officials were confident that would be the eventual outcome.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Obama's move was also cheered in Washington state, where Gov. Chris Gregoire signed that state's similar tailpipe standards into law in 2005.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"This decision will help protect the planet as we work with the federal government to tackle one of our most pressing environmental problems," Gregoire said. "Making investments now to protect our health and environment will cost us far less in the long run."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Ed Murray, D-Seattle, said he was happy that Washington state may soon be able to move forward with the law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"What a difference a president makes," he said. "What's unfortunate is that if we moved quicker, not just as states, but as a nation, we might already be selling cars that people actually want to buy."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2009/01/27/AR2009012700628.html"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0146</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Calls for Standards on Coal Ash After Tennessee Spill </title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0145</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;by Daniel Whitten&lt;br /&gt;Bloomberg.com&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer said she would press for regulations on coal ash, after 1 billion gallons of sludge were dumped from a Tennessee Valley Authority coal plant Dec. 22.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;It is critically important that protective standards for coal-ash waste be created,&amp;rdquo; Boxer, the chairman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, said at a hearing today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The cost of managing the ash under new standards would be less costly than the pending cleanup, Boxer said. She also said she would look at mandating dry ash, rather than allowing the type of wet sludge that spilled in Tennessee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Tennessee Valley Authority Chief Executive Officer Tom Kilgore offered no timetable in testimony for cleaning up the Dec. 22 spill that buried 300 acres of eastern Tennessee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Now that we have entered the recovery phase, we are turning our attention to a long-term plan for full recovery and restoration,&amp;rdquo; Kilgore said. &amp;ldquo;I cannot tell you at this point how long this might take.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Coal ash storage facilities at power plants aren&amp;rsquo;t federally regulated and are subject only to state oversight. The industry-funded Utility Solid Waste Activities Group in Washington says that regulating the waste would be costly and unnecessary, while the Washington-based Environmental Integrity Project says that the ash is toxic and can contaminate water supplies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A wave set off by the collapse of a dump that held decades of coal ash destroyed three homes and damaged 42 properties.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Water samples taken in rivers downstream from the waste spill showed high levels of arsenic, lead and mercury, said Appalachian Voices, an environmental group based in North Carolina. The TVA and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency have tested treated drinking water, which they say is safe.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Almost 100 power plants in Florida, Alabama and at least 10 other states use the same type of coal-ash holding ponds that failed at TVA&amp;rsquo;s Kingston plant on Dec. 22, according to the Environmental Integrity Project, which collected data that companies send to the government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Coal ash typically contains arsenic, chromium, lead, nickel, selenium, and thallium, said Eric Schaeffer, executive director of the Environmental Integrity Project and a former EPA official.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601103&amp;amp;sid=aj90MqDXbG.E&amp;amp;refer=us"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0145</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senators urge swift probe of jet fighter crash</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Dec 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0142</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;
&lt;div&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;AP&lt;br /&gt;Elliot Spagat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SAN DIEGO (AP) &amp;mdash; California's two U.S. senators want the Marine Corps to review its entire fleet of F/A18-D Hornet jets for possible problems after one of the jets crashed into a home and killed two young girls, their mother and their grandmother.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In a joint letter Wednesday, Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer asked Gen. James Conway, Marines commandant, to quickly complete the investigation of Monday's crash and make the results public.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"We can all agree that in urban areas like San Diego County, where the military and civilian populations closely coexist, it is absolutely vital that all precautionary steps are taken to ensure the safety of both our civilian and military residents," the letter read.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Marine spokesman Maj. David Nevers said authorities would thoroughly investigate the cause of the crash but gave no indication of plans for a broader probe of the fleet's 635 Hornet jets.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"While there is no reason to suspect a systemic engine-related problem that might affect the entire fleet of F/A-18s, safety is always of paramount concern," Nevers said. "If the investigation were to point to a wider problem, we would act swiftly to address it."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Initial reports suggest the jet may have suffered engine failure on a training exercise after takeoff from the carrier USS Abraham Lincoln about 50 miles offshore from San Diego. The jet was returning from an offshore training mission when it clipped a tree and slammed into the neighborhood about two miles from Marine Corps Air Station Miramar.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. Rep. Duncan Hunter, the ranking Republican on the House Armed Services Committee, previously called on the Marine Corps to release the maintenance records of its F/A-18D Hornet fighters.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The crash was probably unrelated to the previous discovery of cracks in hinges on the wings of more than a dozen of the aircraft, the San Diego-area congressman said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer and Feinstein also urged the Marines to assist people affected by the crash, particularly Dong Yun Yoon, a Korean immigrant whose family perished when the plane hit his home near the base.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Yoon had asked for guidance from people who have suffered "more terrible things" at a news conference Tuesday. His appearance at the news conference was interrupted by a military jet flying overhead.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His church had identified the victims as Young Mi Yoon, 36; her daughters Grace, 15 months, and Rachel, 2 months; and her mother, Suk Im Kim, 60. Kim was visiting from South Korea to help her daughter move across town and adjust to the arrival of her second child.&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5hukCDXicy0DS1K2Rva8_VdP1d2hgD950IKH00"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Link to Article&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;/div&gt;
&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0142</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer Announces New Global Warming Legislation</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Nov 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0141</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Eric Niiler&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;KPBS News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer joined other Democrats in announcing new legislation they hope will put the brakes on global warming - without stalling the economy. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer and other members of the Senate Environment Committee plan to push for big changes when the new Congress convenes in January. One bill would set aside $15 billion for green energy and advanced biofuels. The other would set up a so-called cap and trade system for industry to cut emissions of carbon dioxide. Boxer also said she expects a new ally in the White House. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer: Instead of denial we will have resolve, instead of procrastination we will have action, instead of listening to the voices of the stagnant status quo, our committee hears our president elect.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For now, Congress is dealing with a struggling domestic auto industry. Its likely Detroit will face even tougher environmental standards under the new Democratic majority. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kpbs.org/news/local;id=13295"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to Article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0141</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer urges more fed funds for infrastructure</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0139</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Rachel Gordon&lt;br /&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer added her name to the list of politicians calling for pumping more federal money into construction projects to shore up the nation's roadways, bridges, water systems and levees to create jobs during the economic downturn.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"I believe these challenges represent real opportunities, not just to rebuild America's infrastructure, but also to jump-start our economy," Boxer said during a press briefing Wednesday on the San Francisco waterfront. "By addressing these challenges in the right way, we can create jobs, help American families and address the needs of communities across the country."&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, who chairs the U.S. Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, said she will use her power to do what she can to push quick action on securing additional federal funds. But such spending bills have died before for lack of support, and there's no guarantee of success for a new initiative. Boxer was uncertain whether the lame-duck Congress would take up an infrastructure-investment plan before January when representatives are sworn in to new terms.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Regardless, she said that if the Democrats pick up additional seats in the House and the Senate, as expected, in Tuesday's election, her chance of success in new infrastructure investments will increase.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When pressed on how such projects would be funded, she was short on concrete ideas, other than calling for a shift in spending from the war in Iraq to domestic investments. Putting people to work, she said, would help stabilize the economy and spark a recovery.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She said there are more than 3,000 "ready-to-go" highway projects in the United States worth an estimated $18 billion that would support the creation of hundreds of thousands of jobs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer was unable to name any specific projects in California she would make a priority, saying she wanted to hear first from local officials.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Will Kempton, director of the California Department of Transportation, said in an interview that he applauds the senator's advocacy for spending on infrastructure, saying it echoes the sentiment of Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;"We agree with Sen. Boxer that investing in infrastructure would be beneficial," Kempton said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He said there are many Caltrans projects throughout the state awaiting funding. Among them in the Bay Area are the seismic retrofitting of the High Street overpass on Interstate 880 in Oakland and the second stage of new carpool lanes on the Interstate 680 Sunol grade in Alameda County.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/10/29/BAKU13QR9O.DTL" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0139</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer wants EPA's status upgraded</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 28 Oct 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0140</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Erika Lovley&lt;br /&gt;Politico&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee plans to push legislation again next year to give the Environmental Protection Agency a permanent seat in the president&amp;rsquo;s Cabinet nearly 40 years after the agency&amp;rsquo;s creation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The move by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) adds to a chorus on Capitol Hill and inside the EPA that is warning the agency needs major reforms before it implements a new president&amp;rsquo;s environmental goals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EPA handles Superfund cleanup and many of nation&amp;rsquo;s biggest pollution issues. But its Cabinet-level status remains temporary, its budget is steadily shrinking and it&amp;rsquo;s had three different leaders in the past eight years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Without permanent Cabinet rank, the EPA is, at least, at a symbolic disadvantage with the U.S. Energy Department and foreign environmental ministries that it deals with around the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Senator Boxer plans to reintroduce a bill to elevate the EPA to Cabinet status because, now more than ever, the agency needs to have a Cabinet position given its central role,&amp;rdquo; a committee staffer said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Under President Bush, the climate agenda restricted the agency&amp;rsquo;s findings on global warming and softened smog health standards, which environmentalists and lobbyists say wounded the agency&amp;rsquo;s reputation as a green crusader.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The most glaring example of the agency&amp;rsquo;s deterioration came last summer when EPA officials ordered the Defense Department to clean up several Superfund sites on its military bases. And in an unprecedented move, the Pentagon refused to comply with the order, sending angry waves through the green community and showcasing the agency&amp;rsquo;s fragile authority.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Both Boxer and House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry A. Waxman (D-Calif.) have tried to dissect the agency&amp;rsquo;s problems through a series of investigative hearings that often lambasted the leadership of the current administrator, Stephen Johnson, a longtime EPA employee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;People now see the EPA as merely a reflection of the White House&amp;rsquo;s failed environmental policies,&amp;rdquo; said Sierra Club Environmental Quality Director Ed Hopkins. &amp;ldquo;EPA has had no clout in the White House. Otherwise you would never see one agency thumbing its nose at another.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Elevating the agency&amp;rsquo;s status would send an early signal that the new administration is serious about climate change, officials say.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Psychologically, it would deliver a strong message as to the importance of the agency. It would also help strengthen relationships with leaders in other departments,&amp;rdquo; said former EPA Administrator Christine Todd Whitman, who pushed to upgrade the agency&amp;rsquo;s status in 2001.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Transforming the agency into the Department of the Environment is not a new idea, but has been a highly politicized one. Former Rep. Sherwood Boehlert (R-N.Y.), sponsored early EPA elevation legislation in 1988, but so far the move has been unsuccessful, in large part because of a lack of widespread congressional support.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer&amp;rsquo;s first attempt to move a bill on the issue in 2001 bill was cosponsored by Sens. Hillary Rodham Clinton (D-N.Y.), Joseph I. Lieberman (I-Conn.) and George Voinovich (R-Ohio).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Despite her clout as chairwoman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, Boxer could face stiff opposition from some Republicans. Small-government supporters are already voicing arguments against bolstering the agency, saying it&amp;rsquo;s already plagued by bureaucratic woes.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Making EPA a Cabinet-level department has been attempted several times but has always been marred by political infighting over peripheral issues,&amp;rdquo; said Marc Morano, a spokesman for the Republicans on Boxer&amp;rsquo;s committee. &amp;ldquo;Since the EPA administrator has been a member of the president&amp;rsquo;s Cabinet since 1993, a lack of White House access has not been a problem.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer&amp;rsquo;s plan, though, may not be the only one to emerge. Some agency union leaders have launched an inner-agency petition drive, demanding the next EPA administrator, or secretary, be a high-profile environmentalist who can wield political clout similar to former Vice President Al Gore.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Russell Wiener, a union leader and scientist, says the petition will be distributed to key congressional offices and to the new president.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;EPA is a badly beaten organization, and it&amp;rsquo;s hard to get people motivated,&amp;rdquo; Wiener said. &amp;ldquo;We think it would be best to have a leader who actually knows what they&amp;rsquo;re doing.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Both Democrat Barack Obama and Republican John McCain have been pushing ambitious green agendas on the presidential campaign trail that could be boosted by a more robust environmental Cabinet post.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;The next leader has an opportunity of empowering people to do their jobs,&amp;rdquo; said former Clinton EPA Administrator Carol Brower. &amp;ldquo;Inevitably when the White House doesn&amp;rsquo;t support the agency, you have to remind people its okay for them to do their job.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In his first 100 days, the new president could also signal the agency&amp;rsquo;s new mission by overturning a stack of environmentally unfriendly rulings, including one barring California from setting its own emission regulations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;We&amp;rsquo;re at the point now where we can see a light at the end of the tunnel and we know it&amp;rsquo;s not a freight train,&amp;rdquo; said EPA union leader John O&amp;rsquo;Grady. &amp;ldquo;Our scientists have been advocating for years that climate change is a reality, but we&amp;rsquo;re still waiting for the agency to get on board.&amp;rdquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.politico.com/news/stories/1008/15022.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0140</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer seeks emergency hearing on train crash</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Sep 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0138</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Associated Press&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer wants the Senate Commerce Committee to hold an emergency hearing on the commuter rail collision that killed 25 people in Los Angeles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The California Democrat made the request in a letter Monday to the chairman and top Republican on the committee, of which she's a member.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer wants senators to discuss legislation requiring technology that would prevent crashes even when a train fails to stop at a red light&amp;mdash;as happened in Friday's crash.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_10470530" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0138</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer To Oil Companies: "Use It Or Lose It!"</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Aug 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0136</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;ktvu.com&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SAN JOSE, Calif. -- At a news briefing in San Jose Tuesday, California Senator Barbara Boxer said the U.S. policy on domestic oil drilling should be one of ''use it or lose it.''&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;''American companies hold a lot of leases that they haven't drilled on. 65 Million acres of leased, inactive federal land, could produce an additional 4.8 million barrels of oil,'' said Senator Boxer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;''That would double U.S. oil production. Let me make it clear: This is what they're sitting on.''&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said those lands already under lease to oil companies should be tapped before pristine coastal waters off California and other states are drilled.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the wide-ranging news conference, Senator Boxer also said that this year, Congress did log a number of successes, despite frequent stand-offs between Democrats and Republicans.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;She said Congress passed legislation to address the mortgage crisis, a huge farm bill that contained protections for California specialty crops, a G.I. Bill of Rights, the Economic Stimulus package, and a bill to save Medicare.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.ktvu.com/news/17105404/detail.html" target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0136</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>4 Senate Dems urge EPA chief to resign</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0137</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;by Zachary Coile&lt;br /&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Four Senate Democrats called on EPA chief Stephen Johnson to resign Tuesday, alleging that he gave misleading testimony to Congress and repeatedly bowed to pressure from the White House to avoid regulating greenhouse gases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Sen. Barbara Boxer, who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, and three other Democrats on the panel -- Sen. Sheldon Whitehouse of Rhode Island, Sen. Amy Klobuchar of Minnesota and Sen. Frank Lautenberg of New Jersey -- also announced they are urging Attorney General Michael Mukasey to investigate whether Johnson made false statements to Congress. Mukasey's office said it was still reviewing the request late Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The pressure on Johnson is part of an escalating battle between Democrats in Congress and the White House over climate change policy. Democrats are seizing on new evidence that Johnson overrode the opinions of Environmental Protection Agency scientists and reversed two of his own decisions at the request of the White House.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EPA spokesman Jonathan Shradar fired back at Boxer for what he called a political attack. ''Administrator Johnson's record is one of aggressive, health protective environmental standards. Sen. Boxer's record is one of press conferences and political tirades,'' Shradar said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Democrats insist that Johnson misled Congress when he testified before Boxer's committee Jan. 24 about his decision to reject California's effort to set the nation's toughest limits on emissions from vehicles. The EPA chief testified that he listened to all sides before deciding that California had failed to make its case.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;''I made the decision. It was my decision. It was the right decision,'' Johnson said at the time.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But last week, a top Johnson aide contradicted his testimony. Former EPA deputy associate administrator Jason Burnett, who resigned last month in frustration with the administration's climate-change stance, testified that Johnson had initially supported granting at least a partial waiver after concluding that California met the legal criteria.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But Burnett said Johnson changed his stance when the White House made clear that President Bush opposed California setting its own fuel economy standards. ''The administrator knew the president's preference for a single (national) standard,'' Burnett said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Klobuchar said the testimony showed that Johnson not only overruled his own staff but also misled the public about who really made the decision. ''If we can't trust the top EPA official to tell the truth to the American people, then he must go,'' she said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The lawmakers also allege that Johnson yielded to White House influence in a recent EPA decision over whether climate change endangers human health. The decision was critical because if the agency had made such a finding, it would have been required to start regulating greenhouse gases.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In December, EPA officials sent an e-mail to the White House stating that Johnson supported the EPA staff's view that global warming threatens human health. ''In sum, the Administrator is proposing to find that elevated levels of [greenhouse gas] concentrations may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public welfare,'' the document read.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The White House refused to open the e-mail and later asked EPA officials to retract it. When Johnson recently announced that EPA was starting a new rule-making process to determine whether climate change poses a health risk, he never mentioned this previous finding.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said she was frustrated that EPA officials have stonewalled congressional inquiries into those recent decisions. Johnson refused to testify at a Senate Judiciary Committee hearing this week about EPA's dealings with Congress. Last week, the White House released the e-mail with EPA's draft of the endangerment finding but would not allow senators to make copies. Lawmakers were allowed to read it only while being watched by two White House lawyers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said the final straw was an e-mail sent to EPA staffers last month that directed them not to speak to the press, congressional investigators or to EPA's own inspector general, and to forward the inquiries to their superiors. Boxer said Johnson ''has become a secretive and dangerous ally of polluters, and we cannot stand by and allow more damage to be done.''&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the White House is standing behind Johnson. White House spokesman Trey Bohn said Johnson's critics are attacking him because they disagree with the administration's policies on energy and climate change.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;''In every sense, administrator Johnson has cooperated fully with Congress, and the facts bear that out,'' Bohn said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2008/07/30/MN51121B60.DTL" target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0137</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer blasts Bush administration on global warming</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jul 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0135</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;By Deborah Barfield Berry&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Desert Sun&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- Sen. Barbara Boxer blasted the Bush administration Tuesday for ignoring warnings about the dangers of global warming and not stepping up to address the problem.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;Despite the scientific consensus, despite the danger, the Bush administration has failed to take any meaningful action,&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; said Boxer, D-Ca., chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The committee held an oversight hearing on the science of global warning and its implications. Several witnesses, including a former official with the Environmental Protection Agency, testified about the impact of global warming, including more flooding and wildfires.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, who lives in Rancho Mirage, also accused the administration of covering up the threat.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;ldquo;They have censored documents&amp;hellip;They have muzzled scientists,&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo; Boxer said. &amp;ldquo;And they have ignored unanimous recommendations from agency experts to act.&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer has criticized the administration for denying California a waiver to regulate its own greenhouse gas emissions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Republican lawmakers, however, said the hearing had little to do with addressing global warming and more to do with political grandstanding. Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., called the hearing &amp;ldquo;political theater with a predetermined outcome.&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo;&lt;br /&gt;Inhofe said if Democrats were serious about addressing global warming they would focus on drafting measures such as one to improve technology to reduce emissions. &amp;ldquo;Instead," he said, "we are here to politicize the internal deliberative process of the administration.&amp;rsquo;&amp;rsquo;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080722/NEWS07/80722031 " target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0135</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate debate a sign of readiness to tackle global warming</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Jun 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0134</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Barbara Boxer&lt;br /&gt;San Jose Mercury News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last week, the United States Senate had a landmark moment in the fight against global warming when 54 senators came down on the side of tackling this issue now.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the floor debate on the Climate Security Act was ultimately cut short by a Republican filibuster, our strong vote proves that we are moving in the right direction.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When a comprehensive global warming bill last came to the floor in 2005, only 38 senators voted in favor of it. Today, our nation is poised to confront this challenge and once again become an environmental leader in the world.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In remarkable contrast to President Bush - who fiercely defends the status quo and threatened to veto the bill even before he saw the final product - both presidential candidates said they are in favor of addressing the issue now.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It is imperative that we move forward - not just for the sake of our planet, our children and grandchildren, and all of God&amp;#39;s creatures threatened by global warming, but also for the sake of our economic security.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The best hope we have for affordable energy is to pass a bill like the Climate Security Act, which will allow the free market to put a price on carbon and send a signal that it is time to invest in alternative energy and new technology. Continuing to rely on big oil and conventional coal would be the worst scenario for the American people, who are paying more than $4 a gallon at the pump and being held captive by hostile Middle East regimes that have too much control over our energy policy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What better time to encourage the development of alternative fuels and energy efficient technology than when oil is nearly $140 a barrel?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Silicon Valley leaders have told me that when we enact a strong, federal cap-and-trade law, they anticipate billions of dollars in investment in green technology, which will create millions of &amp;quot;green jobs&amp;quot; here in America. And, if we take those steps now, we will be able to export that technology to other nations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Senate debate, however abbreviated, gave us a road map for the future. But until we have a new president who is willing to work with us to confront this challenge, we must continue to push policies forward at the state level.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the central fronts in that battle is California&amp;#39;s efforts to obtain a waiver from the Clean Air Act so that we can implement standards to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California has been granted a waiver from the Clean Air Act more than 50 times by both Republican and Democratic administrations, but President Bush and political operatives at the Environmental Protection Agency for the first time outright denied California&amp;#39;s request for a waiver, overruling the unanimous opinion of EPA&amp;#39;s career scientists and lawyers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EPA&amp;#39;s decision means that California, and at least 14 other states that adopted California&amp;#39;s standards, cannot act. The states, led by California&amp;#39;s attorney general, are suing EPA, and I will file an amicus brief supporting them in their efforts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;I hope the courts will act quickly to reverse EPA&amp;#39;s outrageous decision so that California can get started on this problem and continue to set an example for the federal government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Our generation has been handed a tremendous challenge. Legislation to combat global warming will not happen overnight; it took 10 years to pass major Clean Air Act legislation. We started voting on comprehensive global warming legislation in the Senate five years ago. We must get there - scientists have told us clearly that time is not on our side.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;We must convince the negative voices that we need to act now to avert the dangers of global warming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;BARBARA BOXER, a Democratic U.S. senator from California, is chairwoman of the Senate environment and public works committee and a sponsor of the Boxer-Lieberman-Warner Climate Security Act. She wrote this article for the Mercury News.&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/opinion/ci_9537913?nclick_check=1" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0134</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer wants federal funding for Great Park</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0132</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;IRVINE &amp;ndash; Sen. Barbara Boxer on Tuesday got a first-hand look at the future home of the Great Park, announcing her intention to seek federal assistance in making several parts of the ambitious project a reality.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer (D-CA), who serves as chair of the Senate&amp;#39;s Environment and Public Works Committee, said the funds would go toward the creation of a 30-to-50-acre community farm, the refurbishment of a historic WWII hangar for public use and a storm water reclamation and management system.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m going to fight to get these appropriations for you, right now, this year,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;I want to be a part of this adventure.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Lead designer Ken Smith gave Boxer a brief update on the parks master plan, which is approaching the 70 percent completion mark. The ambitious plans call for the transformation of the former El Toro Marine Base into the $1.1 billion, 1,374-acre Great Park.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer praised park designers&amp;#39; plans to restore natural and agricultural land to the area, as well as efforts to retain and celebrate the site&amp;#39;s military heritage. She was unaware of how much federal money is available for the park, but indicated that it would be tied to matching local funds.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t look at this as subsidizing anything,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;I look at it as an investment.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer&amp;#39;s ties to the Great Park effort date back nearly a decade, said Larry Agran, chairman of the parks board of directors, who first approached her to weigh in on the battle between those who wanted to turn El Toro into a commercial airport and Great Park proponents. Boxer said it was important that the issue was decided on a local level.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This has not been easy. This has been hard fought. But the fight is over,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;We need to stick together and get this done.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer&amp;#39;s visit comes a little more than a month before local leaders are scheduled to celebrate the third anniversary of the Great Park&amp;#39;s approval. The celebration on July 12, known as the &amp;quot;Festival of Flight,&amp;quot; is also scheduled to include the return of the Great Park balloon ride, and the unveiling of the first section of a 27.5 acre preview park.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Agran acknowledged the sometimes difficult road in creating the Great Park &amp;ndash; from the initial airport battles to the current housing crunch that has delayed adjacent development &amp;ndash; but expressed optimism for the park&amp;#39;s future.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We faced challenges in the past. We continue to face challenges,&amp;quot; Agran said. &amp;quot;But fundamentally this is a great opportunity.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By Sean Emery&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source OC Register&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0132</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Lawmakers question dismissal of EPA official</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 May 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0131</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;By Ken Thomas&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;Associated Press&amp;nbsp;&lt;span style="font-style: normal" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- Two lawmakers pressured the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency on Tuesday for information surrounding the resignation of a top EPA administrator in the Midwest.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Sheldon Whitehouse, D-R.I., asked the EPA for any documents related to the departure of Mary Gade and her work to enforce the clean up of dioxin contamination near Dow Chemical Co.&amp;#39;s headquarters in Midland, Mich.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gade, the regional administrator of EPA Region 5, told the Chicago Tribune earlier this month that she resigned after two top EPA officials stripped her of her powers and told her to quit or be fired by June 1.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gade told the newspaper her resignation was connected to the Dow case.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The senators asked the EPA if Gade was asked to resign and whether the White House or Dow Chemical were involved in any discussions surrounding Gade&amp;#39;s potential departure. They also want Gade&amp;#39;s most recent job performance evaluation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It is important for there to be a full explanation of the circumstances surrounding Ms. Gade&amp;#39;s allegedly forced resignation,&amp;quot; Boxer and Whitehouse wrote in a letter to EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EPA spokesman Jonathan Shrader said the agency &amp;quot;will review and respond to the letter appropriately.&amp;quot; The agency has said Gade was placed on administrative leave until June 1, but has declined further comment.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;John Musser, a Dow spokesman, said the company was &amp;quot;surprised as anyone else&amp;quot; over Gade&amp;#39;s resignation.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dow and government regulators have debated for months about how to cleanse a group of waters and wetlands.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The company has acknowledged tainting the Tittabawassee and the adjoining Saginaw River, their floodplains, portions of the city of Midland and Lake Huron&amp;#39;s Saginaw Bay with dioxins -- chemical byproducts believed to cause cancer and damage reproductive and immune systems.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But Dow has said it needs to finish measuring how much pollution exists -- and where -- before devising a cleanup plan.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Government officials have urged Dow to move faster. The EPA in October ordered Dow to develop a plan that would show its willingness to design and pay for a comprehensive solution to clean up contamination near the Midland plant. In December, a deadline to reach a deal was extended but talks broke off in January.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gade was appointed in 2006 to lead the federal agency&amp;#39;s Region 5, which covers the states of Illinois, Wisconsin, Minnesota, Indiana, Michigan, and Ohio.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.chicagotribune.com/news/chi-ap-mi-eparesignation,0,4878570.story" target="_blank"&gt;Link to full article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0131</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>White House blocked EPA studies, GAO reports</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0130</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Zachary Coile&lt;br /&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A congressional watchdog agency has found that White House officials repeatedly intervened in the government&amp;#39;s scientific process for assessing the health risks of toxic chemicals, prompting Sen. Barbara Boxer to threaten giving Congress control of the program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Government Accountability Office reported Tuesday that the White House&amp;#39;s budget office, the Pentagon and other agencies had delayed or blocked efforts by the Environmental Protection Agency to list chemicals as carcinogens by requesting more research or more time to review the risks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, D-Calif., who is chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and requested the report, called the findings scandalous. If EPA does not speed up its assessments of toxic chemicals, she warned that Congress might step in and start banning substances that threaten the public health.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;If we don&amp;#39;t see that happen, colleagues of mine are going to take matters into their own hands,&amp;quot; Boxer said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A top EPA official, who was grilled at a hearing before Boxer&amp;#39;s committee Tuesday, responded that it was helpful to have more input from the White House and other agencies.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Ultimately, at the end of the day, it&amp;#39;s EPA&amp;#39;s decision,&amp;quot; said James Gulliford, EPA&amp;#39;s assistant administrator for pesticides, prevention and toxic substances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;GAO officials also faulted the administration for setting new rules that keep secret any involvement by the White House or a federal agency in a decision about the risks of a chemical.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;In the risk assessment program, you don&amp;#39;t want anyone but the scientists involved,&amp;quot; John Stephenson, GAO&amp;#39;s chief investigator for environmental programs, told lawmakers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The issue involves major changes the administration has made to an EPA program called &amp;quot;IRIS&amp;quot; - the Integrated Risk Information System - which allows the agency to determine safe levels of exposure to chemicals to protect the public health. The program has been used to set limits on arsenic in drinking water and benzene in the air, and foreign nations and states like California often use the data for their regulations.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Influencing risk assessment&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since President Bush took office in 2001, the White House has sought to take more control of a process that has long been led by EPA scientists, the report found. The Office of Management and Budget, the Defense Department, the Energy Department and even NASA have taken steps to influence risk assessments that could affect those agencies or hurt U.S. industries, the report said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;For example, the EPA started a risk assessment of naphthalene, a chemical used in jet fuel, in 2002, and agency scientists have been moving toward listing it as a likely human carcinogen. But many military sites are contaminated with naphthalene, which could lead to major cleanup costs for the Pentagon. So, White House budget officials slowed the process, repeatedly requesting more analysis. Six years later, the risk assessment is back at the drafting stage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;The series of delays has limited EPA&amp;#39;s ability to conduct its mission,&amp;quot; the GAO report concluded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The study also found irregularities in the agency&amp;#39;s risk assessment of formaldehyde, a colorless gas used in plywood and many other household products, which the World Health Organization has listed as a known human carcinogen but EPA classifies only as a probable carcinogen.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In 2004, the EPA&amp;#39;s Office of Air and Radiation decided to bypass the risk analysis of its own scientists and use data by an industry-funded group when it issued new rules for formaldehyde - even though EPA&amp;#39;s National Center for Environmental Assessment identified a number of problems with the group&amp;#39;s data. A federal appellate court struck down the rules last year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It was fairly unprecedented,&amp;quot; testified Lynn Goldman, who was assistant EPA administrator for prevention, pesticides and toxic substances during the Clinton administration and is now an epidemiologist at Johns Hopkins University.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Only 4 approved&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Stephenson, the GAO investigator, told lawmakers the risk assessments had slowed to a crawl because of the prolonged inter-agency review. Out of 32 draft risk assessments prepared by the EPA over the last two years, only four were approved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The program, Stephenson said, &amp;quot;is at serious risk of becoming obsolete.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Public health advocates warned that the results are years-long delays in regulating harmful chemicals that scientists have linked to rising cancer rates in some groups.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Dr. Linda Giudice, a professor of obstetrics and gynecology at UCSF, pointed to the growing evidence that a child exposed to chemicals in the womb is not only at higher risk of birth defects and learning disabilities, but also at risk of lower fertility, cancer, diabetes and cardiovascular disease as an adult.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Giudice noted that scientists are just now learning of the effects of some chemicals, such as bisphenol A, a compound found in baby bottles and other products. Manufacturers of BPA insist it is safe, but it&amp;#39;s been linked to breast and prostate cancer, early puberty in females and behavior disorders in laboratory animals.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There are many chemicals where we have no scientific data,&amp;quot; Giudice said. &amp;quot;The absence of scientific data does not mean the chemical is safe.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Senate Democrats have introduced a bill to ban children&amp;#39;s products with BPA, and California lawmakers are considering a similar bill. San Francisco was the first jurisdiction in the world to outlaw BPA in kids&amp;#39; products, but it repealed the ban in 2007 after a court fight with plastics manufacturers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said the United States should consider shifting to the European Union&amp;#39;s new system, known as REACH, which requires all manufacturers seeking to sell their chemicals in Europe to register and prove the chemical will not hurt human health or the environment. She said the program &amp;quot;puts the burden on the chemical industry, where it should be, to show that their chemicals are safe.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;E-mail Zachary Coile at zcoile@sfchronicle.com. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/04/30/MN9A10DOR1.DTL" target="_blank"&gt;Link to full article&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0130</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer named 'Environmental Legislator of the Year'</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 25 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0128</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Erica Solvig&lt;br /&gt; Desert Sun&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The South Coast Air Quality Management District is naming U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer as its &amp;quot;Environmental Legislator of the Year.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;This marks the first year the district has given the award.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, a Rancho Mirage resident, will be honored Saturday during a ceremony at the Santa Monica Library, 601 Santa Monica Blvd.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Sen. Boxer&amp;#39;s commitment to the environmental clean-up of ocean-going ships will help protect the health of millions of Americans and is crucial to achieving health-based air quality standards in many areas of the nation,&amp;quot; district governing board Chairman William Burke said in a news release today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080425/NEWS01/80425041" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to full article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0128</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Barbara Boxer urges air passengers' bill of rights</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0129</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;James Hohmann&lt;br /&gt;Los Angeles Times&amp;nbsp; &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- Seizing on the public&amp;#39;s frustration with airline delays, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) called on her colleagues Thursday to finally approve an air passengers&amp;#39; bill of rights.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The legislation, introduced last year, would require airlines to provide food, drinking water, cabin ventilation, toilet facilities and access to medical treatment to passengers stuck on planes waiting to take off.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Airlines would be required to develop contingency plans for allowing passengers to deplane within a specific time frame. In the absence of such a plan, passengers would have the option, as long as safety was not compromised, of getting off a grounded plane three hours after the aircraft doors had closed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;All of us know that delays happen,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;What we are concerned about is how people are treated after the delays happen.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The proposal would not protect passengers from the kinds of flight cancellations seen this week, Boxer acknowledged.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Senate Commerce Committee approved the measure in May 2007 as part of legislation reauthorizing funding for the FAA. Its co-sponsor, Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), said a dispute between members of the Finance and Commerce committees over airline fees and unrelated funding questions was preventing the bill from coming to a vote in the full Senate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A renewed push for federal legislation came last month after a federal court struck down a 2007 New York state law -- similar to the one being considered in the Senate -- on grounds that only the federal government has the right to regulate air travel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;They put the ball in our lap, and here we are -- led by quarterback Boxer,&amp;quot; said Sen. Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.).&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Elizabeth Merida, a spokeswoman for the Air Transport Assn. of America, which represents airlines and opposes the proposal, said carriers need flexibility to address situations on a case-by-case basis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We believe that a strict law set forth by Washington would actually inconvenience passengers even more in the end.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-air11apr11,1,3576787.story" target="_blank"&gt;Link to full article&amp;nbsp;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0129</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: Explanation Needed on Polar Bears</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 02 Apr 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0127</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Matthew Daly&lt;br /&gt;Associated Press&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON (AP) -- The chair of the Senate Environment Committee on Wednesday slammed Interior Secretary Dirk Kempthorne for failing to appear before her panel to explain why the Bush administration has delayed a decision on whether to protect polar bears under the Endangered Species Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., criticized Kempthorne for declining her invitation to appear before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s wrong that Mr. Kempthorne is not here,&amp;quot; Boxer said after the hearing, which went on without an appearance from Kempthorne or any other administration official. &amp;quot;I like him, but it&amp;#39;s wrong.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The deadline for a decision on listing Alaska&amp;#39;s polar bears as threatened under the Endangered Species Act was Jan. 9. Conservation groups petitioned to list polar bears as threatened more than three years ago because their habitat, sea ice, is shrinking from global warming, many scientists say.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said Kempthorne and other administration officials were &amp;quot;ducking their responsibility to the American people&amp;quot; by delaying a decision on the bears -- and then failing to appear at a hearing to explain why.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said she was especially troubled because the administration did not hesitate to open a major bear habitat to oil leases. The Interior Department opened a large area of the Chukchi Sea to oil and gas leases in early February, despite sharp criticism from environmentalists who note that one-fifth of the Arctic&amp;#39;s polar bears depend on sea ice in their hunt for food.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There&amp;#39;s a rush to drill, and no rush to list&amp;quot; polar bears as threatened, Boxer said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to Boxer, Kempthorne said he &amp;quot;respectfully&amp;quot; declined her invitation to appear at the hearing, since he is a named defendant in a lawsuit over the polar bear listing filed by an environmental group.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Kempthorne, a former Idaho governor and senator, said he understands that the delay in the polar bear decision is frustrating to Boxer and others who advocate additional protections for the bear.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But he said the oil and gas leases opened up in February do not pose a threat to the bear, citing the &amp;quot;localized nature&amp;quot; of the proposed oil and gas developments. If the bear is listed as threatened, any oil and gas exploration would be subject to the Endangered Species Act, regardless of when the leases are sold, Kempthorne said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Careful deliberation will not imperil the survival of the polar bear,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. John Warner, R-Va., said he spoke with Kempthorne this week, and Kempthorne expects a decision on polar bears &amp;quot;before early summer.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Critics say listing polar bears as threatened could hamstring oil and gas exploration and development in the Arctic, and that the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, an agency of the Interior Department, is not equipped to handle duties that would go along with the change. A polar bear recovery plan could force the agency to review new sources of greenhouse gases that contribute to global warming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s a professional wildlife agency, not an air-regulating agency,&amp;quot; said William Horn, an attorney and former assistant Interior secretary for Fish and Wildlife in the Reagan administration.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Interior Department&amp;#39;s inspector general, responding to conservation groups, said last month it is investigating why the department had not made its listing decision. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5gCwyKa5nrcgLaB3cyx-JSBrT3u3wD8VQ12NG3" target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0127</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Urges Support for Foreclosure Protection Act</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0126</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;KCBS&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;SAN FRANCISCO (KCBS)&amp;nbsp; -- Senator Barbara Boxer urged public support for legislation which addresses the home mortgage foreclosure crisis.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Speaking in San Francisco Wednesday, Boxer said California is on the front line of the mortgage meltdown.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re too far behind the curve here on this crisis. We need to get out in front of it. We need to restore confidence,&amp;quot; she said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said her legislation, titled the Foreclosure Protection Act, would increase funding for counseling and legal services for homeowners in danger of losing their homes.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kcbs.com/pages/1854191.php?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;strong&gt; &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kcbs.com/pages/1854191.php?" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0126</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>AP Water Probe Prompts Senate Hearings</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 11 Mar 2008 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0125</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By  MARTHA MENDOZA&lt;br /&gt;Associated Press&amp;nbsp;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Two veteran U.S. senators said they plan to hold hearings in response to an Associated Press investigation into the presence of trace amounts of pharmaceuticals in the drinking water supplies of at least 41 million Americans.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Also, U.S. Rep. Allyson Schwartz, D-Pa., has asked the EPA to establish a national task force to investigate the issue and make recommendations to Congress on any legislative actions needed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, who heads the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, and Sen. Frank Lautenberg, chairman of the Transportation, Safety, Infrastructure Security and Water Quality Subcommittee, said Monday the oversight hearings would likely be held in April.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, D-Calif., said she was &amp;#39;&amp;#39;alarmed at the news&amp;#39;&amp;#39; that pharmaceuticals are turning up in the nation&amp;#39;s drinking water, while Lautenberg, a New Jersey Democrat who said he was &amp;#39;&amp;#39;deeply concerned&amp;#39;&amp;#39; by the AP findings, both represent states where pharmaceuticals had been detected in drinking water supplies, but not disclosed to the public.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;#39;&amp;#39;I call on the EPA to take whatever steps are necessary to keep our communities safe,&amp;#39;&amp;#39; said Boxer in a statement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Added Lautenberg, whose subcommittee has jurisdiction over drinking water issues: &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Our families deserve water that is clean and safe. Our hearing will examine these problems and help ensure the EPA and Congress take the steps necessary to protect our residents and clean up our water supply.&amp;#39;&amp;#39;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EPA spokesman Timothy Lyons said the agency is &amp;#39;&amp;#39;committed to keeping the nation&amp;#39;s water supply clean, safe and the best in the world. We encourage all Americans to be responsible when disposing of prescription drugs.&amp;#39;&amp;#39;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Lautenberg-Boxer announcement came just 24 hours after the AP&amp;#39;s release of the first installment of its three-part series, titled PharmaWater.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The five-month-long inquiry by the AP National Investigative Team found that while water is screened for drugs by some suppliers, they usually don&amp;#39;t tell their customers that they have found medication in it, including antibiotics, anti-convulsants, mood stabilizers and sex hormones.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The series shows how drugs &amp;mdash; mostly the residue of medications taken by people, excreted and flushed down the toilet &amp;mdash; have gotten into the water supplies of at least 24 major metropolitan areas, from Southern California to northern New Jersey. The stories also detail the growing concerns among scientists that this pollution has adversely affected wildlife, and may threaten human health.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a letter to EPA administrator Stephen Johnson, Schwartz said, &amp;#39;&amp;#39;Like many Pennsylvanians, I was especially taken aback by the finding of 56 different pharmaceuticals discovered in the drinking water for the City of Philadelphia. . . The Associated Press report raises serious questions about the safety and security of America&amp;#39;s water system.&amp;#39;&amp;#39;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://ap.google.com/article/ALeqM5ipVx85Nbcbz3VNRF9_kzSkcCKukwD8VB5A500"&gt;Link to full article&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0125</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EPA Chief's Final Decision On California CO2 Ruling Scorned</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0124</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;CNNMoney.com&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON - (Dow Jones) - Environmentalists scorned the Environmental Protection Agency&amp;#39;s final decision Friday that rejects California&amp;#39;s request to regulate greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The decision, a controversial ruling made by EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson against the advice of senior agency staff, has been branded by many Democratic lawmakers and environmentalists as politically motivated and followed strong lobbying pressure from auto manufacturers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;William Becker, executive director of the National Association of Clean Air Agencies, called Johnson&amp;#39;s decision &amp;quot;a direct attack on the rights of states to protect the health and welfare of its citizens.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Never before has EPA denied California and other states the ability to enforce more stringent vehicle emissions standards,&amp;quot; Becker said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;[...]&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;EPA Decision Also Under Scrutiny In Congress&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson is also coming under fire in two congressional investigations into his decision, one conducted by the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee and the other by the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Chairwoman of the Senate environment panel Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said earlier this week that she would be working together with Rep. Henry Waxman, D- Calif., chairman of the House oversight panel, to subpoena emails and records of discussions between the executive branch and the EPA.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Those documents will be subpoenaed,&amp;quot; Boxer said at an EPA budget hearing. &amp;quot; The law requires Mr. Johnson to turn over this information....The fact is that this is not privileged information...and we want to know who influenced your decision.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Friday, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., chairwoman of the Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on the Interior, Environment and Related Agencies, called for the Government Accountability Office and the EPA&amp;#39;s Inspector General also to investigate the decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson has said he received a &amp;quot;wide range of recommendations&amp;quot; from his staff on how to respond to California&amp;#39;s petition. But internal EPA documents made public this week by Senate Democrats also show that several top EPA staffers supported California&amp;#39;s request and tried to warn Johnson that a rejection could mean he would have to resign.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EPA chief has also faced criticism for delaying the decision, waiting for a Supreme Court ruling that forced the agency to make a decision. In May last year, President George W. Bush directed the EPA to craft rules for greenhouse gas emissions from vehicles by the end of 2008, following an April Supreme Court decision that said the EPA has the authority to regulate the pollutant carbon dioxide.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson has previously said his agency is also studying the impact of vehicle greenhouse gas regulations on stationary sources such as power generators, refiners and chemical plants.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Although federal regulation for greenhouse gases from vehicles might initially affect car manufacturers such as Ford Motor Co. (F), General Motors Co. (GM) and Chrysler LLC, ultimately, EPA carbon dioxide rules could also hit utilities such as American Electric Power Co. (AEP) and TXU Energy,refiners such as Tesoro Corp. (TSO) and Valero Energy Corp. (VLO) and most chemical companies, oil companies and other major greenhouse gas emitters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson was careful to note in his rationale that while he recognizes global warming is a serious challenge, the document doesn&amp;#39;t reflect a judgment of whether greenhouse gas emissions cause or contribute to air pollution &amp;quot;which may reasonably be anticipated to endanger public health or welfare.&amp;quot; Such a determination -- which the EPA says it is continuing to evaluate -- would have implications on stationary sources too.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-By Ian Talley, Dow Jones Newswires; 202-862-9285; ian.talley@dowjones.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;-By Stephen Power, The Wall Street Journal&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/news/newsfeeds/articles/djf500/200802291339DOWJONESDJONLINE000861_FORTUNE5.htm" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to full article&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0124</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Barbara Boxer's work on water bill earns award</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0123</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Desert Sun&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- Sen. Barbara Boxer received a leadership award Tuesday for her work on a water bill that became law last year despite a presidential veto.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Association of California Water Agencies gave Boxer, chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, its 2007 legislative leadership award for her efforts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Timothy Quinn, the association&amp;#39;s executive director, said the passage of the Water Resources Development Act was crucial for the water agencies across the state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Senator Boxer deserves our thanks and recognition for taking on this issue,&amp;quot; Quinn said in a statement.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bill, which Boxer helped write, authorized about $30 million for restoration of the Salton Sea, along with about $1 billion in California water projects. The $23 billion water bill became law late last year after Congress overrode a veto by President Bush.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080226/NEWS10/80226034/1263/update" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0123</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer ready for round 2 in global warming fight</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Feb 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0122</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;By Diana Marrero&lt;br /&gt;Desert Sun&lt;/span&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON - Barely 5 feet tall, Barbara Boxer used a wooden box to reach the microphone at a global warming rally here. But her voice was big.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;We are putting global warming on the map,&amp;quot; she told faithful supporters outside the Capitol last winter. &amp;quot;We are saying to our friends in the world, we understand America has to step up to the plate.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer, a California Democrat who had just taken control of the Senate&amp;#39;s environment committee, spoke to a crowd that didn&amp;#39;t need convincing. She now faces a tougher audience inside the Capitol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Rancho Mirage resident is shepherding legislation through the Senate that would cut carbon dioxide emissions by two-thirds nationwide by 2050.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scientists say the United States, the world&amp;#39;s largest emitter of carbon dioxide, must significantly reduce its carbon footprint soon or face the planetary consequences of a warmer climate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;California could see dramatic changes under the most dire predictions. The California desert could become even hotter and drier, increasing the frequency of wildfires and destroying the Joshua trees that dot the landscape. Farmers in the Coachella Valley and across the state could see their water supplies dwindle. And cities along the state&amp;#39;s 1,340 miles of coastline could be swamped by rising sea levels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A fierce environmentalist, Boxer has the passion to push a global warming bill into law. But it takes more than one person&amp;#39;s passion and hard work to make laws in Washington.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bill faces long odds - election year politics that tend to stall major bills, opposition from powerful industry groups and Republicans in the Senate who say the bill would hurt the U.S. economy. At the winter rally, however, Boxer was optimistic.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;All it takes is some political will,&amp;quot; she told the crowd. &amp;quot;With the ever expanding number of Americans who are waking up to this, we will do it.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;No passing fancy&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was March and climate change was the topic of the moment. Sports Illustrated had just devoted its cover story to global warming. Former Vice President Al Gore had been nominated for the Nobel Prize for his tireless lecturing on the subject. His PowerPoint speech-turned-documentary about climate charts and drowning polar bears was being considered for two Oscars.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer had reached the peak of her power. The Democrats controlled the Senate, albeit by a slim margin. And, after a quarter of a century on Capitol Hill, Boxer could set the agenda as chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Her goal: to pass global warming legislation that would set up a cap-and-trade system requiring U.S. companies to trade credits in order to release carbon into the atmosphere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When the legislative session ended in December, Boxer had fallen short of that goal. The bill passed her committee, but it was less stringent than she wanted. And the Senate leadership showed no sign they would bring her bill to the floor for a full Senate vote. Her experience so far offers a glimpse into the tough fight she has ahead.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer, 67, has been in the Senate for 15 years. She spent a decade in the House before that.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In that time, she has tackled mercury emissions, toxic Superfund sites and arsenic in drinking water supplies. She credits Gore with giving her a sense of urgency about global warming in recent years.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This isn&amp;#39;t just a passing fancy,&amp;quot; she said in a recent interview. &amp;quot;It involves the survival of the planet as we know it.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The world&amp;#39;s leading scientists agree that greenhouse gases, the bulk of which is carbon dioxide, is largely responsible for global warming. Its effects, they say, are already being felt, as snowcaps melt and parts of the world become drier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The United States signed the Kyoto climate accord to reduce greenhouse gases a decade ago but, unlike 177 other countries, the U.S. never ratified the treaty.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;President Bush argues such limits could harm the U.S. economy and that the treaty does not impose similar constraints on China, India and other developing nations. China could soon surpass the United States in emissions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Environmentalists say developed nations have the responsibility to show leadership on the issue and that other countries eventually will follow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;That&amp;#39;s what Boxer had in mind when she asked Gore to testify before her committee in late March.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gore praised Boxer&amp;#39;s work on the committee. &amp;quot;There is really hardly any way to overstate the degree of hope that people out in our country have because of what you&amp;#39;re doing,&amp;quot; he told her.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At times blunt, the grandmother of two wins applause from supporters who see her as an ardent environmental advocate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer has frequently sparred with Stephen Johnson, head of the Environmental Protection Agency, over California&amp;#39;s request for a federal waiver to regulate its own car emissions in the state. At one point, she accused him of putting politics before science, saying he was not in charge of the Environmental Pollution Agency. Johnson eventually denied California&amp;#39;s request.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some say Boxer&amp;#39;s bluntness makes it tough for her to work with Republicans. With a 51-49 majority, Democrats must often work with the GOP to get to the 60-vote threshold needed to pass controversial legislation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;If there&amp;#39;s one thing she&amp;#39;s good at, however, it&amp;#39;s making a statement. During a meeting with members of the British parliament this summer, Boxer paused to ask aides to open the curtains so the lights could be turned off.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Small gestures, she said, can make a difference in the fight against climate change. By the end of the year, Boxer&amp;#39;s committee had held nearly two-dozen global warming hearings but had not approved a bill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With a new round of climate talks scheduled for December in Bali, Indonesia, Boxer set aside her own bill to gather support for a more viable cap-and-trade bill by Sens. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., and John Warner, R-Va.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Republicans were not the only members of her committee she had to worry about. Sen. Bernie Sanders, a Vermont independent who co-sponsored Boxer&amp;#39;s bill, felt the Lieberman measure was not strong enough. Sen. Max Baucus, D-Mont., worried about the impact of the bill on his state, a major coal producer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Both eventually voted for the bill - which passed largely on a party line vote - after Boxer convinced Sanders to allow the measure to go to the floor and Baucus got a break for his state&amp;#39;s rural electric cooperatives in the legislation. Boxer said the vote showed international negotiators that many U.S. lawmakers want to address global warming and the fight was just beginning.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The United States, which has the largest coal reserves in the world, gets nearly half of its electricity from coal-fired power plants that spew carbon into the air. Luke Popovich, a spokesman for the National Mining Association, argues the bill would increase energy costs while not making a dent on climate change.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s called global warming. It&amp;#39;s not American warming,&amp;quot; said Popovich, adding that technology to reduce emissions has not caught up with political rhetoric.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He says Boxer may be well intentioned but misguided. &amp;quot;Costs to consumers will certainly go up under the bill she favors,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A place to start&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Environmental and scientific groups agree the bill doesn&amp;#39;t do enough to reduce the threat of a warming planet, but call it a framework they can work with to make larger reductions in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Sen. Boxer knows it&amp;#39;s going to be a difficult challenge and she&amp;#39;s trying to move something forward that&amp;#39;s going to be achievable but also real,&amp;quot; said Lexi Shultz, a lobbyist for the Union of Concerned Scientists, which estimates the U.S. needs to cut emissions by 80 percent by mid-century to slow the effects of global warming.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even if the Senate fails to act on the bill this year, Boxer vows to keep the pressure on, saying she stands to gain support after the elections. Democrats are expected to gain seats in the Senate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This is an issue the American people care about,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;Anyone who stands in the way will be held responsible.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mydesert.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080210/NEWS0301/802100332" target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0122</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer: Why is EPA standing in way of state law?</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 27 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0121</link>
    <description>&lt;em&gt;By Barbara Boxer&lt;br /&gt;Sacramento Bee&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Since the Clean Air Act was amended 30 years ago to allow California and other states to work together to clean the air, we in California have always been given the green light to go further than the federal government, until now.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On more than 50 separate occasions, Democratic and Republican administrations have granted waivers to California so that our state can be on the cutting edge of clean air technology and law. Californians understand firsthand the need to clean up the air. We know how harmful air pollution is because we face so many challenges in our own state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On Dec. 19, after two years of foot-dragging, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency turned down California&amp;#39;s request to implement tougher standards to curb global warming pollution from motor vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;As chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee with responsibility for overseeing the EPA, I asked EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson to provide all the information behind his unprecedented decision, including the advice he received from his professional staff, the role of the White House and the influence of special interests.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;After weeks of missed deadlines, the EPA finally gave up a handful of documents. But page after page was whited out with masking tape.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When I insisted that EPA provide unedited documents, my staff was permitted to peel off the masking tape from a few of the documents -- under the watchful eyes of EPA officials -- and transcribe what had been hidden. Afterward, EPA returned the documents to the agency.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It was immediately evident why the administrator had made it so difficult to see what was in those papers. Johnson has testified that he personally doesn&amp;#39;t believe California has any &amp;quot;compelling and extraordinary conditions&amp;quot; that would have justified granting the waiver under the law. But under the masking tape we found his staff had compiled no less than seven pages of examples -- from wildfires and endangered species to dwindling water supplies, agricultural lands at risk and coastal communities threatened by sea level rise.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The same documents warned the administrator that by denying the waiver, he would face a lawsuit from California and other states &amp;ndash; and that the agency would likely lose that suit.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Why should the taxpayers be forced to pay to defend the administrator&amp;#39;s decision, when EPA&amp;#39;s own lawyers explained to the administrator the EPA would likely lose in the end?&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The administrator claims that he denied the waiver to avoid a &amp;quot;confusing patchwork&amp;quot; of state laws for vehicle pollution. That&amp;#39;s simply wrong, and I would like to set the record straight.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There will be no patchwork of laws. There will be only two standards: a weaker federal rule and a California standard. States are free to choose whichever standard they prefer. More than 150 million Americans -- a majority of the U.S. population -- live in the states that have already either adopted or taken steps toward California&amp;#39;s standards to do more to fight global warming pollution. The federal government should get out of the way of the states&amp;#39; pioneering efforts.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Every day that we wait makes it more difficult to address global warming. Yet the EPA administrator&amp;#39;s every move seems calculated to postpone any real action to curb global warming pollution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The mission of the EPA is to protect human health and the environment.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The administrator&amp;#39;s decision does neither.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One way or another, this unjustified, unprecedented and illegal decision must be overturned. On Jan. 24, I introduced bipartisan legislation, with 18 of my colleagues, to reverse the denial of the waiver. I also plan to file an amicus brief in the state of California&amp;#39;s lawsuit against the EPA. And I will continue the investigation. There remains much to be done as we work to uncover the facts behind this indefensible decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The people who pay the administrator&amp;#39;s salary have a right to know how he came to a decision that is so far removed from the facts, the law, the science and the precedent.</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0121</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EPA staff documents say boss should OK California's emissions waiver</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0120</link>
    <description>&lt;em&gt;Zachary Coile&lt;br /&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Top Environmental Protection Agency officials withheld documents from Congress showing that the agency&amp;#39;s staff sought to convince EPA administrator Stephen Johnson not to reject California&amp;#39;s efforts to enforce the nation&amp;#39;s strongest greenhouse gas rules for cars and trucks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer, who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, requested the documents last month, when Johnson denied California&amp;#39;s request, but EPA officials had stonewalled. On Friday, EPA officials gave Boxer copies of heavily redacted documents in which most key sections were whited out.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But on Monday, EPA officials allowed Boxer&amp;#39;s staff to review -- but not photocopy -- a highly sensitive PowerPoint presentation in which EPA staffers told Johnson that he would likely lose in court if he refused the state&amp;#39;s request for a waiver.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Most of the sensitive portions were covered in white tape, Boxer said. EPA officials would not allow the documents to be taken out of the room, and Senate staffers had to hand copy them under the eye of EPA lawyers, who claimed they were protected by executive confidentiality.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This information belongs to the American people,&amp;quot; Boxer said, who released excerpts of the documents to reporters Tuesday. &amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s shameful that we&amp;#39;ve had to go through such a tortuous process to get it.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;EPA officials did not immediately respond for a request for comment Tuesday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When Johnson rejected California&amp;#39;s request, he said new federal rules, passed by Congress and signed by President Bush, that raised fuel economy standards to 35 mpg by 2020 made the state&amp;#39;s waiver request unnecessary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;He is expected to testify before Boxer&amp;#39;s committee tomorrow on why he made his decision, and he&amp;#39;s sure to be grilled by lawmakers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The new details about the PowerPoint presentation appear to bolster the case of California and 18 other states that are seeking to implement than new tailpipe emissions rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The documents show that EPA staff had concluded that California likely met the &amp;quot;compelling and extraordinary conditions&amp;quot; required under the Clean Air Act for granting waivers to states. The documents cited unique risks to California from climate change including wildfires, threats to coastal communities, water shortages and air pollution.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;California continues to have compelling and extraordinary conditions in general (geography, climatic, human and motor vehicle populations -- many such conditions are vulnerable to climate change conditions) as confirmed by several recent EPA decisions,&amp;quot; the agency&amp;#39;s staff wrote.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California has had long history in battling the smog-forming pollutant, ozone, and EPA&amp;#39;s staffers wrote: &amp;quot;Legislative history, case law, and past waiver practice acknowledge that California&amp;#39;s ozone problem is &amp;#39;compelling and extraordinary.&amp;#39;&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The document also confirmed a revelation -- first reported in the Washington Post last month -- that EPA lawyers believed the agency was &amp;quot;likely to lose&amp;quot; if it denied California&amp;#39;s request.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the agency granted the request, the staffers said the automakers would be likely to sue to overturn it. But the EPA&amp;#39;s lawyers concluded that the agency &amp;quot;is almost certain to win such a suit.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said the documents will help California&amp;#39;s case in court by undermining the credibility of Johnson&amp;#39;s argument.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Clearly this decision is not supported by the facts, by the law, by the precedent...it&amp;#39;s not going to stand,&amp;quot; Boxer said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;You have to raise the question: Who is Mr. Johnson listening to? Who is he listening to besides the advice of his well-qualified staff?&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EPA has also alerted Boxer that there is e-mail between the White House and EPA staff, but the agency has said it will not turn over the information until next month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;House Oversight and Government Reform Committee Chairman Henry Waxman, D--Los Angeles, is preparing to interview EPA staffers and has vowed to use his subpoena power to obtain other documents related to how Johnson made his decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;E-mail Zachary Coile at zcoile@sfchronicle.com.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2008/01/23/BAE6UKCQI.DTL" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0120</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EPA waiver denial not supported by staff, Boxer says</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0119</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By David Whitney&lt;br /&gt;Sacramento Bee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON -- EPA head Stephen Johnson was told by staff members that California had a compelling case for the federal Clean Air Act waiver that he later denied -- and that if sued, the agency was likely to lose in court, according to Sen. Barbara Boxer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson&amp;#39;s denial of the waiver halted California from moving ahead with its tough laws to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks. Sixteen other states were prepared to follow California&amp;#39;s lead if the waiver had been issued.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, D-Calif., heads the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, which is investigating the EPA&amp;#39;s rejection of the waiver. Under the Clean Air Act, California is the only state that can obtain a waiver allowing it to have tougher emission standards than those imposed by the federal government; but once the waiver is granted, other states can follow with similar rules. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson denied the California request in December, saying there was nothing unique about California&amp;#39;s situation that supported issuance of a waiver. A briefing document prepared for Johnson was handed over last week to Boxer&amp;#39;s investigators, but virtually all the text was blotted out.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Investigators were permitted to look at the full documents and take notes from them, however. At a press conference Wednesday, Boxer released excerpts from the notes showing that EPA staffers apparently believed California had a solid case for the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The notes directly quoting from the redacted text of Johnson&amp;#39;s briefing memo said that the agency was likely to be sued regardless of what decision it reached. But it said &amp;quot;EPA is almost certain to win&amp;quot; if the lawsuit was brought by the auto industry because the waiver had been granted, and &amp;quot;EPA likely to lose suit&amp;quot; brought by California if the waiver was denied.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;California continues to have compelling and extraordinary conditions in general (geography, climatic, human and motor vehicle populations -- many such conditions are vulnerable to climate change conditions) as confirmed by several recent EPA decisions,&amp;quot; Boxer staff quoted the memo as saying.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said in a statement that she will closely question Johnson about his decision when her committee holds a hearing on the waiver denial Thursday.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;His decision was not supported by the facts, by the law, by the science or by precedent,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;It will not stand.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/102/story/656346.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0119</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer ready to fight for climate</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 22 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0118</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Diana Marrero&lt;br /&gt;Visalia Times-Delta&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- Barely 5 feet tall, Barbara Boxer used a wooden box to reach the microphone at a global warming rally outside the Capitol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But her voice was big. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;We are putting global warming on the map,&amp;quot; she told faithful supporters last winter. &amp;quot;We are saying to our friends in the world, we understand America has to step up to the plate.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer, a California Democrat who had just taken control of the Senate&amp;#39;s environment committee, spoke to a crowd that didn&amp;#39;t need convincing.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She now faces a tougher audience inside the Capitol.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The three-term senator is shepherding legislation through the Senate that would cut carbon dioxide emissions by two-thirds nationwide by 2050.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Scientists say the United States, the world&amp;#39;s largest emitter of carbon dioxide, must significantly reduce its carbon footprint soon or face the planetary consequences of a warmer climate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;California could see dramatic changes under the most dire predictions. Farmers in the San Joaquin Valley and across the state could see their water supplies dwindle. The state&amp;#39;s climate could become hotter and drier, increasing the frequency of wildfires. And cities along the state&amp;#39;s 1,340 miles of coastline could be swamped by rising sea levels.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;A fierce environmentalist, Boxer has the passion to push a global warming bill into law. But it takes more than one person&amp;#39;s passion and hard work to make laws in Washington.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bill faces long odds after the Senate returns from its holiday recess today -- election year politics that tend to stall major bills, opposition from powerful industry groups and Republicans in the Senate who say the bill would hurt the U.S. economy.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At the winter rally, however, Boxer was optimistic. It was March and Boxer had reached the peak of her power. The Democrats controlled the Senate, albeit by a slim margin. And, after a quarter of a century on Capitol Hill, Boxer could set the agenda as chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Her goal: to pass global warming legislation that would set up a cap-and-trade system requiring U.S. companies to trade credits in order to release carbon into the atmosphere.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;When the legislative session ended last month, Boxer had fallen short of that goal. The bill passed her committee, but it was less stringent than she wanted. And the Senate leadership showed no sign they would bring her bill to the floor for a full Senate vote.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The world&amp;#39;s leading scientists agree that greenhouse gases, the bulk of which is carbon dioxide, are largely responsible for global warming. Its effects, they say, are already being felt, as snowcaps melt and parts of the world become drier.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The United States signed the Kyoto climate accord to reduce greenhouse gases a decade ago but, unlike 177 other countries, the U.S. never ratified the treaty.&lt;strong&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Points of contention&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;President Bush argues such limits could harm the U.S. economy and that the treaty does not impose similar constraints on China, India and other developing nations. China could soon surpass the United States in emissions.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Environmentalists say developed nations have the responsibility to show leadership on the issue and that other countries eventually will follow.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some say Boxer&amp;#39;s bluntness -- she once questioned Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice&amp;#39;s truthfulness -- makes it tough for her to work with Republicans. With a 51-49 majority, Democrats must often work with the GOP to get to the 60-vote threshold needed to pass controversial legislation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It makes it difficult to move her agenda forward,&amp;quot; said Jennifer Duffy, a Senate analyst for the Cook Political Report.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;By the end of the year, Boxer&amp;#39;s committee had held nearly two-dozen global warming hearings but had not approved a bill.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;With a new round of climate talks scheduled for December in Bali, Indonesia, Boxer set aside her own bill to gather support for a more viable cap-and-trade bill by Sens. Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., and John Warner, R-Va.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Environmental and scientific groups agree the bill doesn&amp;#39;t do enough to reduce the threat of a warming planet. But they call it a framework they can work with to make larger reductions in the future.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Even if the Senate fails to act on the bill this year, Boxer vows to keep the pressure on, saying she stands to gain support for the bill after the 2008 elections. Democrats are expected to gain seats in the Senate.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This is an issue the American people care about,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;Anyone who stands in the way will be held responsible.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20080122/NEWS/801220330" target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0118</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Ballyhoo in Bali</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0117</link>
    <description>&lt;em&gt;By William J. Kelly&lt;br /&gt;LA CityBeat&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There&amp;#39;s an old saying in politics: &amp;quot;Tell &amp;#39;em what they wanna hear.&amp;quot; This conventional wisdom explains why politicians often say one thing and do another, often completely contradictory.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bush Administration is no exception, of course, particularly when it comes to global warming. Senator Barbara Boxer learned that when she held a field briefing of the U.S. Senate Environment &amp;amp; Public Works Committee in Los Angeles last week. The committee, which she chairs, delved into the Administration&amp;#39;s recent denial of permission for the state to enforce its ambitious greenhouse gas tailpipe standards for new cars.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;What Boxer learned, was that December was a month when there was a major conflict between the Administration&amp;#39;s rhetoric and action. In Washington, Bush&amp;#39;s U.S. Environmental Protection Agency Administrator Stephen Johnson subverted California&amp;#39;s standards by denying permission to enforce them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Meanwhile, Bush dispatched a senior White House official to go halfway around the world to the United Nations conference on climate change in Bali, Indonesia, to assuage international anger about U.S. inaction on global warming. There, the official -- James Connaughton, chair of the White House Council on Environmental Quality -- actually touted California&amp;#39;s tailpipe standards as evidence to the world that the U.S. is working diligently to cut greenhouse gas emissions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In his latest performance, Connaughton appears to have become the master of ballyhoo on global warming, an old Irish term for &amp;quot;sensational advertising&amp;quot; and &amp;quot;propaganda.&amp;quot; Connaughton is the White House operative who had non--scientists tone down government scientific reports on climate change and then control press contacts with scientists on their research.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In Bali, he sung another tune, telling &amp;quot;the entire world one of the pieces of evidence of American &amp;#39;leadership&amp;#39; on climate change, evidence we were getting &amp;#39;real results,&amp;#39; was that eleven states had adopted California&amp;#39;s clean car standards,&amp;quot; Carl Pope, Sierra Club executive director, told the committee. &amp;quot;The slide he presented actually quantified the carbon dioxide emissions which California&amp;#39;s standards would achieve and took credit for them.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Pope, who attended the Bali meeting, went on to explain that Connaughton&amp;#39;s presentation was based on an official State Department report to the United Nations, entitled the Fourth Climate Action Report to the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change. In explaining myriad efforts underway in the U.S. that will help meet the President&amp;#39;s 2002 goal of reducing the carbon intensity of the U.S. by 18 percent by 2012, the document highlights California&amp;#39;s tailpipe standards and the plans of other states, which now number 15, to enforce them within their borders.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer noted that four more states are moving to adopt the standards, which would bring the total to 19. &amp;quot;More than 150 million Americans, a majority of the U.S. population, live in these 19 states,&amp;quot; Boxer said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The occasion for her field briefing was that last month U.S. EPA Administrator Johnson denied needed permission under the federal Clean Air Act for California and these other states to even enforce the tailpipe standard for automakers. They are supposed to take effect in 2009 and cut greenhouse gases by 30 percent by 2016 from cars, pickup trucks, vans, and sport utility vehicles, former Assemblywoman Fran Pavley testified to the Senate panel.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson&amp;#39;s decision on the standards, which would effectively raise average vehicle mileage to 44 miles per gallon, came after Congress voted last month to boost the federal fuel economy standard for autos to 35 miles a gallon by 2020. He said that the federal increase eliminated the need for California&amp;#39;s standard and will prevent a patchwork of state standards for the auto industry.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The result is that California will come up short on meeting its own greenhouse gas law, which calls for the state to cut the carbon emissions that are causing global warming to their 1990 level by 2020, according to Mary Nichols, chair of the California Air Resources Board. &amp;quot;It would get us half of what we need,&amp;quot; she told the Senate committee.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Moreover, Nichols said that because California&amp;#39;s standard would &amp;quot;yield a better fuel efficiency&amp;quot; it would save drivers money within a year of buying a new car at today&amp;#39;s gas prices. At the same time, she said, it would not restrict choice in vehicle models so drivers would still be able to buy everything from pickup trucks to sport utility vehicles.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Finally, she noted that since the other states are planning to enforce the California requirements, automakers really would not face a patchwork of standards, just two, a national benchmark and a California requirement.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California on January 2 sued the federal EPA to overturn Johnson&amp;#39;s decision. Meanwhile, Boxer plans to haul Johnson before her committee in Washington January 24, potentially under oath, to explain his decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This is nothing more than a backroom deal and Stephen Johnson nothing more than a tool in Washington politics,&amp;quot; concluded Jerry Brown, California attorney general, who is leading the state&amp;#39;s legal battle to overturn the decision. &amp;quot;Sooner or later we&amp;#39;re going to discover real corruption.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.lacitybeat.com/cms/story/detail/ballyhoo_in_bali/6587/" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0117</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>U.S. denial of California emissions waiver criticized</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 11 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0115</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Margot Roosevelt&lt;br /&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Congressional critics launched an offensive against the Bush administration Thursday for denying California and other states the right to adopt strict curbs on greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, said she would consider issuing a subpoena for documents that might show White House interference in the Dec. 19 decision to deny California a waiver to enact its own rules under the Clean Air Act.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This outrageous decision...is completely contrary to the law and science,&amp;quot; Boxer said in a briefing with state officials at Los Angeles City Hall. She held up an empty cardboard box as a symbol of the Environmental Protection Agency&amp;#39;s refusal so far to provide the hefty technical and legal backup that normally accompanies air pollution waiver decisions and are usually published in the Federal Register.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EPA&amp;#39;s decision was in part based on the assertion that global warming, caused by carbon dioxide and other greenhouse gases, is a worldwide problem rather than a California issue, and therefore requires a national, rather than a state-led, solution. EPA administrator Stephen L. Johnson said an energy bill signed by President Bush last month would adequately control greenhouse gas emissions by requiring a 35-mph fleet-wide fuel economy average by 2020.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But the air board has calculated that more greenhouse gas would be emitted under the federal plan than under California&amp;#39;s blueprint.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California already has the nation&amp;#39;s most severe smog and soot. And scientists have found that by warming the air and increasing humidity, carbon dioxide emissions increase concentrations of ozone and fine particulates, which are linked to heart attacks, asthma and other diseases. A Stanford University study released last week calculated that California would have several hundred additional deaths each year due to the effects of global warming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Using a computer model to simulate global pollution changes and factoring in the health effects confirmed by previous studies, Mark Jacobson, a Stanford professor of civil and environmental engineering, concluded that about 21,600 people worldwide could die each year for each degree Celsius of temperature increase.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;With six of the 10 most polluted cities in the nation being in California,&amp;quot; Jacobson said, &amp;quot;that alone creates a special circumstance for the state.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California&amp;#39;s landmark 2002 law requires new automakers to reduce greenhouse gas emissions from vehicle tailpipes by 30% by 2016. Under the Clean Air Act, the state is allowed to issue its own rules, because it had a pollution program before the act was passed.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;States may choose to follow the federal model or California&amp;#39;s rules, but only if the EPA issues a waiver to California. The agency has done so in more than 50 other cases over three decades&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California Atty. Gen. Jerry Brown, who sued the EPA last week in an effort to overturn the decision, said the agency was delaying the issuing of legal and technical documents to stall court action.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Subpoena these guys,&amp;quot; he urged Boxer. &amp;quot;Send the marshals out. Get them to tell us under oath. They are not going to get away with this. Sooner or later, we are going to uncover real corruption...that is dangerous to California and to the whole world.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brown said that the Bush administration may be able to delay court action a year, until the president&amp;#39;s term is over, but that Congress may be able to speed the process. &amp;quot;What you have is a bunch of scofflaws in the White House,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;This fellow Johnson is becoming a stooge in a really pathetic drama that hopefully will not play out much longer.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson is scheduled to testify before the Senate committee in Washington on Jan. 24. An EPA spokesman said, &amp;quot;The official decision documents are being prepared, and they will be released soon.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Mary Nichols, chairwoman of the state Air Resources Board, said that if the court did not act quickly, the board would outline other options for requiring greenhouse gas cutbacks from automobiles, including fees and incentives. She said the California standards, which are scheduled to begin to take effect in 2009, could be met by auto companies with existing technology. So far, she said, 12 states have chosen to adopt California&amp;#39;s standards, pending a waiver approval. Others are in the process of doing so. If all 50 states adopted California&amp;#39;s law, it would reduce the amount of carbon dioxide emissions by 1.4 gigatons, about twice what the federal standards would achieve by then, Nichols said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The outcome of the tailpipe issue may be determined by the next administration, said Brown, who added that he had written the presidential candidates to ask their positions on the waiver. All the Democrats support California&amp;#39;s position, but only one Republican, Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas), answered Brown&amp;#39;s letter in the affirmative.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Testifying Thursday, Carl Pope, executive director of the Sierra Club, urged Californians to focus on the Feb. 5 primary and demand that all candidates endorse the waiver. Although polls show that Americans overwhelmingly support strong measures to curb global warming, and 150 New Hampshire town halls approved resolutions urging candidates to address global warming, the issue has been largely dormant in the presidential campaign, Pope said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;margot.roosevelt@latimes.com&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Times staff writer Marla Cone contributed to this report. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/local/la-me-epa11jan11,1,5236978.story?ctrack=1&amp;amp;cset=true" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0115</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>California leaders take aim at EPA at Senate committee briefing</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0116</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Noaki Schwartz&lt;br /&gt;Associated Press Writer&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;A panel of outraged state and environmental leaders met Thursday to examine why the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency denied a waiver that would have allowed California and 16 other states to regulate emissions from cars, trucks and SUVs.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The denial was the first time the EPA had refused California a waiver under the Clean Air Act since Congress gave the state the right to obtain such waivers in 1967. In response, California sued the federal government.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I think it is fair to say that in the intervening...years, no administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency has issued a decision which more flagrantly violated the clear language and intent of the Clean Air Act, or more fundamentally threatened the American people,&amp;quot; Carl Pope, the executive director of the Sierra Club, told a Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works during the field briefing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Last month EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson rejected the state&amp;#39;s arguments that it faced unique threats from climate change. Johnson said the federal government has a national plan to raise fuel economy standards that would be more effective than a patchwork of state regulations.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EPA&amp;#39;s denial angered members of Congress, including Sen. Barbara Boxer and Rep. Henry Waxman, California Democrats who chair the committees that oversee the EPA. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., called on the agency&amp;#39;s inspector general to investigate allegations that Johnson acted against recommendations from his technical and legal staff in denying the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EPA said it would turn over all documents about its decision, but Boxer&amp;#39;s committee was unable to get the paperwork in time for Thursday&amp;#39;s hearing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Where&amp;#39;s the work? Where&amp;#39;s the beef behind this decision?&amp;quot; Boxer asked as she waved around an empty cardboard box with the label &amp;quot;EPA Documents.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Before her was an empty chair reserved for Johnson, who did not attend the hearing. EPA spokesman Jonathan Shradar said Johnson had a busy schedule and was preparing to address the waiver issue before a full hearing of Boxer&amp;#39;s committee in Washington on Jan. 24.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;On either side of that chair sat Pope, California Attorney General Edmund G. Brown Jr., state Air Resources Board Chairman Mary Nichols and Natural Resources Defense Council senior climate adviser Fran Pavley.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California officials have argued that their more aggressive law would require the auto industry to cut emissions by one-third in new vehicles by 2016, boosting efficiency to about 36.8 mpg. An analysis released by state air regulators showed their 2004 tailpipe regulation would be faster and tougher than the federal fuel economy rules.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Twelve other states -- Connecticut, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, New Jersey, New Mexico, New York, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Vermont and Washington -- have adopted California&amp;#39;s emissions standards, and others have said they plan to do so. The 12 states, along with Arizona, Delaware and Illinois, said Wednesday they plan to intervene in support of California.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The EPA&amp;#39;s Dec. 19 decision was a victory for automakers, which argued that they would be forced to reduce their selection of vehicles and raise prices in states that adopted California&amp;#39;s standards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Brown railed against the EPA and the Bush administration, calling the refusal a &amp;quot;backroom deal&amp;quot; with automakers.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Sooner or later we&amp;#39;re going to uncover real corruption,&amp;quot; he said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Associated Press Writer Erica Werner contributed to this report from Washington, D.C.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2008/01/10/state/n141412S28.DTL&amp;amp;hw=boxer&amp;amp;sn=001&amp;amp;sc=1000" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0116</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer Questions EPA Decision</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 06 Jan 2008 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0114</link>
    <description>&lt;div&gt;SAN FRANCISCO (KCBS) &amp;nbsp;-- The battle between California and the federal Environmental Protection Agency went into another round this week with a lawsuit, joined by 15 other states, challenging the Bush administrations&amp;#39; refusal to let allow vehicle emissions standards to go into effect next year which would limit gases that contribute to global warming. Now Senator Barbara Boxer is questioning why she can&amp;#39;t get more information about why the waiver to exceed federal standards was denied.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;Sentor Barbara Boxer gave EPA administrator Stephen Johnson a Monday deadline to let her Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works have a look at documents that might explain how the decision to turn down the request for a waiver was made.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;quot;The letter they sent back to us says, &amp;#39;sorry we can&amp;rsquo;t meet your deadline. We will get back to you in another week.&amp;#39; And Mr. Johnson not handing over the documents, which, by the way, we can subpoena,&amp;quot; said Boxer. The EPA claims a national approach to auto emissions standards is better than state-by-state regulations.&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;div&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.kcbs.com/Senator-Boxer-Questions-EPA-Decision/1434439"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0114</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer blasts EPA chief over briefing no-show</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0113</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Matthew Hay Brown&lt;br /&gt;Baltimore Sun&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A Senate panel investigating EPA Administrator Stephen L. Johnson&amp;#39;s decision to deny California the authority to regulate automobile emissions of greenhouse gases apparently will have to proceed without Johnson himself.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The agency chief has denied an invitation by Senate Environment and Public Works Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer to discuss his decision at a &amp;quot;field briefing&amp;quot; next month in San Francisco, the committee said today.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Rather than looking in the eyes of the people he is affecting, Mr. Johnson is hiding out in Washington, D.C.,&amp;quot; Boxer said in a statement. &amp;quot;His shameful decision denying the California waiver must be overturned.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;California, which has unique authority under federal law to develop its own air quality standards subject to EPA approval, had sought permission to begin limiting tailpipe emissions of the gases that scientists say contribute to global warming. A dozen other states, including New York, New Jersey, Massachusetts and Maryland, stood ready to enforce the California standards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But Johnson denied the request last week, reportedly against the unanimous recommendations of the EPA&amp;#39;s legal and technical staffs. Johnson said fuel efficiency standards signed into law by President Bush last week rendered the California proposal unnecessary.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Scheduled to appear in San Francisco Jan. 10 are former California Gov. Jerry Brown, now the state&amp;#39;s attorney general, and the heads of the California Air Resources Board and the Sierra Club. But Johnson was to have been the guest of honor.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;As you know, Californians are shocked by your decision,&amp;quot; Boxer wrote to Johnson last week. &amp;quot;I am requesting that you appear...so you can come before the people of the State of California to explain the legal and technical basis for your decision.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In a release this afternoon, the Environment and Public Works Committee said Johnson had declined the invitation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The House Committee on Oversight and Government Reform also is investigating Johnson&amp;#39;s decision; Chairman Henry A. Waxman -- like Boxer, a California Democrat -- has warned Johnson against destroying any documents related to his ruling.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://weblogs.baltimoresun.com/news/politics/blog/2007/12/boxer_blasts_epa_administrator.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0113</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senators Aim to Keep Telemarketers Away from Consumers' Cell Phones </title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0112</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Raju Shanbhag&lt;br /&gt;TMCnet &lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;If the three U.S senators have their way, it might be nearly impossible for telemarketers in the country to call mobile phones. Ohio&amp;#39;s Sherrod Brown, a Democrat, and Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Arlen Specter, R-Pa., have introduced the Wireless 411 Privacy Act to protect cell phone customers from unwillingly having their numbers listed in directories.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the bill, your permission will have to be explicitly gained to list your cell number in any directories. Also, the phone companies need to provide their customers clear notice about their rights of not getting listed. According to a report in msnbc.com, Brown spokeswoman Bethany Lesser said in a statement, &amp;quot;The goal of the legislation is to prevent anybody from doing this. We want to nip it in the bud rather than fight these things as they come up again and again.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;According to the new act, any company other than wireless providers cannot assemble and publish directories of private cell phone numbers. Also, numbers should be removed from the directories at no extra expense to the customers. For the senators who want this act, this is not only about the intrusion of privacy. If the phone number of children or women get into wrong hands, then the consequences could be more dangerous than the intrusion of privacy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The senators also claim that the Cellular Telecommunications and Internet Association are collecting a national cell phone directory, which is vehemently denied by the association. The association says that although some companies wanted to put together a directory, the decision was then called off.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;In the U.S, land-line telephone customers have a national Do Not Call registry aimed at limiting telemarketing calls. But the same facility is not available to cellular customers. Although some companies like Verizon have a policy against providing the cell phone numbers of their customers to telemarketing companies, these companies say that they are always fighting an uphill battle against those companies who are keen on getting the numbers of their subscribers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://internetcommunications.tmcnet.com/topics/broadband-mobile/articles/17155-senators-aim-keep-telemarketers-away-from-consumers-cell.htm" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0112</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer says EPA head ducking her as greenhouse gas deadline nears</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0111</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Erica Werner&lt;br /&gt;San Jose Mercury News&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON -- Sen. Barbara Boxer said Tuesday that EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson is ducking a meeting with her as the deadline nears for the agency to decide whether to allow California to implement its landmark tailpipe emissions law.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Environmental Protection Agency&amp;#39;s self-imposed deadline for making the decision is the end of December.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer, D-Calif. and chairwoman of the Senate&amp;#39;s environment committee, told reporters she&amp;#39;s been trying to meet with Johnson to see where things stand but he&amp;#39;s refused.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Johnson&amp;#39;s spokeswoman, Jennifer Wood, said Johnson would meet with Boxer after the waiver decision is issued. &amp;quot;The senator has already made her position clear in her statements to the media and to the agency,&amp;quot; Wood said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said she has &amp;quot;little hope&amp;quot; that EPA will grant the federal waiver required to allow California to slash greenhouse gas emissions from cars and trucks by some 30 percent by 2016.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;More than a dozen other states plan to enact the same limits if California gets the waiver.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Wood said Johnson is following the statutory process laid out in the Clean Air Act to reach his decision.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bush administration opposes mandatory limits on greenhouse gases and Boxer said she&amp;#39;s concerned politics is playing a role in Johnson&amp;#39;s decision. California has been waiting for a decision since 2005 and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger sued earlier this year to try to force a quicker answer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Politics is alive and well in relation to this waiver,&amp;quot; said Boxer, citing a Transportation Department lobbying campaign against the waiver that was brought to light earlier this year by House investigators.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer also expressed concern about whether EPA is actually doing all the legal analysis to support the waiver decision and whether agency staff might be resisting what political appointees are trying to do. Wood declined to comment on that.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;They&amp;#39;re really going to be in trouble if they deny it and they have nothing to back it up,&amp;quot; said Boxer.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_7751749" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to full article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0111</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Major global warming bill headed for Senate</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 06 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0110</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Frank Davies&lt;br /&gt;Mercury News Washington Bureau&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;WASHINGTON -- In a landmark effort to tackle global warming, a Senate committee Wednesday approved a sweeping program to slash greenhouse gas emissions through the first half of this century and mandate a low-carbon future for the U.S. economy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This is the most far-reaching global warming bill in the world,&amp;quot; said Sen. Barbara Boxer, chair of the Environment Committee, who was jubilant and tearful after the 11-8 vote that sends the bill to the Senate floor next year.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The measure still faces significant obstacles in the Senate and the House, and the Bush administration disagrees with some of the bill&amp;#39;s mandates. But the bill&amp;#39;s backers say political and moral momentum are on their side.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This is historic, and it sends a message to the Senate, White House and the world that the United States is ready to get into this fight and lead,&amp;quot; said Sen. Joseph Lieberman, I-Conn., one of the co--sponsors of the 300-page measure.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The 10 Democrats and independents on the committee were joined by one Republican, John Warner of Virginia -- the other co-sponsor -- who predicted the bill would force members of Congress and presidential candidates &amp;quot;to do their homework and take a stand.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The measure would establish a cap-and-trade program, administered by two new federal boards, and set emissions limits that get tougher every year after 2012. Utilities and industries would be granted allowances to stay under the cap, and could sell or trade those&amp;nbsp; allowances.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Each year, more of the allowances would be auctioned, with some of the proceeds going to investment in clean technology, and to states such as California, which already have adopted efficiency mandates and emissions controls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The ambitious goal is to use a combination of market forces and government mandates to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 70 percent by 2050. The bill&amp;#39;s backers also say it would accelerate international efforts to enact a global cap-and-trade program.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Bush administration has adamantly opposed any mandatory emissions controls.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill&amp;#39;s passage resulted from what Boxer called &amp;quot;a delicately balanced coalition&amp;quot; of lawmakers, environmental and religious groups and some corporations that favor the certainty of long-term carbon caps. Incentives in the bill might benefit nuclear power and could prod the coal industry to adopt new, cleaner technology.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;Through this pull and tug, we&amp;#39;re trying to push industry and help industry, especially through a transition period,&amp;quot; Boxer said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Immediately after the vote, Boxer took congratulatory calls from Sen. Harry Reid, the majority leader, and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who had lobbied for the bill.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;With the exception of Warner, Republicans on the committee attacked the bill as a threat to the economy that would send more jobs and businesses overseas, where tough regulations don&amp;#39;t exist, and boost energy prices, especially in the short term.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This is all pain and no gain,&amp;quot; complained Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., who preceded Boxer as committee chairman. He predicted a 35 percent increase in home electricity bills.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Supporters of the bill pointed to the example of California, which has some of the highest electricity rates in the nation, but household bills that are less than the national average because of stringent efficiency standards.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Republicans failed to amend the bill with a provision that would end the emissions caps unless China -- about to become the world&amp;#39;s largest emitter of greenhouse gases -- adopted similar restrictions within 10 years.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;You&amp;#39;re naive if you think this bill will have some sort of impact on China through osmosis. They won&amp;#39;t do it,&amp;quot; Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, said.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But Boxer and Lieberman said the bill, if adopted, would add to pressure on China to act as part of a new international agreement. The bill would impose extra fees on China if it did not act and U.S. businesses were put at a disadvantage.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This sends a message to China to get with it,&amp;quot; Lieberman said. Several Democrats noted that nations attending the climate change conference in Bali, Indonesia, are looking to U.S. leadership.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Another independent on the committee, Bernie Sanders of Vermont, complained that the bill was not strong enough and contained &amp;quot;too many giveaways&amp;quot; to industry. He also wanted to set a higher target of 80 percent reductions by 2050.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The historic all-day session attracted every senator on the 19-member committee except presidential candidate Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., who was campaigning in the Northeast. Clinton said she would follow Boxer&amp;#39;s lead on the bill, and Boxer cast several proxy votes on Clinton&amp;#39;s behalf -- including the final vote.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/healthandscience/ci_7648382?nclick_check=1" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0110</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer set to tackle climate change bill</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 05 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0109</link>
    <description>&lt;em&gt;By David Whitney&lt;br /&gt;Sacramento Bee&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON -- After 20 hearings and countless speeches on the Senate floor warning of the risks of failure, a key committee starts work today on historic legislation to dramatically reduce global warming.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It&amp;#39;s a tall order. The Senate Environment and Public Works Committee&amp;#39;s chair, Sen. Barbara Boxer, the chamber&amp;#39;s leading liberal, said she was up to the task.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;This is the biggest week of my life,&amp;quot; the California Democrat said Monday. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Republican critics, led by the committee&amp;#39;s senior Republican, Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, also are energized for the fight. Inhofe is a global warming skeptic who believes that rising temperatures have more to do with cyclical changes and not with the burning of fossil fuels such as oil and coal.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;By midday Tuesday, Republicans had filed more than 150 possible amendments. Inhofe has complained bitterly that the sweeping legislation intended to cut carbon dioxide emissions by more than half by 2050 will impose huge costs on consumers and hurt oil- and coal-producing states such as his own.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But Matthew Dempsey, spokesman for the Republican minority on the committee, said Republicans will not be maneuvering to delay or kill the legislation.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s a foregone conclusion it&amp;#39;s going to pass,&amp;quot; he said. Rather, he said, the committee meeting &amp;quot;will provide Senator Inhofe and committee members the opportunity to raise major concerns about the bill, including the severe economic harm this bill will place upon American families and the American economy.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The legislation was introduced by Sens. Joe Lieberman, an independent from Connecticut, and John Warner, R-Va. It would cap emissions and reduce them by 60 percent by 2050 through an allocation system under which companies are assigned pollution credits that can be bought, sold and traded.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the Lieberman-Warner bill has the endorsement of leading industry and environmental groups, it also has critics. Among the complaints is that it doesn&amp;#39;t reduce greenhouse gas emissions enough and rewards the coal industry by initially offering cost-free emission credits based on historic pollution levels.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said she will try to fix some of these complaints in a rewrite of the bill she will offer at the start of today&amp;#39;s session.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The changes would add additional controls on emissions by companies burning natural gas, thus improving the 2050 goal to an overall 70 percent reduction, and shorten by five years the period that industry would be assigned no-cost pollution credits to trim the advantage of coal-burning companies. Her version also will add to the billions of dollars in benefits that states will draw on from the sale of the emission credits to cover such things as transportation improvements and help for low-income families on their higher fuel bills.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;While the legislation will not be as aggressive as California&amp;#39;s landmark global warming law, it has broad backing among environmentalists and won the endorsement of Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger this week.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We are well aware that our goals for climate stabilization cannot be achieved without similar efforts by the rest of the country,&amp;quot; he said in a letter to Boxer.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Committee action comes as the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change is opening in Bali, Indonesia. Boxer hopes to lead a Senate delegation to the Bali talks with the legislative victory in hand. &amp;quot;If this gets out of committee, it will send a powerful signal to the nation and the world that change is indeed coming,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;This will be the most far-reaching global warming bill in the world.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/544164.html" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0109</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer releases bills aimed at preventing oil spills</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Dec 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0108</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;The Associated Press&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;WASHINGTON&amp;mdash;Sen. Barbara Boxer has released two bills in Washington aimed at preventing future oil spills like the one in the San Francisco bay last month.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;One of the bills would give more authority to the U.S. Coast Guard to control ships entering and exiting ports during emergency or hazardous conditions.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The bill would also authorize 20 million dollars to upgrade the Coast Guard&amp;#39;s vessel traffic service.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The other piece of legislation would raise the liability limit for cargo ships. The bills have not yet been formally introduced.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Cosco Busan cargo ship spilled 58,000 gallons of oil into the bay on Nov. 7.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/breakingnews/ci_7624610?nclick_check=1" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&amp;nbsp;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0108</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Barbara Boxer Tours Devastation</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0107</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Lake Arrowhead Mountain-News&lt;br /&gt;By Sam H. Clauder II&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., visited Running Springs last Friday, Nov. 2, to get a firsthand look at the devastation caused by the Slide and Grass Valley Fires. During a press conference with local media, Boxer reported public hearings will be held during the course of investigations to be conducted into the cause of the fires and the fight against them.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer was the first elected federal representative to make an official visit to the mountains since the fires began on Monday, Oct. 22. She met firefighting officials at Fire Station 51, took a tour of burned homes in Running Springs, Fredalba and Smiley Park, and returned to the fire station to speak and take questions from local reporters.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When the entourage of vehicles on the tour made its first stop, Boxer was the first person to step out and walk onto the ashes of a home on Fredalba Road. As the phalanx of officials and reporters followed her, and she was told some of the burned homes in the area were more than 100 years old and on the National Registry of Historic Places, Boxer was visibly moved.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;During her statement, Boxer said she recently spoke to Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, who said investigations would be conducted into the cause of the fires, as well as how they were fought, in order to determine what can be learned from this firefighting effort to help prevent and fight future fires.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;When asked about the timeline of investigations, Boxer deferred to Chief Zacaris, one of the firefighting officials standing behind her. Zacaris explained the investigations and public hearings would be executed quickly enough to complete reports on the fires within the next 60 to 90 days.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said more attention needs to be given to what can be done to prevent and mitigate disastrous fires such as these.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;There has been a lack of prioritization of mitigation and prevention efforts,&amp;quot; she said, &amp;quot;and mitigation should be a huge part of what we should be doing.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;I&amp;#39;ve often been asked why we build in areas like this,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s because California is a beautiful place and we love it. We can and will rebuild on federal land and all across California.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;We&amp;#39;re going to do everything we can to help you get your lives back together. Before I left Washington, Sen. Lieberman and Sen. Collins wrote a letter to me saying tell us what you need and what we can do.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;If you were denied help by your insurance company, stick with it because FEMA or the SBA can help,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;So far we haven&amp;#39;t had any complaints about insurance agencies, but if you&amp;#39;re having trouble, call my office at (909) 888-8525 and tell me if your insurance company is not coming through for you and I will.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer said the national exposure the fires received showed people how our firefighters work together in a unified command team with egos and department protocols set aside. She said people from all over the country have asked her how they could help.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer emphasized a need to make a commitment to the men and women who fought these fires because, she said, &amp;quot;the least we can do is stand behind these firefighters, many of whom are volunteers and some have no health insurance of their own.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Boxer announced she would again try to get her healthy firefighter and healthy forests act passed by the Senate.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&amp;quot;It almost got through the Senate last time,&amp;quot; she said. And I will be pushing it again because, if a firefighter participates in a national disaster, such as these or the one that happened when the twin towers came down on 9/11, we must follow their health for the rest of their lives.&amp;quot;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The 21 fires in Southern California burned 2,180 homes and five businesses. Of those, 450 homes and two businesses were lost in the Grass Valley and Slide Fires. The estimated cost of the fires was $79 billion across the state.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;There were 130 firefighters injured across the state and 14 deaths, all civilian. Seven deaths were caused by the fires and seven others were indirectly related to the fires. To date 12,476 Californians had registered with the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) for emergency assistance and 2,523 had registered with the Small Business Administration (SBA).&lt;a href="http://www.mountain-news.com/articles/2007/11/08/news/news3.txt" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mountain-news.com/articles/2007/11/08/news/news3.txt" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Link to article&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0107</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer calls for aid</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0106</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Andrew Edwards&lt;br /&gt;San Bernardino County Sun&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;RUNNING SPRINGS -- Sen. Barbara Boxer praised the firefighters who battled October&amp;#39;s wildfires during a Friday visit to the San Bernardino Mountains. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Throughout these fires, which are only now being subdued...these brave men and women were there selflessly doing their duty,&amp;quot; she said. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer, D--Calif., spoke at a news conference on Friday outside the headquarters of the Running Springs Fire Department. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She spoke to reporters after a quick tour of Fredalba, a community south of Running Springs where several homes were lost last week in the Slide Fire. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer said she supports efforts -- also backed by Sen. Dianne Feinstein, also D--Calif., and Rep. Jerry Lewis, R--Redlands -- to obtain $1 billion in federal money for fire--protection efforts. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As Boxer called for more money for fire programs, she made a swipe at the war policies of President Bush. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The problem is, we don&amp;#39;t have the right priorities,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;We seem to have everything we need for excursions abroad -- that&amp;#39;s an open checkbook -- but when it comes to our own country, we have to fight.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a telephone interview on Friday, Lewis spokesman Jim Specht said that of the $1 billion Lewis sought, a significant chunk of those resources would be dedicated to fire--prevention efforts such as vegetation removal. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Specht also said $200 million of the desired money would be needed to reimburse Forest Service programs that had funds siphoned from their intended purposes this year to pay for firefighting. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer also said emergency workers injured while responding to a nationally declared disaster should receive federal help. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The least we can do is follow you and make sure you&amp;#39;re healthy,&amp;quot; she said. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fredalba, the area Boxer visited, is part of the site of the Slide Fire, which burned 12,759 acres and destroyed 272 structures -- most of them homes -- in the Running Springs and Green Valley Lake areas. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Dave and Sharon Fogal, who lost the home they lived in for 17 years, didn&amp;#39;t see Boxer in their neighborhood on Friday, but they did find Chatterbox, their noisy Himalayan cat, alive in the debris that used to be their house. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Fogals, who are renting a place to live in Redlands, had not seen Chatterbox since they evacuated from their home as the Slide Fire raged. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This is the first time that the couple faces the task of rebuilding their home after a forest fire. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;We thought we&amp;#39;d make it out,&amp;quot; Sharon Fogal said. &amp;quot;We always had before. We never dreamed it would burn.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Fire crews across the state on Friday were bracing for another round of winds. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Local, state and federal agencies have people ready in the area in case of an emergency, said Kim Zagaris, chief of the state Office of Emergency Services&amp;#39; Fire and Rescue Branch. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;The numbers would stagger you,&amp;quot; Zagaris said. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Intense &amp;quot;devil winds&amp;quot; that reached hurricane force at the start of last week whipped the Slide Fire, Grass Valley Fire and several other blazes into catastrophes. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The National Weather Service has predicted gusts to 40 mph today will blow through Running Springs. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In the San Bernardino Mountains, fire information officer Angela Goldman said five hand crews and eight engine companies are standing by in case another fire breaks out or flames from the Grass Valley or Slide fires breach containment lines. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Six helitankers have also been assigned to the local mountains. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Everybody&amp;#39;s on high alert anywhere they&amp;#39;re expecting high winds,&amp;quot; Goldman. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="mailto:andrew.edwards@sbsun.com"&gt;andrew.edwards@sbsun.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;(909) 335--9520&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www2.sbsun.com/news/ci_7357334" target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0106</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer tours local fire damage</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Nov 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0105</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Adam C. Hartmann&lt;br /&gt;The Press-Enterprise&lt;/em&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, wearing a yellow Forest Service fire jacket, toured the fire-ravaged Fredalba area of Running Springs this morning. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Running Springs Fire Chief Bill Smith told Boxer that 166 homes were destroyed and 39 damaged in that area. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;They also lost the old Brookings Mill. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;You lost a legacy,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;At a news conference after the tour at the Running Springs fire station, San Bernardino County Supervisor Dennis Hansberger said he&amp;#39;s been so frazzled that he&amp;#39;s lost track of what day it is because these fires have been in his district. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It comes real close to home for me,&amp;quot; Hansberger said, referring to his district. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer said of fires, &amp;quot;We know they&amp;#39;re part of life here in California.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She also talked about lessons learned from the Old Fire and the Esperanza fires and said she imagines we&amp;#39;ll learn lessons from this one, too. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer said she took a picture of firefighters in their safety fire shelters to the floor of the Senate. She wrote a letter for the Congressional Record, which is in the form of a letter to the president of the Senate. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She said in the letter that she hopes everyone will recognize firefighters&amp;#39; valor and that the government will stand up to the health problems firefighters will face for the rest of their lives. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer also has sponsored legislation, which failed once in the Senate, encouraging the federal government to work with county agencies to help monitor firefighters who suffer long-term injuries or medical problems resulting from their services at a nationally declared disaster. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Reach Adam C. Hartmann at 909-806-3055 or &lt;a href="mailto:ahartmann@PE.com"&gt;ahartmann@PE.com&lt;/a&gt; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.pe.com/localnews/inland/stories/PE_News_Local_D_webfire2.24903c5.html" target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0105</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Announces Date for EPW Hearing on Yucca Mountain</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0104</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;YubaNet.com&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Chairman of the Senate Committee on Environment and Public Works, announced today that the Committee plans to hold an oversight hearing on the proposed Yucca Mountain nuclear waste repository project on October 31st, 2007 at 10:00am EDT. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Environment and Public Works Committee has jurisdiction over the Nuclear Regulatory Commission, the agency that will act on the Department of Energy&amp;#39;s Yucca Mountain license application. The Committee also has oversight over the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, which is charged with setting radiation standards for the site. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chairman Boxer and other Senators, including Majority Leader Reid and Senator Hillary Clinton, a member of the Committee, have expressed a high level of interest in the issues surrounding the Yucca Mountain project. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Additional details about the hearing, including the list of witnesses, will be announced on October 24th. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_68214.shtml" target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0104</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer gives views on politics, climate, war</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 23 Sep 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0103</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Zachary Coile&lt;br /&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;As chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer is gearing up for the biggest challenge of her career&amp;nbsp;-- writing legislation to combat global warming.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The 66-year-old former House member and Marin County supervisor says in an interview with The Chronicle that she hopes to defy the conventional wisdom in Washington that climate change legislation won&amp;#39;t be passed until a new president and new Congress take over in 2009.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer&amp;nbsp;-- first elected to the Senate in 1992 along with Dianne Feinstein in what was dubbed the &amp;quot;Year of the Woman&amp;quot; -- is already busy raising money for her re-election race, which isn&amp;#39;t until 2010. Why? Republican Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger is eyeing the race. Boxer says she is &amp;quot;lifting weights&amp;quot; in case the former bodybuilder decides to run.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In a wide-ranging interview with Washington Bureau reporter Zachary Coile, Boxer talks about why Democrats can&amp;#39;t end the war in Iraq, how Congress should respond to the subprime mortgage crisis, why the public won&amp;#39;t let President Bush invade Iran, and why she has no plans to retire anytime soon. Here are excerpts of the interview, edited for space.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Politics&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; Who&amp;#39;s going to win the White House in 2008?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; A Democrat.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; Which Democrat?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; Whichever Democrat gets the nomination (smiles.) I don&amp;#39;t know who that will be. They are all really good. I&amp;#39;m proud of them. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; Are you going to endorse anyone before the primaries?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; No, I won&amp;#39;t because I have so many dear friends, so many brothers and sisters running. I&amp;#39;ve known them for so long.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; You&amp;#39;re raising money for your re-election. Are you definitely running in 2010?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; Yes, I am. Definitely running. Raising money, doing what I have to do. And lifting weights in case Arnold enters the race. I&amp;#39;m getting ready in all ways.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; Do you think he will run against you?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; I don&amp;#39;t know. I just feel I have to prepare in case he does. Because even if he doesn&amp;#39;t, someone strong will. They always do.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; Do you think that he makes a tough opponent in the sense he has similar views on global warming and he has moderate views on social issues? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer: &lt;/strong&gt;Without talking about Arnold, I think anyone who runs against me who is pro-choice and pro-environment, people are going to wonder why. Why do we need to get a new senator on these issues when our senator is the champion in the Senate on the environment and choice, among other issues? &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So I don&amp;#39;t know if there&amp;#39;s a rationale for that. It would be hard to say, &amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m an environmentalist therefore I&amp;#39;m going to run against the strongest environmentalist in the Senate, who is chair of the environment committee.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Climate change&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; You recently got back from a trip to Greenland, where the ice sheets are melting at an accelerating rate. Did the trip shape your view about how quickly Congress needs to act?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; Definitely. It&amp;#39;s always one thing to read facts and to read the clips, as I do every week. ... It&amp;#39;s another thing to see these icebergs in the ocean, that average 9,000 years apiece, and they are going to melt. ... It&amp;#39;s just stunning. ... We had 10 senators in all on the trip, and everyone was moved by what we saw. So no question it gives you that sense of urgency that you intellectually felt before, but it&amp;#39;s almost emotional after you see it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; There&amp;#39;s a growing view in Washington, among industry people and even some environmentalists, that climate change legislation is too difficult to achieve in this Congress, that it will get pushed to the next Congress under a new president. What&amp;#39;s your view?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; If you look at where the president is&amp;nbsp;-- which is no mandatory caps and no cap-and-trade system (to control greenhouse gas emissions)&amp;nbsp;-- if he holds to that, it makes it difficult to actually pass legislation into law. My goals are to get the strongest bill I can out of the committee as the first mark of progress. And the second is, get as many votes as I can toward 60 (in the full Senate). ... We are wasting time if we don&amp;#39;t do something. If we just throw up our hands and say this president will sign nothing meaningful therefore do nothing, that means you are really part of the problem. ... This issue is going to be a huge issue in the &amp;#39;08 election. Not just the presidency, but in the House and Senate. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; How close are you to 60 votes?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; I don&amp;#39;t know. Really it&amp;#39;s way too soon to know. Right now I have to get a good bill through the committee. And that is going to take a lot of focus.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; John Dingell, chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, is talking about a carbon tax (to address global warming.) Is that a good idea?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer: &lt;/strong&gt;It&amp;#39;s really not because it doesn&amp;#39;t have a chance in the world of passing. And we think we do need to have a price on carbon, but it&amp;#39;s far better to have it done through a cap-and-trade system. ... We know it&amp;#39;s working in Europe; it&amp;#39;s worked here when we cut back on sulfur, acid rain. ... Also there&amp;#39;s a whole cap-and-trade system being promulgated in the world and by California. Why on earth would you walk away from that?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; Some Republicans on your committee say this legislation is going to wreck the U.S. economy. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; People who say it will wreck the economy have just been sleeping through the 16 hearings that we&amp;#39;ve had, and the European experience. We know for example, the British have cut back 15 percent on carbon over the past 10 years and their economy has grown 40 percent. ... And they&amp;#39;ve created a huge new industry in terms of job creation ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now, will there be dislocations and do we have to be concerned about them? Absolutely. And any bill that we do is going to address the transitional stages, where you are transitioning out of certain jobs into other jobs, and out of certain types of (electricity) generation into others. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; We hear from Silicon Valley that they feel there isn&amp;#39;t enough commitment by the federal government to long-term incentives for solar, for wind, for clean fuels. What can Congress do?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; That&amp;#39;s part of the battle. Once you have a cap-and-trade system in there, there is a price on carbon and all of these systems become way more affordable. ... &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; The Environmental Protection Agency will decide by December whether to grant California&amp;#39;s waiver to put in place its climate change rules. What are the odds that EPA says yes?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; I think the odds are awful. I think that Mr. Johnson (EPA administrator Stephen Johnson) has been rude toward our state. I think the administration has been dismissive of our state. ... So I&amp;#39;m not at all expecting them to do it. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; Does California have a legal recourse?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; I have a lot of confidence in (California Attorney General) Jerry Brown working with Gov. Schwarzenegger and if there is a legal remedy, I can tell you they will be all over it. ... If this administration doesn&amp;#39;t grant the waiver, No. 1 we&amp;#39;re going to have Mr. Johnson come before our committee and explain himself. Because there is no explanation.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Iraq war&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; I was just back in the Bay Area and the No. 1 question I heard was: &amp;quot;We as voters elected Democrats to end the war. Why hasn&amp;#39;t the war ended?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; Until we have 60 votes to end the war in the Senate, we can&amp;#39;t get a bill to the president&amp;#39;s desk. Until we have 67 votes, we can&amp;#39;t override a veto. ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So the question to us becomes, and I&amp;#39;m asked this by the press all the time: Why are you bothering to do anything if you can&amp;#39;t end this war? The answer is ending the war is a process. ... Getting into a war is one vote - which thank the Lord I voted against. But the fact is beginning a war is one vote, ending a war is a process because if we don&amp;#39;t have all the pieces in place and everybody on the same page, the commander in chief is going to continue the war.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; There&amp;#39;s been a lot of talk about whether the U.S. will strike Iran. What&amp;#39;s your gut feeling about whether this White House is preparing for strikes on Iran?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer: &lt;/strong&gt;I really don&amp;#39;t want to talk about such a horrific turn of events, except to say the American people in my opinion would be so outraged if this president started another war before he left office that it would reverberate against the Republicans for a very long time.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; The economy is being hammered by the mortgage crisis. California has the highest foreclosure rate in the country. Should Congress step in and help people who got adjustable rate mortgages and now can&amp;#39;t make their payments?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; The first thing is to help the legitimate cases, the legitimate families who were really sold a bill of goods, who by refinancing can stay in their homes. ...&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;And for California, we need to have more federally backed mortgages - at higher numbers - because our real estate values are much higher. ... I also think there needs to be a crackdown on predatory lending. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Last term?&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Chronicle:&lt;/strong&gt; If you&amp;#39;re re-elected, would you see this as your last term? Or are you going to keep going like (89-year-old) Sen. Robert Byrd, D-W. Va.?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer:&lt;/strong&gt; Oh my God. Don&amp;#39;t ever ask me that. ... The last time I said this is my last term, it turned out not to be. So I&amp;#39;ve decided not to say that. I know I&amp;#39;m definitely running the next time. After that? The door is open to anything. You don&amp;#39;t know what your life is going to be like.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer - a few more thoughts &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On Hillary Rodham Clinton&amp;#39;s health care plan, which requires all individuals to obtain health insurance:&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;quot;If it&amp;#39;s implemented right, it&amp;#39;s fine. You don&amp;#39;t want to put a burden on people that they can&amp;#39;t do. I believe what she wants to do is say there is a mandate, but of course there is help for people who need to purchase it. Also the federal employee health benefits plan, which I have, would be open to them. ... You can&amp;#39;t just say everybody has to have insurance and sink or swim, but I don&amp;#39;t think that&amp;#39;s her intent.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On nuclear power as a solution to global warming:&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;quot;I think there will be nuclear power plants built. My concern has always been the disposal issue. I have a lot of concerns about that. I also believe it&amp;#39;s such an expensive way to produce electricity. There are better ways and less centralized ways and less costly ways.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On a gas tax increase to finance bridge and road repairs:&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;quot;I don&amp;#39;t really lean toward that. What we&amp;#39;re finding about the gas tax is that it&amp;#39;s really very unreliable. Here we are trying to move our cars away from gas and toward electrics, fuel cells and hybrids. It just means we are going to a source that is diminishing. ... We need to look at a combination of ways,&amp;quot; including user fees on trucking freight and infrastructure bonds.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On her passengers&amp;#39; bill of rights proposal requiring airlines to offer adequate food, water and restroom access during long flight delays:&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;quot;When people talk about foul smells from the bathroom, kids screaming, horrible situations, hot in the plane, it&amp;#39;s just not acceptable. They were right when they said they felt like prisoners. We just have to make that a thing of the past. If the airlines don&amp;#39;t act responsibly after this, we&amp;#39;ll do more.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;On the Democrats&amp;#39; chances of adding seats in the House and Senate in 2008:&lt;/strong&gt; &amp;quot;Let me tell you why I think that. I agree with my leader, Harry Reid, who said ... the Republicans now own this war. They own it. ... Bush owns it and the Republicans in the Senate own it, and the Republicans in the House own it. That makes for a very clear choice. It&amp;#39;s not a mushy election. &amp;#39;08 will not be an election fought around the edges. It&amp;#39;s fundamental.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;Your opinion &lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Agree with Sen. Boxer? Disagree? Let her know your thoughts.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer&amp;#39;s San Francisco office: (415) 403-0100.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;E-mail: Go to boxer.senate.gov/contact/email/policy.cfm&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;E-mail Zachary Coile at &lt;a href="mailto:zcoile@sfchronicle.com"&gt;zcoile@sfchronicle.com&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/09/23/MNJBSAVDK.DTL" target="_blank"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0103</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer scoffs at Petraeus' optimism on Iraq</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0101</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;By Diana Marrero&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- Sen. Barbara Boxer questioned the recent assessment on U.S. progress in Iraq by Army Gen. David Petraeus during a Senate Foreign Relations Commitee hearing Tuesday.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;I ask you to take off your rosy glasses,&amp;quot; Boxer told Petraeus. &amp;quot;We are sending our troops where they&amp;#39;re not wanted, where there&amp;#39;s no end in sight.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer, D-Calif., reminded Petraeus of his public comments in 2003 that the United States&amp;#39; involvement in Iraq had a shelf life and that American troops were not there to stay. Tuesday&amp;#39;s hearings&amp;nbsp;-- Petraeus will address the Senate Armed Services Committee&amp;nbsp;-- later this afternoon, followed testimony in the House on Monday. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Petraeus came into this week&amp;#39;s hearings following almost a week of attacks on his credibility by anti-war factions that claimed he would cherry pick positive statistics and trends. The latest salvo fired was a Moveon.org advertisement in Monday&amp;#39;s New York Times accusing Petraeus of &amp;quot;cooking the books for the White House.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Contact reporter Diana Marrero at &lt;a href="mailto:dmarrero@gns.gannett.com"&gt;dmarrero@gns.gannett.com&lt;/a&gt;. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://thecalifornian.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070911/NEWS01/70911004/1002" target="_blank"&gt;Salinas Californian&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0101</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Petraeus faces wrath over Iraq 'disaster'</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Sep 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0102</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;By Toby Harnden&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;America&amp;#39;s senior commander and top diplomat in Iraq have been given a rough ride on Capitol Hill after the Democratic presidential contender, Barack Obama, demanded an end to &amp;quot;a disastrous foreign policy mistake.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;General Petraeus: Iraq troop surge is working&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Frustrated senators called on Gen David Petraeus and the ambassador, Ryan Crocker, to take off their &amp;quot;rosy glasses&amp;quot; after they reported that the troop surge in Iraq had been successful.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br /&gt;Gen Petraeus was asked to take of his &amp;#39;rosy glasses&amp;#39; after saying the surge in Iraq had been sucessful&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;After a relatively smooth ride before two House of Representatives committees on Monday, the visitors from Baghdad faced the full wrath of senators from both parties who want US forces brought home immediately.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Into the mix was thrown the 2008 White House campaign as several candidates took the opportunity to lambast the soldier and the diplomat for what they viewed as an excessively optimistic picture of events in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mr Obama, who unlike his rival Hillary Clinton opposed the war even before the 2003 invasion, was among the most withering in his response to Gen Petraeus&amp;#39;s verdict that the surge of an extra 30,000 troops was working and force levels should not be brought down to 130,000 until next year.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;We have now set the bar so low that modest improvement in what was a completely chaotic situation, to the point where now we just have the levels of intolerable violence that existed in June of 2006, is considered success,&amp;quot; he said. &amp;quot;And it&amp;#39;s not.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;This continues to be a disastrous foreign policy mistake.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Mr Crocker conceded: &amp;quot;There is an enormous amount of dysfunctionality in Iraq; that is beyond question. The government, in many respects, is dysfunctional.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Joe Biden, another 2008 candidate, outlined his conclusion that &amp;quot;the American people will not support an infinite war whose sole remaining purpose is to prevent the situation in Iraq from becoming worse&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;He added: &amp;quot;We should stop the surge and start bringing our troops home.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, was even more direct. &amp;quot;I ask you to take off your rosy glasses,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;You had them on in &amp;#39;05, I believed you.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Referring to the president, George W Bush, she said: &amp;quot;This is the president who said, &amp;#39;Mission accomplished&amp;#39;, and thousands of our own died.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Then he said, &amp;#39;Bring it on&amp;#39;, and more and more died. And just the other day, he was quoted in the Australian press as saying, &amp;#39;We&amp;#39;re kicking a-s-s in Iraq&amp;#39;, and we have lost 28 soldiers in six days.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But it was not just Democrats who expressed deep scepticism about Gen Petraeus&amp;#39;s testimony that &amp;quot;as a bottom line up front, the military objectives of the surge are in large measure being met&amp;quot;.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Chuck Hagel, a Vietnam combat veteran, said it was no surprise that because &amp;quot;we&amp;#39;ve inserted more American troops costing more American lives, we&amp;#39;ve seen some differences&amp;quot; in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Are we going to continue to invest American blood and treasure at the same rate we are doing now, for what? The president said let&amp;#39;s buy time. Buy time? For what?&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2007/09/12/wiraq112.xml" target="_blank"&gt;Telegraph.co.uk&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0102</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Barbara Boxer Tours Sun Microsystems</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Aug 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0100</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Bay City News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., presented Sun Microsystems with her office&amp;#39;s &amp;quot;Conservation Champion Award&amp;quot; today in recognition of the company&amp;#39;s efforts in cutting their energy consumption. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer toured Sun&amp;#39;s Agnews campus in Santa Clara this morning and had Sun Chief Technology Officer Greg Papadopoulos explain the dramatic reduction in energy consumption the company has achieved at its data centers.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;This is a really innovative design that actually cuts our power usage in half,&amp;quot; Papadopoulos said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer later told an audience of Sun employees that this type of conservation can be and needs to be copied across the country.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;We don&amp;#39;t have to reinvent the wheel. If everyone were doing what you folks are doing we would be way down the road on where we need to be to fight global warming.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Later today Boxer is holding a field hearing in San Jose of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee on the issue of green technology jobs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer left the Sun campus for her hearing the same way she arrived -- in a fuel-efficient Toyota Prius hybrid. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=local&amp;amp;id=5567990" target="_blank"&gt;Link to Article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0100</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer finds hope in Visalia</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Aug 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0099</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Daniel Gilmore&amp;#39;s story was just what U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer wanted to hear.&lt;br /&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;br /&gt;Boxer, D-Calif., had heard so much about Visalia&amp;#39;s youth-based gang-intervention activities she decided to see for herself during an hour-long stop Wednesday at the Visalia Boys and Girls Club. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Gilmore, 17, is president of the Keystone Club, part of the Boys and Girls Club&amp;#39;s multifaceted youth program. The Mt. Whitney High School student and his friends converted a patch of bare ground behind the center into a full-blown garden.&lt;br /&gt;The project inspired Gilmore to seek a career in agricultural business.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;I&amp;#39;m already enrolled in ag classes at school,&amp;quot; Gilmore said. &amp;quot;College is next. That&amp;#39;s what I want to do.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer took special note of Gilmore&amp;#39;s choices and the role the Boys and Girls Club garden played in them.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Young people need to know where the food comes from,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;The joy of growing, harvesting, socializing.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boys and Girls Club executive director Galen Quenzer, who Wednesday received a public-service award from Boxer, emphasized that the mission of the Boys and Girls Club is to prepare young people for adult life using computers, sports and college field-trip programs.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;It&amp;#39;s all about opportunity and preparation,&amp;quot; Quenzer said.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer, seeing the city&amp;#39;s LOOP buses that bring youngsters from as far away as north Visalia, Goshen and Ivanhoe, said &amp;quot;The minute you walk in here, see the buses outside, see what&amp;#39;s happening, you realize there&amp;#39;s hope.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer told the crowd that Congress awarded Tulare County a fresh $149,000 grant to keep programs like the Boys and Girls Club alive and kicking. She said she is also pushing for a steep increase in federal after-school grants from the present $1 billion level to $3 billion.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Tulare County&amp;#39;s Pro-Youth HEART after-school program has a $5 million annual budget to pay for its after-school program &amp;mdash; much of it from federal grants, county records show.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Study after study has shown that [juvenile crime] all starts at 3 p.m. after school and stretches into the evening,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;That&amp;#39;s where the need is.&amp;quot;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.visaliatimesdelta.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070809/NEWS01/708090326"&gt;Visalia Times-Delta&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0099</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer: Commerce Committee Passes Coast Guard Reauthorization Bill</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Aug 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0098</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;August 2, 2007 -- Washington, D.C. &amp;ndash; The U.S. Senate Commerce Committee today passed the Coast Guard Reauthorization Bill, including language by Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) that addresses her concerns about &amp;ldquo;mothballed&amp;rdquo; World War II vessels rotting in the Suisun Bay.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer said, &amp;ldquo;I want to see these rotting ships moved out of the Bay, but first we need to make certain that we don&amp;rsquo;t cause more environmental damage in the process. This language will help ensure that we are moving forward in the most efficient, environmentally safe, and cost-effective manner possible. I want to thank the Senate Commerce Committee and in particular, Senator Maria Cantwell, for working with me to address this important issue in a way that respects environmental laws.&amp;rdquo;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The language included by Senator Boxer in the Coast Guard Reauthorization Bill states that within 30 days after enactment, the Secretary of Transportation must convene a working group, including senior representatives of MARAD, the Coast Guard, EPA, the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration, and the U.S. Navy, to review and make recommendations on environmental practices for the storage and disposal of the vessels. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The language also states that within 90 days after enactment, the Secretary of Transportation must submit a plan to the Senate Commerce and EPW Committees, as well as the House Armed Services Committee, on how to improve storage and disposal of the vessels in an environmentally sensitive way. Finally, the bill requires that the relevant federal agencies implement a disposal plan that is in accord with both federal and state laws. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;There are currently 73 deteriorating National Defense Reserve Fleet vessels that have been rotting in Suisun Bay, California since the end of World War II. More than two-thirds of those vessels are beyond repair and awaiting disposal at sites around the country. Before MARAD can transfer the ships to the recycling facilities, the Coast Guard requires that the hulls be cleaned of any organic matter to ensure no invasive species are transported to other waters. Unfortunately, during this cleaning process, toxic paint flakes off the ships into the water, posing a serious health and environmental risk to Suisun Bay and the surrounding community.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.allamericanpatriots.com/48727622_barbara_boxer_barbara_boxer_commerce_committee_passes_coast_guard_reauthorization_bill"&gt;All American Patriots&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0098</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer blasts EPA's stance on gases law</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Jul 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0097</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- Sen. Barbara Boxer lashed out Thursday at the head of the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency, saying she is sure the Bush administration already has decided to block California from enforcing its landmark law limiting greenhouse gases from cars and trucks. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;You would have to be born yesterday not to see it,&amp;quot; Boxer, a Democrat and chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, told EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson at a hearing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;California has the authority under the Clean Air Act to set tougher-than-federal standards for air pollutants -- provided it gets federal approval with a waiver from the EPA. But the White House has been so resistant to any regulation of greenhouse gases that most California officials assume the agency will reject the state&amp;#39;s request for a waiver. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The hearing was the latest scuffle in the high-stakes battle over who will set the nation&amp;#39;s first standards to combat global warming. Twelve states have joined California, and together they represent almost 45 percent of the country&amp;#39;s population. If the EPA grants the state&amp;#39;s request, it would be approving new regulations for all new cars and trucks sold in half the country. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer also grilled Johnson on why he had delayed a decision on the waiver for 20 months and blasted him for refusing to criticize top Transportation Department officials who lobbied lawmakers and governors to oppose California&amp;#39;s request. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;You have the administration lobbying against the waiver, and you can&amp;#39;t comment or call them out on it?&amp;quot; the state&amp;#39;s junior senator said to Johnson, incredulously. &amp;quot;You&amp;#39;re part of this because you will not speak out against it.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Johnson, for his part, insisted no decision has been made. He said he is reviewing the more than 60,000 public comments EPA has received -- the most for any waiver request in the agency&amp;#39;s history. He repeated his earlier pledge to California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger that the agency would make its decision by December. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;I am running a very rigorous process inside the agency ... so I can make an informed, unbiased decision,&amp;quot; Johnson told reporters after the hearing. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But critics said the EPA chief is deliberately dragging out the process to keep the states from implementing their tougher emissions standards. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Instead of being excessively thorough, this amounts to foot-dragging,&amp;quot; said Sen. Frank Lautenberg, D-N.J. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The only lawmaker to speak in Johnson&amp;#39;s defense was Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., a vocal skeptic of climate change. Rushing the decision would be arbitrary and capricious, he said. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Johnson cited several reasons for the delay, saying he had first waited for the Supreme Court to rule in the case of Massachusetts vs. EPA -- in which the court rejected the agency&amp;#39;s claim that it lacked the authority to regulate greenhouse gases -- and then waited for public comment. Now his staff is reviewing those comments, which he said raise technical and legal issues. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer shook her head in disbelief at the remark. According to her staff&amp;#39;s review of the comments on EPA&amp;#39;s Web site, almost 54,000 of the 60,000 received were postcards or one-page form letters, organized by environmental groups, that supported California&amp;#39;s waiver request. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;First, EPA hides behind a false premise that under the Clean Air Act, EPA couldn&amp;#39;t address carbon emissions and greenhouse gas emissions -- when all you had to do was read the act,&amp;quot; Boxer said. &amp;quot;Now you are hiding behind 60,000 comments, most of which are form letters -- which, by the way, the vast majority overwhelmingly favor&amp;quot; California&amp;#39;s request. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Schwarzenegger, a Republican, has announced he will sue the EPA in October for moving too slowly on the waiver. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Lawmakers also are seeking to force Johnson&amp;#39;s hand. Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., has introduced a bill that would force EPA to make a decision within a month of passage of the bill and no later than Sept. 30. Boxer plans a committee vote on the bill on Tuesday. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;Why is it important to my state and to the ... other states, in addition to California? Florida has more coastline than any other state except Alaska,&amp;quot; said Nelson, whose state&amp;#39;s Republican governor, Charlie Crist, just joined California&amp;#39;s bid to curb emissions. Alluding to scientists&amp;#39; predictions that warming will cause sea levels to rise, Nelson warned that the effects would be seen first &amp;quot;on the shores of a state like my beloved Florida.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Much of the hearing was consumed by Boxer&amp;#39;s cross-examination of Johnson about what he knew about an administration-led effort to lobby Congress to fight California&amp;#39;s waiver request. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Transportation Department officials sought to contact dozens of lawmakers and governors from auto-producing states, urging them to write EPA to oppose California&amp;#39;s request by warning that a patchwork of regulations could have significant impacts on the light truck and car industry, according to documents obtained by Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;If asked our position, we say we are in opposition of the waiver,&amp;quot; the department&amp;#39;s script said, using arguments identical to those made by automakers, who have been fighting California&amp;#39;s law in the courts. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer asked Johnson on Thursday how he felt about another Cabinet agency lobbying to influence his decision. &amp;quot;Do you think this was appropriate?&amp;quot; she said. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;I must defer to DOT (Department of Transportation),&amp;quot; he said, ducking the question. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Johnson later acknowledged speaking with Transportation Secretary Mary Peters about checking with her constituency -- which he defined as lawmakers and governors who are interested in transportation -- to see if they needed more time to comment. It&amp;#39;s not clear if his call influenced the lobbying by the transportation agency. He said he never saw the e-mails or the scripts. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;In his testimony, Johnson also said the administration will release a draft proposal this fall to increase fuel economy standards and mandate greater use of biofuels and alternative fuels, such as coal-to-liquid fuels. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer warned that the White House might try to use the new fuel economy rules as an excuse to deny California&amp;#39;s request -- by claiming the state emissions laws would interfere with the new federal regulations. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&amp;quot;My own belief is there is going to be a hiding behind this executive order,&amp;quot; she said. &amp;quot;Even if you were to produce a regulation on cars, that is not a substitute for granting a waiver to the most populous state in the nation and twelve other states.&amp;quot; &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Source: &lt;strong&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/07/27/BAG67R87GI1.DTL&amp;amp;feed=rss.bayarea" target="_blank"&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0097</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Making the federal government an example of energy efficiency</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Jun 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0096</link>
    <description>&lt;p style="margin: 0px 0px 13px; font-family: Georgia; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 13.3px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 15px" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;em&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The Hill&lt;/em&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p style="margin: 0px 0px 13px; font-family: Georgia; font-style: normal; font-variant: normal; font-weight: normal; font-size: 13.3px; line-height: normal; font-size-adjust: none; font-stretch: normal"&gt;&lt;span style="line-height: 15px" class="Apple-style-span"&gt;The energy bill that passed the Senate on June 21 represents an important step toward a new energy direction for this country. The bill includes provisions that will go a long way toward making America more energy independent, protecting consumers, and encouraging the development of new technologies and creation of jobs in energy-smart industries. The overwhelming bipartisan support for the bill -- it passed 65 to 27 -- underscores that the time has come for a real change in America&amp;#39;s energy policy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The bill includes many provisions that will pay economic and environmental dividends for decades to come, but its earliest benefits may be evident in the area of energy efficiency. Experts have called boosting efficiency the single greatest untapped source of energy in America. If the whole country used electricity as efficiently as my home state of California, the energy we would save would be the equivalent to all of America&amp;#39;s oil imports from the Middle East.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; The federal government is one of the largest energy consumers in the world. We have made great strides in recent years, but I believe strongly that the federal government should lead by example when it comes to smarter, cleaner energy policy.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt; That&amp;#39;s why I worked with my colleagues on the Environment and Public Works committee to include in the energy bill several important pieces of legislation that our committee passed that take aim squarely at the challenge of making the federal government a model of energy efficiency. &lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/op-eds/making-the-federal-government-an-example-of-energy-efficiency-2007-06-27.html"&gt;Click Here to Read Full Article&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0096</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Speech at Take Back America Conference</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Jun 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0095</link>
    <description>&lt;p&gt;Thank you all, thank you so much, what a fantastic night.&amp;nbsp; Have you had a wonderful conference so far?&amp;nbsp; [Applause.]&amp;nbsp; Alright, and are we gonna change America?&amp;nbsp; Because you already started that , didn&amp;#39;t you?&amp;nbsp; It&amp;#39;s wonderful&amp;hellip;I want to thank all of the people at Campaign for America&amp;#39;s Future and I just have about two to three minutes to talk to you, so I want you to listen intently.&amp;nbsp; Because what I&amp;#39;m going to say, I think is important to you because you are in the frontlines of change.&amp;nbsp; Bob Borosage, and Roger Hickey, and Rob McKay and Jason Alexander, and my fellow awardees, Im just thrilled and honored.&amp;nbsp; And I share this beautiful award with all of you and all of the progressive champions- not only right here in this room, but across the country.&amp;nbsp; You&amp;#39;re making such a difference and it just makes me so happy.&amp;nbsp; In the many battles that I have waged, I may have stood alone at times in the United States Senate. But I never, &lt;em&gt;ever&lt;/em&gt;, was alone because you were out there right behind me and I thank you so much, Guy, and Bill, and all of my friends I see out there.&amp;nbsp; [Applause.] &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Back in the darkest days, when many Democrats were agonizing, you were out there organizing.&amp;nbsp; You believed that America did not want us to &lt;em&gt;turn&lt;/em&gt; right, but rather that they wanted us to &lt;em&gt;do&lt;/em&gt; right.&amp;nbsp; You believed we could take back America and now we are, and believe me as you know, we don&amp;#39;t have a minute to spare, do we?&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; For six years this country that we love, this country that gave my family everything- opportunity, fairness and hope, has been looted by the special interests.&amp;nbsp; Has been drawn into a disastrous war, based on lies and the politics of fear, has ignored global warming while the whole world watches us in amazement, has spied on its people, and politicized the Department of Justice.&amp;nbsp; It has turned its back on America&amp;#39;s families, squeezing the middle class hard, attacking organized labor, and abandoning the working poor.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now in the 2006 election, the American people said that this attack on our values is &lt;em&gt;over&lt;/em&gt;, it is &lt;em&gt;history&lt;/em&gt;, and a new day is dawning [applause].&amp;nbsp; We are proving, and you are proving, as I said to Jim Inhofe one fine day [laughter]&amp;hellip;when we had the second hearing ever on global warming in six years, by now we&amp;#39;ve had twelve.&amp;nbsp; I turned to him as he tried to take over the committee, sort of a coup, and I said, &amp;quot;You now, you used to have this gavel, but now I have it.&amp;nbsp; Elections have consequences, &lt;em&gt;elections have consequences&lt;/em&gt;&amp;quot; [applause].&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; So, because of your hard work I am now Chairman of the Environment Public Works Committee, and Jim Inhofe is the Ranking member.&amp;nbsp; He no longer holds the gavel, and we can take real steps to fight global warming, and to end this war, and to create good jobs, and to provide quality affordable health care and education to everyone starting &lt;em&gt;now&lt;/em&gt; [applause]. &amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;So, now the words everyone always waits for during a speech: in closing.&amp;nbsp; We will write a whole new chapter in 2008 by electing a real working majority in Congress and a Democratic President.&amp;nbsp; And we can&amp;#39;t wait, and the people of America can&amp;#39;t wait, and the people of the world can&amp;#39;t wait.&amp;nbsp; And starting now, we will ensure that the progressive values that define our country, that have always defined our country, will truly shape its future.&amp;nbsp; Thank you for this award, stay strong, I&amp;#39;ll be there with you every inch of the way.&amp;nbsp; [Applause.]&amp;nbsp; Thank you so very much.&amp;nbsp; Goodnight everybody, thank you.&amp;nbsp; I really mean it, it means a lot to me, thank you [applause].&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0095</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Air passenger rights bill draws concern</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 21 May 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0094</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Jeff Cox&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;CNNMoney.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Legislation that would help those stranded on airport runways draws concern that language doesn't go far enough.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;NEW YORK -- While the Senate moves forward to pass an airline passengers' bill of rights, consumer groups remain wary that its language may not be tough enough to help stranded fliers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bill of rights, approved last week by the Senate Commerce Committee, mandates that airlines supply basic services to passengers stranded during flight delays. Among the requirements are that the carriers provide food, water and adequate restroom facilities while planes are grounded.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the rules the committee adopted did not include a provision that passengers be given the option to get off planes that are delayed more than three hours for takeoff. Instead, the bill allows airlines to devise their own timetables.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A passengers' rights group said Monday it will continue to lobby to have the three-hour requirement put back in the legislation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If this were the final version it would be very disappointing from a minimum standards standpoint," said Kate Hanni, spokeswoman for the Coalition for an Airline Passengers' Bill of Rights. "We have to fight for stronger language."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hanni said her group is willing to allow for some compromise that would take into account instances when the three-hour requirement isn't feasible. She noted that the minimum standard had included two 30-minute extensions that could be called for at the discretion of pilots, such as when they believe deplaning would be unsafe, or if the pilot has reason to believe that takeoff is imminent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But despite the disagreement over that portion of the bill, Hanni and other advocates said they were generally pleased that the bill of rights was moving ahead.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Along with thousands of other passengers left stranded for eight to 10 hours or more in non-hygienic planes, I am very pleased that the committee has moved an airline passengers' bill of rights closer to takeoff," Hanni said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Edmund Mierzwinski, of the U.S. Public Interest Research Group, said his organization also will be working with the legislation's sponsors, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) and Sen. Olympia Snowe (R-Maine), to make sure the tougher language is included.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In addition, Boxer said she has sent letters to airline carriers requesting that they submit proposals to address tarmac delays within 30 days.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The passengers' bill of rights was included as part of the FAA reauthorization bill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Officials at several airlines as well as industry representative group the American Transportation Association were not immediately available for comment Monday. Top of page&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://money.cnn.com/2007/05/21/news/companies/airlines_billofrights/?postversion=2007052112"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0094</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer gives California a shot at big federal bucks</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 17 May 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0091</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Edward Epstein&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Senate passes bill with $1.4 billion for state water projects&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer of California is giving her constituents a textbook example of the power a single senior senator can wield, using her new post chairing the Environment and Public Works Committee to add generously to the amount of money the state stands to get for water and flood control projects.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In all, California accounts for about $1.4 billion of the estimated $13.9 billion in projects authorized under the Water Resources Development Act passed 91-4 Wednesday by the Senate. At about 10 percent of the total, California ranks second only to flood- and hurricane-ravaged Louisiana, which accounts for 25 percent of the total.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For California -- a state whose leaders complain regularly about sending far more to Washington in federal tax dollars than the state gets back -- the experience in the water legislation represents a positive reversal of fortune.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;By the time the bill, the first such water program legislation to get this far in Congress in seven years, was wrapped up in Boxer's committee, hundreds of millions of dollars for specific California projects had been added. What's more, many other projects in the state were added to the bill without specific funding totals, making them eligible for future appropriations. And the bill called for federal studies of several other potential water projects.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We have a lot of important projects in here because we have so many needs," said Boxer, who has served on the committee in the minority and the majority since coming to the Senate in 1993. She became chairwoman after Democrats took control of Congress in November.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We are definitely in the mix," added Boxer, who said California projects had to meet the same criteria for inclusion in the 426-page legislation as those from any other state.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To veteran Washington observers, California's rise is no mystery.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The power of the gavel is not to be discounted," said Tim Ransdell, executive director of the California Institute for Federal Policy Research. "It's not an automatic blank check but it empowers a member to ensure that the rights of their home state are represented effectively."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Such legendary senators as Democrat Robert Byrd of West Virginia and Republican Ted Stevens of Alaska have become famous for their single-minded devotion to funding projects in their home states. Stevens, who has served in the Senate since 1968, was named the greatest Alaskan of the 20th century, in good part for the federal largesse he brought.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Ransdell said that Boxer and California's other Democratic senator, Dianne Feinstein, aren't in the Byrd-Stevens league. "They have many other policy priorities," he said. "But it's rarely a bad idea to take care of your constituents."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"As she has increased in seniority, she has amassed more projects under the California Christmas tree," Steve Ellis of Taxpayers for Common Sense, a taxpayers' watchdog group, said of Boxer. "She hasn't been shy about bringing home the bacon for California."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The money designated for projects in the bill will have to be followed by actual appropriations legislation to pay for the projects. Full funding of all the water projects in the bill is iffy, given intense competition for federal dollars. But California could have a leg up because Feinstein chairs the Senate's appropriations subcommittee on interior and environment and sits on the subcommittee on energy and water that is likely to handle the bulk of these projects.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The biggest reason for California's rise in the bill is money for raising the Folsom Dam and adding an auxiliary spillway to increase flood protection in the Sacramento area.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Army Corps of Engineers ranks Sacramento as the U.S. urban area most in danger of serious flooding. The project's total cost is $683 million, with the federal share put at $444 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another major item in the long list of projects is $106 million to pay for levee work under the Cal-Fed program in the Sacramento River-San Joaquin River Delta. In Marin County, there is an authorization for environmental restoration at Bel Marin Keys near the former Hamilton Airfield. The federal cost is $166 million, with a local share of $55.5 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In Santa Clara County, a project for flood control along the Llagas Creek would cost the federal government $65 million and local government $40 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In addition, the bill describes projects for which no price tag is yet available.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the House-passed version of the water bill, Speaker Nancy Pelosi inserted at the request of the Port of San Francisco $25 million authorization for repairs at several piers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pelosi's action, which she cleared with House ethics officials before acting, drew fire from House Republicans who charged that the speaker was violating her own new ethics rules because Pelosi's husband owns property within a few miles of the city waterfront. Conceivably, he could financially benefit from the port repairs, they said, a charge Pelosi's staff said is far-fetched.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Senate bill removes the $25 million price tag but still includes language to help the port make repairs. The differences will have to be reconciled between the House and Senate bills.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among other items without a price tag in Boxer's bill is an instruction to the Army Corps of Engineers to annually dredge the Redwood City Navigation Channel, study a flood control project in St. Helena in Napa County, and study the South San Francisco bay shoreline for flood protection and restoration of salt ponds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ellis estimated the bill's cost could rise to $14.9 billion because of the costs that aren't spelled out. The White House, while stopping short of a veto threat, has criticized the House and Senate bills as too costly.&lt;br&gt;Money for California water projects&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Here are some major provisions for California in the Senate version of the Water Resources Development Act, whose chief sponsor is Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- Raising Folsom Dam for Sacramento-area flood control. Federal share, $444 million; other agencies, $139 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- Bel Marin Keys restoration at Hamilton Army Airfield. Federal cost $166 million; nonfederal $55.5 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- Llagas Creek flood work in Santa Clara County. Federal share $65 million, nonfederal $40 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among items in the bill without a price tag:&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-- Flood control project review in St. Helena in Napa County, South San Francisco bay shoreline flood and salt ponds restoration study, study of San Pablo Bay watershed and a report on whether federal maintenance of the Larkspur Ferry Channel is appropriate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/05/17/MNG4VPSA611.DTL&amp;amp;feed=rss.news"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0091</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer wants review of trucker standards after freeway collapse</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 04 May 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0092</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Aaron C. Davis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Associated Press&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer on Friday asked the Department of Homeland Security to come up with tougher guidelines to ensure truckers transporting gasoline and other hazardous materials are fit for the job.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The announcement capped a week of widening fallout from the crash of a speeding tanker that collapsed one of the nation's busiest highway interchanges.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After a tour of the charred freeways, U.S. Transportation Secretary Mary Peters announced the federal government would immediately release $2 million in emergency funds and pay for most, if not all, of the expected $35 million price tag to rebuild the interchange.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She pegged the total daily cost of the disaster to commuters and businesses at $4 million to $6 million, meaning the cumulative economic impact could top $300 million. The interchange is not expected to fully reopen until June 29.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;California Department of Transportation Director Will Kempton also announced Friday that the state had launched a review of all major bridges and interchanges to determine if California can take measures to insulate critical roadways from similar disasters in the future.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was Boxer's announcement, however, that could potentially affect thousands of truck drivers and hundreds of companies that transport gasoline, chemicals, jet fuel and other hazardous materials nationwide.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In her letter to Department of Homeland Security Secretary Michael Chertoff, Boxer asked that the Transportation Security Administration develop recommendations to strengthen truck driver standards to "ensure the highest level of public safety on our nation's transportation system."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I'm thinking we might need to tighten these regulations up," Boxer said after the tour of the damaged portion of the MacArthur Maze in Oakland.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If a driver has a very checkered past, there are a lot of things they can haul, like furniture," she said. "They don't necessarily need to be hauling hazardous materials."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The truck driver behind the wheel in Sunday's crash, James Mosqueda, cleared an FBI criminal history check and an intelligence review from the TSA in order to haul gasoline, despite a history of criminal convictions, including felony drug and burglary arrests.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The TSA said Mosqueda was cleared because his last stint in jail, for heroin possession, was more than seven years ago. He had never been convicted of murder, treason or other crimes that can disqualify truckers for life from hauling hazardous materials, and he had a clean driving record for the last decade.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Mosqueda, however, had previously lost his license, according to department of motor vehicle records, which redacted the reason why. Industry experts say a nationwide shortage of truckers has led to more drivers with criminal backgrounds. Mosqueda also was relatively new to the job. He had only been driving tankers for 10 months.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Assemblyman Pedro Nava, D-Santa Barbara, who chairs both the Assembly Transportation Committee and the Joint Committee on Emergency Services and Homeland Security, said Friday he's considering legislation that would require tanker drivers in California to demonstrate proficiency hauling liquids before they're allowed to haul hazardous materials.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The public would be better served if a driver would have to operate a similar truck for three years," Nava said. "We know the physical properties of a truck with 8,600 gallons of liquid is different than 8,600 pallets of basketballs. Before you haul gasoline, maybe you have to haul milk."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The California Highway Patrol, meanwhile, is continuing its investigation into the accident. The CHP and the Federal Motor Carrier Safety Administration also are conducting safety reviews of Sabek Transportation, the company that owned the truck.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dale Bonner, secretary for the state's Business, Transportation and Housing Agency, said Friday that the state would not assign blame in the case -- or determine if it will seek financial reimbursement from Sabek -- until the investigation is complete.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to documents obtained from the Motor Carrier Safety Administration, the tanker or its driver have been cited 27 times since 2004 for violations ranging from unsafe brakes and tires to carrying more gasoline than the truck was rated for.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/05/04/state/n121927D23.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0092</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Says Bush Veto Would be Major Setback for Ending the War</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 01 May 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0090</link>
    <description>&lt;SPAN style="FONT-STYLE: italic"&gt;&lt;/SPAN&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Excerpts from speech delivered by Senator Boxer&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Today is the fourth anniversary of the President's speech that major combat operations are over. Four years ago he said that in a military outfit. Yet, today, we read, 'April Toll is Highest of '07 for U.S. Troops. Over 100 Killed in Month; Iraqi Deaths Far Higher.' [The Washington Post] Four years ago the President said major combat operations are over. Today, we read, the deadliest month in 2007.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;This President's policies left unchecked have been a disaster. What does he want? More of the same. He criticizes us for coming up with a new policy, and this new policy will work because it combines a gradual redeployment of troops with a focus on diplomacy and a political solution, which is exactly what everyone says we need. General Petraeus says we must have a political and diplomatic solution. Well, everyone has heard it, but obviously, not this President.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Anyone who reads the Constitution--and I highly recommend it--will see that when it comes to war, there is a shared responsibility. As a matter of fact, if you read the Constitution, you'll see that Congress is mentioned far more times, far more times than the President. And the President can't act as if he's king. We already had one King George. We have a democracy. This is what the President says our young people are dying for in Iraq. Yet, here at home, he acts as if he is a one-man show when it comes to Iraq. And the American people said no to that this past election. And yet he continues as if there is no Congress, there has been no election, there has been no change of heart by the American people, when in fact there has been an enormous change of heart by the American people, and that change of heart was reflected in the elections.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Mr. President, take a look at what we have done for our people here at home in this bill. You deride it and make it sound like we are spending on things we shouldn't. Why shouldn't we fix up Walter Reed? Why shouldn't we fix up the Veterans Administration so when our soldiers come home they get mental health care? Why shouldn't we invest in better technologies to protect our troops from these horrific landmines. Why shouldn't we help our farms who lost their money because of horrific droughts, horrific frosts? That's what the bills are for--emergencies.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In light of everything that has happened, doesn't this President understand it's time for a change? Doesn't he listen to the voters? Doesn't he read these articles? 'Send me the bill, I'm going to veto it.' It is not brave to continue a failing policy. I don't think it's courageous not to admit it's time to change. I don't think it shows strength. I think it's stubborn. I think it's wrong, and worst of all, our troops are paying the price for this stubbornness.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Mr. President, sign this bill. Have a change of heart. Read the paper today... read what our troops are saying. Reconsider. </description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0090</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer concerned with airport saftey</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0093</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Nicole C. Brambila&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The Desert Sun&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer echoed the safety concerns of a national pilot's association in a letter to the FAA Friday about Palm Springs' radar functions moving to the San Diego area.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I request that the FAA take immediate action to delay this highly controversial consolidation until there is a much more robust public debate and more answers provided by your agency," said Boxer, who owns a home in Rancho Mirage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer serves on the Senate Commerce, Science and Transportation Committee, which oversees the Federal Aviation Administration.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Rancho Mirage resident is the latest in a string of organizations and legislators to write FAA Administrator Marion Blakey. Earlier this week, the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association expressed concerns that the June 7 consolidation could cause delays and reductions in services.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The FAA has cited unspecified cost savings for the relocation. An FAA spokesman said Friday that the administration had received the Aircraft Owners and Pilots Association letter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Terminal Radar Approach Control, or TRACON, guides planes within 50 to 75 miles of airports. The So-Cal TRACON in Miramar, about 14 miles north of San Diego, is the busiest facility in the world.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The National Association of Air Traffic Controllers, which is embroiled in a union dispute with the FAA, has expressed concerns about short staffing and safety.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thedesertsun.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20070427/UPDATE/70427023"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0093</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Rising to the challenge posed by global warming</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0088</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Sen. Barbara Boxer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The Hill&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nearly four decades ago, the founder of Earth Day, Sen. Gaylord Nelson of Wisconsin, wrote: "Evidence of environmental degradation was appearing everywhere and everyone noticed except the political establishment."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is ample evidence that across America, leading businesses, religious communities, governors, mayors and millions of citizens from all walks of life have not only noticed the threat posed by global warming -- they are demanding action.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;California has moved with the leadership of our Democratic legislature and our Republican governor. Other states have done it with Democrats and Republicans working side by side to develop programs to reduce greenhouse gas emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More and more of the nation's leading companies and investors have come together to call for a mandatory greenhouse gas program. Religious leaders of a broad spectrum of faiths are also joining the fight against global warming, rolling up their sleeves and working for the protection of the gifts we have inherited from our Creator. And recently, key national security and military leaders have been strongly urging us to wean ourselves from oil, and to avert global political instability, mass migrations and conflicts over water and food that could be caused by unbridled climatic changes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At last, the political establishment here in Washington is awakening to the fact that global warming is more than an inconvenient truth; it is the challenge of our generation. It is a challenge that will make us stronger as a nation and as a people if we meet it head-on with hope, not fear.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The science is clear; we must take bold, decisive, scientifically based action to set the country on a path to stabilizing the world climate. Now, senators are not climate scientists. But we are policymakers. Just as our nation has taken action based on scientific consensus before -- to deal decisively with challenges from the polio epidemics to water pollution -- we must have the courage to act on what we know now.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am committed to doing everything I can, as a senator and as chairwoman of the Environment and Public Works Committee, to capitalize on that momentum and ensure that the Senate rises in a bipartisan way to the global warming challenge. My committee -- with the support of members on both sides of the aisle -- has already passed legislation that will help make federal buildings models of energy efficiency, and will provide grants to cities and counties to upgrade their own buildings. And that is only the beginning. Whenever I have the votes to pass strong global warming bills out of the committee, we will send them to the Senate floor.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is good news in the meantime. The Supreme Court ruled April 2 that right now the Environmental Protection Agency can begin to regulate greenhouse gas emissions under the Clean Air Act.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That means that right now, EPA can and should let California and other states go forward with global warming pollution standards for cars. That's a 30 percent reduction from cars in California.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It means that EPA can and should set strong nationwide global warming standards for cars as well, meeting California's standards. That would mean at least a 30 percent reduction from cars, which are about a third of our emissions, and could lower America's global warming pollution by as much as 10 percent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And it means that EPA can and should require strong global warming pollution limits for new and upgraded coal-burning power plants immediately. That way, we won't be saddled for the next half-century with vast quantities of global warming pollution from coal-fired power plants that don't use the latest clean technologies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Supreme Court has left the Bush administration with no excuses for further delay. When EPA Administrator Steve Johnson comes before my committee today, I will challenge him to use the power EPA has had all along to address global warming, and has refused to use.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have faith that by stepping up to the challenge of global warming in the right way will transform and invigorate our country, not devastate it. In fact, failure to act would result in a huge economic cost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I have a vision of a nation driven by innovation, energy efficiency, and green technology exported around the world. I see a strong American economic base, with entrepreneurs and businesses thriving as they develop the technologies that will solve this problem ... a people united by a challenge in their daily lives, and as a society. I believe we will rise to this challenge, and that we will be the better for it as a nation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://thehill.com/leading-the-news/rising-to-the-challenge-posed-by-global-warming-2007-04-23.html"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0088</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Abortion ruling spurs reply</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0089</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Alicia Mundy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Seattle Times&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON -- In response to the Supreme Court's narrow decision limiting abortion on Wednesday, Rep. Jim McDermott and Sen. Patty Murray are co-sponsoring bills to preserve abortion rights.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Freedom of Choice Act was introduced in the House and Senate on Thursday. Rep. Jerrold Nadler, D-N.Y., and Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., are promoting the legislation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The legislation would codify the 1973 Roe v. Wade decision and bar states from limiting abortion rights. It was introduced in 2006 and 2004 but never made it out of either the Senate or House judiciary committees.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That could change in the House this time with a clear Democratic majority, but it's uncertain if there are enough votes on the Senate side.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Wednesday's Supreme Court decision was the first time in 30 years the court ruled that a specific abortion procedure could be outlawed. At issue was a controversial mid- and late-term abortion method medically known as dilation and extraction, or D&amp;amp;X, which critics call "partial-birth" abortion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"As a medical doctor who has witnessed firsthand the horrors of what can happen if a woman cannot freely choose a course of action in consultation with a health professional, I am gravely concerned when the Supreme Court votes to insert itself into the room with a doctor and patient," said McDermott, D-Seattle.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/localnews/2003677203_dcnotebook23m.html"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0089</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Madam Enforcer</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 22 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0087</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Bret Schulte&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;U.S. News &amp;amp; World Report&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The first woman to chair the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee is the enforcer of a new world order. When the previous chairman, Republican Sen. James Inhofe, frequently interrupted former Vice President Al Gore during his recent testimony on climate science, Sen. Barbara Boxer intervened. "You're not making the rules," she said, and brandished the gavel. "You used to. Elections have consequences." Gore supporters burst into applause; even Inhofe gave a smile. A U.S. senator since 1993, Boxer was re-elected in 2004 with 6.9 million votes, the most of any senator in history. With Democrats in control, the dedicated environmentalist now runs the committee with jurisdiction over global warming legislation and charged with oversight of the Environmental Protection Agency. She has accused the Bush White House of rolling back environmental regulations and is promising a U-turn from Inhofe, who calls global warming a hoax. A new world order, indeed. Recently, she spoke to U.S. News.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;One of your first actions as chair was to create new subcommittees. Why?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I tried not to be held back by any particular tradition, because we have so much work to do and so little time to do it. I've divided up the responsibilities for global warming among two subcommittees simply because I knew we could get more done. Sen. Joe Lieberman held a very important hearing on the threats to wildlife. And I've done several others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;You are cosponsor of a "gold standard" bill that would slash greenhouse gas emissions 80 percent below 1990 levels by 2050. Will you support other measures?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I don't think any bill is going to get through as written. I think what will happen-because I want it to happen-is we'll have a confidence-building measure first that will deal with low-hanging fruit: increasing energy efficiency in public buildings. If the government becomes a model of energy efficiency, this could take hold in our communities and show people that they can save money.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Would you rather have a weak bill or no bill?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I want a bill that gets us on the right path as soon as possible. Any bill has to have look-backs. It can't be permanent. We're going to have to keep passing new bills. So anything we pass, whether it's the gold-standard bill or a weaker bill, will have to have a look-back. Maybe the strong bill is too strong. Maybe the weak bill is too weak. Maybe the strong bill is too weak! Any bill I support will have continual look-backs so we can stay in tune with the science.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;When will we see a global warming bill from your committee?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As soon as I get the votes. I haven't counted noses yet, but I'm sitting down with colleagues to start the process of who are possible votes on the Republican side and what the needs are in order to get a vote for such a bill. If I have the votes tomorrow, I'll move the bill tomorrow.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Does that mean that Democrats, as a bloc, are ready?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think so. I don't want to speak for every Democrat, but I want to say that's my strong impression.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;What's it going to take to get the 60 votes necessary to override a filibuster?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I think senators have to come to grips with the issue. And I think it's happening. This isn't something that happens overnight. This is an inconvenient truth. Al Gore is right. We're sending around articles. We're featuring scientists in private briefings with colleagues. My staff has briefed other staffs. This is one of the greatest challenges of our generation. It's going to take a realization on the part of a majority of senators, and maybe a supermajority, to understand that we have to take strong action, or we're going to fail our grandchildren.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;You're promising tough oversight of the EPA, which you've accused of a number of environmental rollbacks. What do you feel is EPA's No. 1 problem?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;You've got to go to the top. This president has the worst record of any president in terms of utilizing the EPA as a watchdog agency and a proponent for making our environment as healthy as it can be. As someone who cares deeply about public health, I can tell you it's been a disaster.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Shouldn't environmentalists be pleased that the White House has promoted a career scientist, Stephen Johnson, to the agency's top post?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My own view is if you're serious about the environment, you do two things. You make it a cabinet-level post, and you pick someone who has a real profile in environmental issues. When I called him to task on the environmental rollbacks, he gave a speech on how wonderful everything is. He doesn't get it, or he doesn't want to get it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;But isn't it true that air quality standards are tougher than ever before?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The problem is there is more pollution. The standards are higher, but how high does it have to be to protect the people? In my state, 9,000 people a year are dying of air-related illness.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Do you expect a battle with the White House over the EPA and its budget?&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This latest budget request from the president is so underfunded that even my Republican colleagues, to my happy surprise, have said they cannot stand by and watch this. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.usnews.com/usnews/news/articles/070422/30qa.htm"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0087</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Pelosi, Boxer work to make Capitol greener</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0085</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Edward Epstein&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Both lawmakers hope Congress sets example for nation&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;Washington -- Saying she wants to set an environmental example for the rest of the country, Speaker Nancy Pelosi vowed Thursday to make the House's five buildings and 6 million square feet of space carbon-neutral by the end of 2008.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I believe we have to get our own house in order before we launch a global warming initiative for the rest of the country,'' Pelosi, D-San Francisco, said in a Capitol conference room where the huge crystal chandelier had been outfitted with energy-efficient compact fluorescent bulbs.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pelosi's Green the Capitol Initiative is mirrored in the Senate by the efforts of Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who chairs the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In addition to trying to increase energy efficiency in Senate buildings, Boxer is working with the General Services Administration on legislation to mandate new energy savings in thousands of federal buildings across the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The two houses of Congress are zealously independent of each other, but Pelosi said she hopes they can come together on energy-saving measures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Getting Congress to act on its own carbon footprint would set a powerful example for the rest of the vast federal government that is the world's largest single consumer of energy, spending about $14.5 billion a year on fuel for vehicles and heating, lighting and cooling buildings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pelosi's new effort envisions eliminating or offsetting the 91,000 tons of annual greenhouse gas emissions the House complex produces, as estimated made by the Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Electricity use accounts for 63 percent of the House's total emissions, while the Capitol's old power plant just a few blocks away from the complex of office buildings accounts for another 33 percent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The plant, which burns coal and natural gas, produces steam to heat buildings and chilled water to cool them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pelosi's plan is to work with Potomac Electric Power, Washington's local utility, to buy 100 percent renewable power, such as that generated by the sun or the wind, which will cost about 20 percent more than traditional power.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Daniel Beard, the House's new chief administrative officer, estimated in a report to Pelosi that the higher costs will be offset over time by energy conservation measures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beard estimated that switching to renewables will eliminate 57,000 tons of annual greenhouse gas emissions, the equivalent of removing 11,000 cars from the roads.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Conservation measures include converting desk lamps and overhead lighting to energy-efficient fluorescents.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beard also recommended that the House adopt sustainable practices, including buying only energy-efficient appliances and environmentally friendly building products. He also wants the House to install an E-85 ethanol-blend fuel station for House cars.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the end, he said that in order to reach the goal of carbon neutrality, it will be necessary for the House to enter the new carbon-offset market to either purchase credits or make a per-ton payment into a green revolving fund to help pay for future cuts in emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congress already is considering what to do about the old power plant, but getting rid of it won't be easy because members of Congress from coal-producing states probably would oppose such a move.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Beard is working on a second report for Pelosi, who took office in early January, that is due by the end of June. He is considering more ambitious steps that include planting roof gardens, collecting and recycling rainwater from buildings, turning off more lights at night, promoting transit usage among House employees, repairing leaky roofs and fixing leaks in heating and air-conditioning systems.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pelosi's effort at the Capitol comes as she is pushing the House to pass global warming legislation by this summer, a complicated task in which environmentalists are coming up against a variety of industries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer, on the Senate side, is working on legislation that would mirror California's landmark law to mandate reductions in greenhouse gases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On the issue of energy efficiency, Boxer held a hearing last month on ways the government can make federal buildings more energy efficient.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;David Winstead of the General Services Administration testified at the hearing that the agency is intensifying its efforts to improve federal buildings, which consume about 40 percent of all the energy consumed nationally. President Bush, through executive order, has already ordered the government to cut energy use and employ new technologies in buildings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Winstead singled out the "remarkable'' new office building at Seventh and Mission streets in San Francisco for its use of a variety of energy-saving techniques. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2007/04/20/MNGS0PCFL21.DTL"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0085</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer panel offers to help you cut carbon emissions</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0082</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By David Whitney&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Sacramento Bee&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Want to know how you can help cut global warming? Sen. Barbara Boxer is here to help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The California Democrat, chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, announced at a National Press Club speech Wednesday that she has prepared a committee Web site to help users determine how big a polluter they are and how they can reduce carbon dioxide emissions that are trapping heat and turning the Earth into a hothouse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among the tips: If every household in the country were to replace just one of those hot-burning incandescent light bulbs with a more expensive -- but much longer-lasting -- energy-saving compact fluorescent bulb, the collective effort would be the equivalent of taking 6.3 million cars off the road.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Or you could just turn your car into a flower pot. "Every gallon of gasoline saved keeps 20 pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere," the Web site advises.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer's committee has been holding hearings in advance of writing legislation to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. She declined Wednesday to predict when major legislation would be ready, saying that it will come as soon as she has the votes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it's looking better all the time, Boxer said, noting that all of the panel's Democrats and three committee Republicans now are behind legislation to cut the emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Additionally, she said, because the U.S. Supreme Court recently concluded that the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority under the Clean Air Act to tackle global warming, she will be holding the agency's feet to the fire at a hearing next week, and the next week, and the next week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"There will be an electoral price to pay if they do nothing," Boxer declared. "The margin in Congress is at stake. The presidency is at stake. The people of the United States want action."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer favors national legislation similar to California's groundbreaking global warming law that seeks to cap carbon emissions from power plants, cars and other burners of fossil fuels to lower them to 1990 levels by 2020. She also favors creating a trading system so companies surpassing reduction targets can sell credits to other companies that haven't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said her committee, though still divided on the larger solutions, is making progress. Last month it approved legislation requiring federal buildings to install energy-efficient lighting and other technologies to cut energy use by 20 percent over five years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The carbon calculator can be found at the committee's Web site, http://epw.senate.gov, and clicking on the blue button in the left column marked "act now to stop global warming."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The link asks a series of quick questions, such as residence, how many miles driven each year and how much electric and natural gas bills are each month. With that information, it will calculate how many tons of carbon dioxide each user is responsible for, and offer recommendations on lowering that number.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using that calculator, Boxer is a big polluter. She drives a gas-sipping hybrid car but spends a lot of time on airplanes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer's office estimated that she made 20 round-trip flights last year, which is good for about 19,500 tons of carbon dioxide emissions. But Natalie Ravitz, the congresswoman's press aide, said Boxer buys credits through carbonfund.org to offset the emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the carbonfund.org Web site, its members use a calculator similar to that on the committee's Web site to determine their carbon "footprint" and then pay to buy emissions credits from forestry operations and renewable energy projects to compensate for the pollution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Senator Boxer purchased enough carbon offsets through carbonfund.org to make herself carbon neutral and to more than cover her round-trip travel between California and Washington, D.C.," Ravitz said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/341/story/157486.html"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0082</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer's 2-track push on warming</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 19 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0080</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Frank Davies&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;San Jose Mercury News&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;SENATOR PLANS BILLS, PRESSURE&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON - Trying a two-pronged approach on global warming, Sen. Barbara Boxer pledged Wednesday to send bills to the Senate floor "whenever I have the votes," while pressuring the Environmental Protection Agency to begin regulating greenhouse gas emissions without legislation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The California Democrat, who chairs the Environment and Public Works Committee, said she saw "an emerging consensus" on the panel for some emissions controls, at least on power plants. One key Republican, Sen. Lamar Alexander of Tennessee, is planning to introduce such a bill, as are several Democrats, Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other bills, including one from presidential candidate Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz., are more far-reaching, and would cover all industries.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer plans to "strategize" with other senators today on the best way to approach global warming legislation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In a speech to the National Press Club, she said she will try to send bills to the full Senate even if passage is not a sure thing, and she clearly sees this as a winning political issue that is gaining public support.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Let people stand up in the Senate and vote 'no' on curbing greenhouse gases," Boxer said. "If they vote 'no,' they may get booted out. There will be an electoral price to pay if they do nothing."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer also plans at a committee hearing next week to challenge EPA chief Steve Johnson to use a ruling by the Supreme Court to "set strong nationwide global warming pollution standards" for vehicles and power plants.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In a major environmental decision, the court ruled April 2 that the EPA has the authority to regulate carbon-dioxide emissions under the Clean Air Act. The Bush administration had argued that it lacked the authority.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The ruling also helps California's request for a federal waiver to enforce its own emissions standards, and Boxer said she would press Johnson to grant the waiver.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer called the ruling "a gift" that "puts the wind at our backs."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We will hound them on this," Boxer said. "We will let people know that the administration has the power to help solve this problem now."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At an informal meeting of the committee Tuesday, two Republicans - Alexander and Robert Bennett of Utah - said they saw the impact of global warming as a serious problem. But Bennett was wary of how far the government should go in regulating emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bennett pressed a group of scientists who worked on international global warming reports to break down how much of global greenhouse gas emissions are caused by human activity and how much are from natural causes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stephen Schneider, a climate expert from Stanford University who has studied climate change for more than 30 years, said that although the data was not precise, he was convinced that human activity was the principal cause of most emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/ci_5701567?source=rss&amp;amp;nclick_check=1"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0080</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer introduces Web site to help consumers fight global warming</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0081</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By David Whitney&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;McClatchy Newspapers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON - Want to know how you can help reduce global warming? Sen. Barbara Boxer is here to help.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The California Democrat, chair of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, announced at a National Press Club speech Wednesday that she has prepared a committee Web site to help you determine how big of a polluter you are and how you can reduce carbon dioxide emissions that are trapping heat and turning the Earth into a hothouse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among the tips: If every household in the country were to replace just one of those hot-burning incandescent light bulbs with a more expensive - but much longer lasting - energy-saving compact fluorescent bulb, the collective effort would be the equivalent of taking 6.3 million cars off the road.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Every gallon of gasoline saved keeps 20 pounds of CO2 out of the atmosphere," the Web site advises.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer's committee has been holding hearings in advance of writing legislation to reduce carbon dioxide emissions. She declined Wednesday to predict when major legislation would be ready, saying that it will come as soon as she has the votes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But it's looking better all the time, Boxer said. All of the panel's Democrats lined up behind legislation, and Boxer said three committee Republicans now are behind legislation to cut carbon emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Additionally, she said, the Supreme Court recently concluded that the Environmental Protection Agency has the authority under the Clean Air Act to tackle global warming, and she said she'll be holding the agency's feet to the fire at a hearing next week, and the next week, and the next week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"There will be an electoral price to pay if they do nothing," Boxer declared. "The (Republican) margin in Congress is at stake. The presidency is at stake. The people of the United States want action."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer favors national legislation similar to California's groundbreaking global warming law that would cap carbon emissions from power plants, cars and other burners of fossil fuels and lower them to 1990 levels by 2020.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She also favors creating a trading system so that companies surpassing reduction targets can sell credits to other companies that haven't.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said her committee, though still divided on the larger solutions, is making progress. Last month it approved legislation that requires federal buildings to install energy-efficient lighting and other technologies to cut energy use by 20 percent over five years.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The carbon calculator can be found at the committee's Web site, http://epw.senate.gov, and by clicking on the blue button in the left column marked "act now to stop global warming."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The link will ask you a series of quick questions, such as where you live, how many miles you drive and how much your electric and natural gas bills are each month. With that information, it will calculate how many tons of carbon dioxide you are responsible for, followed by recommendations on lowering your output.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Using that calculator, Boxer is a big polluter. She drives a gas-sipping hybrid car but spends a lot of time on airplanes. Each seat on a round-trip flight from California to Washington adds 1,000 pounds of carbon dioxide to the atmosphere, or about the same as a 25-mpg car would spew on a 1,000-mile trip.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer's office estimated that she made 20 roundtrip flights last year, which is good for about 19,500 tons of carbon dioxide emissions. But Natalie Ravitz, the congresswoman's press aide, said she buys credits through carbonfund.org to offset the emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to the carbonfund.org Web site, its members use a calculator similar to that on the committee's Web site to determine their carbon "footprint" and then pay to buy emissions "credits" from forestry operations and renewable energy projects to compensate for the pollution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Senator Boxer purchased enough carbon offsets through carbonfund.org to make herself carbon neutral and to more than cover her roundtrip travel between California and Washington, D.C.," Ravitz said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.realcities.com/mld/krwashington/news/nation/17098773.htm?source=rss&amp;amp;channel=krwashington_nation"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0081</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: Time for Bush to act on climate change</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Apr 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0083</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Carolyn Lochhead&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;San Francisco Chronicle &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Washington -- Sen. Barbara Boxer promised to pressure the Bush administration to adopt California-style global warming regulations, telling reporters today the Supreme Court "handed us a gift" with its recent landmark decision authorizing the Environmental Protection Agency to reduce greenhouse gasses as a pollutant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The decision "put the wind at our backs," the California Democrat said, vowing at the National Press Club to haul administration officials before her Senate Environment and Public Works Committee to ask them what immediate steps they will take to reduce greenhouse gas emissions, which are produced by the consumption of fossil fuels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I will hound them on this week after week after week after week," said Boxer, who chairs the committee. "It doesn't take China doing anything. It doesn't take India doing anything. It doesn't take Congress doing anything."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The administration has the power to act on its own, she said, and "I intend to move to make sure the administration uses its powers."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among the steps she said she expects the agency to take is allowing California a waiver from federal rules, which would allow the state to impose greenhouse gas emissions limits on automobiles. She also wants a similar rule adopted nationwide, as well as new limits on all new and existing coal-fired power plants. A national rule would reduce greenhouse gases from cars by 30 percent, she said, while gases from utilities account for 40 percent of emissions nationwide.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;EPA chief Steve Johnson is scheduled to appear Tuesday before the committee along with Carol Browner, who ran the agency under Democratic President Bill Clinton and William Reilly, who headed it under Republican President George H.W. Bush.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although President Bush embraced global warming as a problem in his January State of the Union address, his administration opposes mandatory emissions reductions on industry. Boxer faces an uphill struggle to pass a global warming bill in Congress, even though she said Senate majority leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., has the issue second only to the Iraq war on Democrats' agenda.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer promised to move a bill out of her committee as soon as she has Republican support. While that support is growing among moderates -- committee member Sen. Lamar Alexander, a Tennessee Republican, is poised to introduce a global warming bill this week -- Boxer conceded it is unlikely that Democrats will be able to overcome the 60-vote filibuster threshold needed to pass global warming legislation in this Congress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speaker Nancy Pelosi of San Francisco faces a similar difficulty pushing global warming legislation through the House despite creating a special committee on the issue and pledging to have a bill by July.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the first hearing of the special committee today, Republicans questioned efforts to paint global warming as a national security threat.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Unfortunately, this debate hasn't been characterized by common sense. It's been characterized by extremism," said Rep. James Sensenbrenner, R-Wis. "While this extremism hasn't done anything to produce effective solutions, it has created a lot of hot air, which hasn't been good for Congress' carbon footprint."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Boxer, in her speech to the press club, said she is counting on public pressure to force the administration to act before the 2008 elections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"At some point," she said, "the administration will realize that the price isn't worth it," to stand in the way. "Congress is at stake. The presidency is at stake."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer ruled out a carbon tax, widely viewed by economists as an efficient and quick way to encourage energy conservation and reduce fossil fuel consumption, especially gasoline, by raising prices. For that same reason, it is highly unpopular politically.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"There's no support for it," Boxer said. Clinton attempted early in his first term to impose an energy tax, but was hammered by Republicans and the idea hasn't surfaced seriously in Congress since.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer instead favors a "cap and trade" system modeled on the approach taken in California's new law and in Europe. Under such a system, the government sets overall emissions levels and develops a market in emissions, in which companies can earn credits by reducing greenhouse gas emissions, or buy credits from other companies that can do so more cheaply. Such a system was initially adopted by Bush's father's administration to curb acid rain pollutants from power plants. The idea was initially denounced but has since been widely embraced. While leveraging market forces, it has the political advantage of targeting industry, while hitting consumers only indirectly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"At the end of the day, it does the same thing," Boxer said of a cap-and-trade system versus a carbon tax. "You put a price on carbon." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/04/18/MNG9FPATPA17.DTL&amp;amp;feed=rss.news"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0083</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer: No to Public Lands Sell-Off</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 30 Mar 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0086</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Senator Barbara Boxer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;YubaNet.com&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Like many Americans, I am greatly disturbed by the President's renewed efforts to sell 273,000 acres of national forest lands, his shortsighted solution to secure funding for rural schools. This proposal would strike at the heart of California's natural heritage, since more than 65,000 acres - 24 percent of all lands that would be sold - are in California.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A review of these California lands shows that roadless areas and wild and scenic rivers would be put up for sale - hardly mere "parcels" of land that do not meet our Forest Service "needs," as the Department of Agriculture has claimed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I believe we can find alternative ways to fund our rural schools while continuing to preserve our public lands. That is why I am an original co-sponsor of the Secure Rural Schools and Community Self Determination Reauthorization Act of 2007 (S.380). This bill would provide funding to rural forest counties to help finance schools and roads - without having to sell off any federal forest land. I am pleased that the Senate recently passed similar legislation as an amendment to the 2007 Emergency Supplemental Appropriations bill. This amendment would provide about $5 billion for rural schools over the next five years, including $283 million for California's rural counties. Based on this success, I am confident that we can pass S.380 in the 110th Congress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Creating a misleading choice between our priceless natural heritage and our rural public schools is irresponsible, and the Bush Administration is clearly derelict in its duty to be a sound steward of our national lands. I will do everything I can to see that California's precious national forests are protected as a resource for generations to come.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sincerely,&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barbara Boxer&lt;br&gt;United States Senator &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yubanet.com/cgi-bin/artman/exec/view.cgi/23/53857"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0086</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Al Gore a star in return to Capitol Hill</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0084</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Zachary Coile&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;He finds growing agreement on need to fight warming&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;Washington -- Former Vice President Al Gore, hoping to spur action on legislation to fight climate change, warned Congress of a planetary emergency and urged lawmakers of both parties to put the Earth's future ahead of partisan politics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I promise you a day will come when our children and grandchildren will look back and they will ask one of two questions," Gore told a House panel Wednesday. "Either they will ask, 'What in God's name were they doing?' " or "they'll say, 'How did they find the uncommon courage to rise above politics and redeem the promise of American democracy?' "&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore's appearances on both sides of Capitol Hill showed how far the debate over climate change has shifted in the 30 years since he began holding some of Congress' first hearings on global warming as a young representative from Tennessee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The world is finally paying attention," Rep. Bart Gordon, D-Tenn., chair of the House Science and Technology Committee, said at Wednesday's hearing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore's newfound celebrity from his lead role in the Academy Award-winning global warming documentary "An Inconvenient Truth," also has made him a bigger target of his opponents in Congress. They accused him Wednesday of exaggerating scientific claims to scare the public and proposing solutions that could hurt the U.S. economy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Gore's position is increasingly shared by many Republicans in Congress, who are calling for some action on climate change. Gore's supporters say his relentless advocacy on the issue has played a part.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"In Tennessee, we sometimes say about an especially determined horse that he gets the bit in his teeth and you can't turn him," said Tennessee Republican Sen. Lamar Alexander, who introduced Gore at the Senate hearing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore's return to Congress was orchestrated by Democratic leaders, who expected that his high-profile testimony would focus the public's attention and build support for the party's efforts to pass major climate change legislation this year. The speculation that he might run again for president only heightened the buzz.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore was mobbed by TV cameras the minute he arrived with his wife, Tipper, on Capitol Hill in a black Mercury Mariner, a hybrid SUV. The line for the public to get into the House Energy and Commerce Committee hearing room snaked around the building. The hearing was so packed that a few lawmakers sat in seats reserved for the public just to listen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Former House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., jokingly referred to Gore's new role as "a thinker, a personality and now movie star."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Rin Tin Tin was a movie star," Gore responded. "I just have a slide show."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore quickly got into a sparring match with the panel's ranking Republican, Rep. Joe Barton of Texas, who alleged that Gore had exaggerated scientific claims of rising sea levels and increased malaria infections due to warming. Barton also challenged Gore's assertion that rising carbon dioxide levels were the main cause of rising temperatures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Mr. Vice President, you're not just a little off," Barton said. "You're totally wrong."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore responded that Barton's contrarian position on carbon dioxide had repeatedly been shot down by the National Academy of Science and by other respected scientific bodies.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The planet has a fever," Gore said. "If your baby has a fever, you go to the doctor. If the doctor says, 'You have to intervene here,' you don't say, 'Well, I read a science fiction novel that says this isn't important.' If the crib's on fire, you don't speculate that the baby is flame-retardant."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore also laid out an ambitious set of solutions to global warming, including a call for an immediate freeze on greenhouse gas emissions, a ban on incandescent bulbs and a tax on carbon pollution, which he said would replace the payroll tax. He conceded, however, that Congress was likely to be leery of his tax plan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I fully understand this is considered politically impossible, but part of our challenge is to expand the limits of what's possible," he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Hastert surprised some fellow lawmakers by agreeing with Gore's assessment that climate change is a real threat. But the former speaker warned that Gore's prescription for cap-and-trade systems and carbon taxes could hurt U.S. businesses. Barton added that Gore's proposed freeze on carbon emissions would mean "no new industry, no new people and no new cars."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Democrats praised Gore's proposals as innovative ideas that could make their way into legislation. At a hearing before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Sen. Hillary Clinton, D-N.Y., said she was impressed by Gore's proposal to start a new national mortgage program that helped the public invest in energy-saving technologies in their homes.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore's appearance before the Senate was highly anticipated, because he was facing off against the Congress's chief climate change skeptic: Republican Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, who famously called global warming the "greatest hoax ever perpetrated on the American people."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Inhofe accused Gore of hypocrisy for asking people to change their lifestyles while he lives in a mansion outside Nashville that uses 20 times as much energy as the average U.S. household -- a charge first aired by a Tennessee advocacy group that's become a favorite of Gore critics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Are you willing to change the way you live?" Inhofe asked.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore started to explain that he was already buying power from renewable sources and was trying to get zoning rules changes so he could install solar panels. But Inhofe cut him off, saying he was taking too much time -- which enraged California Sen. Barbara Boxer, the Democrat who chairs the panel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"How can you ask the question and not give a man a minute to answer?" Boxer said, who gave Gore extra time, explaining that now that she chairs the committee, "I make the rules."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the end of the hearing, Boxer called Gore a role model who would be judged well by history for his early warnings about the threat of global warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gore appeared almost embarrassed by the praise. "Now, you don't give out any kind of statue or anything, do you?" he said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2007/03/22/MNGDROPM7I1.DTL"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0084</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Uncle Sam's Greenhouse Gases</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 02 Mar 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0079</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Editorial&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The Wall Street Journal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stop the presses: Senator Barbara Boxer of California has a good idea. Ms. Boxer, who heads the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, suggested last week that a first step in reducing greenhouse gases would be to require that federal buildings use more efficient light bulbs, and ask federal bureaucrats to turn off their computers at night.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Don't you think it's time the federal government were a model of energy efficiency?" she asks. We warmly agree, not least since the United States Government is the largest single consumer of energy in the United States.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's also one of the most inefficient energy users. According to a 1999 report by the Alliance to Save Energy, the "federal government, consumes about 32% more energy per square foot than the nation's building stock at large." This inefficiency costs taxpayers an estimated $1 billion a year. In Al Gore's phrase, Uncle Sam's leaving one giant "carbon footprint."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Of course, it follows from all this that the best way to make the federal government more energy efficient would be to undertake a government-wide policy of...lights out, permanently. Save the environment; kill a federal program.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Start, needless to say, with the Department of Energy, operating at an annual cost of $22 billion. The U.S. Government Accountability Office reports that from 1980 to 1996 Energy frittered away more than $10 billion on programs that were "terminated before completion." On behalf of combating climate change, America could live without DOE's Energy Hog Webgame for kids, which cost taxpayers $325,000.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Senate Government Reform Committee has identified more than $200 billion of budget savings, enough to easily balance the budget, by eliminating redundant and wasteful federal activities. They'd have to open that nuclear-waste dump at Yucca Mountain to bury all the turned-off lightbulbs and computers. At this rate, Barbara Boxer might eclipse Al Gore as the Democrat who saved the planet. The key to success is one wonderful word -- "efficient."&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0079</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Pushing Passenger Bill Of Rights After Last Week's Melt Down</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0078</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Teresa Garcia&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;KGO ABC 7 News&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer is set today to unveil a federal passenger bill of rights to protect air travelers and JetBlue is unveiling its own plan today, after last week's melt down that had passengers trapped on the tarmac.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;JetBlue flights leaving San Jose and Oakland are functioning just fine, but elsewhere backups stemming from last week continued through the President's Day Holiday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yesterday cancellations affected 11 airports, stretching from Texas to Maine. Today though, the airline plans to operate a regular flight schedule nationwide.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Valentine's Day was tough for thousands, but especially for those passengers stuck in JetBlue planes at JFK for nearly 11 hours. They were grounded by the east coast's intense snow and ice storm.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The carrier is finally getting back on its feet. JetBlue's CEO has been forthcoming with apologies, attributing the service breakdown to lack of staff training, poor communication and an overwhelmed reservation system.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To avoid such a repeat, the carrier is launching a passenger bill of rights; a type of bill that California Senator Barbara Boxer is trying to take the legislative route.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;JetBlue CEO David Neeleman: "Look. We're sorry. We're humiliated. This isn't like us."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer (D) California: "They can't stay on the plane for more than three hours without having a chance to deplane and that's every three hours. And they must have access to clean water, food and toilet facilities."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bill of rights would give passengers the right to leave their plane if the departure time is delayed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer plans to introduce her version of a bill today and wants to make it industry-wide. JetBlue will also detail its bill of rights later today.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The airline says it includes imposing penalties on itself and compensating passengers if it cannot recover from weather and other events. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://abclocal.go.com/kgo/story?section=local&amp;amp;id=5050001"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0078</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Climate Change Heats Up Washington</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0076</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Tara Lohan&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;AlterNet&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A new commercial from the Ad Council begins with a pastoral scene. Leaves rustling on a branch. A gentle breeze. Curving train tracks surrounded by green grass. The camera stops on a middle-aged man.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Global warming," he says, and the camera cuts to a fast-moving locomotive. "Some say irreversible consequences are 30 years away," he continues as it suddenly becomes visible that he is standing on the tracks and the train is barreling down on him. "Thirty years? That won't affect me." Just as the train is about to reach him he steps out of the way, revealing a young girl behind him on the tracks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The commercial directs viewers to fightglobalwarming.com and then ends with the message "There is still time." That seems to be what environment groups are hoping to get across to the public -- and their elected officials -- that it's not too late to do something about global warming. Yes, the ball is rolling, climate change is happening, but it is also a snowball, and the quicker we slow the momentum, the better.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;However, there are some a big "ifs" involved. We can stop climate change if we take action and if that action is really meaningful. We are past the point of gesturing and in need of real action. That is why the 110th Congress has piqued so many environmental hopes. But will a Democratic-led legislature be able to bring about the necessary change -- and will any meaningful laws that those houses pass make it through the final hurdle at the White House?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Off to the races&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"For 12 years, the leadership in the House of Representatives has stifled all discussion and debate of global warming," House Speaker Nancy Pelosi told the Committee on Science and Technology last week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"That long rejection of reality is over ... scientific evidence suggests that to prevent the most severe effects of global warming, we will need to cut global greenhouse gas emissions roughly in half from today's levels by 2050."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Pelosi said she aims to have legislation passed in the House to combat global warming by July and she is co-sponsoring a bill with Henry Waxman, D-Calif., called the Safe Climate Act to do just that.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the House has already made some progress on energy issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Democrats got the ball rolling in their first 100 hours when the House passed HR 6, known as the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007. With 98 percent of Democrats voting in favor of it and 82 percent of Republicans opposing it, the bill aims "to reduce our nation's dependency on foreign oil by investing in clean, renewable, and alternative energy resources, promoting new emerging energy technologies, developing greater efficiency, and creating a Strategic Energy Efficiency and Renewables Reserve to invest in alternative energy, and for other purposes."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;More succinctly, the bill's primary goal is to take taxpayer money out of the pockets of the oil industry and put it towards investments in clean energy -- which may explain the clear partisan split.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As Gene Karpinski, president of the League of Conservation Voters said, "This legislation eliminates $14 billion in giveaways to oil companies already making record profits and starts investing in clean renewable energy and energy efficiency. The inclusion of the CLEAN Energy Act of 2007 as part of the first 100 hours' agenda sends a clear signal that the new Congress is serious about creating real changes in our nation's energy policy. By saying no to Big Oil and yes to renewable energy, our country is taking a significant first step toward a clean energy future."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While it would seem that the House got off in the right direction, four bills were also introduced in the Senate to address global warming -- all call for mandatory caps on greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The front runner for environmentalists is one put forth by Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., and Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., first introduced in the last Senate by now-retired Jim Jeffords of Vermont.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Global Warming Pollution Reduction Act, as it is called, would require a gradual move toward 80 percent emission reductions from 1990 levels by 2050 and incentives for renewable energy development.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We think of the Boxer/Sanders bill as the gold standard because that bill would really set us on a path toward slowing, stopping and reversing global warming," said Julia Bovey, senior legislative communications associate of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NRDC).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"That's because it has bold targets to cut GHG pollution, and it is working on a scale that we think is vital if we are really going to be able to stop this problem in time. All of them have excellent elements, and it is really time for Congress to buckle down and choose the parts of the bills that will get us where we need to go."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;All the bills basically call for some sort of cap-and-trade policy that would put a limit on the amount of GHG emissions that will be allowed and then enable companies to trade "pollution credits." The idea is to create a market incentive to cut pollution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The main issue is that you have to give carbon a value, and once it's got a market value, then people can trade it. Those who are able to cut their pollution are able to sell what they are not using to someone who isn't cutting and that means that those who are cutting pollution will be rewarded in the market place," said Bovey. "Once something like that is in place it gives the opportunity for enormous economic growth because polluters are paying. There will be jobs for investments in clean energy and businesses can improve their bottom line by doing the right thing."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While all the bills contain cap-and-trade language, they do differ. The McCain/Lieberman bill, also co-sponsored by Barack Obama, D-Ill., requires serious GHG reductions, but for some, the bill is a no-go for other reasons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"While the bill's environmental objectives are a strong advance, one provision remains misguided," said NRDC President Frances G. Beinecke. "Despite the provision of billions of dollars in subsidies to the nuclear industry in the 2005 Energy Policy Act and over $85 billion in historical subsidies, the bill ... contains additional nuclear subsidies that NRDC continues to oppose. Additional giveaways to an industry made up of some of the world's wealthiest firms are neither necessary nor warranted."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bovey added: "There are problems with nuclear power that we don't have answers for -- what to do with the waste -- whether taxpayers should be subsidizing an industry that is so expensive when there are cleaner, cheaper, faster, and better sources of energy. And when we look at McCain/Lieberman, we applaud that there is a defining cap and some other terrific elements but with the subsidy for nuclear power in there it is just a nonstarter."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other two bills have even less enthusiasm from most environmental groups. Jeff Bingaman, D-NM, and Arlen Specter's bill, R-Pa., is largely considered the weakest of the bunch. "It would implement a cap-and-trade program to gradually slow the growth of greenhouse-gas intensity, or the amount of greenhouse gases emitted per dollar of gross domestic product, beginning in 2012, but it wouldn't actually start reversing the trend until 2020," wrote Amanda Griscom Little for Grist. "The proposal also offers a 'safety valve' that would limit the amount of money companies would have to spend on emission-reduction efforts or emission allowances."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While the bill may have more of a chance of garnering bipartisan support, it sets the bar too low, as does the bill by Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., and Tom Carper, D-Del., which is also "too little, too late," Little wrote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;The White House's brick wall&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is good movement and rhetoric surrounding the issue, but what happens if the House and Senate pass something that keeps the heart of the Waxman/Pelosi and Boxer/Sanders bills intact. Could it be a political reality?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I believe it is absolutely feasible if you see the change in the American people's feelings about global warming in the last year or two," said Bovey. "Global warming deniers have seen some of their funding dry up, the Bush administration has been forced to admit that it is a serious problem, and the Al Gore movie has really gone a long way to help people understand what has long been considered a scientific issue. The American people have the will to slow, stop, and reverse global warming, and they sent a new cast of characters to Washington, and people are really hopeful that this new Congress will be able to do it."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever bills are passed by Congress will need to be signed by the president and considering it has taken Bush his lifetime to even utter the worlds "global climate change," the chances of him signing meaningful legislation is very questionable.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His new budget shows how he prioritizes environmental concerns, especially global warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"This budget should have been an opportunity to start moving America beyond oil. An opportunity missed," said Heather Taylor, deputy legislative director for the NRDC.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"For instance, only 10 percent of the money for new energy development in this budget is for clean, renewable energy. The other 90 percent is for technologies from the past that pollute our world and fail to provide us economic growth. The programs funded by this budget would actually make global warming worse, not better."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;According to an analysis of the budget by leading environmental and conservation groups, "the most disappointing part about this budget, however, may not be its funding cuts, but its failure to chart a new environmental course for the nation and begin wrestling with the global warming crisis that is affecting our planet, especially in light of the president's call to end our addiction to oil."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Senate's Environmental and Public Works Committee released a statement saying, "The president also proposes to cut the EPA's science and technology budget for climate protection by about $5 million, from $18.64 million in 2006 to $13.1 million at a time when we need more global warming research, not less."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It is apparent that the Bush administration will be continuing to tune out not just scientific reality, but also political reality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Despite all this, Bovey says that the NRDC is hopeful that cap-and-trade legislation will be passed to require significant GHG reductions over time and to spur investments in clean energy. They are also pushing for the government to renew programs for green building and other energy-saving incentives.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But others are less optimistic and more realistic. "All the buzz has, for the first time in decades, awakened greens to the possibility of fundamental change," wrote David Roberts for Tom Paine.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"But they should remember that the interests of the planet and the interests of the new congressional leadership are not entirely in alignment. Right now, the overriding political objective for Pelosi and Reid is to position the party favorably for the 2008 elections."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Things are still politics-as-usual in Washington. But the Democratic Congress has responded to the public's call for action on climate change. They are eager to show that global warming is a priority, but it is simply a question of how much can be done -- and whether it will be enough.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"A climate-change bill that can pass through today's Congress, much less avoid a Bush veto, will inevitably be feeble. Worse, it could lock the U.S. into a slow, bureaucratic response and dampen public pressure to act," Roberts said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are reasons to be hopeful, to be wary, but most of all, to be vigilant. The passage of meaningful legislation will take public pressure on our elected officials -- all the way up to the White House. People are already mounting a day of action, Step It Up 2007, on April 14 and nonprofits such as the NRDC and Environmental Defense can help people make a difference in other ways.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The next generation is standing on the tracks, and we can't let Congress simply step aside. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.alternet.org/envirohealth/47891/"&gt;&lt;br&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0076</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Working to Protect California's Public Lands</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Feb 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0077</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Barbara Boxer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;YubaNet&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I am very pleased to let you know that I recently introduced legislation to protect more than 2.4 million acres of federal public lands in California.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The California Wild Heritage Act would designate public lands owned by the American people as "wilderness" - the highest level of protection in federal law - and segments of California rivers as "wild and scenic." These areas would remain open for recreational activities such as horseback riding, fishing, hunting, hiking, backpacking, rock climbing and canoeing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;My bill would also protect vital watersheds in our national forests, which are a source of California's drinking water supply. In addition, the bill would help protect vulnerable ecosystems and threatened species of plants and animals, such as salmon and trout.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last year, my Northern California Coastal Wild Heritage Wilderness Act - which designated over 273,000 acres of public land in Del Norte, Humboldt, Lake, Mendocino, and Napa Counties as wilderness - was enacted into law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Now I am excited to build on last year's successes and continue efforts to preserve even more of California's magnificent wild lands for future generations. These places are the natural treasure of California.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As I work to pass my statewide wilderness bill, I will also continue my successful strategy of working district by district with members of the House of Representatives. In particular, I plan to continue the efforts begun last year with Republican Congressman Howard P. "Buck" McKeon in the Eastern Sierra Nevada and desert portions of his district. I also plan to work with Republican Congresswoman Mary Bono to protect California's desert.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last year we proved that protecting wilderness is a bipartisan issue. This year, I believe we have an unprecedented opportunity to preserve California's natural treasures for future generations to enjoy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.yubanet.com/artman/publish/article_50940.shtml"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0077</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: Act now to curb warming</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0073</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By David Whitney&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Sacramento Bee &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;But the Senate committee she chairs is divided on the best approach to reduce emissions.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;A key Senate committee found broad bipartisan support Tuesday for doing something about global warming, but deep divisions remained over how to curb the emissions scientists say are contributing to the Earth's warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"A consensus is developing that we must take action at the federal level now," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, who's presiding over her first hearing as chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the House of Representatives, Democrats charged Tuesday that they'd found repeated instances in which the Bush administration ordered changes to scientific studies to soften references to the cause and effect of global warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, who chairs the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said top administration officials had sought "to mislead the public by injecting doubt into the science of global warming and minimizing the potential dangers."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said she would try to steer the Senate committee toward enacting something like California's global-warming law, which requires lowering emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. But she acknowledged she was uncertain how far she'd get.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The hearing, the first of many Boxer will hold before trying to craft a compromise bill, was limited to senators describing where they stood on the issue. Several Republicans joined committee Democrats in calling for legislation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There was less agreement on how far and how fast Congress should go to reduce emissions from cars, power plants and industry. The emissions, primarily carbon dioxide, contribute to global climate change by enveloping the Earth in a virtual greenhouse, scientists say.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many Democrats and industry leaders favor "cap and trade" legislation, which would set federal emissions standards and allow companies to sell emissions credits when they fall below that standard and to buy credits when they exceed the limits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Others want to limit mandatory reductions to power plants, which are responsible for about 40 percent of U.S. emissions. That could invite a fight with states that rely heavily on coal-fired power plants, particularly in the Midwest, or states that provide coal for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another controversial issue is whether a uniform national standard should pre-empt tougher state laws, an issue that could divide California lawmakers if the deal Boxer cuts falls short of the state's standards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer kept the hearing from drifting into an ideological argument with a minority of Republican committee members who remain skeptical that human activity is at the root of rising temperatures and changing global weather patterns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla. -- who was unseated as committee chairman by the November elections, which thrust Boxer into her most prominent role in Congress -- is a skeptic of global warming who was able to bottle up remedial legislation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He didn't seriously challenge the science Tuesday. The harshest Republican critic was Idaho Sen. Larry Craig, who said the rush to enact legislation was driven by the 2008 presidential elections, which Democrats didn't dispute.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of the more prominent advocates of global-warming legislation are candidates for the White House. Among those speaking at Tuesday's Senate hearing were Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain and New York Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the House hearing, two private advocacy groups produced a survey of 279 government climate scientists showing that many of them say they have been subjected to political pressure aimed at downplaying the climate threat. Their complaints ranged from a challenge to using the phrase "global warming" to raising uncertainty on issues on which most scientists basically agree, to keeping scientists from talking to the media.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The survey and interviews with scientists have "brought to light numerous ways in which U.S. federal climate science has been filtered, suppressed and manipulated in the last five years," Francesca Grifo, a senior scientist at the Union of Concerned Scientists, told the committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Drew Shindell, a climate scientist with NASA's Goddard Institute for Space Studies, said climate scientists frequently have been dissuaded from talking to the media about their research, though NASA's restrictions have been eased.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/116301.html"&gt;&lt;br&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0073</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Global warming the hot topic at Boxer hearing</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 31 Jan 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0074</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By David Whitney&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The San Luis Obispo Tribune&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON -- A key Senate committee found broad bipartisan support Tuesday for doing something about global warming, but deep divisions remained over how to curb the emissions that scientists think are causing the Earth to warm rapidly.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"A consensus is developing that we must take action at the federal level now," declared Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, who's presiding over her first hearing as the chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the House of Representatives, Democrats charged Tuesday that they'd found repeated instances in which the Bush administration had ordered changes to scientific studies to soften references to the cause and effect of global warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rep. Henry Waxman, D-Los Angeles, the chairman of the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee, said top administration officials had sought "to mislead the public by injecting doubt into the science of global warming and minimizing the potential dangers."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said she'd try to steer the Senate committee toward enacting something like California's tough global warming law, which requires lowering emissions to 1990 levels by 2020. But she acknowledged that she was uncertain how far she'd get.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The hearing, the first of many that Boxer will hold before trying to craft a compromise bill, was limited to senators describing where they stood on the issue. Several Republicans joined committee Democrats in calling for legislation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There was less agreement on how far and how fast Congress should go to reduce emissions from cars, power plants and industry. The emissions, primarily carbon dioxide, are thought to be contributing to global climate change by enveloping the Earth in a virtual greenhouse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many Democrats and industry leaders favor "cap and trade" legislation, which would set tough federal emissions standards and allow companies to sell emissions credits when they fall below that standard and to buy credits when they exceed the limits.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Others want to limit emissions reductions to power plants, which are responsible for about 40 percent of total U.S. emissions. That could invite a fight with states that rely heavily on coal-fired power plants, particularly in the Midwest, or states that provide coal for them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Another controversial issue is whether a uniform national standard should pre-empt tougher state laws, an issue that could divide California lawmakers if the deal Boxer cuts falls short of the state's standards.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer kept the hearing from drifting into an ideological argument with a minority of Republican committee members who remain skeptical that human activity is at the root of rising temperatures and changing global weather patterns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla. -- who was unseated as committee chairman by the November elections, which thrust Boxer into her most prominent role in Congress -- is a skeptic of global warming and has been able to bottle up remedial legislation. He didn't seriously challenge the science Tuesday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The harshest Republican critic was Idaho Sen. Larry Craig, who said the rush to enact legislation was driven by the 2008 presidential elections, which Democrats didn't dispute.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some of the more prominent advocates of global warming legislation are candidates for the White House. Among those speaking at Tuesday's hearing were Arizona Republican Sen. John McCain and New York Democratic Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Differences have emerged already between Boxer and Sen. Dianne Feinstein, California's senior Democratic senator, over whether federal legislation should pre-empt the state law to create a uniform national standard.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If you think about it, there should be one system," Feinstein testified Tuesday. "And that system should be worldwide."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer is a strong states' rights supporter. In an exchange after Feinstein's testimony Tuesday, however, the two senators seemed to move closer together.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If we have one system with good goals, then one system is the best," Boxer said. "One system is what we need if we can do it."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sanluisobispo.com/mld/sanluisobispo/16586003.htm"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0074</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer, Feinstein support nationwide approach on global warming</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 Jan 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0075</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;
By Erica Werner&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Associated Press&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON -- A strong federal law to combat global warming would be better than states passing their own measures as California did, Democratic Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein agreed Tuesday as Boxer chaired her first hearing on climate change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When Feinstein introduced a global warming bill earlier this month, criticism from California officials led her to drop language that would have pre-empted the state's first-in-the nation law capping greenhouse gas emissions, she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The language "became very controversial," Feinstein said in testimony before the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee that Boxer chairs. Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger's office and environmental groups voiced concerns about whether Feinstein's bill would reach the same strong standards set out in California law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feinstein believed it would, but state Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez and others disagreed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nevertheless, Feinstein said, "I think we need to grapple with a national standard so everybody plays with the same standards across the board."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If we have a good system with good goals then one system is clearly the best," said Boxer, while making clear she would not support having strong state laws pre-empted by weaker federal measures.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer called the hearing to get senators' views on climate change as the new Democrat-controlled Congress prepares to grapple with the issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A number of senators -- including several 2008 presidential hopefuls -- endorsed imposing mandatory caps on greenhouse gas emissions that cause global warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer and Feinstein both support that approach, though Feinstein has limited her bill to just the utility sector, while Boxer support deeper, economy-wide caps.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The broad consensus of those who spoke is that the time for action is now," said Boxer. "I think that this is the moment where we will take a stand."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She faced opposition from several Republicans, including Sen. James Inhofe of Oklahoma, the former committee chairman, who has called global warming a hoax&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is "no convincing scientific evidence" that human activity is causing global warming, declared Inhofe. "We all know the Weather Channel would like to have people afraid all the time."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I'll put you down as skeptical," replied Boxer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among senators testifying Tuesday were Sens. John McCain, R-Ariz., and Barack Obama, D-Ill., who have introduced a bill with Joe Lieberman, I-Conn., calling for mandatory caps. The bill aims to return releases of heat-trapping gases to 1990 levels by 2020, and to 60 percent below 1990 levels in 2050.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That bill is supported by Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton, D-N.Y., a committee member.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer has co-sponsored a different bill that seeks to return emissions to 1990 levels by 2020, and 80 percent below 1990 levels in 2050.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Those are among at least four competing bills in the Senate, and Tuesday's hearing was a first step toward reconciling them. In the House, Speaker Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., has announced creation of a special committee to study the issue, something that annoyed members of existing committees with jurisdiction. But Pelosi has said it's necessary to focus attention on the issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Bush in his recent State of the Union speech acknowledged that climate change needs to be addressed, but he continues to oppose mandatory emission caps, arguing that industry through development of new technologies can deal with the problem at less cost.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;California's law seeks to reduce greenhouse gas emissions to 1990 levels by 2020 but doesn't go past 2020. It allows for the creation of a cap-and-trade program, which Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger supports over the opposition of some Democrats in the Legislature.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Carbon dioxide, produced from the burning of fossil fuels, is the primary greenhouse gas. U.S. emissions of that gas have increased an average of about 1 percent year since 1990.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2007/01/30/state/n151139S55.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics"&gt;&lt;br&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0075</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Asks Senators to Save Energy</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jan 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0072</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Erica Werner&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Associated Press&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON -- The new head of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee wants to reduce energy consumption -- starting with her colleagues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;California Democratic Sen. Barbara Boxer is installing energy efficient lights in her Capitol Hill office that dim in response to natural light. At her invitation, five other senators are doing the same.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The change is not going to solve global warming, but Boxer said the pilot program, overseen and funded by the Architect of the Capitol, could cut electricity consumption as much as 50 percent at participating offices.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Don't you think it's time the federal government were a model of energy efficiency?" Boxer said Thursday at a meeting of the U.S. Conference of Mayors where she described the plan.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer also urged senators to turn off their computers when they leave for the night and purchase energy-efficient cars.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She drove to and from the conference in a Toyota Prius, one of three she owns.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other senators participating are Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev.; Dick Durbin, D-Ill.; Wayne Allard, R-Colo.; Susan Collins, R-Maine; and Thad Cochran, R-Miss.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The offices of Boxer's committee and the Senate Energy and Natural Resources Committee will take part, too.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That is all there is room for in the pilot program. Boxer hopes to expand it to cover other offices in the future. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/politics/wire/sns-ap-senate-saving-energy,1,6723039.story?coll=sns-ap-politics-headlines"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0072</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer targeting feds' approach to toxin</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 Jan 2007 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0071</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Fred Ortega&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Inland Valley Daily Bulletin&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The federal government's attitude toward perchlorate contamination, sharply contrasted in recent years by California's efforts to deal with the potentially dangerous chemical, could be about to change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tens of millions of dollars have been spent throughout the state to remove perchlorate - an ingredient in rocket fuel and dry cleaning solvent - from drinking water supplies. State officials are close to establishing a mandatory limit on the amount of chemical allowed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At the same time, the federal government has set a nonmandatory limit for perchlorate contamination that is four times higher than what California is considering, and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency recently nixed a requirement to even test for the chemical in drinking water.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Changing the seemingly lackadaisical approach taken by the federal government toward perchlorate will be among the top priorities of the new Democratic Congress, said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-San Francisco.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We are going to look at perchlorate in drinking water and its risks to kids and pregnant women," said Boxer in early December, announcing a series of hearings she plans to hold as incoming chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. "There is a lot we need to do in protecting our families, and there is a lot of people who need to know because the EPA has been moving backwards on this."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Studies have suggested that perchlorate can harm thyroid function and is particularly dangerous to pregnant women and their unborn children. Even at 6 parts per billion - the mandatory limit being considered in California - thousands of pregnant women may still have to be treated because of perchlorate contamination in drinking water in California alone, said Sujatha Jahagirdar of Los Angeles-based Environment California.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The decision of the U.S. EPA to not require testing of rocket fuel pollution in drinking water can only be described as negligent," said Jahagirdar, whose nonprofit group has studied the effects of perchlorate. "Over the last few years we have seen a slowdown and even reversal on environmental priorities (at the federal level), and we hope Sen. Boxer's chairmanship signals a sea change."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer was adamant that Democratic control of Congress would indeed lead to a change of direction on environmental issues.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The days of these rollbacks without questioning, without oversight, are over," said Boxer, who called the nation's record on global warming issues "disastrous." "When the EPA does a rollback, we are going to look at it, bring them forward, and say, `Why is this in the public interest to roll back this regulation or weaken that regulation?"'&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even as a committee chairwoman, Boxer cannot simply force the EPA to change policy, said Jack Pitney, politics professor at Claremont McKenna College.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"But she can use publicity to bring pressure to bear," said Pitney, referring to Boxer's ability to call for hearings on issues under the committee's purview. "Expect a lot of investigations."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He also noted that the Democrats' razor-thin majority in the Senate means Boxer would definitely need Republican support for any legislative change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"On the issue of perchlorate, she is taking on every dry cleaner in the country," Pitney said. "So I wouldn't expect a flood of legislation. But I would expect a barrage of hearings."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer also said she hopes to steer more federal money toward environmental causes. She pointed out that the $469 billion funding gap for the government's environmental programs could be completely covered by the resources spent so far on the Iraq war - now approaching $500 billion - with money to spare.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Locally, the federal government has already kicked in more than 13 percent of the cleanup costs spearheaded by the San Gabriel Water Quality Authority, said Bob Kuhn, a member of the authority's board of directors. That funding came from a bipartisan effort led by Rep. David Dreier, R-Glendora, but also including Sen. Dianne Feinstein and Rep. Adam Schiff, D-Pasadena, among others.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since the Nov. 7 election, Schiff has been appointed to the powerful House Appropriations Committee, which sets funding priorities for the federal government.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We have already received $72 million of the $85 million pledged by the feds five years ago," said Kuhn, adding that his organization plans to ask for more federal assistance. "It seems like a lot of money, but with all the new technology and new chemicals emerging it would be nice to double that effort - and maybe that is where Adam (Schiff) can be more supportive."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Schiff was careful to pledge support for ongoing cleanup efforts while avoiding promises of earmarks, the locally targeted requests inserted into spending bills by members of Congress to benefit their own districts. Democrats have promised to curtail or even eliminate the practice.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Clean drinking water has always been a very high priority of mine, and I have successfully sought funding for this in the past," he said. "Chairman-Elect (David) Obey has announced there will be no earmarks in this year's budget, but it will be something I will certainly look at in the future once the earmarking process has been reformed." &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailybulletin.com/news/ci_4939720"&gt;&lt;br&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0071</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>With Democrats in control, Yucca project may be doomed</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Dec 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0069</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By David Whitney&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;McClatchy Newspapers&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON - A few years ago, the plan to store the nation's nuclear waste in Nevada seemed all but certain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Congress decided that highly radioactive waste from commercial nuclear-power plants, which takes centuries to decay, needed to be stored underground. And it reaffirmed by wide margins in 2002 that Yucca Mountain, 100 miles from Las Vegas, was the place to build such a repository.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But now that's being rethought, for a variety of reasons. And the Nov. 7 elections, which propelled Democrats into power on Capitol Hill, are likely to accelerate that thinking despite strong bipartisan support for Yucca Mountain in Congress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-The incoming majority leader of the Senate, Nevadan Harry Reid, long has pledged that Yucca Mountain will never open. The incoming chairman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee, Californian Barbara Boxer, agrees. Both voted against the Yucca repository.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;They think that nuclear waste should stay right where it is - at the nation's nuclear power plants - at least until better waste technology comes along.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"There's no rush to put it someplace that's dangerous," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-There are questions about how safe the Yucca Mountain facility would be, and others about whether transporting radioactive waste on roads and rail lines would pose unacceptable risks of accidents or terrorist attacks.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-More than 100 national and state environmental groups - including the Sierra Club, Greenpeace and the Natural Resources Defense Council - coalesced in September behind a set of principles that include permanent storage of used fuel at the reactor sites.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The problem is the concept that the public wants the waste moved," said Michele Boyd, the legislative director and nuclear expert at Public Citizen. "That's a 20-year-old concept."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;-Even the nuclear-power industry is giving ground. It still wants Yucca Mountain opened, but it's willing to allow taxes that plant operators pay into a fund for Yucca Mountain to be used for interim storage, a kind of euphemism for aboveground storage until there's a way to reprocess old fuel assemblies safely into new fuel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nuclear Energy Institute President Frank L. Bowman told the Senate environment committee in September that surface-level interim storage could "instill public confidence in the waste-management program."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That confidence may have eroded because the Energy Department is eight years late in responding to a federal mandate to open an underground repository. Deputy Energy Secretary Clay Sell said recently that it could be "decades" before Yucca Mountain opens.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Because of the long delay, plants already are turning to surface storage. At facilities such as Pacific Gas and Electric Co.'s Diablo Canyon, near San Luis Obispo on California's scenic central coast, construction is well under way on thick concrete pads that eventually will hold concrete-encased steel containers where fuel assemblies would be entombed.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PG&amp;amp;E spokesman Shawn Cooper said the company was still hopeful that Yucca Mountain would open someday. But as long as the Nuclear Regulatory Commission licenses cask storage, the waste could be there well into the next century, venting heat from the decaying fuel into the brisk Pacific Ocean winds.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"It's called temporary dry-cask storage, but the canisters can hold the waste 100 years," he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jill ZamEk, a leader of San Luis Obispo Mothers for Peace, was one of the signers of the environmentalists' principles in September. Mothers for Peace is fighting to force a rearrangement of the dry casks so that they'd better survive a terrorist attack, and the Supreme Court will decide soon whether to hear that case.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We want Diablo Canyon plants shut down," ZamEk said. When it comes to the plant's waste, however, she said, "the risk of transporting it is so great it needs to stay where it is."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rep. Lois Capps, D-Calif., whose district includes Diablo Canyon, agrees that the waste should stay put but with more security to protect it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I believe that we should actually be beefing up security against potential terrorism and improving safety to prevent accidents at all nuclear facilities around the country," she said in a prepared statement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among Boxer's biggest concerns about Yucca Mountain is that it's not as impervious to water as initially thought. Sophisticated testing has shown that water percolates through its caverns and heads toward the Colorado River.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Sixteen million Californians drink from that river," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jon Summers, Reid's spokesman, said the senator would do all that he could to make sure Yucca Mountain never opened because the site was unsuitable. He said Reid had introduced legislation a year ago directing the Energy Department to take possession of the waste at the nation's nuclear plants and store it on site.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bill drew a sharp rebuke last January from the nuclear energy industry, which said the legislation would only further undercut Yucca Mountain, which is exactly what Reid wants to do.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The bill went nowhere this year. The chairman of the Senate environment committee, James Inhofe, R-Okla., favors a Yucca Mountain repository. When the bill is reintroduced next year, however, Boxer will be heading the committee - and she likes it, or something like it.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She leans toward on-site storage but with the possibility of constructing regional or state gathering places for some of it, such as that at Rancho Seco near Sacramento, Calif., where a reactor closed in 1989.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Although she's a skeptic, Boxer also favors research into reprocessing, something that environmentalists oppose.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said that if a way to reprocess nuclear waste safely could be found, it would help with the waste issue, produce new fuel for reactors and "make me feel more positive about nuclear power" as a pollution-free alternative for lowering greenhouse-gas emissions from oil-, natural gas- and coal-burning power plants.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Growing interest in building a new generation of nuclear plants since the enactment of an energy bill that offers generous government subsidies is driving the industry's shifting attitude about waste storage.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since Congress began working on the energy bill, nearly three dozen applications for new reactors have been planned. The bill was signed into law in August 2005, touching off what Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., called a "nuclear renaissance."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I am a pragmatist," Boxer said. "The vast majority of the members on my committee support nuclear power, and so do the majority in the Senate. So my focus is on safety, security and research, because I don't think there is any question that we are going to be seeing new plants."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Victor Gilinsky, who served on the Nuclear Regulatory Commission from 1975 to 1984 under Presidents Ford and Carter, said a reshaping of the waste debate was under way, which eventually would spell the end of the notion of a repository at Yucca Mountain.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Gilinsky, who consults for Nevada against the repository, said he was on the NRC when it began debating underground storage, and the debate was never about safety.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"It was intended as a (public relations) device," he said. The commission was faced with lawsuits by environmentalists trying to stop plant licensing, and the lack of a waste disposal plan was seen as a vulnerability in the courtroom, he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Now that they have a possibility of building new reactors, they don't want to be chained to this," Gilinsky said of the nuclear industry. "They are working their way around to saying that surface storage of the waste is a workable solution." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.montereyherald.com/mld/montereyherald/news/nation/16258458.htm"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0069</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer, mover and shaker</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 10 Dec 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0068</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By David Whitney&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Sacramento Bee&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;California senator is at peak of power thanks to Democrats' big triumph in November elections.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barbara Boxer sweeps into the Senate radio and television studio, cushioned by her posse of aides. The room is packed with reporters, cameras and digital recorders all pointed at her. They are there to hear her talk about -- bipartisanship?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's another sign of the times.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The liberal California Democrat began the 109th congressional session 23 months ago with such flamboyance that she alone challenged certifying the 2004 Ohio presidential vote because of "irregularities." She later stopped just short of calling Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice a liar at a hearing on the war in Iraq. These days, though, she is sounding restrained.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I really have two major goals," Boxer said as she began to unveil her agenda as the incoming chairwoman of the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee. "They are to protect the health of the American people. And the second is to make the environment a bipartisan issue again on Capitol Hill."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At 66, the third-term senator who spent a decade in the House before her 1992 election to the upper chamber, is suddenly at the pinnacle of power by virtue of the Democrats' sweeping victory in the November elections.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The committee she will head has enormous reach, covering everything from global warming and clean air to nuclear safety and flood control.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer has taken nothing off the table.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Air pollution. Safe drinking water. Perchlorate leaching into the ground from defense plants. Nuclear waste from government bomb plants. Cleanup of toxic Superfund sites. All could be subjects of oversight hearings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The world's biggest oil companies and polluters, which rarely faced a tough question in the Republican-controlled Congress, will have to answer in the Senate to Boxer, one of their biggest critics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"She is going to be a very tough chairwoman who'll do a lot of things we don't like," said Frank Maisano, an energy industry lobbyist whose clients include oil refiners and electricity producers.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I don't know how effective she will be," he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"It will be a tough challenge for her -- and for us."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer, who calls the environment her "signature issue," suddenly is in hot demand.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Already I am getting calls from global leaders," Boxer said, adding the world wants to know if the United States is going to lift its reluctance to reduce pollutants that contribute to global warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Wednesday, for example, Boxer met in the afternoon with California Assembly Speaker Fabian Nunez, D-Los Angeles, to talk about the state's global warming initiative, and then was among a group meeting with British Prime Minister Tony Blair in the evening to talk globally.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's not just the global stage that has opened in front of her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As head of the 18-member committee, Boxer will take direct charge of legislation on Sacramento flood control, long-term storage of nuclear waste at the former Rancho Seco power plant, air pollution spreading like fog over the Central Valley, and her most ambitious priority, making a national model out of the state's groundbreaking law to limit greenhouse gases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the first time in her Senate career, Boxer is likely to step out from behind the large shadow cast by the state's senior senator, fellow San Francisco Democrat Dianne Feinstein, and into a spotlight all her own.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nunez said California will be the winner, particularly on global warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I am very optimistic because the senator is the best person to take the leadership on this issue," said Nunez.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"This has been her No. 1 issue for a long time. The fact that she is chairing the pertinent committee I think is phenomenal."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Environmentalists, for whom Boxer has been a faithful champion since entering politics as a San Francisco County supervisor more than three decades ago, are ecstatic.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Her taking that position will transform that committee from the pollution protection committee to the environment committee," said Frank O'Donnell of Clean Air Watch.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What I anticipate is that she'll hold lots of hearings and lay the groundwork for real action on global warming."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But can Boxer push through the Senate a version of the landmark California law that calls for a 25 percent reduction in greenhouse gases by 2020?&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Congress is probably not ready for that," O'Donnell said. "The real challenge will be to make members understand that it's a big problem and that California has taken action worthy of emulation."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a dramatic change in committee leadership. The outgoing chairman, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., is a global warming skeptic. In his last hurrah as chairman, Inhofe held a hearing last week into how the news media was whipping up worldwide hysteria over the warming phenomenon that he regards as nothing more than a natural cycle without human cause.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Inhofe is not alone in his skepticism. And because actions to curb emissions have regional implications, some of Boxer's toughest critics could turn out to be Democrats such as Sen. Robert Byrd of coal-rich West Virginia and Rep. John Dingell. Dingell, incoming chairman of the House Energy and Commerce Committee, represents the Detroit area, home to the domestic auto industry.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At a recent meeting of the Western Business Roundtable in Colorado, Sen. Larry Craig, R-Idaho, pointed out the difficulties ahead for Boxer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Barbara can do all she wants to do as chairman of the environment committee," Craig said, according to Greenwire, an energy and environment publication. "She can jump up and down. She's not going to get anywhere without John Dingell. And she's not going to get anywhere without 60 senators." Sixty is the magic number of senators needed to stop a filibuster and move legislation to a vote.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer's answer is to move slowly with hearings, steadily building a case for environmental reforms. Others on the committee are eagerly awaiting her arrival, even some Republicans who, unlike Inhofe, believe global warming is real.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What's bothered me about the committee is that we get together to discuss issues, and because of special interests and the media, we don't listen to each other," said Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Earlier, Boxer summed up her approach in three words: "Listen, listen, listen."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But she was careful not to promise results, saying she doesn't believe pent-up frustration over environmental regression during the past six years of congressional harmony with the White House is putting unrealistic pressure on her to produce reforms.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"When you shine a light of truth on these issues, they take on a force of their own," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I don't think people are expecting too much. I've said I will take these issues as far as I can."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/111/story/90302.html"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0068</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Incoming EPW Committee Chairwoman Barbara Boxer outlines agenda for 2007</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 07 Dec 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0070</link>
    <description>
As the Democrats prepare to take control of Congress, the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee is set to be chaired by Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.). During today's E&amp;amp;ETV Event Coverage, Sen. Boxer discusses her goals and agenda for the Senate EPW Committee. She sets a goal of making the environment a bipartisan issue on Capitol Hill. Boxer also outlines plans to address toxics and pollution.&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.eande.tv/main/?date=120706&amp;amp;page=1"&gt;&lt;br&gt;Click here to watch this episode.&lt;/a&gt;
</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0070</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Says No More Environment Rollbacks</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 Dec 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0067</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Associated Press&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;California Sen. Boxer Says the Days of Environmental Rollbacks Are Over&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON - Environmental rollbacks from the Bush administration "in the dead of the night" are history, the incoming head of the Senate environment committee declared Tuesday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"That's over. We are going to bring these things into the light," Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said in a wide-ranging interview laying out her agenda with The Associated Press. She cited concerns about a host of new Bush administration rules on air, land and water quality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer expressed optimism that Congress could reach agreement with President Bush on a global warming bill, but acknowledged she might not get all she hopes for. Bush has opposed mandatory regulation of industrial carbon dioxide.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I have no line in the sand. ... Even a little step will look like a big step," she said. "I very much want the environment to go back to being a nonpartisan issue."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer's rise marks not only a sharp turn in the nation's environmental leadership, but in Democrats' ability to question and demand documents on the administration's decisions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Any kind of weakening of environmental laws or secrecy or changes in the dead of night it's over," Boxer said. "We're going to for once, finally, make this committee an environment committee, not an anti-environment committee ...This is a sea change that is coming to this committee."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer, who takes over the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee in January, anticipates fireworks as early as Wednesday when the outgoing chairman, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., holds a last hearing portraying the news media as fanning global warming alarmism.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Her first hearing next month will focus on ways to address global warming, including her goal of imposing the nation's first mandatory caps on carbon dioxide and other heat-trapping greenhouse gases.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"This is a potential crisis of a magnitude we've never seen," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said she would model federal legislation after a new California law that imposed the first statewide limit on greenhouse gases and seeks to cut California's emissions by 25 percent, dropping them to 1990 levels by 2020.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Real goals, real percentages," Boxer said of what she's seeking nationally, though she added that along with being an idealist, she's also a realist and hopes above all to get some form of new regulations started.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Several world leaders have called Boxer expressing their hope for a new day in U.S. environmental policy, she said, adding that "we want to send a signal to the world."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To help pay for Super Fund sites that are the nation's worst contaminated, Boxer said she will push to reinstate a special tax on oil and chemical industries and other businesses. Congress that levy expire in 1995.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She also plans to hold field hearings in Louisiana on the environmental effects of Hurricane Katrina. the Senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On another matter, Boxer said the government should provide health care for sick 9/11 workers, vigorously endorsing presidential hopeful Hillary Rodham Clinton's plan for a long-term ground zero care program.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We are taking care of the families who lost loved ones and nobody complains about that," Boxer said. "Why wouldn't we take care of the people who are surviving and coughing and sick and dying, I might add as a result of their work? To me it's clear, I don't have any hesitation about what our obligation is."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Doctors found thousands of workers suffered a variety of ailments, principally lung and gastrointestinal disorders. The demands for treatment grew more urgent after the January death of 34-year-old former NYPD detective James Zadroga was blamed on his exposure at ground zero.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Clinton has estimated that sick workers would need an average of about $5,800 a year in health care.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After Sept. 11, 2001, the government spent $90 million on health monitoring programs and this year spent an additional $75 million the first federal dollars specifically for treatment. Health experts estimate that funding will run out in about a year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=2701710"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0067</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer wants Salton Sea restored in new role</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0065</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Diana Marrero&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Gannett News Service&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;As environmental panel chief, senator likely to deliver funds&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON - Sen. Barbara Boxer will have new power to pursue restoration of the Salton Sea when she takes over the Environment and Public Works Committee next year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A fierce environmentalist, Boxer says California's largest lake needs help. Once a popular recreation spot, the lake has been steadily shrinking and suffers from high pollution levels.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At stake: the area's air quality, the natural habitat for millions of migrating birds and the survival of fish in the lake's increasingly salty water.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Restoring the Salton Sea is not just about protecting wildlife," said Boxer, who lives part-time in Rancho Mirage. "It's about improving the air our families breathe."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As a member of the committee, Boxer was able to include $26 million for restoration projects at the Salton Sea in a large bill this year.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer's environmental outlook couldn't be any more different from that of the current chairman of the committee, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla. Inhofe rejects the wide scientific consensus that fossil fuels are largely responsible for global warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He has called those who warn about global warming "Chicken Little types," and says concerns about catastrophic climate change are a "hoax."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Our positions on many pressing environmental needs couldn't be further apart," Boxer said of Inhofe. "I believe global warming is one of the major challenges facing our generation."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She is planning extensive hearings on the issue starting in January. Addressing global warming is among her top priorities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Green crusader&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer, one of the Senate's most liberal members, has a long history of environmental advocacy.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She has crusaded for cleaner drinking water, led wilderness protection efforts in California, and has fiercely opposed oil and gas drilling in Alaska's Arctic National Wildlife Refuge.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Local environmentalists are thrilled about her new role.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"It's been a stunning victory for the environment," said Joan Taylor, of the Sierra Club's Coachella Valley chapter. "She's extremely well respected in the environmental community. She's a real fighter."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But land rights groups say Boxer has crusaded for the environment at the expense of landowners.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"She has aligned herself with the radical environmentalists and does not even consider fairness to property owners when she makes her decisions," said Chuck Cushman, chairman of the League of Private Property Voters.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rep. Mary Bono, a Palm Springs Republican, has not worked closely with Boxer in the past. But her staffers say she hopes to work with her in the future on local environmental issues such as the Salton Sea.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"One of the issues of greatest concern to our district is the quality of life and the preservation of our environment," said Frank Cullen, Bono's chief of staff. "There will be an opportunity to work in a bipartisan fashion with the new majority on a wide range of issues."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other issues of concern for Boxer include cleaning up highly contaminated Superfund sites, protecting vulnerable species and preserving open spaces.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"There are dangerous levels of smog and toxic soot and dust that contribute to premature death, asthma and other adverse health effects," she said. For example, she said, Joshua Tree National Park "is increasingly vulnerable to ecological degradation, which is just another reason we need to tackle the issue of global warming."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thedesertsun.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20061119/NEWS10/611190313/1024"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0065</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Democrats to Push Pocketbook Issues</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 19 Nov 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0066</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Amy Goldstein and Lyndsey Layton&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The Washington Post &lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Minimum Wage, College Costs Top Agenda; Party Less Unified on Tax Reform, Energy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;After retrieving control of Congress for the first time in a dozen years, Democrats will set out to redefine the domestic agenda through policies they say would address the economic needs of middle- and working-class Americans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Striving for a few quick legislative victories in January and longer-term goals whose details -- and viability -- are not yet certain, Democratic lawmakers want to shift the dialogue on Capitol Hill to workers' pay, college tuition, health-care costs, retirees' income and other issues that touch ordinary families.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Their success is not assured. Democrats will hold a tenuous 51 to 49 majority in the Senate, where Republicans and the Bush administration will be well-positioned to thwart their legislation, and Democrats in the House already are showing signs of division. Democrats will face a conflict, too, between the cost of some of their policies and their pledge to tighten federal spending rules.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Still, key Democrats interviewed in recent days portrayed their strategy as an attempt to do several things at once: distinguish themselves from the outgoing Republican majority, heed voters' messages from the midterm elections and lay groundwork for the 2008 presidential campaign, in which they predict the widening income gap in the United States will be a prominent theme.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;During the last several years of Republican reign in Congress and the White House, "all we've had . . . has been trying to scare the bejesus out of people with the word 'terrorism' and using that as an excuse to ignore everything else," said Rep. Fortney "Pete" Stark (D-Calif.), who is in line to lead the House Ways and Means health subcommittee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What we saw in the course of this campaign was, people wanted to know who's on their side," said Sen. Edward M. Kennedy (D-Mass.), who will chair the Health, Education, Labor and Pensions Committee. "Whether it's health care or wages or retirement issues, they want to have someone on their side."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The broad appeal to the middle class is not the only thread running through Democrats' ambitions. The party will get its first chance in years, for instance, to push views on energy and the environment that diverge sharply with those of the White House and congressional Republicans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;span style="font-weight: bold;"&gt;Democrats want to replace the current emphasis on oil production and nuclear energy with an approach that encourages conservation and alternative fuels. Meanwhile, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), who will chair the Environment and Public Works Committee, has said she will pursue mandatory limits on greenhouse gases.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If such environmental stances appeal to Democrats' older, liberal constituency, the heavy emphasis on pocketbook issues reflects the party's narrow electoral victory this month. "Since it was the middle class that was the swing voters, this agenda is designed to reward that group and to win them over," said Ross K. Baker, a political-science professor at Rutgers University. "The theme is the preservation and salvation of the middle class."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Danielle Doane, the Heritage Foundation's director of congressional relations, said the agenda also represents those issues on which most Democrats concur, mirroring the "Contract with America," the policy statement of the GOP when it took control of Congress in 1994.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;To hold voters' support and to navigate legislation through a divided government, several incoming House and Senate committee chairmen said, it will be critical to forge productive working relationships with Republicans.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The first thing I have to do is bring some civility and trust to the committee," said incoming House Ways and Means Chairman Charles B. Rangel (D-N.Y.). "Nothing could please me more than to be the chairman that had tax reform, Social Security reform and health reform. I have no clue as to what can really be accomplished until I see how serious people are in being willing to compromise."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Democrats also will have to reconcile their policy goals with their promise to find ways to cover new spending through additional revenue or cuts elsewhere in the federal budget. "There is, as is often the case, an element of schizophrenia there," said Robert D. Reischauer, president of the Urban Institute and a former director of the Congressional Budget Office. "You have an expansive programmatic agenda that you're trying to reconcile with a desire to be fiscally responsible."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The necessity of some GOP votes, combined with the austere fiscal climate, has influenced how Democrats plan to proceed in their first weeks. Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D-Calif.), the next speaker of the House, has said that one of the first domestic issues she will bring up will be an increase in the minimum wage by $2.10 per hour, to $7.25. The cost of that would largely be borne by private employers, not the government. President Bush has supported similar proposals, said Dana Perino, a White House spokeswoman.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other changes would be far more expensive and divisive. Democratic leaders have vowed to protect middle-class households from the alternative minimum tax. For now, they are planning a one-year fix. They have not decided on a permanent reform. "That's a tough one. It's easy to say, 'We are going to do away with it.' The challenge is how to pay for it," said former senator John Breaux, who co-chaired a presidential tax commission last year that estimated that eliminating the tax would cost $1 trillion over the next decade. The White House favors reforming the tax only if Congress considers other tax changes, which Democrats might not like.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The tax is one of several priorities that the Democrats have not determined specifically how to address. To make college more affordable, they want to cut interest rates on student loans, but they have not decided whether to make that change for all loans or only federally subsidized ones for low-income students.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On other issues, it is not clear whether the Democrats can even agree among themselves. Many in the party want to change Medicare's new drug benefit so the government can negotiate prices directly with pharmaceutical companies. Incoming Senate Finance Committee Chairman Max Baucus (D-Mont.) remains unsure. "We need to be very honest in getting the facts" about whether such a switch would be helpful, he said. And Baker, of Rutgers, predicted that energy policies could "erode Democratic cohesion."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"These will be years of testing," said William A. Galston of the Brookings Institution, who was a domestic policy adviser to President Bill Clinton. "The American people are going to be watching very carefully."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/11/18/AR2006111801001.html"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0066</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Feinstein and Boxer poised for pivotal roles in U.S. policy</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Nov 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0064</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Carolyn Lochhead&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;div style="text-align: center;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;They're planning to change national course on global warming and Iraq strategy&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;br&gt;Washington -- California Sens. Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer charted a course change Thursday on everything from global warming to tough confirmation hearings for the incoming defense secretary as they catapulted to power in the Senate, now officially in Democratic hands.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Alternately moderate and confrontational, as befits their political personae, the two women first elected to the Senate in 1992 are central beneficiaries of Tuesday's political earthquake that gave Democrats a monopoly on Capitol Hill.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Republican Sen. George Allen's concession Thursday to Democratic challenger Jim Webb in their close contest in Virginia gave Senate Democrats their 49th seat and, with the backing of independents Joe Lieberman of Connecticut and Bernie Sanders of Vermont, provides them a 51-49 majority in the new Congress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Nowhere is the change starker than with Boxer's impending chairwomanship of the Environment and Public Works Committee, where she takes the reins from a conservative Republican who thinks global warming is a hoax.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She vowed to push through global warming legislation next year, taking California's landmark model nationwide -- a move Feinstein proposed in a major speech in August in San Francisco.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer, describing global warming as the challenge of this generation, rattled off the potential dire consequences from a projected 3.7-degree rise in the Earth's temperature, including a melting of the polar ice caps and a 20-foot rise in sea levels along California's coasts. She said she would bring "everybody to the table to come up with a sense of legislation ... because time is running out."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Among the Senate's severest critics of Bush, Boxer said the administration had already extended an olive branch, with a top aide from the President's Council on Environmental Quality contacting her staff indicating a willingness to work together.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"In five minutes, (former Defense Secretary) Donald Rumsfeld resigned, and in 10 minutes we got a call on global warming, so change is in the air," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She acknowledged that she may face resistance even from some Democrats in the Senate and House.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If I had my way, I would go all 100 yards to do what we need to do," Boxer said. "But if people are willing to go 90 or 80 or 70, we'll find out. But the call from the White House means this is a very different world we're living in."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feinstein, for her part, warned that Bush's new nominee for secretary of defense, Robert Gates, faces a Senate grilling on Iraq.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While Congress will not cut off money for the war, given the presence of U.S. troops there, Feinstein said, "I think there will certainly be hearings and there will certainly be great discussion on what should be done and I think it will begin with confirmation hearings of the nominee for the secretary. He's going to have to put forth in his nomination hearing what he thinks he would do."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rumsfeld wasn't solely responsible for Iraq policy, Feinstein said, "but he certainly played a big role in it."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Transformation of the military is Donald Rumsfeld," she said. "Too few troops is Donald Rumsfeld. The taxing now of the U.S. Army is a product of Donald Rumsfeld's policies, so this all has to be changed."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feinstein said it will be "very interesting to hear what Gates is going to propose. I don't think he can come before this committee as just any peacetime secretary of defense. ... There is a lot of baggage on the table, and that baggage is going to have to be opened and discussed. There is no better place in my view than the confirmation hearing."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feinstein, who won re-election Tuesday to a third six-year term, outlined a cautious approach on other matters, noting the Senate's close numbers and the power of the filibuster, a blocking maneuver empowering Senate minorities that requires 60 votes to overcome.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"You have to realize that going into a slim majority is not dominant control," Feinstein said. "Dominant control can only come with 60 votes. ... In other words, we can stop something, but you can't necessarily pass something."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feinstein predicted movement on immigration reform, but said that the Senate bill passed last year is too big and unwieldy and must be pared back, especially its large expansion of visas. She insisted that Bush propose a bill, which he refused to do last year, and she argued that the administration has greater capacity to pull factions together on such a controversial issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer also acknowledged the Senate's institutional constraints.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Look, I said, this isn't going to be a piece of cake," Boxer said. "But I believe we can make progress. It isn't going to be easy, but it's going to be a lot easier than it was before to move forward."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But both California senators said there is a pent-up demand for movement on global warming.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The current chairman of Boxer's Environment and Public Works Committee, Sen. James Inhofe, R-Okla., held just one hearing, whose "star witness was Michael Creighton, who is a novelist, not a scientist." Nonetheless, Boxer has a warm relationship with Inhofe, who she said called her Wednesday to wish her well. "He was very, very sweet," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feinstein sits on the committees of Judiciary, Appropriations, Energy and Natural Resources, but she may become chairwoman of the Senate Rules Committee, where she plans to propose federal standards for elections. However, she may assume the chair of the Intelligence Committee if Sen. Jay Rockefeller, D-W.Va., takes another post.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Long an advocate of environmental issues, Boxer, who was first elected to office in 1976 as a Marin County supervisor and served 10 years in the House, described her impending chairmanship as "a dream come true for me. This is something that I consider myself blessed with, and I thank the people of this state for keeping their confidence in me all these years." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2006/11/10/MNG6SMA41J1.DTL&amp;amp;type=politics"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0064</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer pledges shift on global warming policy with new Senate role</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0062</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Samantha Young&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Associated Press&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;SACRAMENTO, Calif. - Sen. Barbara Boxer on Thursday promised major policy shifts on global warming, air quality and toxic-waste cleanup as she prepares to head the U.S. Senate's environmental committee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Time is running out, and we need to move forward on this," Boxer said of global warming during a conference call with reporters. "The states are beginning to take steps, and we need to take steps as well."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer's elevation to chairwoman of the Senate Environmental Public Works Committee comes as the Democrats return to power in the Senate. It also marks a dramatic shift in ideology for the panel.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The California Democrat is one of the Senate's most liberal members and replaces one of the most conservative senators, Republican James Inhofe of Oklahoma. Inhofe had blocked bills seeking to cut the greenhouse gases contributing to global warming, calling the issue "the greatest hoax perpetrated on the American people."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Environmentalists were overjoyed at the change.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"That's like a tsunami hit the committee," said Karen Steuer, who heads government affairs at the National Environmental Trust, a nonprofit based in Washington, D.C. "You can't find two members or people more ideologically different.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As chairman, Inhofe tried to overhaul the Endangered Species Act and supported the Bush administration's 2002 rules to roll back provisions in the Clean Air Act. He also promoted legislation that would have allowed the government to suspend air quality and water quality rules in response to Hurricane Katrina.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It's a record that earned Inhofe the lowest possible legislative score from the League of Conservation Voters. By comparison, Boxer, who has made the environment a signature issue since coming to the Senate in 1992, received a 93 percent rating.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said she intends to introduce legislation to curb greenhouse gases, strengthen environmental laws regarding public health and hold oversight hearings on federal plans to clean up Superfund sites across the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On global warming, Boxer said she would model federal legislation after a California law signed this summer by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger. That law imposes the first statewide cap on greenhouse gases and seeks to cut California's emissions by 25 percent, dropping them to 1990 levels by 2020.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Some of the practical solutions are in the California approach," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A top environmental aide at the White House signaled Thursday that the administration would work with her.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In an e-mail to the senator's chief counsel, George Banks, the associate director for international affairs at the Council for Environmental Quality requested a meeting to discuss global warming, Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;President Bush has opposed a federal mandate to limit greenhouse gas emissions from industry and automobiles, saying such steps should be voluntary. His administration also has ruled that greenhouse emissions are not a pollutant.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We look forward to working with Congress in bipartisanship on all issues," said Kristen Hellmer, a spokeswoman for the Council on Environmental Quality.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She declined to discuss specifics related to the upcoming global warming discussion.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Democrats and environmentalists have criticized Bush for refusing to send the Senate the 1997 Kyoto accord for ratification. It requires 35 industrialized countries to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by 5 percent below 1990 levels by 2012.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;California's law and various bills in Congress set more aggressive targets.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whether Bush will consider reversing his long-standing policy of making cutbacks in greenhouse gas emissions voluntary rather than mandatory will be one test of the new reality he confronts Washington.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The administration is defending a previous Environmental Protection Agency ruling that greenhouse gases are not a pollutant under the Clean Air Act. An appeal of that administrative rule is scheduled to go before the U.S. Supreme Court later this month.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;California also is seeking a waiver to the Clean Air Act so it can implement a law that took effect in 2004 forcing the auto industry to make cleaner-burning vehicles. Automakers have sued in federal court to block the California emissions law.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"On the issue of global warming in particular, we're going to need a new president before we see major progress," said Eric Antebi, spokesman for the San Francisco-based Sierra Club. "But this Congress can really lay the groundwork for that and make incremental changes."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer suggested she would push for energy-efficiency and alternative-fuel programs that already have been adopted by dozens of states.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/local/states/california/northern_california/15973523.htm"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0062</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Feinstein, Boxer to wield Senate gavels in Dems regime</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Nov 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0063</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Lisa Friedman&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;LA Daily News&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON - California Democrats Dianne Feinstein and Barbara Boxer moved quickly Thursday to lay out broad agendas on everything from the environment to ethics as their party prepared to assume control of the U.S. Senate in a momentous power shift.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Both U.S. senators from the Golden State will wield gavels come January. Feinstein, the state's senior senator, will oversee changes in campaign finance and election reform while chairing subcommittees on military-construction spending and terrorism.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer, poised to take control of the Committee on Environment and Public Works, plans to make global warming her top-priority issue.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"California's senators will get their calls returned," predicted Jack Pitney, political science professor at Claremont-McKenna College. "They will be able to ensure that California gets a fair hearing for its interests."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said her staff has already received communication from the White House Council on Environmental Quality, asking to discuss global warming, which she intends to make her "signature issue."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If the rest of the country just adopted the energy-efficiency laws of California, we would solve a huge amount of our problem," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Myron Ebell, director of policy on energy and global warming for the Competitive Enterprise Institute think tank in Washington, said Boxer is simply "liberal, establishment California."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"She believes what the Sierra Club believes on virtually every issue," he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed, Sierra Club spokeswoman Melinda Pierce called Boxer "one of our top choices to lead that critical committee."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Environmental groups have long been frustrated with the current chairman of the panel, Sen. James Inhofe, an Oklahoma Republican who has called global warming "the greatest hoax ever perpetrated upon the American people."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;His spokesman, Matt Dempsey, said Inhofe will continue to oppose legislation capping carbon emissions.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer also vowed to shine more light on the administration's process for cleaning up Superfund sites and to step up oversight of the Environmental Protection Agency.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feinstein, in the meantime, will preside over the Senate Rules and Administration Committee - a somewhat obscure panel known for being Trent Lott's consolation prize when he resigned as Senate majority leader. Democrats accused Lott of using the post to dole out favors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Feinstein spokesman Scott Gerber said she intends to use her position to examine reported problems with electronic voting machines and to push for reform of funding for local projects. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.dailynews.com/ci_4633921"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0063</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer pushes paper ballot option </title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 28 Sep 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0061</link>
    <description>
&lt;strong style="font-weight: normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Zachary Coile&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Washington&lt;/strong&gt; --
California Sen. Barbara Boxer, worried that new electronic voting machines 
could break down or possibly be hacked, is pushing legislation with other 
Democratic colleagues that would reimburse states and counties that allow 
voters to choose paper ballots instead of machines. 
&lt;p&gt;The bill would not require election officials to offer paper ballots, but 
Boxer said her goal was to encourage them to print extra ballots as a backup in 
case of mechanical failure and for voters who simply prefer a paper ballot. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"We are not coming in saying you must do this," Boxer said at a news 
conference at her Capitol Hill office with the bill's co-sponsor, Sen. Chris 
Dodd, D-Conn. "We are saying we want to help make it easier for you, so if 
money is an issue, we're going to help ease the pain of providing the paper 
ballots." 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;However, time is running out for Congress to take action, with lawmakers 
set to adjourn this week to return home to campaign before the Nov. 7 
elections. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer insists she could move the bill quickly if her Senate colleagues 
sign on, but she acknowledged it could be tough to win over Republican 
congressional leaders, who are more focused on legislation on military 
tribunals and wiretapping. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The measure could be especially helpful for California, which has a state 
law requiring election officials to offer voters the choice of a paper ballot. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Many California counties are struggling to meet the mandates of the Help 
America Vote Act, passed by Congress in 2002, which requires election officials 
to replace punch-card and lever voting machines and install at least one voting 
device in every precinct that is accessible to the disabled. The state also 
requires counties to ensure that their electronic machines have a paper backup 
to help demonstrate the accuracy of the vote in the case of disputed election 
that requires a recount. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;For example, San Mateo County purchased 2,100 electronic voting machines 
last month, but plans to use only a quarter of them in the November election  
--  one in each precinct  --  to make it easier for poll workers and voters to 
adjust to the new devices. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Disabled voters will use the electronic machines, and others can choose to 
do so, but the vast majority of voters will use paper ballots. But those paper 
ballots will be scanned and counted at the county's election central office  -- 
a slow process. Election officials are warning they will not have final 
results until 4 a.m. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Alameda County had to get rid of 4,000 electronic voting devices made by 
Diebold Election Systems because they didn't meet the state requirement that 
every voting machine produce a verifiable paper trail. The county has since 
bought 1,000 new touch-screen machines from Sequoia Voting Systems in Oakland. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;But most voters will be casting paper ballots, said the county's acting 
Registrar of Voters Dave MacDonald. Alameda County has already spent more than 
$500,000 on paper ballots for November. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"Printing paper ballots is a huge expense," MacDonald said. He said the 
extra federal money "would be wonderful  --  we'll take every nickel we can 
get." 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer said her bill would cost $10 million based on her staff's estimates 
of how many extra ballots may be needed nationwide. States and counties would 
be reimbursed 75 cents for every extra ballot printed. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The senator said she was motivated by the recent election debacle in 
Maryland, where administrative problems and some technical glitches in a new 
$106 million electronic voting apparatus led to hourslong waits at polling 
places and forced thousands of voters to cast provisional ballots. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Some voters and election experts worry that electronic voting systems are 
more susceptible to fraud. Rep. Rush Holt, D-N.J., who is sponsoring a similar 
bill in the House, said the measure could boost the confidence of these voters 
by letting them choose paper over a touch-screen device. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"There have been so many instances where things have gone wrong (with 
electronic devices), and there is inadequate protection against fraud," Holt 
said. "That's not to say that fraud is taking place, but there is inadequate 
protection against it. Voters are losing confidence, and that is the worst 
thing that can happen in a self-governing country."

&lt;/p&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/09/27/MNGPOLDALP1.DTL"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0061</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senators Propose Funds for Paper Ballots to Back Up Electronic Ones</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 27 Sep 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0060</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Ian Urbina&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The New York Times&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON, Sept. 26 -- Three Senate Democrats proposed emergency legislation today to reimburse states for printing paper ballots that can be ready at polling places in case of problems with electronic voting machines on Nov. 7.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proposal is a response to grass-roots pressure and growing concern by local and state officials about touch-screen machines. An estimated 40 percent of voters will use those machines in the election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"If someone asks for a paper ballot they ought to be able to have it," said Senator Barbara Boxer of California, a co-sponsor of the measure with Senator Christopher J. Dodd of Connecticut and Senator Russ Feingold of Wisconson.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Republican leadership aides were skeptical about the prospects for the measure. It would have to advance without opposition from any senator and then make it through the House in the short time available before Election Day.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Dozens of states are using optical-scan and touch-screen machines to comply with federal laws intended to phase out lever and punch-card machines after the hanging-chads confusion of the 2000 presidential election. Widespread problems were reported with the new technology and among poll workers using the machines this year in primaries in Arkansas, Illinois, Maryland, Ohio and elsewhere.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Local and state officials have expressed concern that the new systems might not be ready to handle increased turnouts. Election experts fear that the lack of a paper trail with most touch-screen machines will leave no way to verify votes in case of fraud or computer failure.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last week, Gov. Robert L. Ehrlich Jr. of Maryland, a Republican, joined the skeptics, saying he lacked confidence in his state's new $106 million electronic system and suggesting that state officials offer all voters paper ballots as an alternative.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The proposed federal bill would provide 75 cents for each backup paper ballot that local officials print. If ballots are printed for half the 27 million voters expected to use touch-screen machines, Ms. Boxer said, her bill would cost Washington no more than $10.1 million.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barbara Burt, vice president and director of election reform programs at Common Cause, a good-governance advocacy group, said that the bill would have been stronger if it had required precincts to provide paper ballots in federal elections, but that it was a step in the right direction.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Lack of funding has been the main excuse that local election officials have used to avoid implementing paper precautions," Ms. Burt said. "This takes that excuse away from them entirely."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ms. Boxer said ordering paper ballots in all elections would have been impractical.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I think Big Brother dictating something to local jurisdictions is a big mistake, because they will balk at it," she said. "What we're saying here is that you run your own elections, and we are going to help you run it properly. If local officials don't take advantage of the option to take precautions, then they're the ones on the line."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Brad Friedman, a liberal blogger and longtime critic of electronic voting, said that incentives to print paper ballots would help, but that without a federal mandate some voters would still have no choice but to use touch-screens.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"In the case of many states, such as Florida, there is simply nothing in the state code that allows election directors to provide emergency ballot in the event of machine failure," he said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;On Thursday, the Committee on House Administration, which has a role in overseeing election procedures, will hold a hearing on whether to require that all voting equipment produce a paper record that lets voters verify how they voted. &lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/09/26/washington/26cnd-ballots.html?ei=5090&amp;amp;en=848613e0091c2950&amp;amp;ex=1316923200&amp;amp;partner=rssuserland&amp;amp;emc=rss&amp;amp;pagewanted=print"&gt;&lt;br&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0060</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer stumps for Sanders, Welch</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0059</link>
    <description>

&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;Burlington Free Press&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Democratic Senator Barbara Boxer of California told a noontime rally
for independent Bernie Sanders in Burlington that Democrats need to
take control of the House and Senate in order to restore the system of
checks and balances between the government's executive and legislative
branches.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sanders is running for the U.S. Senate seat being vacated by independent Jim Jeffords. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"That's
what the founders wanted," she said. "It was King George then and now
we've got another one who doesn't care about Congress. He just has Karl
Rove call up the Republican leaders and tell them what to do." Rove is
an advisor to President George Bush. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer, who also appeared
at a fundraiser for Planned Parenthood of Northern New England, told a
rowdy crowd of 300 that Vermonters know Sanders well enough to not
believe the "nasty" television ads about Sanders that Republican Rich
Tarrant is running. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She also urged Vermont to elect Democrat
Peter Welch to replace Sanders in the House. She said a vote for
Republican Martha Rainville, Welch's opponent, is a vote to continue
one-party control in Washington.
&lt;/font&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.burlingtonfreepress.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20060925/NEWS01/60925017&amp;amp;theme"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0059</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Endorses Sanders</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0058</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;WCAX-TV&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Burlington, Vermont -- U.S. Senate candidate Bernie Sanders received a big political boost Monday. Barbara Boxer, a Democrat from California, stopped in Burlington to endorse Sanders.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer and Sanders started the day by attending a private fundraiser for Planned Parenthood, at the fire house gallery, next door to the "Rally for Change" at City Hall in Burlington. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer is a U.S. Senator from California. She's been a senator since 1993. And was in the U.S. House for ten years before that. Her visit is important to Sander's campaign. She has a huge following. In fact, when she was elected to a third term in 2004, she received more votes than any Senate candidate in U-S history.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She's a big advocate for women. And like Bernie opposes President Bush. Boxer said quote "Supporting Bernie Sanders for U.S. Senate because he has been a leader in opposing the right-wing Bush agenda. Bernie has a 100 percent voting record for a woman's right to choose and is a national leader in helping protect women against violence of all kinds."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer will also talk about Sander's role in securing funding to build women's shelters across Vermont.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.wcax.com/Global/story.asp?S=5452901&amp;amp;nav=menu183_2&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0058</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate Dems rally on Diag; Speakers criticize Bush, Iraq war while emphasizing education funding</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Sep 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0057</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Dave Mekelburg&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The Michigan Daily&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A flock of big-name Democratic senators descended on the University yesterday to rally Democratic troops for the Nov. 7 election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.), Blanche Lincoln (D-Ark.), Mary Landrieu (D -La.), Patty Murray (D -Wash.) and Barbara Mikulski (D-Md.) came to Ann Arbor in support of Democratic Sen. Debbie Stabenow of Michigan, who is seeking re-election this year. The six of them make up two-thirds of the women in the Senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The senators' day began with a "Women on the Road to Victory" brunch, a private fundraiser in Ann Arbor. Attendees paid $150 for tickets, and some paid $1,000 to attend a pre-brunch event and to take photos with the senators.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Following the fundraiser, the senators spoke at a rally organized by the College Democrats. In an attempt to appeal to the students, rally organizers played "Clocks" by Coldplay and "American Baby" by the Dave Matthews Band.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stabenow led her Republican challenger, Oakland County Sheriff Mike Bouchard, by 19 points in a recent poll, but speakers at the rally warned their faithful constituents not to become complacent.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ann Arbor City Councilwoman Wendy Woods (D-Ward 5) encouraged Democratic supporters to work for Stabenow's campaign. Six Democratic senators speaking in Ann Arbor might be an example of preaching to the choir, she said, but "a choir has to sing."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Landrieu stressed Woods's point by recounting her close 2002 re-election in Louisiana, where she said she won her seat by one and a half votes per precinct.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Throughout the rally, there were several mentions of the Michigan football team's victory over Notre Dame, earning cheers from the crowd.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We're going to see a completely different kind of blue victory," College Democrats chair Jamie Ruth said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The success of female Democrats was a dominant theme throughout the event. Amos Williams, the Democratic candidate for state attorney general, summed up his experience with women like Stabenow and Gov. Jennifer Granholm: "They don't have hot flashes. They have power surges."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Stabenow was the last to speak. She rose to the podium amid the loudest cheers of the day. Supporters waved their blue and green signs with the word "Debbie!" emblazoned on them.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I'm just proud to be a part of that team," Stabenow said, motioning to the senators sitting behind her. She went on to echo previous speakers' themes - criticizing President Bush, stopping the war in Iraq, keeping jobs in Michigan and funding education.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Support for Granholm, who is in the middle of a tense re-election campaign, was a popular topic for the speakers. Boxer, the California senator, called a series of negative ads against Granholm some of the "nastiest" she'd ever seen.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After the speeches finished, the senators spent a few minutes shaking hands and talking to students - Sen. Lincoln even received a blue University of Michigan hat - before rally organizers ushered them away.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;An event with such big names is bound to attract some detractors.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Speckled throughout the crowd were signs varying in political agenda. Some, such as the anti-Israel protesters, were issue-specific.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other signs were more general.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ann Arbor residents Megan Andrews and Libby Hunter protested Stabenow and the other Democrats, saying they did not accurately represent their party's liberal constituency.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There was also a small contingency of Republican protesters, including Morgan Wilkins, an intern for the College Republican National Committee who recently made news for radical campaign event ideas such as "Catch An Illegal Immigrant Day."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Republican protesters brandished signs attacking Stabenow's physical appearance and her stance on abortion. Wilkins held a sign that read, "Debbie kills babies."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;As the rally went on, several of the protesters began to get closer to the front of the stage to get their signs noticed. The supporters tried to block out the unfriendly signs with their own signs, which organizers had handed out earlier.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At one point, a student supporter and an elderly woman began elbowing each other for a space in the crowd. A party organizer settled the scuffle and the student yielded.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.michigandaily.com/media/storage/paper851/news/2006/09/18/Government/Senate.Dems.Rally.On.Diag-2282246.shtml?norewrite200609191337&amp;amp;sourcedomain=www.michigandaily.com"&gt;Link to article&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0057</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Democratic senators campaign to have Whitehouse join their ranks</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 18 Sep 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0056</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Scott MacKay&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The Providence Journal&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;PROVIDENCE -- Sen. Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, serves on the Senate Environment and Public Works Committee with Rhode Island Republican Sen. Lincoln D. Chafee.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Chafee, Boxer said last night, "is a really nice guy. But this election isn't about who is a nice guy or tradition."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"The problem is he votes for people who aren't nice guys," Boxer said last night in an interview at an East Side Democratic fundraiser and pep rally for Democrat Sheldon Whitehouse, who is running against Chafee in one of the country's most watched races this fall.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"He votes for [Tennessee Republican] Bill Frist to be majority leader, he votes for [Kentucky Republican] Mitch McConnell [for majority whip], he votes to put [Oklahoma Republican] Jim Imhofe in as chairman of the environment committee," said Boxer. "Imhofe, the guy who denies there is such a thing as global warming."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer was one of five Democratic senators, all women, who swooped into Rhode Island last night for a $1,000-per-person event to help Whitehouse's campaign, which every Democratic leader in the United States says is crucial if Democrats are to regain the Senate majority.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We can't do this without Sheldon winning this seat," said Boxer.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The other senators were Barbara Mikulski of Maryland, Mary Landrieu of Louisiana, Blanche Lincoln of Arkansas and Patty Murray of Washington. They were joined at the fundraiser, at the home of Providence lawyer Jack McConnell, by Rhode Island Sen. Jack Reed, meaning that five of the nine Democratic women in the Senate -- and 6 percent of the 100-member Senate -- were sipping drinks and talking up Whitehouse's campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Rhode Island stop was one of five this weekend in a cross-country burst of campaigning for the women Democratic senators that took them from San Francisco and Washington State to Ohio, Michigan and Rhode Island .&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Last night's fundraiser, which raised $75,000 to $100,000, was heavily salted with local Democrats, including Lt. Gov. Charles Fogarty, the party's gubernatorial candidate, state Sen. Elizabeth Roberts, candidate for lieutenant governor, Attorney General Patrick C. Lynch and Providence Mayor David N. Cicilline.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Also in attendance was Iris Rivera, mother of Jennifer Rivera, the 15-year-old Providence girl who was murdered in May 2000, days before she was scheduled to testify in a murder trial.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At that time, Whitehouse was attorney general and the state's Latino community was highly critical of him for failing to adequately protect Jennifer Rivera.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But last night, Iris Rivera said in an interview translated from Spanish by state Rep. Anastasia Williams, D-Providence, that she supports Whitehouse in his campaign against Chafee."I wouldn't be here if I couldn't be supportive of him," she said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Reed and the visiting senators said the election of Whitehouse is the only way Rhode Island voters can protest President Bush's policies and change the agenda in Washinton, D.C., where the GOP controls the legislative and executive branches of government.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It will be a message Whitehouse said he will sound relentlessly in the next 50 days before the Nov. 7 election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"A Republican Bush agenda has taken this country in the wrong direction in domestic affairs and in the wrong way in foreign policy," said Reed. The only way to change that, he said, is to elect Whitehouse.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.projo.com/extra/election/content/projo_20060918_dems18.322891b.html&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0056</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer to call for Rumsfeld's firing</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 01 Sep 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0055</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Dena Bunis&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;The Orange County Register&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;WASHINGTON - When Congress comes back into session next week, Sen. Barbara Boxer plans to offer an amendment to a defense spending bill urging President Bush to fire Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer, D-Calif., a longtime critic of Rumsfeld and the administration's handling of Iraq, said Rumsfeld's most recent comments about war critics has led her to this decision.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I think it's time that the Senate hold this administration accountable for the people in their administration,'' Boxer told reporters during a conference call this morning. "It seems to be that this Republican Congress has been compliant to the point of dangerous, and it's time that we speak up.''&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In making her comments, Boxer is joining several Democratic colleagues, including Minority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev., who have said similar things this week.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In a speech Tuesday before the American Legion convention, Rumsfeld accused critics of the Iraq war of trying to appease "a new type of fascism." He also likened the current atmosphere to the 1930s when the world ignored the growing menace of the Nazi movement.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I recount this history because once again we face similar challenges in efforts to confront the rising threat of a new type of fascism," Rumsfeld said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Rumsfeld has gone too far,'' Boxer said. "He's attacked the American people."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But White House officials said this week that Rumsfeld's remarks have been mischaracterized.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What Rumsfeld was talking about was clearly making the case that we remain vigilant in fighting the war on terror and confronting the threats to free societies,'' deputy White House press secretary Dana Perino told reporters on Wednesday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer's measure would have a difficult time passing the Republican-controlled Senate. The California lawmaker has called for Rumsfeld's resignation before.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Of course we can't make the president do anything, but we surely can have a voice instead of sitting back," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer will point out in her resolution that retired generals have already called for Rumsfeld's resignation and that he offered it twice to the president in the wake of the Abu Ghraib prison abuse scandal. She also contends he has not adequately planned for the post-war operations in Iraq.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;http://www.ocregister.com/ocregister/homepage/abox/article_1261671.php&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0055</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate Votes to Bar Abortion in Other States for Some Minors</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Jul 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0054</link>
    <description>
&lt;strong style="font-weight: normal;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Carolyn Lochhead&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Washington&lt;/strong&gt; --
The Senate moved back into the abortion battle Tuesday, voting to make
it a federal crime to transport a minor across state lines to have an
abortion if it bypasses state law requiring parental notification or
consent. &lt;p&gt;The overwhelming 64-34 vote gives the measure a good chance at
enactment this year. A similar measure already has passed the House,
and both bills enjoy President Bush's strong backing.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The vote was the first on the issue since similar legislation
died eight years ago during the Clinton administration. The bill is one
of a long-running series of Republican-led efforts to restrict abortion
while stopping short of banning it, since the Supreme Court has held
since 1973 that the right to abortion is protected by the Constitution.
It adds abortion to the GOP's election-year push on such divisive
social issues as same-sex marriage and flag burning.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;California is one of a handful of states that do not require a
minor's parents to be notified before she has an abortion. Proposition
85 on the November ballot would require parental notification. A
similar measure failed in last year's special election.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Senate bill would allow fines and up to a year in jail for
those who transport minors across state lines for an abortion in
contravention of their state laws, and also allow civil suits by
parents.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Democrats, led by California Sen. Barbara Boxer, abandoned
efforts to block the bill through a filibuster after Republicans agreed
to allow amendments, all of which failed. One by Boxer would have
exempted incest victims from the transport ban, and another by Sen.
Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., would have exempted grandparents and clergy
trying to help girls obtain an abortion. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The bill's sponsor, Sen. John Ensign, R-Nev., agreed to change
the legislation to remedy some but not all of Boxer's concerns --
preventing lawsuits by fathers in incest cases against those who
transport victims cross state borders, and preventing such fathers from
taking their daughters out of state for an abortion.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Feinstein's amendment was dropped because she was home sick
with the flu, and Republicans refused to let Boxer offer it for her. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"It's send your grandma to jail -- that's what we're doing
today," Boxer said. "At the end of the day, this is really more about
posturing, because it's not going to impact many lives ... but
(Republicans) are in charge, and this is what they want to do."
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The last federal anti-abortion laws were enacted in 2004,
banning late-term abortions, since blocked by the courts, and
recognizing "fetal homicide" in cases where an unborn child is killed
during the commission of a federal crime. &lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Supreme Court has agreed to hear two abortion cases this
term, one from California and one from Nebraska, challenging the
constitutionality of Congress' ban on late-term abortions. The cases
could be a bellwether decision for Bush's two new appointees, Chief
Justice John Roberts and Justice Samuel Alito.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Republicans cast the new measure as a reasonable requirement,
arguing that most schools typically require parental consent for such
noncontroversial activities as field trips and taking aspirin.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The debate reached an emotional crescendo when Sen. Hillary
Clinton, a former Arkansas legal aid attorney who defended incest
cases, squared off against Sen. Tom Coburn, a former Oklahoma
obstetrician who said he failed to save a girl who died of
complications from a secret abortion.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Coburn, a conservative Republican, said a patient he called
anonymously "Julie" became pregnant at 16, had an abortion without her
parents' knowledge and came to Coburn at 2 a.m., feverish and bleeding.
Three days later, she died.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"She died because we separated the choice she made from her
parents without their involvement," Coburn said. "Her parents will
never get over the fact that they weren't there."
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Clinton, a New York Democrat, said she came with a different
perspective, recalling her days as a lawyer for a legal aid clinic in
Fayetteville, Ark., not far from the Oklahoma border.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;She told of three incest cases she handled, one in which she
defended the father of two girls, ages 14 and 12. The first had a child
by her father, and the second was pregnant by him.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"I got deeply into the family dynamics of this perverse
incestuous family," Clinton said. "I met the 12-year-old who was now
pregnant with her father's baby, and my heart just broke. Now who was
that child supposed to talk to? Where was that child supposed to go?
The sister was trying to help that child. If the sister had a driver's
license, she might have driven her to some place where she could have
gotten medical care."
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ensign argued that his bill is consistent with protecting such
victims, because requiring teenagers to ask a judge to bypass parental
notification laws -- a common exception in most states -- brings such
cases to authorities' attention.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Ensign said the exceptions for clergy and grandparents sound
reasonable, but in some cases it is clergy committing sexual abuse. He
said grandparents are not necessarily helping in incest cases if they
take children across state lines for an abortion and avoid the
embarrassment of involving law enforcement authorities, even if that
could help remove children from incestuous situations.
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer said the bill violates the Constitution because it lacks
a health exception and requires individuals to obey their home state's
laws even when in another state. She compared it to the Fugitive Slave
Act, the 19th century measure that held that slaves escaping to free
states were still slaves.&lt;/p&gt;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/07/26/ABORTION.TMP&lt;br&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0054</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>A Look at Military Mental Health Policy</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 13 Jul 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0053</link>
    <description>

&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Matthew Kauffman &amp;amp; Lisa Chedekel&lt;br&gt;Hartford Courant&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;Members of a military task force examining mental health services for troops will gather for the first time this weekend to assess whether the Armed Forces are doing enough for troubled soldiers.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;The Defense Task Force on Mental Health was established by Congress last year, amid criticism of the military's mental health screening and treatment. The 14-member group, split evenly between military and non-military experts, is required to submit a report and recommendations to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld by May 2007.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., sponsor of the bill that established the task force, met Wednesday with Army Surgeon General Kevin C. Kiley - co-chairman of the task force - and said she urged him to pay close attention to three areas:&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;ul dir="ltr"&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;establishing uniform standards governing when troops with post-traumatic stress disorder or other serious mental illnesses can be deployed;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;deciding which psychiatric medications are compatible with combat deployments; and&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;
&lt;li&gt;
&lt;div style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;drafting rules addressing the authority of commanders to overrule a mental health professional's conclusion that a service member is not mentally fit for combat.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/div&gt;&lt;/li&gt;&lt;/ul&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer said it was important for the military to develop across-the-board deployment policies for troops suffering from PTSD and other mental problems. "There certainly isn't a standard here," she said.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;The committee is also expected to look at ways to reduce the military stigma associated with mental health treatment - among both commanders and ground troops. &lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;Many of the issues to be examined by the task force were the subject of a four-part series in The Courant in May that reported the military was increasingly sending mentally troubled troops into combat, keeping them there and assigning them to additional combat tours.&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer earlier this year had chastised the Defense Department for what she said was its slow pace in naming members to the task force.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;But on Wednesday, she praised Kiley for "taking this assignment very seriously."&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer said she was moved to propose the mental health task force after hearing a year ago from a military physician who complained he had been pressured to avoid diagnosing soldiers as having PTSD, and was told instead to choose a more transient diagnosis, such as combat stress, that would not interfere with sending a soldier back to combat. &lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p dir="ltr" style="margin-right: 0px;"&gt;&lt;font face="Arial" size="2"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Boxer said she is still hearing from "whistleblower physicians," including a recent call from a doctor who discovered a soldier with bipolar disorder had been accepted for deployment, contrary to the Army's own regulations.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.courant.com/news/nationworld/hc-mentalsoldiers0713.artjul13,0,3067993,print.story?coll=hc-headlines-nationworld"&gt;http://www.courant.com/news/nationworld/hc-mentalsoldiers0713.artjul13,0,3067993,print.story?coll=hc-headlines-nationworld&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0053</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Offshore Drilling Compromise Proposed, Cal Officials Opposed</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 12 Jul 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0052</link>
    <description>

&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By H. Josef Hebert&lt;br&gt;Associated Press&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON - Senate leaders produced a compromise on offshore oil and gas drilling Wednesday that they hoped would satisfy lawmakers in California, Florida and other coastal areas who fear for their tourist-based economies.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;But California Sens. Barbara Boxer and Dianne Feinstein immediately announced reservations about the deal and said they would block its passage unless they got assurances that California's coastline would not be affected.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The deal would limit new offshore development - outside the central and western Gulf of Mexico - to an area of the eastern Gulf known as Lease Area 181 and protect waters within 125 miles of the Florida coast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;To gain support from states that already allow offshore oil and gas development - Texas, Louisiana, Mississippi and Alabama - it would substantially increase the royalty revenue that would be funneled to those states.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This "will protect our shoreline," said Sen. Mel Martinez, R-Fla., who negotiated the compromise with GOP leaders and had insisted that protection be extended to at least 125 miles off Florida's shore.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Sen. Bill Nelson, D-Fla., said he's not yet convinced and held open the possibility he would filibuster the legislation, meaning supporters would have to get 60 votes to get it through.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Nelson, Boxer and Feinstein also said they want some assurance that the delicate compromise would not be shattered in negotiations with the House,&lt;/strong&gt; which has approved a much broader offshore drilling bill pushed by Resources Committee Chairman Richard Pombo, R-Calif.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The House-passed bill would end, beyond 50 miles, the quarter-century drilling moratorium that has been in effect in virtually all waters outside of the central and western Gulf of Mexico, although it would give states a way to maintain the drilling ban if they chose. Even within 50 miles, states would be able to opt out of the ban.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger sent a letter Wednesday to each member of the Senate opposing the House bill. Spokeswoman Margita Thompson said the governor also was concerned about the Senate bill and opposed any legislation that might open the door to drilling off California's coast.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Senate proposal, expected to come up for floor consideration later this month, would keep the current drilling ban intact and extend it by 10 years to 2022.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The measure would open about 8 million acres including 1.6 million acres of Lease Area 181, which is 100 miles south of the Florida Panhandle, that government geologists believe contains significant amounts of both natural gas and oil. It also would make available about 6.3 million acres to the south.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"This is the best single energy arrangement we can make this year. ... The leases are ready to go," said Sen. Pete Domenici, R-N.M., who worked out much of the compromise. He said the area contains 1.25 billion barrels of oil and at least 5 trillion cubic feet of natural gas.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Domenici said he believes there is enough support in the Senate to get the 60 votes needed if it becomes the target of a filibuster.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Dealing with the House may be another matter. The House bill, approved two weeks ago by a 232-187 vote, goes much further in allowing offshore drilling than many senators are willing to accept.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Nelson said his support hinges on Frist getting assurance from House Speaker Dennis Hastert, R-Ill., that the House will take up the more limited Senate bill separately. Frist said he has no such assurance, but he planned to discuss the matter with Hastert.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;In a letter to Minority Leader Harry Reid of Nevada, Boxer and Feinstein said they would block action on any offshore drilling legislation "until we are given assurances that California and its coast will be protected from offshore drilling throughout the process." Boxer's spokeswoman, Natalie Ravitz, said the main concern was that if the House and Senate bills were combined in conference committee negotiations, the final product would be unacceptable.&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The House bill also would dramatically alter the revenue sharing from both existing and new offshore leases, giving states where there is offshore development 50 percent to 75 percent of the royalties. Such a revenue shift is opposed by the White House.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Senate bill offers a more modest revenue sharing program, giving the four oil and gas producing Gulf states 37.5 percent with another 12.5 percent to go into a conservation fund and 50 percent to the U.S. Treasury.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/15023659.htm"&gt;http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/breaking_news/15023659.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0052</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senate Telecom Bill's Future Murky</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Jun 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0051</link>
    <description>

&lt;div class="copy"&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Ted Hearn&lt;br&gt;Multichannel News&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;A major telecommunications bill passed the Senate Commerce Committee on Wednesday in a 15-7 vote, but the bill's future was left murky by a bruising battle over an Internet regulation amendment that split the panel largely along partisan lines.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;The bill, sponsored by Commerce Committee chairman Ted Stevens (R-Alaska), would allow phone companies to enter cable markets within 90 days without any obligation to wire an entire franchise area. As new video providers enter their markets or when their old franchises expire, cable incumbents may opt in to the new franchising system created by the bill.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Stevens prevailed in keeping Internet nondiscrimination language from the bill after a net neutrality amendment failed on an 11-11 vote. Tie votes mean amendments fail. But the price of that victory might be that the full Senate never considers the bill because Stevens would need 60 votes to block a filibuster. The Senate has 55 Republicans, 44 Democrats and one independent.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;"If this amendment goes down, you can expect a massive fight on your hands from a lot of folks, not just in the Senate but in the country," said Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) moments before the net neutrality amendment's defeat. "It's not going to be pretty."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;Sen. John Ensign (R-Nev.) said the Senate had to avoid net neutrality provisions because they would ultimately take down the entire bill.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;"This is absolutely a poison pill that the House will not accept," Ensign said. "This will kill the bill."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;As the Senate panel was wrapping up its work, Stevens was already talking about paring back the bill and working with the Judiciary Committee on crafting net neutrality language from an&amp;nbsp;antitrust law perspective.&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;"We're going to have to take a good look at it and see how we might slim it down," Stevens said, optimistic that a bill of some kind can become law this year. "I do believe this bill should be passed and I do believe we will get to the point where we will pass it."&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;span&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6348280.html?display=Breaking+News"&gt;http://www.multichannel.com/article/CA6348280.html?display=Breaking+News&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/span&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;/div&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0051</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Democrats Cite Report On Troop Cuts in Iraq</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 26 Jun 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0050</link>
    <description>

&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Pentagon Plan Like Theirs, Senators Say&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Michael Abramowitz and Thomas E. Ricks&lt;br&gt;The Washington Post&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senate Democrats reacted angrily yesterday to a report that the U.S. commander in Iraq had privately presented a plan for significant troop reductions in the same week they came under attack by Republicans for trying to set a timetable for withdrawal.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sen. &lt;a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/b000711/" target=""&gt;Barbara Boxer&lt;/a&gt; (D-Calif.) said that the plan attributed to Gen. George W. Casey resembles the thinking of many Democrats who voted for a nonbinding resolution to begin a troop drawdown in December. That resolution was defeated Thursday on a largely party-line vote in the Senate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"That means the only people who have fought us and fought us against the timetable, the only ones still saying there shouldn't be a timetable really are the Republicans in the United States Senate and in the Congress," Boxer said on CBS's "Face the Nation." "Now it turns out we're in sync with General Casey."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sen. &lt;a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/l000261/" target=""&gt;Carl M. Levin&lt;/a&gt; (Mich.), one of the two sponsors of the nonbinding resolution, which offered no pace or completion date for a withdrawal, said the report is another sign of what he termed one of the "worst-kept secrets in town" -- that the administration intends to pull out troops before the midterm elections in November.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"It shouldn't be a political decision, but it is going to be with this administration," Levin said on "Fox News Sunday." "It's as clear as your face, which is mighty clear, that before this election, this November, there's going to be troop reductions in Iraq, and the president will then claim some kind of progress or victory."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;At issue was a report yesterday in the New York Times that Casey presented a private briefing at the Pentagon last week in which he projected that the number of U.S. combat brigades -- each with about 3,500 troops -- would decrease from 14 to five or six by the end of 2007. About 127,000 U.S. troops are now in Iraq, including many support troops beyond the combat brigades.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;White House and Pentagon officials declined to confirm the projections, saying only that Casey met with President Bush on Friday to discuss how the military might proceed in Iraq after Prime Minister Nouri al-Maliki forms a new government. Bush has often said the U.S. military will stand down as Iraqi forces become adequately trained to handle security.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;One White House official said there was "no formal plan presented or signed off on" in Casey's meeting with Bush, only a discussion of "various scenarios" to guide their talks with the new Iraqi government.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"We are entering a phase where discussions with the Iraqis will begin to practically define what 'stand up, stand down' will look like over the next two years," said this official, who spoke on the condition of anonymity in order to discuss internal conversations.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;This official dismissed the suggestion by some Democrats that Casey's approach resembles their approach. "A conditions-based strategy outlined by our generals on the ground is a far cry from politicians in Washington setting an arbitrary date for withdrawal," the official said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Pentagon official said his impression is that Bush and Casey had no lengthy discussion about troop reductions, and that any projections of specific numbers remain speculative. This source noted that Casey had said that he hoped U.S. force levels would be substantially reduced this year but has decided against such a move because of the continuing violence in Iraq.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I think there will be a modest decrease between now and the end of the year," the official added. But, he concluded, "Nobody really knows."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;U.S. commanders have long wanted to cut the size of their force in Iraq. But plans to do so have proven difficult to realize.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Before the U.S. invasion in March 2003, the Pentagon's war plans called for a swift reduction, from about 150,000 to 30,000 by the early autumn of that year. Paul Wolfowitz, then the deputy defense secretary, told a congressional committee that the thinking behind this was that "it is hard to conceive that it would take more forces to provide stability in post-Saddam [Hussein] Iraq than it would take to conduct the war itself and to secure the surrender of Saddam's security forces and his army -- hard to imagine."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;That plan was shelved when a fierce insurgency broke out in the summer of 2003. That fall, top commanders hoped to cut the U.S. presence to about 100,000 by the next summer. But a major escalation in violence in the spring of 2004, along with the collapse of the new Iraqi police force and parts of the new army, forced that plan to be discarded as well.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The result is that the United States has kept about 135,000 soldiers in Iraq for the past three years, with occasional fluctuations to as high as 160,000.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The widespread expectation inside the Army is that the U.S. presence will be cut to about 100,000 by the end of this year, with further reductions in 2007 to perhaps 50,000 to 75,000. That size could be maintained almost indefinitely by the Army and the Marine Corps. But whether those new plans will be realized will depend on events in Iraq, which have proven difficult to predict.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Casey's meeting with Bush followed an eventful several weeks in Iraq that included the death of insurgent leader Abu Musab al-Zarqawi and the completion of a new Iraqi government. It also followed particularly rancorous debates in the House and Senate, in which GOP lawmakers -- with the encouragement of the White House -- went after Democrats for being insufficiently supportive of the war effort and said decisions about issues such as troop deployments should remain with the president.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Coming so soon after the congressional debates, the report of Casey's briefing served to keep the debate going another day.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sen. &lt;a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/k000148/" target=""&gt;John F. Kerry&lt;/a&gt; (D-Mass.), who co-sponsored an unsuccessful resolution setting a July 1, 2007, deadline for the removal of U.S. combat troops from Iraq, issued a statement saying the Casey plan looks "an awful lot like what the Republicans spent the last week attacking. Will the partisan attack dogs now turn their venom and disinformation campaign on General Casey?"&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But Sen. &lt;a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/w000154/" target=""&gt;John W. Warner&lt;/a&gt; (R-Va.), chairman of the Armed Services Committee, played down the significance of the reported briefing. "The department's drawn up plans at all times, but I think it would be wrong now to say that this is the plan that we're going to operate under," he said on "Fox News Sunday."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Warner counseled patience. "We have struggled and made tremendous sacrifice to give this nation its sovereignty," he said. "They are now beginning to exercise this sovereignty with a young government. Give them a chance to move out. We will consult with them. I'm confident our government will not let them make mistakes that would reflect adversely on troop withdrawals."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Sen. &lt;a href="http://projects.washingtonpost.com/congress/members/l000504/" target=""&gt;Richard G. Lugar&lt;/a&gt; (R-Ind.), chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee, voiced some skepticism that the administration can reach the conditions set for withdrawing troops.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Given current events in Baghdad, in particular, reported on every day quite apart from Anbar province, the violence is horrific," he said on "Face the Nation." "So getting to the plans either of General Casey or Maliki are a broad sweep. But it is good news to know that there are contingency plans."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/25/AR2006062500764_pf.html"&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2006/06/25/AR2006062500764_pf.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0050</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: Soldier's "Family Was Not Told the Truth"</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Jun 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0049</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Jim Doyle&lt;br&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON, D.C. -- U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer released documents today that appear to show that the Army completed its investigation in September 2005 into the deaths two years ago of two California National Guard soldiers in Iraq, but waited nearly nine months to inform the family of its conclusion that the two Americans had been killed by Iraqi forces during a joint patrol. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The family was not told the truth," Boxer, D-Calif., told reporters during a conference call. "It's troubling that the Pentagon would withhold this information from the family. It's troubling that Specialist McCaffrey told his family that he had been attacked twice before by Iraqi soldiers. It's troubling that it took the involvement of a Senate office to get the autopsy and a written report about his death." &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Pentagon document that the senator obtained today indicates that the Army's Criminal Investigation Command had completed by Sept. 30, 2005, its investigation into the June 22, 2004, deaths near the town of Balad, Iraq, of Spc. Patrick Ryan McCaffrey, 34, of Tracy, and 2nd Lt. Andre Demetrius Tyson, 33, of Riverside. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;But the unclassified document indicates that the Army did not provide any clarification to the McCaffrey and Tyson families, who had been told by the Army in a preliminary casualty report that the soldiers' patrol had been ambushed by small arms fire from enemy insurgents. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Army will conduct a "follow-up notification" to the McCaffrey's family, the Army document states, "advising them as to the findings of the investigations, and explaining why they were not more timely notified of the existence of the two concurrent investigations and the conclusions contained within each report of investigation." &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The document contains no written explanation of the delay. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Brig. Gen. Oscar Hillman and three other officers were scheduled to brief Nadia McCaffrey about her son's death this afternoon in Tracy. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"In September '05 they knew exactly what happened, but failed to tell the families until today," Boxer said. "You have to ask yourself, 'What are we doing there with a blank check and a blind eye, when our soldiers are risking their lives for the Iraqi people and the Iraqis are turning around and killing our soldiers?' We need an exit strategy." &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;A Pentagon spokesman was unavailable for comment. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;McCaffrey and Tyson were both attached to Alpha Company, 579th Engineer Battalion, based in Petaluma. They were conducting training and joint operations with the Iraqi Civil Defense Corps. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Army insists that such instances of Iraqi forces killing American soldiers are extremely rare, but Boxer voiced skepticism. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"The sense you get is that this could have happened before," Boxer said. "Your trust and faith is weakened when you learn that they knew about this by at least September '05 but they didn't tell the family." &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The senator said she plans to raise the issue with the chair of the Senate Armed Services Committee. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"I want to make sure that the casualty officers assigned to these families are allowed to tell the truth," Boxer said. "I want to make sure that there are enough casualty officers. ... We ask so much from these parents." &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;She also said that if a family is unsatisfied with the answers given by the Army, there should be people up the chain-of-command who are accessible to families. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer's office was contacted in early May by anti-war activist Nadia McCaffrey of Tracy, who asked the senator's staff to help her obtain information about her son's death. A Boxer aide wrote a letter to the Army's legislative liaison requesting information about the McCaffrey case on May 22. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/21/MNGJMJI2PB4.DTL&amp;amp;feed=rss.news"&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2006/06/21/MNGJMJI2PB4.DTL&amp;amp;feed=rss.news&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0049</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Democrats Say Key Superfund Data is Being Withheld From the Public</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 16 Jun 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0048</link>
    <description>
&lt;p align="left"&gt;&lt;em&gt;By T. Christian Miller&lt;br&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;WASHINGTON -- Senate Democrats on Thursday accused the Bush administration of withholding key details about toxic waste sites that present risks of exposure to nearby residents.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;At a congressional hearing, Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-Calif.) said the Environmental Protection Agency had designated as confidential the details of about 140 Superfund sites where toxic exposure remained uncontrolled.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;Boxer and other Democrats said the secret data included information about how much money and time it would take to clean up the dangerous sites, including one site where the EPA predicted it would take 26 years to close off access to toxics.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;"This isn't a question of left or right," Boxer said, waving a document marked "Privileged" by EPA officials to prevent its release to the public. "This is a question of right and wrong."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;The EPA said that it had blocked only information related to law enforcement and that the public had access to all relevant health-risk data for the sites, seven of which are in California.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;"There is far more information available for each [high-priority] site than has ever been available before," said Susan Parker Bodine, the assistant administrator responsible for the Superfund program, which was designed to clean up toxic waste sites such as chemical dumping grounds and contaminated factories.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;Republicans said Democrats were trying to manufacture a political issue, and noted that Senate tradition had long prevented the release of sensitive information.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;They also said they feared that Democrats were seeking to reinstate a controversial tax in which chemical manufacturers and other companies were forced to pay a fee to contribute to cleaning up waste sites, even if the firms played no role in creating the mess.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;"This tax would fall on businesses already paying for their own cleanup or that had never created any kind of a Superfund site," said Sen. James M. Inhofe (R-Okla.), chairman of the Senate environment committee. "It would put a burden on those companies."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;Democrats have routinely accused the Bush administration of restricting access to information designed to protect the public. One Republican-sponsored bill moving through Congress would limit data available on toxic substances released into communities, and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers has blocked information on flooding dangers in Florida.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;Thursday's hearing of the Superfund and waste management subcommittee was the first in four years. The Superfund program was created almost three decades ago in response to environmental disasters such as Love Canal, a neighborhood in Niagara Falls, N.Y., where chemical contamination forced the removal of 800 families and led to $200 million in remediation costs.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;The cleanup effort has drawn criticism ever since, from environmentalists who claim it is underfunded and too slow, and from industry officials who say it is costly and punitive.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;Bodine said that the agency had made significant progress, but that larger, more costly projects -- including many of the 140 sites at issue at Thursday's hearing -- take more time to remediate.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;Those sites are areas where the public still faces some possible exposure to toxic substances -- such as a building near buried radioactive waste that was not surrounded by a fence. A skateboard park built over the site, however, was protected by a layer of dirt.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;Sen. Frank R. Lautenberg (D-N.J.) said he was disturbed by some of the answers from Bodine, who at times appeared flustered and at a loss for words under the Democrats' questions. New Jersey, with 20, has the highest number of sites with uncontrolled exposure.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;The EPA's decision to withhold information is "nonsense, and everybody knows it's nonsense," Lautenberg said. "It's deceptive."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p align="left"&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-toxic16jun16,0,1298148.story?coll=la-headlines-politics"&gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la-na-toxic16jun16,0,1298148.story?coll=la-headlines-politics&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0048</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>New Political Ground Trod at Yearly Kos</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 10 Jun 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0047</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Joe Garofoli&lt;BR&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Las Vegas -- While leading Democratic politicians have embraced the digital age of politics by kissing up to the 1,000 Internet-savvy bloggers convening here at the first YearlyKos convention this weekend, everybody is still trying to figure out how exactly to behave in a 21st century political courtship.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is a question provoking much discussion among the digiterati at the first major convention inspired by a political blog, Daily Kos, which is run by Berkeley resident Markos Moulitsas Zuniga.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Many of those who identify themselves as "net- roots" activists started blogging over the past few years out of the frustration of feeling excluded from the chummy world of Washington politics. But now that Washington has come calling after seeing how much buzz and cash the blogosphere can raise, the bloggers are warily sizing up their suitors. And many are wondering which in-person approach seems the most true to their values.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"We're more skeptical of the big-name candidates being here than the little guys," said David Atkins, who owns a market research firm in Los Angeles. "The little guys need our help more."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps, then, a candidate might use the deferential, open-source style of Democrat John Laesch, the first-time Illinois politician running against Republican House Speaker Dennis Hastert. In a media training session, he asked activists for advice on how he should appear on camera.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"They told me to lock my feet together so I don't wobble back and forth," he said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And how do the "netroots" want to be courted by the presidential wannabes? Maybe candidates will adopt the approach of New Mexico Gov. Bill Richardson, who fed 35 of them croissants and coffee Friday morning and answered questions while seated in a hotel suite dressed in jeans, white T-shirt and blazer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I like that he sat in the middle of the room and took all his own questions. It was very multidirectional, and that appeals to this audience," said Justin Krebs, a New Yorker who founded Drinking Liberally, a 3-year-old social group that now has 145 chapters in 40 states.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But Richardson seemed to be typecasting his blogger audience at times. Although many of the people in the room had white hair, Richardson remarked several times that the audience was too young to get some of his cultural references and that perhaps they could help get out the youth vote. Krebs shrugged, noting that the average age of a Daily Kos reader is 45. "It's common misperception many people have about the blogosphere. That we're all living in our parents' house."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Still, Krebs admits, maybe the croissants helped soften the crowd on such missteps. "The next time he does something bad, maybe somebody on a blog will give him a pass once, instead of pounding on him right away."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Other politicians tried different tacks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On Thursday, a couple hundred "Kossacks," as they call themselves, sipped Buds and Heinekens and listened as retired Army Gen. Wesley Clark stood on a chair at the Hard Rock Casino and addressed them without a microphone. On Friday, former Virginia Gov. Mark Warner offered an "open bar, free food and thrill rides" at his swank gig dubbed "Blogosphere at the Stratosphere (Casino Tower Hotel)" that was whispered to cost more than what most bloggers make in a year. Iowa Gov. Tom Vilsack will be more low-key, focusing his efforts on a panel discussion today on education.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I don't know what I think about them spending all this money on parties to try to get to know us. It's a new thing to us," said Katie Halper, a New York filmmaker.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I don't see anything wrong with it," said her friend, David Alpert, a high-tech project manager from New York. "It happens all the time in other industries at conventions."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;More than a dozen congressional and statewide candidates are peppering the YearlyKossacks in Las Vegas with campaign material and pleas for support. Michigan's Nancy Skinner, running for Congress in Detroit against a seven-term incumbent, has been buttonholing bloggers with her green "Elect a Green Congresswoman from Detroit" flyers. And it's hard to miss the mailers for Texas Senate candidate Barbara Ann Radnofsy: "Tough Name. Smart Dame."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"We're a new medium, and we're trying to figure things out, and I think the politicians are trying to figure this out, too," said Jonathan Singer, a campaign manager for an Oregon politician who blogs on &lt;A href="http://www.MyDD.com"&gt;www.MyDD.com&lt;/A&gt;. "I don't think we'll know who has been most successful at this until (the convention) is over."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Moulitsas, who said he has no favorite 2008 presidential candidate yet, said more can be learned from the next Daily Kos straw poll at the end of July and from diary entries people post around the blogosphere. "And hopefully from meeting us, these politicians can see that we're not these crazy, wild-eyed radicals that some people like to think we are.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I like people who are the same in an intimate setting as they are on stage," Moulitsas said. "In person, Hillary Clinton is one of the warmest, most genuine politicians I've met. But once she gets on stage, she's ice cold."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Maybe the best way to address the netroots was offered by California Sen. Barbara Boxer, who got a standing ovation before and after her keynote speech Friday.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Thank you for all you're doing," Boxer said. "The netroots is key to giving people the courage to stand up for what is right."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;UC Berkeley professor of linguistics George Lakoff gave Boxer high marks for appealing to the crowd by talking to them about issues that mattered to them: Net neutrality, surveillance and the war. Yet she didn't pander to them, Lakoff said, when one audience member asked why Democrats weren't pushing for impeachment hearings.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"That might not have been the answer people wanted to hear," said Lakoff, a favorite in the liberal blogosphere. "But it was an answer from a politician who knows what she can and cannot do politically."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/06/10/MNG29JC45I1.DTL"&gt;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/c/a/2006/06/10/MNG29JC45I1.DTL&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0047</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer at YearlyKos</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 09 Jun 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0046</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Bob Geiger&lt;BR&gt;Alternet&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In a speech met with multiple standing ovations, Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) delivered the lunch keynote on day two of the &lt;A href="http://yearlykos.com/"&gt;YearlyKos&lt;/A&gt; conference and told a crowd filled with liberal activists and bloggers "never, ever become silent about things that matter and we will get our country back."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi, who had been scheduled to appear with Boxer, canceled at the last minute due to Congressional business. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Speaking to a packed hotel ballroom, Boxer covered a variety of topics including the midterm elections, the domestic spying scandal, gay marriage and the war in Iraq.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I voted no on going to war," said Boxer to thunderous applause. "It was one of the best votes I ever cast in so many years of public life. There are only 23 of us in the Senate who voted that way and it was a very hard thing to do."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;!--break--&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Boxer acknowledged the presence of Ambassador Joe Wilson, whose wife, Valerie Plame, is the former CIA agent outed by the Bush White House.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"They went after your family. It's despicable and cowardly and you deserve our thanks," said Boxer directly to Wilson, who was sitting nearby in the audience. "He goes out, he went and found out the truth about Saddam's supposed efforts to get weapons of mass destruction. He comes back and tells the truth and instead of getting thanked, what happens? They go after his family. Can you think of anything more cowardly than that?" &lt;/P&gt;&lt;A name=more&gt;&lt;/A&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Boxer railed against the Bush administration for its warrantless, domestic spying program saying "we cannot stand by quietly as our privacy is invaded."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"We are facing a White House that is dangerously incompetent and a Republican Congress that is far too eager to write a blank check or turn a blind eye."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Talking about the Iraq war, Boxer invoked a recent conversation with the mother of a soldier deployed to Baghdad who told Boxer that a recent letter from her son conveyed agreement with what the majority of the American people are feeling. "We've done all we can do -- it's time for us to come home," said Boxer, quoting from the soldier's letter.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But Boxer saved her most forceful comments for the disgraceful attempts by the Republican party to write discrimination against the gay community into the U.S. Constitution.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"If you really want to do something to help marriages, raise the minimum wage, help people raise their families. You wanna do something to save marriages, help people get health care so that pressure is off their families," said Boxer to massive applause. "How about saving marriages in the military where the divorce rate on those over in Iraq has doubled over the last few years? Bring home the troops to help save marriages.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"If gay marriage threatens your marriage then there's something wrong with your marriage. It's not the problem of other people who want to live together."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The California Senator had special praise for the blogging community and provided encouraging words when asked by an audience member about the negative way some in Congress may view bloggers. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"You shouldn't worry about what other people think. Just keep doing what you're doing because it's working."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.politicstv.com/blog/?p=189" target=_blank&gt;Watch video of Senator Boxer's speech here!&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/37372/" target=_blank&gt;http://www.alternet.org/blogs/peek/37372/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0046</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Wants Troops Out of Iraq By Year's End</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 30 May 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0045</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;KCBS&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;U.S Senator Barbara Boxer plans to introduce a resolution in the Senate calling for the withdrawal of American troops from Iraq within six months, if not earlier. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The California Senator, a member of the Senate Foreign Relations Committee, held a news conference today at San Francisco's War Memorial Building.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;KCBS Reporter Barbara Taylor said the resolution conveys both strong language and a sense of irony, noting that each goal set by the Bush Administration has been met, whether it's eliminating Saddam Hussein or democratic elections.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The senator said there's simply no more reason to be there and lots of reasons to get out.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"Right now it's a drip, drip, drip of pain. It's a drip, drip, drip of horror," she said.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer was asked to introduce this resolution calling for the withdrawal of troops within six months by two mothers with sons stationed there.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Ann Russler's son Michael was in the army's 82nd airborne during all three Iraqi elections.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"He called me and said this is as close to a win as we're ever going to get. And we need to get out now. And if we don't get out now, we're looking at another Vietnam."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The Boxer resolution isn't likely to be approved, but it does show a growing dissatisfaction in Congress with the failure of the Bush Administration to bring the war to a quick resolution.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_150183839.html" target=_blank&gt;http://cbs5.com/topstories/local_story_150183839.html&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0045</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer: Protecting the freedom of the Net</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 28 May 2006 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0044</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Santa Cruz Sentinel Op-Ed&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Barbara Boxer&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Imagine that every day for your entire working life you have taken the same on-ramp to the same freeway to get to work. 
&lt;P&gt;But as you begin your usual commute on this particular day, you find that the on-ramp to the freeway is blocked by a huge truck. While you are waiting for traffic to clear, a car speeds past you on the shoulder and the truck moves away, allowing that car to get through. 
&lt;P&gt;Thinking that the road is now clear, you again attempt to enter the freeway. But the truck is back, blocking your way. Finally, when you do gain access, your progress is made at a snail's pace. 
&lt;P&gt;Now that kind of blockage and slowdown is what's in store for Internet users if Congress doesn't act to preserve "Net Neutrality," a concept best described by the words "Internet Freedom." 
&lt;P&gt;Internet Service Providers (ISPs) want to become the gatekeepers of the Internet and create a two-tiered system where Web sites that can afford to pay them large fees gain faster and better service. So while you may be paying $50 a month for what you assume is high-speed access to the entire Internet, the level of service your ISP provides could depend on whether or not the Web site you visit is paying the ISP an additional fee. 
&lt;P&gt;Let's say, for example, you are trying to download a CD from your favorite online store. The Web site is incredibly slow, so your ISP suggests another site where the download is fast. Why would your ISP make this suggestion? Because they are being paid to make the second Web site work better and faster than the one you chose. 
&lt;P&gt;These attempts to discriminate among Web sites threaten a core democratic aspect of the Internet. 
&lt;P&gt;The fundamental beauty of the Internet, and the reason it has resulted in one of the greatest economic and social shifts since the industrial revolution, is that the Internet enables a 15-year-old boy with a computer in his parents' basement to do the same thing as a Fortune 500 company: Communicate with the people anywhere in the world via the Web. 
&lt;P&gt;Right now, any person with access to a computer can set up a blog and share his or her ideas with the world. Millions of Internet users can access that Web page as easily as that of the Democratic or Republican parties. Just as important, others can add to their thoughts and a dialog can be shared by hundreds or thousands of people. 
&lt;P&gt;To preserve the ability of Internet users to access the Web sites of their choice, Net Neutrality, or Internet Freedom, is picking up speed. This means freedom for subscribers to choose what sites they want to access, when they want to access them, and to do so without deliberate interference from their ISP. 
&lt;P&gt;Net Neutrality will secure freedom for individuals to speak and be heard on the Internet; freedom for entrepreneurs, so that their new ideas and products will not be crushed by large companies who can afford to buy preferential treatment from your ISP. 
&lt;P&gt;Under the current system, people surfing the web determine whether one site succeeds and another fails; whether one idea takes hold and another becomes a faint memory. Giving a Web site the ability to buy an advantage over others threatens the competition of ideas and the fundamental principals that have made the Internet such a success. 
&lt;P&gt;Among the most threatened Web sites are those that provide the greatest public service to Americans. Nonprofit and government sites such as the one maintained by the Center for Disease Control (CDC) provide vital information on a range of issues. If, for example, a pharmaceutical company pays for preferred access to Internet users, consumers might end up getting biased health information because the CDC's site was "too slow." 
&lt;P&gt;In the coming weeks, the Senate will begin to debate on a telecommunications reform bill. One aspect of the debate will focus on whether the free flow of ideas and services should be protected on the Internet. I will do all I can to ensure that Internet Freedom is protected. 
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;Barbara Boxer is a U.S. senator from California.&lt;/I&gt; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2006/May/28/edit/stories/03edit.htm" target=_blank&gt;http://www.santacruzsentinel.com/archive/2006/May/28/edit/stories/03edit.htm&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0044</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer, Kerry and Lautenberg Push for Full Disclosure of White House Contacts with Abramoff</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0043</link>
    <description>
&lt;p align="center"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://ga4.org/campaign/abramoff"&gt;Click here to email your Senators and&amp;nbsp;tell them to support Senator Boxer's amendment, urging the White House to disclose all contacts with Jack Abramoff!&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Boxer Press Release&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Washington, DC - U.S. Senators Barbara Boxer (D-CA), John Kerry (D-MA) and Frank Lautenberg (D-NJ) today offered an amendment expressing the sense of the Senate that the White House should provide the public with a thorough account of the meetings the President, his staff, and senior executive branch officials had with disgraced lobbyist Jack Abramoff. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Boxer said, &lt;strong&gt;"The public's confidence in the government has been rocked by widespread reports of corruption involving Jack Abramoff and federal officials. Despite the President's rhetoric in his State of the Union address, the White House's refusal to fully disclose information about their dealings with Jack Abramoff simply exacerbates the problem. It's not just George Bush's White House- it's the people's White House- and it is long past time they got an unobstructed look into their own government. If the President has nothing to hide, there shouldn't be a problem."&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;On January 3, 2006, Abramoff pled guilty to conspiracy, fraud, and tax evasion charges, and agreed to cooperate with prosecutors in their investigation of a number of public officials. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;According to White House Press Secretary Scott McClellan, the President does not know and does not remember meeting Jack Abramoff. But documents show that in May 2001, the White House arranged an event on behalf of the group "Americans for Tax Reform" that both the President and Abramoff attended . There is also a trail of documents that show that Abramoff asked some of his clients for $25,000 to go to the event with the funds going to Americans for Tax Reform. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In addition, according to press accounts, Jack Abramoff and his lobbying team had nearly 200 contacts with the Bush Administration in the first 10 months they were in office. Still, the White House has refused to fully disclose information. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Kerry said, &lt;strong&gt;"The American people have a right to know what influence Jack Abramoff had on the President and his Administration. We can't restore faith in government and reform Washington, if Americans see the White House refusing to answer the most basic questions about their connection to a corrupt lobbyist. It's important to the country to let the sunshine in and get the truth out."&lt;/strong&gt; Kerry sent a letter to White House Chief of Staff Andrew Card and every Cabinet Secretary on January 20 requesting this information, as well as an explanation of any changes in federal policy based on administration officials' contacts with Abramoff.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Lautenberg said, &lt;strong&gt;"The President needs to clear the air and answer these questions about his relationship with Jack Abramoff. The claim that the President didn't know Mr. Abramoff doesn't seem to hold water. The American people need to know if the White House knew that Jack Abramoff was charging his clients $25,000 to meet the President."&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://boxer.senate.gov/news/record.cfm?id=251104" target="_blank"&gt;http://boxer.senate.gov/news/record.cfm?id=251104&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0043</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Democrats Call for Special Prosecutor in Lobbying Case </title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Feb 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0042</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Philip Shenon, Staff Writer&lt;br&gt;New York Times&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON, Feb. 2 -- Most Senate Democrats called on the Justice Department today to appoint a special prosecutor to take over the criminal investigation centered on the Republican lobbyist Jack Abramoff, who has pleaded guilty to conspiring to corrupt members of Congress and other public officials.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The 35 Democrats and Senator James Jeffords of Vermont, an independent, said in a letter to Attorney General Alberto R. Gonzales that an outside prosecutor was needed because of "Mr. Abramoff's significant ties to Republican leadership in Congress and allegations of improper activity involving administration officials."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Senate Democratic leader, Harry Reid of Nevada, said he signed the letter because "we need an independent investigation, not a whitewash led by Attorney General Gonzales, President Bush's best friend." He added in a statement, "President Bush has worn out his credibility with the American people yet he continues to stonewall an investigation into his involvement with Jack Abramoff, asking him to trust him without explaining why."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;He was referring to President Bush's comments at a news conference last week in which he said he could not recall ever meeting Mr. Abramoff, a major fund-raiser in Mr. Bush's presidential campaign. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The Justice Department had no immediate response to the senators' request but in the past has rebuffed calls for a special prosecutor, saying that the department had demonstrated that it is pursuing the investigation aggressively. The call for a special prosecutor was first made last week by two of the Democratic senators, Charles E. Schumer of New York and Ken Salazar of Colorado.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The letter today noted that the chief investigator in the case, Noel Hillman, the head of the department's Public Integrity division, was stepping down after the announcement last week that he was being nominated by the White House to a federal judgeship in New Jersey. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;His departure, which creates a vacancy at the top of the inquiry less than a month after Mr. Abramoff's guilty plea, means that the "appointment of a special counsel at this point in time is made even more appropriate," the letter said.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The calls for a special prosecutor came as Democrats made a separate effort on the Senate floor today to bring attention to Mr. Abramoff and his ties to the White House. They introduced an amendment to a budget bill that called on the White House to provide a public account of meetings that Mr. Abramoff may have had with Mr. Bush, his staff or others in the executive branch. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Democratic Congressional aides, speaking on condition of anonymity because of staff rules that bar them from commenting publicly, said they had little expectation that the amendment would pass in the Republican-controlled Senate. But they said Democrats were still eager to bring attention to the issue.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"If the president has nothing to hide, there shouldn't be a problem," said Senator Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat and one of the amendment's sponsors. Another sponsor, Senator Frank R. Lautenberg of New Jersey, said that "the claim that the president doesn't know Mr. Abramoff doesn't seem to hold water."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Senator Lautenberg, who also signed the letter seeking a special prosecutor, had supported Mr. Hillman for the judicial appointment in New Jersey, and discussions about the nomination have been under way since last year. &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The senator's chief counsel, Dan Katz, said that Senator Lautenberg "has supported Noel Hillman for a judgeship for almost a year and didn't think he should be denied the opportunity because he is doing a good job in his current position." But with Mr. Hillman gone, he said, the senator supports a special prosecutor because he "believes this case has become too politically sensitive to continue within the administration."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/02/politics/02cnd-lobby.html?_r=1&amp;amp;oref=slogin" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.nytimes.com/2006/02/02/politics/02cnd-lobby.html&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0042</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer delivers major address on why the Alito nomination should be defeated</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Jan 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0041</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Los Angeles, CA -- U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer today delivered the following address in opposition to the nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the U.S. Supreme Court:
&lt;P&gt;Today, I am announcing my opposition to the nomination of Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court of the United States.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;According to Article II of the Constitution, justices of the Supreme Court may not be appointed by the president without the advice and consent of the United States Senate. So it is our solemn duty to consider each nomination carefully, keeping in mind the interests of the American people. And this nomination is particularly crucial because the stakes have rarely been so high.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First, consider the context in which this nomination comes before us. The seat that Judge Alito has been nominated for is now held by Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, who came to the Court in 1981.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;For years, Justice O'Connor has provided the tie-breaking vote and a commonsense voice of reason in some of the most important cases to come before the Court, including a woman's right to choose, civil rights, and freedom of religion.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second, consider the tumultuous political climate in our nation. President Bush understood that in 2000 when he promised to govern from the center, and be "a uniter, not a divider." Sadly, this nomination shows that he has forgotten that promise because it is notnfrom the center and it is not uniting the nation.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The right thing to do would have been to give us a justice in the mold of Justice O'Connor, and that is what the president should have done.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let me be clear: I do not deny Judge Alito's judicial qualifications. He has been a government lawyer and judge for more than 20 years and the American Bar Association rated him well qualified. He is an intelligent and capable person. His family should be proud of him and all Americans should be proud that the American dream was there for the Alito family.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But after reviewing the hearing record and the record of his statements, writings and rulings over the past 24 years, I am convinced that Judge Alito is the wrong person for this job.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am deeply concerned about how Justice Alito will impact the ability of other families to live the American dream -- to be assured of privacy in their homes and their personal lives, to be secure in their neighborhoods, to have fair treatment in the workplace, and to have confidence that the power of the executive branch will be checked.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As I reviewed Judge Alito's record, I asked whether he will vote to preserve fundamental American liberties and values --&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will Justice Alito vote to uphold Congress' constitutional power to pass laws to protect Americans' health, safety, and welfare?&amp;nbsp; Judge Alito's record says NO.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the 1996 Rybar case, Judge Alito voted to strike down the federal ban on the transfer or possession of machine guns because he believed it exceeded Congress' power under the Commerce Clause. His Third Circuit colleagues sharply criticized his dissent and said that it ran counter to "a basic tenet of the constitutional separation of powers." And Judge Alito's extremist view has been rejected by six other circuit courts and the Supreme Court. Judge Alito stood alone and failed to protect our families.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In a case concerning worker protection, Judge Alito was again in the minority when he said that federal mine health and safety standards did not apply to a coal processing site. He tried to explain it as just a "technical issue of interpretation." I fear for the safety of our workers if Judge Alito's narrow, technical reading of the law should ever prevail.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will Justice Alito vote to protect the right to privacy, especially a woman's reproductive freedom? Judge Alito's record says NO.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have all heard about Judge Alito's 1985 job application, in which he wrote that the constitution does not protect the right of a woman to choose. He was given the chance to disavow that position during the hearings -- and he refused to do so. He had the chance to say, as Judge Roberts did, that Roe v. Wade is settled law, and he refused.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;He had the chance to explain his dissent in the Casey decision, in which he argued that the Pennsylvania spousal notification requirement was not an undue burden on a woman seeking an abortion because it would affect only a small number of women, but he refused to back away from his position. The Supreme Court, by a 5-4 vote, found the provision to be unconstitutional, and Justice O'Connor, co-writing for the Court, criticized the faulty analysis supported by Judge Alito, saying that "the analysis does not end with the one percent of women" affected... "it begins there." &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;To my mind, Judge Alito's ominous statements and narrow-minded reasoning clearly signal a hostility to women's rights, and portend a move back toward the dark days when abortion was illegal in many states, and many women died as a result. In the 21st century, it is astounding that a Supreme Court nominee would not view Roe v. Wade as settled law when its fundamental principle -- a woman's right to choose -- has been reaffirmed many times since it was decided.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will Justice Alito vote to protect Americans from unconstitutional searches? Judge Alito's record says NO.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In Doe v. Groody in 2004, he said a police strip search of a 10-year-old girl was lawful, even though their search warrant didn't name her. Judge Alito said that even if the warrant did not actually authorize the search of the girl, "a reasonable police officer could certainly have read the warrant as doing so..." This casual attitude toward one of our most basic constitutional guarantees -- the Fourth Amendment right against unreasonable searches -- is almost shocking. As Judge Alito's own Third Circuit Court said regarding warrants, "a particular description is the touchstone of the Fourth Amendment." We certainly do not need Supreme Court justices who do not understand this fundamental constitutional protection.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will Justice Alito vote to let citizens stop companies from polluting their communities? Judge Alito's record says NO.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the Magnesium Elektron case, Judge Alito voted to make it harder for citizens to sue for toxic emissions that violate the Clean Water Act. Fortunately, in another case several years later, the Supreme Court rejected the Third Circuit and Alito's narrow reading of the law. Judge Alito doesn't seem to care about a landmark environmental law.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Will Justice Alito vote to let working women and men have their day in court against employers who discriminate against them? Judge Alito's record says NO.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In 1997, in the Bray case, Judge Alito was the only judge on the Third Circuit to say that a hotel employee claiming racial discrimination could not take her case to a jury.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the Sheridan case, a female employee sued for discrimination, alleging that after she complained about incidents of sexual harassment, she was demoted and marginalized to the point that she was forced to quit. By a vote of 10 to 1, the Third Circuit found for the plaintiff.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Guess who was the one? Only Judge Alito thought the employee should have to show that discrimination was the "determinative cause" of the employer's action. Using his standard would make it almost impossible for a woman claiming discrimination in the workplace to get to trial.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Finally, will Justice Alito be independent from the executive branch that appointed him, and be a vote against power grabs by the president? Judge Alito's record says NO.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As a lawyer in the Reagan Justice Department, he authored a memo suggesting a new way for the president to encroach on Congress' lawmaking powers. He said that when the president signs a law, he should make a statement about the law, giving it his own interpretation, whether it was consistent with what Congress had written or not. He wrote that this would "get in the last word on questions of interpretation" of the law. In the hearings, Judge Alito refused to back away from this memo.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When asked whether he believed the president could invade another country, in the absence of an imminent threat, without first getting the approval of the American people, of Congress, Judge Alito refused to rule it out.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When asked if the president had the power to authorize someone to engage in torture, Alito refused to answer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Administration is now asserting vast powers, including spying on American citizens without seeking warrants -- in clear violation of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act -- violating international treaties, and ignoring laws that ban torture.&amp;nbsp; We need justices who will put a check on such overreaching by the executive, not rubberstamp it. Judge Alito's record and his answers at the hearings raise very serious doubts about his commitment to being a strong check on an 'imperial president.'&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In addition to these substantive matters, I remain concerned about Judge Alito's answers regarding his membership in the Concerned Alumni of Princeton and his failure to recuse himself from the Vanguard case, which he had promised to do.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;During the hearings, we all felt great compassion for Mrs. Alito when she became emotional in reaction to the tough questions her husband faced in the Judiciary Committee. Everyone in politics knows how hard it is for families when a loved one is asked tough questions. It is part of a difficult process, and whoever said politics is not for the faint of heart was right. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Emotions have run high during this process. That's understandable. But I wish the press have focused more on the tears of those who will be affected if Judge Alito becomes Justice Alito and his out-of-the mainstream views prevail.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I worry about the tears of a worker who, having failed to get a promotion because of discrimination, is denied the opportunity to pursue her claim in court. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I worry about the tears of a mentally ill woman who is forced by law to tell her husband that she wants to terminate her pregnancy and is afraid that he will leave her or stop supporting her. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I worry about the tears of a young girl who is strip searched in her own home by police who have no valid warrant.&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I worry about the tears of a mentally retarded man, who has been brutally assaulted in his workplace, when his claim of workplace harassment is dismissed by the court simply because his lawyer failed to file a well written brief on his behalf.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;These are real cases in which Judge Alito has spoken. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fortunately, he did not prevail in these cases. But if he goes to the Supreme Court, he will have a much more powerful voice -- a radical voice that will replace a voice of moderation and balance.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Perhaps the most important statement Judge Alito made during the entire hearing process was when he told the Judiciary Committee that he expects to be the same kind of justice on the Supreme Court as he has been a judge on the Circuit Court.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is precisely the problem. As a judge, Samuel Alito seemed to approach his cases with an analytical coldness that reflected no concern for the human consequences of his reasoning.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Listen to what he said about a case involving an African-American man convicted of murder by an all white jury in a courtroom where the prosecutors had eliminated all African-American jurors in many previous murder trials as well.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Judge Alito dismissed this evidence of racial bias and said that the jury makeup was no more relevant than the fact that left-handers have won five of the last six presidential elections. When asked about this analogy during the hearings, he said it "went to the issue of statistics... (which) is a branch of mathematics, and there are ways to analyze statistics so that you draw sound conclusions from them..."&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That response would have been appropriate for a college math professor, but it is deeply troubling from a potential Supreme Court justice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As the great jurist and Supreme Court Justice Oliver Wendell Holmes, Jr. wrote in 1881, "The life of the law has not been logic; it has been experience... The law embodies the story of a nation's development through many centuries, and it cannot be dealt with as if it contained only the axioms and corollaries of a book of mathematics."&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What Holmes meant is that the law is a living thing, that those who interpret it must do so with wisdom and humanity, and with an understanding of the consequences of their judgments for the lives of the people they affect.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It is with deep regret that I conclude that Judge Alito's judicial philosophy lacks this wisdom, humanity and moderation. He is simply too far out of the mainstream in his thinking. His opinions demonstrate neither the independence of mind nor the depth of heart that I believe we need in our Supreme Court justices, particularly at this crucial time in our nation's history.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp;&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR&gt;That is why I will oppose this nomination.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0041</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Op-Ed: House has opportunity to fix cruel budget, protect families</title>
    <pubDate>Sun, 08 Jan 2006 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0040</link>
    <description>
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;By Barbara Boxer&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;
&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;San Jose Mercury News&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
How many times in life do we wish we had a second chance to correct an error in judgment?&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
When President Bush took office in January 2001, we had a projected
10-year surplus of $2.7 trillion, not counting Social Security and
Medicare surpluses. Now we have raging deficits as far as the eye can
see, and the Republican Congress is making matters worse with an open
checkbook for millionaires and the Iraq war.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
And who is paying the price? Our middle class, our children and our elderly.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
But, thanks to Senate Democrats' strict enforcement of Senate rules,
and thanks to Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi's insistence on another
recorded vote, the House has a second chance to vote on this budget,
giving them an opportunity to start this year off with budget fairness.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
They should start by abandoning cuts to student aid. This budget bill
includes the largest cuts to student loan programs in history -- more
than $12 billion over five years -- and would burden our students with
higher fees and higher interest rates on their loans.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
They should also abandon cuts to child support enforcement, cuts that
would result in an estimated $2.9 billion reduction in the amount of
child support collected over the next five years, and an $8.4 billion
loss over the next 10 years.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Why would we cut a program that has the sole purpose of helping to
ensure that our children's basic financial needs are being met?
Irresponsible deadbeat parents are getting off, and this must change.
If delinquent parents fully paid their child support, thousands of
women and children could be taken off welfare.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
To top it all off, this budget bill hurts the sick and the elderly with
cuts to Medicare and Medicaid that will increase health care costs for
millions of Americans and restrict access to affordable prescription
drugs.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This budget bill fails the American people, and it fails the test of fairness.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The challenges we face are as great as the differences between our
parties, but American values transcend politics. We must find a way to
unite behind those values for the common goal of protecting and
strengthening America's families.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
We can do that right now by scrapping these cruel cuts and agreeing
that we should instead cancel some of the tax cuts for millionaires.
That would accomplish the same thing -- deficit reduction -- but
without harming our kids, our elderly and the middle class.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
This budget is immoral -- that is why faith leaders from many different
religions have spoken out against it. I hope that House Speaker Dennis
Hastert and his Republican colleagues will use the second chance they
have been given to do right by the American people and scrap this poor
excuse for a budget.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
BARBARA BOXER represents California in the U.S. Senate. She wrote this article for the Mercury News.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;&lt;a style="font-weight: bold;" href="http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/opinion/13578169.htm" target="_blank"&gt;
http://www.mercurynews.com/mld/mercurynews/news/opinion/13578169.htm&lt;/a&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;

</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0040</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Asks Specter to Hold Hearings on Bush's Surveillance Program Before Hearings on Judge Alito</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 21 Dec 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0038</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Washington, D.C.- U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today sent the following letter to Senator Arlen Specter (R-PA), Chairman of the Senate Judiciary Committee: 
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;December 21, 2005 
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Honorable Arlen Specter Chairman Senate Judiciary Committee United States Senate Washington, DC 20510 
&lt;P&gt;Dear Mr. Chairman: 
&lt;P&gt;I was very pleased that you responded so quickly to the news regarding warrantless surveillance being conducted on American citizens by announcing that the Judiciary Committee will hold hearings on the matter. 
&lt;P&gt;I really believe it is important to have those hearings as soon as possible, and I ask you to consider holding them before the hearings on Judge Alito. Because Justice O'Connor has graciously agreed to stay on the Court until her successor is confirmed, the importance of this matter should take precedence, especially since the President has vowed to continue this warrantless surveillance. 
&lt;P&gt;I believe waiting to have the hearings may well send a signal that this issue is simply not that important to Senators. In fact, many experts and Senators are saying that this action by the President is an abuse of executive authority. For example, John Dean, who was White House counsel to President Nixon during Watergate, believes that this President has admitted to an "impeachable offense." 
&lt;P&gt;Clearly, hearings by the Judiciary Committee are essential. Thank you for your immediate attention to this request. 
&lt;P&gt;Best regards, 
&lt;P&gt;Barbara Boxer 
&lt;P&gt;United States Senator &lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0038</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer delivers remarks on the War in Iraq</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Dec 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0036</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;In 1968, Martin Luther King told us: "If we do not act, we shall surely be dragged down the long, dark, and shameful corridors of time reserved for those who possess ... strength without sight."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Dr. King was talking about ending the Vietnam War. But 40 years later, his warning is increasingly relevant to the Iraq war.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Strength without sight has now led us into a war based on mistaken intelligence, and down a thorny path of pain for too long.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And none of us can afford to be silent, because as Martin Luther King also said: "Our lives begin to end the day we become silent about things that matter."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So we must have the courage to speak out about things that matter.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It matters that 2,158 servicemen and women have given their lives in Iraq, leaving their families grieving.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It matters that 16,155 have been wounded, many with scars that will last a lifetime.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It matters that the majority of the American people are demanding a new strategy so that we don't have a war without end.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We saw seventy-nine Senators recently back an amendment saying that the Iraqis should take the lead in providing their own security next year. That matters too.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We heard Congressman Jack Murtha's brave statement against the war, calling it a "flawed policy wrapped in illusion." He is a decorated Marine, a war hero who bled on the battlefield, the military's best friend.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And he now advocates redeploying U.S. forces at the earliest possible date, while maintaining a quick-reaction U.S. force in the region to be called upon if necessary.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So how did the Administration and its supporters respond to his thoughtful proposal? Congressman Murtha, with his two Purple Hearts and Bronze Star, was insulted by the White House Press Secretary and branded a coward by the newest Republican in the House. People who never bled on the battlefield tried to demean a war hero.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And that is what we see again and again. Instead of thoughtful dialogue about the life and death issues in Iraq, the Administration lashes out at those who dare to disagree with them.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Recently, the Republican National Committee issued a video news release attacking Democrats, including me. I'm used to being attacked, and I normally just ignore them. But this one was so incendiary that I have to respond.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The ad said Democrats were waving a white flag of surrender. And their evidence? My statement that we should start reducing our troop strength in Iraq after the Iraqi election.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Well, guess who else said that last weekend? The U.S. Ambassador to Iraq, Zalmay Khalizad, appointed by President Bush. His words were, "we can begin to draw down our forces in the aftermath of the elections." Are they going to run an ad against him now?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Democrats aren't waving any white flags. We are doing the jobs we were elected to do. We have a right--and a responsibility--to tell the truth, whether the topic is Iraq or any other policy. We have a right--and a responsibility--to wave a warning flag about a war that is making our nation less secure.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And so, regardless of how many times they attack me, I will continue to speak out, just as I am doing today. I have four points.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First: We must restore our credibility.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we want the American people to be optimistic and if we want the nations of the world to consider us a leader to be trusted, our motives must be clear, our justifications must be sound, and our policies must reflect our ideals.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;During the Cuban missile crisis, Secretary of State Dean Acheson offered to show Charles de Gaulle satellite images of Soviet missiles in Cuba as proof of their existence. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;President de Gaulle responded by saying, "the word of the President of the United States is good enough for me."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Today, the word of this President and his administration has been called into question. Frankly, it is hard to believe those words any longer on Iraq.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember all of the false expectations that the Bush Administration peddled?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember when Secretary Rumsfeld said that the war "could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months?"...Or that we knew exactly where to find the Weapons of Mass Destruction?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember when Vice President Cheney predicted, "...my belief is we will, in fact, be greeted as liberators?"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember when White House Budget Director, Mitch Daniels said that Iraq will be "an affordable endeavor" and reported that it "will not require sustained aid?"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember when the case for Weapons of Mass Destruction was called a slam dunk?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember Vice President Cheney's now-famous assessment that the insurgency was in its "last throes"?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember when the President told us about the yellow cake from Niger?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember when we were told "mission accomplished" and that Iraqi oil would pay for the war?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember when Secretary Rice said she didn't want the smoking gun to be a mushroom cloud?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Remember Secretary Colin Powell's forceful presentation before the United Nations Security Council...that he now calls a blot on his record?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is 0 for 10.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Yet, even in light of all this history, the Bush Administration refuses to do more than a perfunctory mea culpa.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In his last speech, the President took responsibility for going to war on false intelligence. The President is only two years behind the American people, who figured this one out long ago, but I'll take it. But he keeps repeating the false statement that Congress saw the same intelligence that he did even though a congressional report recently found that the Administration had access to more than they shared with us.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And he still doesn't answer the central question: Was the intelligence cherry picked or manipulated to make the case for war?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Democrats are insisting that we complete the Senate investigation into this matter. And it's not about politics. It's because if the intelligence was cherry picked or manipulated, the American people deserve to know and the Congress will need to act.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And it's because the next time we need to convince the world of an imminent threat, it will be far more difficult unless we clear the air and restore our credibility.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You know, America is more than an economic and military power. Our ideals have made us a shining light for those around the world seeking freedom, democracy and human rights.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now that moral standing is at risk.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We all saw the horrific photos of Abu Ghraib, which were at odds with everything this country stands for. We all know that torture does not produce accurate intelligence or make us safer. Instead, as Senator McCain says, "It's killing us."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But, amazingly, banning torture was extremely controversial for this Administration. Dick Cheney even worked non-stop to exempt the CIA from the torture ban passed by the Congress.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fortunately we won this one, but we still don't know everything about the secret prisons or secret spying on Americans, all of which chips away at our reputation as a great beacon of freedom and gives an eerie sense of a secret government. And now we face the issue of our government spying on Americans without a warrant. This is serious and must be investigated to restore our credibility.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second and third, we must reverse the strain on our military and get our budget priorities straight.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This Administration says dissent hurts our military. But what really hurts our military is sending men and women to war without a plan and without the necessary armor and equipment. What really hurts our military is stretching it to the breaking point and deploying our soldiers for third and fourth tours of duty. What really hurts our military is a lack of candor.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Our men and women in the military serve bravely and skillfully in Iraq. They have sacrificed so much since the war began. We need to honor their sacrifices not just with words, but also with actions. That means treating their caskets and families with the respect they deserve. And that means opening our eyes to their injuries, and getting them the help they need.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Medical studies reveal that 17 percent of soldiers returning from Iraq are suffering from mental health problems including depression, anxiety and PTSD. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The VA says that 17,000 Iraq and Afghanistan vets have been diagnosed with mental disorders through February.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Despite this huge problem, the American Legion says that mental health programs are being under funded by $500 million a year. I offered an amendment to provide these critical resources by canceling future tax cuts for millionaires. Sounds reasonable, right? Well, it failed. The President says he loves our military, but he loves tax cuts for millionaires as much or more.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let's be clear: To finance a war that has already cost $251 billion, this Administration did not ask the wealthiest in our own country to sacrifice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Under the Bush tax cuts, millionaires got $242 billion dollars back over the past five years. In the first two years of the Iraq war, the average millionaire received $112,000 in tax cuts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And the President did not secure enough real financial commitments from other countries. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Instead, our needs our being sacrificed and our children and senior citizens are paying the price.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Talk about waving a white flag of surrender? The Republican Congress and this administration are waving a white flag over our children, cutting their after school programs by 1.3 billion from what this President and Congress authorized. No Child Left Behind was funded at 13.1 billion less than what their own legislation asked for.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They are waving a white flag of surrender over our seniors, causing them anxiety and threatening their social security and Medicare by using those trust funds to finance the war and the tax cuts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;They are waving a white flag over fiscal responsibility by creating a debt which is more than $8 trillion. Of the total debt held by the public, 45% is in foreign hands. That means that approximately $92 billion is leaving this country every year to pay off the interest to foreign entities.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And, they are waving a white flag over our homeland security, instead of making it a top priority. The Administration says all the right things in public, and then shortchanges homeland security at every turn. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's been four years since 9/11. Why are we still dangerously unprepared for another terrorist attack? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why haven't we provided the additional $555 million needed this year to better secure our ports?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And, why in the world, haven't we provided the $14.3 billion still needed to make sure that our firefighters, police officers, and health care providers can communicate with each other in a time of crisis, whether it is a terrorist attack, a hurricane, or an earthquake? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On December 5, the 9/11 Commission released a report card on the status of the recommendations it made a year and a half ago. It was full of Ds and Fs, and showed us that we are falling short, far short. This is unacceptable.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So we must help our military and get our priorities right.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fourth and finally, it is time to change course in Iraq&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The President continues to present a false choice between leaving immediately and staying indefinitely.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;He continues to just say "stay the course," despite evidence that the war is making us less, not more, safe from terrorism. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And he continues to begin almost every speech about Iraq with a reference to 9/11 even though the 9/11 Commission and his own Administration's documents have been clear: There was no link between Iraq and 9/11 and no collaboration between Saddam Hussein and al Qaeda.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In fact, the war in Iraq was a diversion from the war against al Qaeda.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Like the Soviet invasion of Afghanistan in the 1980s, the war in Iraq is helping al Qaeda recruit, radicalize, and train a new generation of terrorists.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;According to National Memorial Institute for the Prevention of Terrorism, worldwide terror attacks increased by more than 1,200 in the last year alone.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even the President's own Director of Central Intelligence, Porter Goss, says: "Those jihadists who survive will leave Iraq experienced in and focused on acts of urban terrorism." &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I agree with the President about the importance of spreading democracy across the globe. But as Robert Pape of the University of Chicago has written, "...spreading democracy at the barrel of a gun in the Persian Gulf is not likely to lead to a lasting solution against suicide terrorism."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Last week's election in Iraq was an important step forward. I view each election as a landmark and I hope and pray that this one will result in a government that is able to unite the Sunni, Shiite, and Kurdish people.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Early next year, Iraqis will have a choice to amend the Constitution to protect the interests of the Sunni minority and this will be another defining moment.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I also view each election in Iraq as a chance to turn Iraq over to its own people, who must ultimately chart their own destiny. Reducing our presence would be a sign of success, not failure.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The fact is, as long as our presence is perceived as open-ended, there is little incentive for the Iraqis to make the necessary political compromises.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Indeed, if we want the Iraqis to move toward a political solution we must lessen their dependence on a U.S. military solution which almost everyone agrees is not the answer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Too many Iraqis believe that the United States has no intention of leaving Iraq. And with good reason. The Bush Administration continues to answer all reasonable requests for timeframes or benchmarks with the same "as long as it takes" mantra.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This, despite the fact that General Casey made it clear to me earlier this year that our long term presence would be counter-productive. And this despite the fact that two-thirds of Iraqis oppose the presence of U.S. troops in their country.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We must dispel the common and dangerous perception that we are occupiers and instead articulate a clear mission for this Iraq war, with an exit strategy based on real political, military, economic benchmarks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;How?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We need to accelerate efforts to train Iraqi troops and reduce our military footprint. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second, the President must immediately declare that the United States has no desire to maintain permanent U.S. military bases in Iraq.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Third, the President must work more with Iraq's neighbors and reduce our visibility in rebuilding Iraq's institutions. In fact, we should have been doing this from the beginning.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Last week, the Egyptian Ambassador lamented the fact that so few troops had been trained in his country, saying: "We have the capacity to train about 3,000 Iraqi troops in Egypt each month." How in the world can we fail to take advantage of offers like this? &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It doesn't matter if you were for the war, against the war, or undecided. None of us can remain silent or on the sidelines now.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As a Senator, I feel obligated to tell the people of my state how I feel. It's time for a new policy. It's time for a new strategy that makes us more safe and secure. It's time to put to rest the notion that to speak out for a new strategy in Iraq is unpatriotic.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's time to realize that turning Iraq over to the Iraqis is what they expect and what we should do.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's time for a real strategy to stop the spread of terrorism and prevent the proliferation of WMDs--not preemptive wars that isolate America from the rest of the world.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's time to remember that a strong America begins at home, and that we cannot have real security if we abandon our children and families, our fiscal responsibility or if we cannot prepare for a terrorist strike or an emergency like Katrina.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;It's time for America to once again be a shining example for the rest of the world.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We can do it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Again, let's be honest about the past and restore our credibility. Let the Administration support Congressional inquiries and not fight them - on the past use of intelligence; on the secret prisons in Europe; on the secret surveillance of Americans.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Two, let's truly honor our military by articulating a real plan for success in Iraq and taking care of our soldiers.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Three, let's get our priorities straight and get back on a solid fiscal footing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fourth, let's get Iraq right by working in a bipartisan way - not running ugly 30-second commercials while our soldiers die and get wounded.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We can do it. We can do better and with the wisdom of the American people, we will. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0036</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Asks Presidential Scholars About Former White House Counsel's Statement that Bush Admitted to an 'Impeachable Offense' </title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0039</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Washington, D.C.- U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today asked four presidential scholars for their opinion on former White House Counsel John Dean's statement that President Bush admitted to an "impeachable offense" when he said he authorized the National Security Agency to spy on Americans without getting a warrant from a judge. 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer said, &lt;B&gt;"I take very seriously Mr. Dean's comments, as I view him to be an expert on Presidential abuse of power. I am expecting a full airing of this matter by the Senate in the very near future."&lt;/B&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer's letter is as follows: 
&lt;P&gt;&lt;I&gt;On December 16, along with the rest of America, I learned that President Bush authorized the National Security Agency to spy on Americans without getting a warrant from a judge. President Bush underscored his support for this action in his press conference today. 
&lt;P&gt;On Sunday, December 18, former White House Counsel John Dean and I participated in a public discussion that covered many issues, including this surveillance. Mr. Dean, who was President Nixon's counsel at the time of Watergate, said that President Bush is "the first President to admit to an impeachable offense." Today, Mr. Dean confirmed his statement. 
&lt;P&gt;This startling assertion by Mr. Dean is especially poignant because he experienced first hand the executive abuse of power and a presidential scandal arising from the surveillance of American citizens. 
&lt;P&gt;Given your constitutional expertise, particularly in the area of presidential impeachment, I am writing to ask for your comments and thoughts on Mr. Dean's statement. 
&lt;P&gt;Unchecked surveillance of American citizens is troubling to both me and many of my constituents. I would appreciate your thoughts on this matter as soon as possible. 
&lt;P&gt;Sincerely, 
&lt;P&gt;Barbara Boxer 
&lt;P&gt;United States Senator &lt;/I&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0039</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Jennings surprised by haul at event</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0037</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Jeremy Wallace&lt;br&gt;Sarasota Herald-Tribune&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;SARASOTA COUNTY -- In just over an hour on Tuesday morning, Democrat Christine Jennings raised more than $100,000 in political contributions in her bid to win a seat in Congress.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;While $100,000 in a day is not abnormal for Republican fund-raisers in Sarasota County, it's a surprising one-day haul for a Democrat. In 2004, Jennings raised $264,000 during her entire campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Can you believe it?" a stunned Jennings said as the total was announced during the fund-raiser, which featured U.S. Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It was Boxer who helped draw a crowd of about 100 to the $1,000-a-person event at a condominium in the Beau Ciel tower on Sarasota Bay.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer lends credibility to Jennings as she tries to convince people that she can beat well-funded Republicans in the 2006 election.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jennings is running against Jan Schneider and Michael LaFevers for the Democratic nomination in the 13th Congressional District, which includes all of Sarasota, DeSoto and Hardee counties, plus most of Manatee and a part of Charlotte.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The seat is held by U.S. Rep. Katherine Harris, R-Longboat Key, but Harris is leaving the post to run for the U.S. Senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jennings is still far behind the top Republicans in fund raising. The leading Republican in the race has more than twice as much as she has.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Jennings said the credit for the Tuesday event goes to Boxer, who has been in the U.S. Senate since 1992. Boxer has often been talked about as a potential presidential candidate and recently wrote a novel that she is promoting across the country.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She has been a consistent critic of the war in Iraq, having voted against giving President Bush the authority to use military force there.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In June, she was one of two senators to submit a resolution pushing for a timetable to begin withdrawing troops.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said she wouldn't have made time for the fund-raiser if she didn't think Jennings could win.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She said she checked with the Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee before agreeing to do the fund-raiser with Jennings.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"What did it for me was the fact that the DCCC said she can win," Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer isn't the first big name national Democrat to support Jennings. Political action committees for former presidential candidate John Kerry, House minority leader Nancy Pelosi, D-Calif., and DCCC Chairman Rahm Emmanuel have all contributed to Jennings campaign.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The big names aren't scaring Schneider away from the primary contest.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Schneider sent an e-mail to voters this week declaring she had the best name recognition of anyone in the race for the 13th Congressional District, by virtue of having run for the seat twice before. Schneider could not be reached for comment Tuesday.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There are four Republicans in the race so far.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Longboat Key businessman Vern Buchanan, State Rep. Donna Clarke, R-Sarasota, State Rep. Nancy Detert, R-Venice and Sarasota banker Tramm Hudson are running in the Republican primary.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sarasota Republican Party Chairman Bob Waechter said raising $100,000 in a day is a surprisingly good showing by Jennings. But Waechter said he suspects she has already tapped out the Democratic money available in Sarasota.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Over the past six years, of the nearly $4.8 million that was donated by Sarasota residents to federal campaigns, just 30 percent went to Democrats, while nearly 70 percent went to Republicans, according to the Center for Responsive Politics, a nonpartisan group based in Washington, D.C., that tracks money in politics.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the latest campaign finance reports from October, Buchanan was leading all of the candidates in fund raising. He had pulled in more than $588,000 and had another major fund-raising event Tuesday night with conservative commentator William Bennett.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article?AID=/20051208/NEWS/512080571/1060/INDEX01" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;font size="1"&gt;http://www.heraldtribune.com/apps/pbcs.dll/article? AID=/20051208/NEWS/512080571/1060/INDEX01&lt;/font&gt;&lt;/a&gt; </description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0037</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer wants end to 'endless war' </title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0035</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Carla Marinucci&lt;BR&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, a persistent critic of President Bush, lambasted the administration Tuesday for being in such disarray on Iraq that she argued the war effort is fast disintegrating into "a disaster'' for Americans at home and the troops abroad. 
&lt;P&gt;"Every day, there's another message. ... They don't seem to know what they're doing,'' she said during a news conference in San Francisco. "We are in a mess because they have no plan, and now it seems they don't even talk to each other. ... What's happening there is not working; it's a disaster.'' 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer referred specifically to Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld's comments Tuesday, in which he said that "quitting is not an exit strategy'' because it would be "an invitation for more terrorist violence.'' 
&lt;P&gt;Rumsfeld's comments came as Bush said it would be "a terrible mistake'' to pull out U.S. forces -- remarks on the eve of his planned speech today at the U.S. Naval Academy. The president is expected to outline his continuing strategy for the war in the face of intensifying calls for a reduction in U.S. troops in Iraq. 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer, in San Francisco to highlight energy and environmental issues, said the Bush administration has been rudderless in its Iraq policy. 
&lt;P&gt;"Right now, there's an endless war,'' she said. "If he's ready to say there's a date (for withdrawal), there's an end here, that would be a welcome thing. ... We should tell the Iraqis we're not there indefinitely.'' 
&lt;P&gt;The Senate, in what was widely seen as a vote of no confidence in the president's Iraq policy, voted 79-19 on Nov. 15 to require the administration to present formal reports on the course of the war and prepare a plan for troop withdrawals. 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer said she supports immediate efforts to "bring the troops home -- starting with the National Guard.'' 
&lt;P&gt;Public opinion also has turned against the administration, with recent polls showing that a majority of Americans disapprove of the president's handling of the war. 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer also addressed Bush's renewed attention to immigration, including his announcement Monday that he plans to step up border security as well as push a guest worker program. 
&lt;P&gt;The plan, she said, will "exacerbate illegal immigration, and it doesn't do anything to get people out of the shadows.'' 
&lt;P&gt;The senator said that -- along with tougher border enforcement -- a better plan would be to identify illegal workers at jobs and then "put them on a path to legality.'' &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/11/30/MNGKAG0B2G1.DTL" target=_blank&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/11/30/MNGKAG0B2G1.DTL&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0035</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Statement by Senator Boxer on President Bush's Iraq Address</title>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Nov 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0034</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;STATEMENT BY U.S. SENATOR BARBARA BOXER&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The President fails to see and confront the truth about the war in Iraq.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;First, he refuses to acknowledge that the Iraq war has nothing to do with the 9/11 attack on our country by al Qaeda, and it has diverted us from our appropriate response to that attack which was to go into Afghanistan and hunt Osama bin Laden.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Second, he refuses to acknowledge the fact that our long term presence in Iraq is fueling the very insurgency that the President vows to end.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Third, the President refuses to acknowledge that any mistakes were made and that this war was based on false pretenses.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Fourth, he ignores the tremendous financial burden on our citizens, and he completely ignores the thousands of wounded that need to hear that they will not be forgotten and that they will receive the care they need.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Finally, the President even refuses to acknowledge that Iraqi government officials believe that we can withdraw within a two-year time frame, and he continues to demean those members of Congress who disagree with him.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The President used this speech to lash out in a very personal way against those who believe the best strategy for success is an &lt;BR&gt;accelerated training of Iraqi security forces and a drawdown of American troops, starting with the National Guard.&amp;nbsp; Once we clearly state that we do not intend to stay in Iraq forever, the insurgency will be diminished and our brave men and women can begin to come home.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The President's failure to address the concerns of the American people and the Congress is a devastating blow to everyone who hoped to hear the President articulate a clear mission and a projection of when our troops can return home.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0034</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Statement by Senator Boxer on the Nomination of Judge Samuel Alito to the Supreme Court</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0033</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I believe this nomination is aimed at appeasing the most right wing elements of the President's political base, and in so doing the President turns his back on the hopes and dreams, and the rights and freedoms of the majority of the American People. 
&lt;P&gt;Judge Alito may be soft spoken but if many of his opinions had prevailed the hard reality of his views would have hurt our families. 
&lt;P&gt;Judge Alito has a record which includes opinions that would have undermined the rights of the American People, especially the rights of women, minorities and families. 
&lt;P&gt;Had the President simply asked Justice Sandra Day O'Connor to finish this term on the Court, he could have avoided a bruising battle and united the country, instead of once again dividing it. 
&lt;P&gt;It is especially ironic that at a time when all of America is honoring Rosa Parks that the President would send us a nominee whose decisions could jeopardize the principle of equality for all Americans. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0033</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Statement by Senator Boxer on White House leak scandal</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0032</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The most disturbing part of this White House leak scandal is that it involves a personal, vicious attack on an undercover CIA agent because her husband exposed the lies behind the Bush Administration's premise for the Iraq war. 
&lt;P&gt;This despicable incident brings back echoes of the worst political scandals, when political "enemies" were targeted for personal destruction. This isn't the first time this Administration has tried to discredit or punish those who disagreed with them or stood up to them on the Iraq war and other Bush priorities. 
&lt;P&gt;But, this CIA outing case, where an indictment has been issued against the Vice President's top man, is particularly egregious because a deep undercover agent's career was completely destroyed, putting her life and the lives of others in extreme jeopardy. 
&lt;P&gt;The first President Bush said, "I have nothing but contempt and anger for those who betray the trust by exposing the name of our sources. They are, in my view, the most insidious, of traitors." 
&lt;P&gt;Now his son should show the same outrage and moral disgust with those who were involved in this treasonous activity. President Bush should act immediately to fire anyone in his Administration who played any role in harming our national security by outing an undercover agent in order to punish her husband. 
&lt;P&gt;President George W. Bush said in 2001, "We must always maintain the highest ethical standards. We must always ask ourselves not only what is legal, but what is right." This case is a matter of right and wrong, and there is no gray area. President Bush needs to apologize for the actions of his Administration and rid his White House of anyone connected to this scandal. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0032</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Statement of Senator Boxer on the Withdrawal of the Nomination of Harriet Miers to the U.S. Supreme Court</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0031</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;The withdrawal of the nomination of Harriet Miers to the Supreme Court is the consequence of a rushed Presidential decision with virtually no consultation with the Senate. 
&lt;P&gt;This is not a happy day for our country. 
&lt;P&gt;The President should follow the tradition of past presidents' handling of Supreme Court vacancies and nominate a moderate candidate after full consultation with the key Democratic and Republican members of the Senate. 
&lt;P&gt;For example, before Justices Ginsberg and Breyer were nominated, the White House had extensive consultation with the Judiciary Committee members of both parties. Those nominations went smoothly because of respect for the Constitution. 
&lt;P&gt;This country deserves better than an arrogant Executive Branch that ignores the constitutionally-mandated advice and consent role of the Senate. 
&lt;P&gt;I do not believe that this nomination was withdrawn simply because of the President's refusal to release White House documents. That is a fig leaf to cover the real problem which was a badly mismanaged and rushed nomination. 
&lt;P&gt;In going forward, the President should graciously accept Justice Sandra Day O'Connor's commitment to stay on the Court as long as she is needed. He should slow down, consult with the Senate, and nominate a mainstream nominee who will unite this country, not divide it. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0031</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Statement by Senator Boxer on U.S. Military Death Toll in Iraq Reaching 2,000 </title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0030</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;Mr. President, today is a very somber day. The U.S. military death toll reached 2,000 in Iraq, a figure that I&amp;nbsp;-- and every American&amp;nbsp;-- hoped we would never reach. Our hearts go out to the families and friends of those who have lost loved ones. 
&lt;P&gt;I pray for these young Americans, may they rest in peace; and I pray for their families, may they heal. Let us honor their lives and their memory. 
&lt;P&gt;And let us honor the lives of those who continue to serve by developing a credible plan for Iraq. It is time for this Administration to level with the American people and provide a strategy for success. 
&lt;P&gt;As the current investigation into the leak of CIA agent Valerie Plame reminds us, this Administration took us to war on false intelligence, misstatements, and exaggerations. 
&lt;P&gt;This Administration told the American people that we had no other option but to go to war because the regime of Saddam Hussein posed a threat to the security of the United States. However, no weapons of mass destruction have been found, and there was no serious link between Iraq and al Qaeda. 
&lt;P&gt;The Administration also provided rosy scenarios and false expectations about how the United States would be greeted as liberators in Iraq and how the war would be brief. In fact, Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld actually said in February 2003 that the war "could last six days, six weeks. I doubt six months." 
&lt;P&gt;Yet here we are, two and a half years later, lamenting the death of the 2,000th soldier in Iraq. Of those 2,000 soldiers, 464 of these soldiers were either from California or based in California. 
&lt;P&gt;Even as attacks on American soldiers continue, the Administration refuses to level with the American people. In May 2005, Vice President Cheney proclaimed that: "I think the level of activity that we see today in Iraq from a military standpoint, I think will clearly decline. I think they're in the last throes, if you will, of the insurgency." 
&lt;P&gt;Since that day&amp;nbsp;-- since Vice President Cheney told us that violence was coming to an end in Iraq&amp;nbsp;-- more than 300 Americans have lost their lives. And the violence continues to escalate. 
&lt;P&gt;Today we do not just lament the strategic disaster in Iraq, the loss of U.S. credibility around the world, and the overwhelming costs to the American taxpayer. Above all, we mourn the tragic deaths of 2,000 young Americans. 
&lt;P&gt;These men and women voluntarily put their lives on the line to defend us when they put on the uniform of the United States Armed Forces. They put their trust in the government that we would only send them to war if there was no other recourse. 
&lt;P&gt;In rushing to war, in twisting and revising the case for war, and in failing to plan for the aftermath of the war, this Administration broke the trust with these young men and women at a catastrophic cost. 
&lt;P&gt;These 2,000 young men and women have sons and daughters, husbands and wives, mothers and fathers, friends and extended family, all of whose lives have been forever changed by the consequences of this reckless war. 
&lt;P&gt;Today, let us remember these 2,000 brave Americans. Let us honor their lives and their memory by bringing this war to an end. &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0030</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Rice: U.S. May Still Be in Iraq in 10 Years</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0029</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Anne Gearan&lt;BR&gt;AP Diplomatic Writer&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice declined on Wednesday to rule out American forces still being needed in Iraq a decade from now. Senators warned that the Bush administration must play it straight with the public or risk losing public support for the war. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Pushed by senators from both parties to define the limits of U.S. involvement in Iraq and the Middle East, Rice also declined to rule out the use of military force in Iran or Syria, although she said the administration prefers diplomacy. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I don't think the president ever takes any of his options off the table concerning anything to do with military force," Rice said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rice appeared before the Senate Foreign Relations committee for only the second time since members gave her an unexpectedly tepid endorsement to replace Colin Powell in January, and she fielded pointed questions about U.S. intentions and commitment on Iraq from lawmakers who said they are hearing complaints at home. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Our country is sick at heart at the spin and false expectations," Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., told Rice. "They want the truth and they deserve it." &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rice said Iraq's police and Army forces are becoming better able to handle the country's security without U.S. help, and she repeated President Bush's warning that setting a timetable for withdrawal plays into terrorists' hands. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"The terrorists want us to get discouraged and quit," Rice said. "They believe we do not have the will to see this through." &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rice said the United States will follow a model that was successful in Afghanistan. Starting next month, she said, joint diplomatic-military groups called Provincial Reconstruction Teams will work alongside Iraqis as they train police, set up courts, and help local governments establish essential services. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By State Department design, Rice testified before the committee just days after Iraq apparently approved its first constitution since a U.S.-led coalition ousted Iraqi dictator Saddam Hussein in 2003. Her appearance also coincided with the start of Saddam's trial in Baghdad for a 1982 massacre of 150 of his fellow Iraqis. Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., agreed with the Bush administration's stay-the-course approach but said there are legitimate questions to ask about the future. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"We should recognize that most Americans are focused on an exit strategy in Iraq," said Lugar, the Foreign Relations Committee chairman. "Even if withdrawal timelines are deemed unwise because they might provide a strategic advantage to the insurgency, the American people need to more fully understand the basis upon which our troops are likely to come home."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;An AP-Ipsos poll this month found 61 percent of respondents disapprove of Bush's handling of Iraq while 32 percent said they approve. In August, 53 percent said the United States made a mistake by going to war while 43 percent said it was the right decision. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The figures represent a sharp drop-off from strong support for the war in the early going. The war also had overwhelming support in Congress, including from most of Rice's questioners Wednesday. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"One thing the Vietnam generation learned is no foreign policy can be sustained without the informed consent of the American people. And we haven't gotten that informed consent in terms of them knowing what they're signing on to from here on out," Sen. Joseph P. Biden Jr., D-Del., told Rice. "So I'm not looking for a date to get out of Iraq. But at what point, assuming the strategy works, do you think we'll be able to see some sign of bringing some American forces home?" &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Rice did not address the Vietnam comparison, and said the question of withdrawal is one for military planners. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I really don't want to hazard what I think would be a guess, even if it were an assessment, of when that might be possible," Rice said of a troop withdrawal. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Later, Sen. Paul Sarbanes, D-Md., told Rice that her response to questions about U.S. troop withdrawal leaves open the possibility that U.S. forces could be in Iraq five or even 10 years down the road. Rice did not dispute that. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I don't know how to speculate about what will happen 10 years from now, but I do believe that we are moving on a course on which Iraqi security forces are rather rapidly able to take care of their own security concerns," Rice responded. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Boxer read quotation after quotation from administration figures about Iraq, including Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld's February 2003 prediction that the war could "last six days, six weeks, I doubt six months," to make the point that the war has not gone as the administration predicted. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, read portions of a letter from a father who lost a son in Iraq. The letter called the war a "misguided effort."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"We have to really level with the American people," Voinovich told Rice. "This is not going to be over in two years ... we're not going to just be able to walk out of Iraq and this is going to be over." &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1231332" target=_blank&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=1231332&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0029</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Report: Federal Rail Security Plan Late </title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 08 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0027</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Leslie Miller&lt;br&gt;Associated Press&lt;/em&gt; 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON - The government still doesn't have a comprehensive plan to keep passenger railways safe, and the security precautions it does suggest may do more harm than good, congressional investigators say. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The federal government ordered rail systems to install bomb-resistant trash cans, but railway groups said they might not work because they'd direct the force of a blast upward, possibly causing underground stations to collapse, the Government Accountability Office said in a report released Friday. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The GAO, Congress' investigative and auditing arm, also said the government ordered railways to lock all doors to the operator's cab, which would violate federal safety regulations that require the door to be unlocked so the engineer can escape in an emergency. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The report, which comes out shortly after a terror threat against the New York City subway was disclosed, said the two Homeland Security Department agencies responsible for rail security may be duplicating each other's efforts in assessing the risk faced by railways. With the two working independently, there still isn't a comprehensive plan that sets priorities for spending limited funds -- and no deadline for completing it, the GAO said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"The GAO report shows that the Transportation Security Administration is not fulfilling its duty to protect Americans," said Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., who requested the report. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Sen. Olympia Snowe, R-Maine, who also asked for the report, said, "Given the London bombings and the recent heightening of security in the New York City subway system, one wonders what it will take before the federal government makes a real commitment to rail security." 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The Office for Domestic Preparedness, which gives out grants, had finished assessing risk on seven railways and was working on 12 more. There are 32 U.S. rail systems that represent 95 percent of ridership. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The TSA is required to coordinate protection of transportation infrastructure. By July, the agency had given scores to 700 rail stations based on their potential for loss of life, economic impact and symbolic importance -- without any input from the people who run the railways. The TSA has also assessed 73 bridges and tunnels, but needed to do 370 more, the report said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;TSA spokeswoman Yolanda Clark said the agency had done more than that, having given 848 scores to rail systems and more than 2,600 for mass transit. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;It was the deadly May 2004 railway bombings in Madrid that prompted the Homeland Security Department to order railways to take a series of security measures, including more frequent inspections, passenger awareness programs, locked doors to operators' cabs and bombproof trash cans. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The American Public Transit Association and the American Association of Railroads complained that they weren't consulted before the directives were issued, the report said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"The directives did not, in their view, reflect a complete understanding of the passenger rail environment or necessarily incorporate industry best practices," the report said. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The TSA's Clark said railways were consulted on most of the security measures. 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;"The security directives establish a baseline of security measures which could be enhanced in response to heightened or specific threats," she said. "These measures were flexible by design to allow for variations." 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Snowe said the TSA needs to work with the railways.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/ap/20051008/ap_on_go_co/rail_security_3" target="_blank"&gt;http://news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&amp;amp;u=/ap/20051008/ap_on_go_co/rail_security_3&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0027</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer's Statement on Nomination of Harriet Miers</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 03 Oct 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0028</link>
    <description>
&lt;h5&gt;Statement of Senator Barbara Boxer on the Nomination of Harriet Miers to be Associate Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court &lt;/h5&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Washington, D.C. -- U.S. Senator Barbara Boxer (D-CA) today made the following statement on the nomination of Harriet Miers to be Associate Justice of the United States Supreme Court: 
&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;b&gt;"The President has selected a loyal political ally without a judicial record to sit on the highest court in the land. This means that the Senate has a huge job to do as we seek to replace Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, the swing vote on the Supreme Court, who has upheld the rights and freedoms of Americans."&lt;/b&gt; &lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0028</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Boxer to oppose Supreme Court nominee Roberts</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 22 Sep 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0026</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Associated Press&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., announced Wednesday that she will oppose the nomination of John Roberts to be Supreme Court chief justice.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I said I could only vote for a nominee who would protect the rights and the freedoms of the people that I represent ... This nominee fails that bar," Boxer said on the Senate floor.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I don't buy into this reasoning either: Let's support this nominee because the next one might be worse," she said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The announcement by California's junior senator, a liberal who opposes many Bush nominees, was not a surprise. Still unknown is how the state's senior senator, Dianne Feinstein, will vote when the Judiciary Committee convenes Thursday to decide on the nominee.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Feinstein, a moderate, is the only woman on the Judiciary Committee.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Boxer's announcement came as a number of other Democrats were revealing their decisions on the nominee to replace Chief Justice William Rehnquist.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Senate Judiciary Committee's senior Democrat, Patrick Leahy of Vermont, announced his endorsement for Roberts. Senate Democratic leader Harry Reid, liberal stalwart Edward Kennedy of Massachusetts and former presidential candidate John Kerry of Massachusetts decided, like Boxer, to vote no.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Boxer said she was concerned about the views Roberts expressed in memos written while a lawyer in the Reagan administration, and about his failure to assist in the release of his writings from his years in the solicitor general's office under the first President Bush.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"With so many of our fundamental rights hanging in the balance, it is not good enough, in my view, to simply roll the dice, hoping a nominee will change his past views," Boxer said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/09/21/state/n163701D88.DTL" target=_blank&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/n/a/2005/09/21/state/n163701D88.DTL&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0026</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer threatens to slow Senate activity over court pick /  She'll vote 'no' unless Roberts backs right to abortion</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Aug 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0025</link>
    <description>&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;
Bob Egelko&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br style="font-style: italic;"&gt;&lt;span style="font-style: italic;"&gt;
San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/span&gt;&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Sen. Barbara Boxer said Wednesday she will vote against Supreme Court
nominee John Roberts unless he supports rights she considers essential
- - including abortion and privacy -- and slow Senate business to a
crawl if he doesn't answer her questions.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
"I need to know exactly where he will stand, and I need to know if he
will fight to protect and defend the rights and freedoms of the
American people,'' Boxer, D-Calif., told reporters after addressing a
group of law students and abortion rights supporters at Golden Gate
University in San Francisco.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Those rights, she said, include reproductive choice and the
constitutional right of privacy that was the basis of Roe vs. Wade, the
1973 Supreme Court ruling legalizing abortion. Boxer said she was
alarmed to learn that Roberts, as a lawyer in President Ronald Reagan's
Justice Department, referred in a 1981 memo to a "so-called right of
privacy.''&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Roberts must answer questions about his writings, his work on anti-
abortion legal briefs, and his rulings as a federal appeals court
judge, including a recent opinion that questioned federal authority to
protect endangered species, Boxer said.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
If he declines, she said, she will "use all the parliamentary tools
I've been given as a U.S. senator,'' including procedures that "make it
difficult for other business to get done until we get the information
we need.'' She did not threaten a filibuster, however, reflecting
Democrats' hesitation to embark on all-out political warfare against
the nomination.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The Senate Judiciary Committee is scheduled to begin hearings Sept. 6
on President Bush's nomination of Roberts, a judge on the U.S. Court of
Appeals in Washington, D.C., to succeed the retiring Justice Sandra Day
O'Connor. Boxer is not a committee member but said the questions she
wants answered would be asked by members, including California's other
senator, Democrat Dianne Feinstein, who Boxer said will press Roberts
on privacy issues.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
In her speech, Boxer noted two Supreme Court briefs Roberts signed in
the early 1990s while a high-ranking Justice Department deputy under
President George H.W. Bush. One said Roe vs. Wade should be overturned.
The other argued that blockades of abortion clinics were an exercise of
free speech, did not discriminate against women, and thus violated no
federal law justifying the presence of U.S. marshals.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
Boxer disputed arguments by Roberts' defenders that he was merely
representing the administration's views. As deputy solicitor general,
she said, "he played a top leadership role in deciding which cases to
appeal.''&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
The abortion clinic case was particularly troubling, Boxer said,
because Roberts "sided with some of the nation's most violent
anti-choice extremists'' at a time of widespread violence against the
clinics. The court adopted the administration's views in that case in
1993, leading Boxer and other senators to sponsor a law that made it a
federal crime to obstruct health centers.&lt;br&gt;
&lt;br&gt;
http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/08/11/MNGC1E63J81.DTL&lt;br&gt;
</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0025</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>7 Dem women want to know Roberts' stand on privacy</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Jul 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0024</link>
    <description>Seven Senate Democratic women warned Tuesday that they would insist that Supreme Court nominee John Roberts say whether he thinks the Constitution contains an implicit right to privacy, the basis of 40 years of landmark split decisions on abortion and homosexual rights, and future potential controversies over personal records, police surveillance and other social issues. 
&lt;P&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., said that Roberts, nominated last week by President Bush, "is a very affable individual. He is a very likable individual. " But his thin record of written decisions leaves "some confusion where he stands" on privacy, she said. "There can be no confusion." 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer also signaled new flash points rising from the release of Roberts' memos as a young lawyer during the Reagan administration. 
&lt;P&gt;Among these is Title IX, the landmark 1972 law prohibiting sex discrimination in education. An expansive reading of the law under the Nixon administration proved an unexpected boon to women's athletics, changing women's perceived role in society and the face of American sports. 
&lt;P&gt;A 1982 Roberts memo urged the Justice Department not to appeal a federal court ruling limiting Title IX's reach into all programs at a university that received federal funds. 
&lt;P&gt;The memo said "under Title IX, federal investigators cannot rummage willy- nilly through institutions, but can go only as far as the federal funds go." 
&lt;P&gt;"That's a very troubling position," Boxer said. "I think that is an area where we are going to see some in-depth questioning." 
&lt;P&gt;The Bush administration has made efforts to limit Title IX's requirements. A recent 5-4 Supreme Court decision, with Justice Sandra Day O'Connor writing the opinion, found that the act does extend to a male coach who said he was fired for complaining about unfair treatment of a girls high school basketball team in Birmingham, Ala. 
&lt;P&gt;Roberts was tapped by President Bush last week to fill the O'Connor vacancy, a swing seat on the court and pivotal in controversial decisions. 
&lt;P&gt;Roberts has received a largely warm reception on Capitol Hill. A former White House counsel, deputy solicitor general, private litigator and now federal appellate judge, Roberts has many friends on both sides of the aisle in Washington and a top-notch legal resume. He also apparently leaves an excellent impression in face-to-face interviews. 
&lt;P&gt;Liberal opponents have been short on ammunition until the release this week of more than 70,000 pages of documents from his tenure as a young lawyer in Reagan White House counsel's office. 
&lt;P&gt;Democrats and Republicans continued to spar over the release of more documents from Roberts' time as principal deputy solicitor general in the first Bush administration. 
&lt;P&gt;Republicans cite a 2002 letter signed by seven solicitor generals and written by Seth Waxman, who held the office under President Clinton, insisting that releasing internal memos would gravely harm the free exchange of ideas necessary to carry out the office's job of defending government policy. 
&lt;P&gt;Sen. Mitch McConnell, R-Ky., accused Democrats of failing in the first two parts of their three-part attack strategy -- charging insufficient White House consultation and casting Roberts as out of the mainstream -- and now are resorting to their third, "to endlessly request documents about the nominee in a fishing expedition designed to drag the process out as long as possible." 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer said she does not buy the argument that the solicitor general memos should be withheld. 
&lt;P&gt;"Whether he's a Democrat or a Republican, John Roberts in the Solicitor General's office was paid by the taxpayers of this country," Boxer said. "We have to see the man's heart, his soul, his mind, and we need to know if he's going to protect the rights of the American people." 
&lt;P&gt;"I'm sworn to uphold the Constitution," Boxer said. "That's my job, and how can I vote for someone who's a blank slate?" 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer cited polls showing that most people believe it is more important to judge a nominee on the issues rather than on qualifications. She cited polls showing that a majority of the public favor a right to abortion in most or all circumstances. 
&lt;P&gt;"They want us to get the information," Boxer said. 
&lt;P&gt;The Democratic women announced the creation of a new Web site, &lt;A href="http://democrats.senate.gov/AskRoberts"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;democrats.senate.gov/AskRoberts&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;, which they said will allow citizens to send in questions they would like the nominee to answer. 
&lt;P&gt;Sen. Barbara Mikulski, D-Md., is leading the effort, joined by Boxer, Hillary Clinton of New York, Maria Cantwell of Washington and others. Sen. Dianne Feinstein, a California Democrat and the only woman on the Judiciary Committee, did not attend the news conference to announce the Web site, but Mikulski said it has her full support. No Republican women joined the effort, and Sen. Blanche Lincoln, D-Ark., was also absent. 
&lt;P&gt;The women said they expect Roberts to answer questions on abortion. 
&lt;P&gt;"I can't wait for the picture to be shown on national television consistently through the hearings ... of a group of men and one woman deciding a very important issue," Cantwell said, referring to Feinstein. "Yes, she will speaking loud and clear, and so will that picture."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/07/29/MNG7LDVSU41.DTL"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;http://sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/07/29/MNG7LDVSU41.DTL&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0024</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Take the measure of the man before we rush to confirm</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Jul 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0023</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;(Op-ed by Senator Boxer in the San Francisco Chronicle)&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Justice Sandra Day O'Connor was a powerful force for moderation, independence and consensus-building on an often deeply divided court. Over the next few months, the Senate must ask tough questions to determine whether Judge Roberts will continue her tradition: Will he be mainstream like Justice O'Connor or extreme like Justices Antonin Scalia and Clarence Thomas? Will he uphold or erode the right to privacy, including a woman's reproductive freedom? Will he respect Congress' ability to pass laws protecting our families?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The stakes are high. According to a recent CNN poll, 65 percent of Americans want the next Supreme Court justice to uphold Roe vs. Wade. Many of us are old enough to remember what it was like before the court's landmark opinion. Women seeking illegal abortions were forced into the back alleys, risking their health and lives. Thousands died every year. We cannot go back to those dark days.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As deputy solicitor general, Judge Roberts argued before the Supreme Court on the side of Operation Rescue in one case, claiming that the often- violent mass demonstrations at clinics were simply free expression. He also co- wrote a brief for the government in Rust vs. Sullivan, a case about whether health-care providers at federally funded clinics could be barred from discussing abortion. Although Roe vs. Wade itself was not at issue in that case, Roberts' brief commented on it anyway, stating that Roe was "wrongly decided and should be overruled." The American people deserve to know if Judge Roberts wrote this troubling statement himself, whether he agreed with it, and, ultimately, whether he believes in a constitutional right to privacy.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The threat to Roe is not only serious; it is also immediate. In December, the next justice will hear arguments in Ayotte vs. Planned Parenthood, a parental-notification case. If Judge Roberts is confirmed, he would likely be the deciding vote on whether the Supreme Court will continue safeguarding the health and safety of all women seeking abortion. Make no mistake: Without a protection for health, which is the centerpiece of Roe, women will be at grave risk.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the stakes for families go even beyond the right to privacy. Since the 1930s, the Supreme Court has recognized Congress' broad role under the Commerce Clause to protect families across America by ensuring, for example, a healthy environment, a safe workplace, the minimum wage, family and medical leave, safe food and drugs, and protection from discrimination, violence and child pornography. Some current justices want to severely limit the ability of Congress to meet these kinds of critical challenges.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Does Judge Roberts share that view? His opinion in Rancho Viejo vs. Norton, in which he argued that regulations issued under the Endangered Species Act exceeded Congress' power, raises real concerns about whether he would join the right-wing bloc of the court to invalidate important legislation that protects so many of our nation's values.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After President Bush made his announcement, many right-wing groups who have called for the criminalization of abortion sounded downright ecstatic. What do they know that we don't? Judge Roberts' credentials are impressive and not in dispute. But his record as an attorney and judge raises concerns about the philosophy he would bring to the Supreme Court. At age 50, Judge Roberts would become the youngest justice on the highest court in the land. He could serve for more than three decades, and influence our law and society far longer than that.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As senators, it is our job to aggressively seek the truth from this nominee. We must ask questions -- and not rest until we get answers -- about whether Judge Roberts will uphold or undermine our fundamental rights and freedoms as Americans. None of us can sit on the sidelines. There is simply too much at stake.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Justice O'Connor was a pivotal vote in protecting our rights. Her retirement from the Supreme Court has created, in and of itself, an extraordinary circumstance -- one that places an equally extraordinary obligation on all of us to ensure that her successor honors her independence by continuing it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/07/25/EDG4PDMIGH1.DTL"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;FONT style="BACKGROUND-COLOR: #ffffff" color=#0000ff&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/07/25/EDG4PDMIGH1.DTL&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0023</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>GOP Senator in Democrats' Crosshairs</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 19 Jul 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0022</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;FONT size=4&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;GOP Senator in Democrats' Cross Hairs&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;FONT size=2&gt;A conservative favorite, Rick Santorum's blunt take on cultural issues may give ammunition to opponents in the battle for his seat next year.&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Faye Fiore&lt;BR&gt;Los Angeles Times&lt;BR&gt;July 19, 2005&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;WASHINGTON -- Sen. Rick Santorum, the politician whom the Democrats most want to defeat next year, has long been a lightning rod, owing to his habit of saying exactly what's on his mind. Lately, though, the bolts have been dancing at the Pennsylvania Republican's feet.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;After losing the fight this year to prevent the withdrawal of nutrition and hydration from Terri Schiavo, the Florida woman who doctors said was in a persistent vegetative state, Santorum concluded that she had been "executed" when she died March 31. A tireless defender of marriage, he equated same-sex relationships and bestiality in a 2003 newspaper interview. More recently, he apologized for comparing Democrats who opposed changing Senate rules to block the filibuster for judicial nominees to Adolf Hitler.&lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR&gt;And last week, sparks were flying on Capitol Hill after Santorum, the third-ranking member of the GOP leadership, refused to recant a July 2002 column he wrote for the website Catholic Online that blamed Boston "liberalism" for the Catholic Church's sex abuse scandal. That prompted a roar from Massachusetts Democrats, one of whom called Pennsylvania's junior senator "a jerk."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, Santorum has compiled his views into a newly released book that his opponents are embracing as 449 pages of ammunition for the battle over his Senate seat in 2006.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In "It Takes a Family: Conservatism and the Common Good," Santorum finds fault with two-income families, cohabitation before marriage and working women, who have chosen not to stay home with their children, he contends, "because of the influence of radical feminism, one of the core philosophies of the village elders." He also compares abortion to slavery.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Judging from the blog traffic, women of nearly all ideological stripes are less than happy about what he's written about women working instead of staying home with their children," said Jennifer Duffy, an independent analyst with the nonpartisan Cook Political Report. "He appears to ignore that some women work because they have to."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The father of six, a devout Catholic who offers catechism classes to GOP colleagues in his Capitol office, Santorum makes no apologies for his candor and dismisses criticism as "attacks by the liberal left," said Dan Ronayne, spokesman for the National Republican Senatorial Committee, where Santorum's office referred questions last week.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"A liberal columnist in Boston attacked Sen. Santorum for something he said three years ago, and the Democratic attack machine has been up and running ever since," Ronayne said, referring to a column in the Boston Globe last Tuesday.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Santorum is a favorite among evangelical voters and conservatives who cheer his outspokenness, even while some confide that they wouldn't dare go as far.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Conservative activists tell me they agree with him on pretty much everything, but would never say it themselves," said Stuart Rothenberg, a Washington political analyst. "He may have to take a position on a Supreme Court justice or Bush's Social Security plan, but he does not have to take a position on whether women should be working outside the home. He seems almost eager to evoke some outcry."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Santorum's candor has served him well. A youthful-looking 47, he was elected to the House in 1992 with a wave of other rambunctious, Newt Gingrich-style conservatives. He captured his Senate seat at age 36 and zoomed up the leadership ladder, and is considered a possible contender for the GOP presidential nomination in 2008.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But the storms of attention Santorum regularly stirs could be affecting his bid for a third term in his home state, where a recent poll showed him trailing his likely opponent by 11 percentage points.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On his own merits, Robert P. Casey Jr., a Democrat who favors restrictions on abortion rights, is a formidable foe. The son of a popular two-term governor, Casey has won statewide election three times and currently is state treasurer.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But he has garnered a lead mostly by letting Santorum do the talking.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"He is congenitally unable to stop that," G. Terry Madonna, director of the Center for Politics and Public Affairs at Franklin &amp;amp; Marshall College in Lancaster, Pa., said of Santorum's blunt take on controversial cultural issues. "He does something that looks like it will help him with moderate voters in the state, then he can't go a week without getting back into a maelstrom."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Tensions flared last week when the Boston Globe asked Santorum if he stood by remarks in 2002 saying the city's "sexual license" nurtured an environment for sexual abuse by priests.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"The basic liberal attitude in that area ... has an impact on people's behavior," Santorum told a Globe reporter, affirming his comments of three years ago.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That provoked outrage from Massachusetts Democrats: "Irresponsible, insensitive and inexcusable," Sen. Edward M. Kennedy thundered.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The families of Massachusetts soldiers who have died in Iraq "know more about the mainstream American values of Massachusetts than Rick Santorum ever will," Sen. John F. Kerry said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"He's a jerk," Rep. Barney Frank said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The prickliness spilled into the Senate hallway where New York Democrat Hillary Rodham Clinton, author of "It Takes a Village," passed Santorum, author of "It Takes a Family," and had this to say, according to Associated Press:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;" 'It takes a village, Rick, don't forget that,' Clinton called out. &lt;BR&gt;&amp;nbsp; &lt;BR&gt;" 'It takes a family,' Santorum countered. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;" 'Of course, a family is part of a village,' Clinton replied. The two continued on in opposite directions."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Whether all of this works to his favor or detriment in 16 months depends on its reception by voters in Pennsylvania, a politically unpredictable state: Republicans control the two Senate seats, 12 of the 19 congressional seats and both houses of the state Legislature, but Democrats have an overall registration edge and hold most of the executive branch offices, including the governorship.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;And tangling with some of the Senate's most prominent liberals could buttress his image as a conservative hero, providing Santorum, who has a reputation as an effective campaigner, with ammunition of his own.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I am pretty sure that his strategists are gleefully collecting all the things that Ted Kennedy, John Kerry and Barney Frank are saying about him," said Duffy of the Cook Political Report. "I suspect they will use them in direct mail sooner or later."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-santorum19jul19,0,3187492.story?track=tothtml"&gt;&lt;FONT color=#0000ff&gt;http://www.latimes.com/news/nationworld/nation/la-na-santorum19jul19,0,3187492.story?track=tothtml&lt;/FONT&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0022</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer criticizes iraq war in SF speech / 'Our troops deserve more,' senator says</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Jul 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0021</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;BR&gt;July 6, 2005&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer offered a major foreign policy speech on the war in Iraq before hundreds of her constituents in San Francisco today.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The situation in Iraq is spiraling out of control, she said, and the pool of people willing to fight in the insurgency against American troop presence there seems bottomless.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She described herself as "distressed, angry and frustrated'' over the continuing unrest in Iraq and the mounting death toll with no apparent end in sight.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Iraq was a war of choice, not a war of necessity,'' she said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"We have no idea, none, how long the administration plans to be in Iraq,'' she said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"When we see this next generation coming along&amp;nbsp;... we owe them everything that we have in us to leave them a better world,'' Boxer said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She cited the latest American soldier death count of 1,749, 13,336 wounded and at least 8,000 dead Iraqis as proof positive that a clear mission and foreign policy shift are in order.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Our troops deserve more than they are getting, they deserve more than the status quo,'' she said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;President George Bush's administration "took its eye off the ball'' when it shifted its focus from finding Osama bin Laden to waging a pre-emptive war against Iraq, she said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;As Bush's reasons for the war have changed, the mission has become ever more ambiguous, she said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"That mission is a guarantee of a never-ending cycle of violence,'' she said, as America's military presence there seems to be a magnet for recruits for the insurgency.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The insurgency now numbers anywhere from 12,000 to 50,000 fighters, she said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"The insurgents are winning the propaganda wars now,'' she said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Terrorism is a result of this war,'' Boxer said, amid applause at the Commonwealth Club of California-sponsored speech at the Renaissance Parc 55 Hotel.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The mission, she said, should be security for Iraqis by Iraqis.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"It takes a long time to get a perfect democracy -- ours certainly did,'' Boxer said, citing the Supreme Court's involvement in the 2000 presidential election as evidence that even America's democracy has yet to reach perfection.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Give us a mission that can succeed,'' she said. "Give us a mission that makes sense.''&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Boxer described her speech as the culmination of her thoughts and comments she's made on the war in Iraq, since the war began in March 2003.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/baycitynews/a/2005/07/06/boxer06.DTL&amp;amp;hw=boxer&amp;amp;sn=003&amp;amp;sc=846"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/baycitynews/a/2005/07/06/boxer06.DTL&amp;amp;hw=boxer&amp;amp;sn=003&amp;amp;sc=846&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0021</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>EPA Blocked From Human Pesticide Studies</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 30 Jun 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0020</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;By ANDREW TAYLOR&lt;br&gt;The Associated Press&lt;br&gt;Wednesday, June 29, 2005; 8:20 PM&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON -- The Senate voted to block the Environmental Protection Agency from using studies that intentionally expose people to pesticides when considering permits for pest killers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;By a 60-37 vote, the Senate approved a provision from Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., that would block the EPA from relying on such testing - including 24 human pesticide experiments currently under review - as it approves or denies pesticide applications.&lt;br&gt;&amp;nbsp;&lt;br&gt;The Bush administration lifted a partial moratorium imposed in 1998 by the Clinton administration on using human testing for pesticide approvals. Under the change, political appointees are refereeing on a case-by-case basis any ethical disputes over human testing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The tests include a 2002-04 study by the University of California-San Diego in which chloropicrin, a fungicide that was used as a chemical warfare agent during World War I, was administered to 127 young adults in doses that Boxer said exceeded average federal safety limits.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;New EPA rules under development envision permitting the agency to accept data from human tests on children, pregnant women, newborns, infants and fetuses. Even newborns of "uncertain viability" could be tested under the draft EPA rule.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer's proposal would block the EPA from using data taken from human testing for the budget year starting Oct. 1. It would also bar the agency from conducting such testing.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"Let's use this time to throw out this rule that they're drafting which is immoral on its face because it would allow EPA itself to test pregnant women and fetuses," Boxer told reporters. "And let's go back to the basic rules of science and morality."&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The pesticide industry said Boxer was deliberately inflaming the issue and manufacturers do not intentionally perform tests on children. It said Boxer's amendment is so broad as to block testing to determine safe exposure levels for agricultural pesticides, insect repellents and pool sanitizers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;"It would effectively cripple the regulatory process at EPA," said Dr. Pat Donnelly, an executive vice president at CropLife America, a pesticide industry association.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The vote came as the Senate passed, 94-0, a bill funding the EPA and Interior Department budgets. The House approved identical language when considering its version of the bill last month.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The underlying $26.3 billion measure provides about $542 million more than President Bush's request but $751 million less than current spending levels. During the debate, the Senate also voted 96-0 to add $1.5 billion to make up for a recently revealed shortfall in Veterans Affairs health care accounts.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Ordinarily, approval by both the House and Senate would ensure the language is retained in the final version of the bill. But GOP floor manager Conrad Burns, R-Mont., opposed Boxer's amendment, and as the lead Senate negotiator on the bill he is well-positioned to kill it in future talks with the House.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Burns countered with an amendment, adopted 57-40, allowing human testing to continue but instructing the EPA to study if it's being conducted ethically and whether the benefits outweigh the risks to volunteers.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;The EPA is developing rules, slated to be issued by 2006, on the use of human subjects for testing pesticides in the wake of a 2003 decision by the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia that sided with pesticide manufacturers. The court ruled that the EPA cannot refuse to consider data from manufacturer-sponsored human exposure tests until it develops regulations on it.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Boxer and Bill Nelson, D-Fla., had held up the confirmation of EPA Administrator Stephen Johnson until he promised to cancel a pesticide study in Florida. Over the study's two years, EPA had planned to give $970 plus a camcorder and children's clothes to each of the families of 60 children in Duval County, Fla., in what critics of the study noted was a low-income, minority neighborhood.&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/29/AR2005062902090.html"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/06/29/AR2005062902090.html&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0020</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Testing Pesticides on Humans (Audio)</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jun 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0019</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Morning Edition&lt;BR&gt;National Public Radio&lt;BR&gt;June 17, 2005&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer, a California Democrat, says the Environmental Protection Agency is using human testing data when considering specific pesticides. Critics say such tests encourage practices that do not have proven scientific merit and may endanger the test subjects.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4707438&amp;amp;sourceCode=RSS"&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Listen to the story here.&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/A&gt; &lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0019</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer proposes major overhaul in oceans policy</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 10 Jun 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0018</link>
    <description>&lt;STRONG&gt;Bill to cut overfishing and pollution faces uphill fight in Congress, could conflict with White House plans&lt;/STRONG&gt; 
&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Zachary Coile&lt;BR&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;California Sen. Barbara Boxer introduced legislation Thursday to address threats to the world's oceans, including tougher rules to reduce overfishing and strict new limits on agricultural and storm-water runoff. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The measure also would spin off the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration into an independent agency -- separate from the Commerce Department, where it has been based since its creation in 1970 -- in a move proponents say would boost the autonomy of its scientists. 
&lt;P&gt;The legislation faces an uphill battle in Congress, which has not taken up a broad overhaul of the nation's oceans policy for more than three decades. Boxer, a Democrat, has not secured any Republican co-sponsors for her bill and may have difficulty even getting a hearing before the Senate Commerce Committee. 
&lt;P&gt;At a news conference on Thursday, Boxer said she plans to use the same strategy she has employed on her 2002 California Wild Heritage Wilderness Bill, where she has managed to get some areas designated as wilderness while falling short of her goal of adding 2.5 million acres of new wild lands. 
&lt;P&gt;"We can't get the whole thing done," Boxer said of her oceans bill, "but we can get parts of it done." 
&lt;P&gt;For example, she said, many senators have expressed interest in a ban on the discharge of ballast water from ships in U.S. waters, which can lead to the spread of invasive species. San Francisco Bay is threatened by 186 such invasive species, Boxer said. 
&lt;P&gt;But it's not clear if Boxer will get a hearing on her bill this year. A Commerce Committee spokesman said Chairman Sen. Ted Stevens, R-Alaska, had not yet seen Boxer's proposal, but the committee already has approved four oceans-related bills this year and has no more hearings scheduled on the topic this session. 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer's legislation is a response to two major reports by the Pew Oceans Commission and the U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, which documented major declines in certain fish and other marine species and warned of increasing threats from invasive species, disappearing wetlands and polluted runoff of fertilizer and toxic chemicals. 
&lt;P&gt;Both reports criticized the federal government's response to the growing threats, but the two groups split over how best to reorganize the more than two dozen federal agencies that oversee oceans policy. 
&lt;P&gt;The Pew report called for transforming the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration into a new independent agency, similar to the Environmental Protection Agency. The U.S. Commission on Ocean Policy, appointed by President Bush, preferred a more modest approach of forming a new National Council on Oceans at the White House to help unify the work of NOAA and other agencies. 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer's proposal is a mix of both, creating a new White House Council on Ocean Stewardship to set policy and budget priorities, but also making NOAA an independent, science-based agency. 
&lt;P&gt;Rep. Sam Farr, D-Carmel, is introducing similar legislation in the House and said the measure has support from the House Oceans Caucus, whose leaders include three Republicans -- Rep. Curt Weldon of Pennsylvania, Rep. Wayne Gilchrest of Maryland and Rep. Jim Saxton of New Jersey. 
&lt;P&gt;"Now is the time for Congress to act," Farr said. "We can't wait. This is of the essence. The oceans are suffering." 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer's bill has been endorsed by 129 groups, mostly environmental organizations such as the Sierra Club and the Natural Resources Defense Council, as well as some fishermen's groups, including the Pacific Coast Federation of Fishermen's Associations. 
&lt;P&gt;But the measure could face tough opposition from large-scale fishing interests and agricultural groups. 
&lt;P&gt;The bill may also put Boxer at odds with the White House, which proposed new rules this week to allow major fish farms in U.S. waters up to 200 miles off the coast. Aquaculture has become big business in countries from Canada to China, but scientists have warned that large fish farms could deplete stocks of feeder fish and taint the gene pool of wild fish. 
&lt;P&gt;Boxer's bill would prohibit NOAA from issuing any leases for fish farms until new national standards are written to address concerns about water pollution and threats to wild fish from parasites and invasive species. 
&lt;P&gt;Sylvia Earle, a former NOAA chief scientist who joined Boxer at the news conference, said she is worried about a national policy that allows farming ocean fish such as salmon, tuna or swordfish, which consume huge amounts of smaller fish. 
&lt;P&gt;"We have selected carnivores to grow for much of the current aquaculture, using wild fish to feed the cultivated fish," Earle said. "It's a bit like taking the songbirds to feed the chickens. It takes a lot of wild fish to get a few cultivated fish." &lt;BR&gt;
&lt;HR&gt;

&lt;P&gt;Oceans bill &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., proposed a bill Thursday to protect oceans from overfishing and pollution. Here are some of the provisions: 
&lt;P&gt;-- Set new limits on the amount of nutrient pollution runoff from agriculture and municipal water districts. 
&lt;P&gt;-- Make the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration an independent agency, removing it from the Commerce Department, and also create a White House Council on Ocean Stewardship. 
&lt;P&gt;-- Authorize $11.2 billion a year to pay for state and local efforts to reduce storm-water pollution. 
&lt;P&gt;-- Create new "individual fishing quotas" to protect against overfishing; require NOAA and regional fishery councils to develop plans that consider the health of the entire ecosystem, not just a single fish species. 
&lt;P&gt;-- Create "coral management areas" to protect fragile coastal areas, and authorize $3 million a year to research the effects of sonar on marine mammals. 
&lt;P&gt;Source: U.S. Senate &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/06/10/MNG8SD6C4O1.DTL" target=_blank&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?f=/c/a/2005/06/10/MNG8SD6C4O1.DTL&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0018</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer: Senate Should Delay Bolton Vote</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 May 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0017</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Anne Gearan&lt;BR&gt;Associated Press&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The White House is stiff-arming Democrats over classified information about President Bush's pick to be United Nations ambassador, and the Senate should put off a vote on the embattled nominee until next month, a Democratic opponent argued Thursday.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"We should delay this until we see that information; it's a matter of right and wrong," Sen. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., maintained at the start of a second day of Senate debate over John R. Bolton's fitness and qualifications. "It is right for us to get that information, it is wrong for the administration to withhold it."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The Senate planned a procedural vote Thursday that Democrats hoped to win and force postponement of a confirmation vote until June. If Republicans prevailed, the Senate was expected to quickly approve Bolton, whom President Bush says would reform the United Nations.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The material, which Democrats have sought for weeks, involves Bolton's use of government intelligence on Syria and instances in which he asked for names of fellow U.S. officials whose communications were secretly picked up by a spy agency.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Boxer read out a litany of allegations about Bolton that she said show he is ill-suited to be the nation's top representative at the world body. She also accused Bolton of misleading the Senate committee that wrangled over Bolton's nomination for weeks without offering him its endorsement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"John Bolton did not tell the truth to the Foreign Relations Committee," on several points, Boxer alleged. "If nothing else I've said matters ... you ought to care about telling the truth to a committee of the United States Senate," Boxer told other senators. "We have it chapter and verse. We have it cold here."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Democrats said Wednesday they did not plan to mount a filibuster, or procedural delays, to indefinitely block the vote, and some of their leading voices seemed to acknowledge that time was running out.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"I would seriously hope that the president -- and I really don't have much hope -- but I wish the president had taken another look at this and found us someone" else, Sen. Joseph Biden, D-Del., said.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Republicans said it was time to vote after weeks of exhaustive investigation into allegations that Bolton mistreated subordinates and misused government intelligence. This week's bipartisan agreement on judicial filibusters in the Senate and the approach of the Memorial Day recess, which starts at week's end, seemed to be sapping some of the strength from the effort by Bolton's opponents to erect further roadblocks.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"Where does legitimate due diligence turn into partisanship?" asked Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., chairman of the Foreign Relations Committee. "Where does the desire for the truth turn into a competition over who wins and who loses?"&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;On Wednesday, the Republican leader of the Senate Intelligence Committee, Sen. Pat Roberts of Kansas, said he and his Democratic counterpart had been briefed on the matter and found that Bolton had done nothing improper when asking for the names.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Bolton is currently the undersecretary of state for arms control and one of Bush's most conservative foreign policy advisers. Bush nominated him in March to succeed John Danforth as U.N. ambassador, a plum diplomatic job despite the Bush administration's sometimes chilly attitude toward the world body.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Not all Republicans back Bolton. Sen. George Voinovich, R-Ohio, said Bolton would set back the U.S. goal of reforming the United Nations and lacks the diplomatic touch for the sensitive job of ambassador.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Voinovich implored senators to think hard before voting to approve Bolton. His surprisingly strong opposition forced a delay of last month's planned Foreign Relations Committee vote on Bolton, and the panel subsequently denied Bolton its customary endorsement.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;"The message will be lost because our enemies will do everything they can to use Mr. Bolton's baggage to drown his words," Voinovich said. "The issue will be the messenger, not the message."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2005/05/26/national/w081022D76.DTL" target=_blank&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/news/archive/2005/05/26/national/w081022D76.DTL&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;&lt;!-- END STORY --&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0017</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer's Statement on Defeating the Nuclear Option</title>
    <pubDate>Mon, 23 May 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0016</link>
    <description>I am very pleased that senators from both sides of the aisle have walked the Senate back from the brink and preserved the great tradition of the United States Senate.&amp;nbsp; This is a victory for the American people.&amp;nbsp; It is a defeat for the abuse of power known as the nuclear option.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I will continue to defend the independence of the judiciary by doing all I can to ensure that we confirm mainstream judicial nominees who will protect the rights and freedoms of the American people. </description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0016</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer's Floor Speech on Judicial Filibusters</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 17 May 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0015</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Congressional Record&lt;BR&gt;United States Senate&lt;BR&gt;May 17, 2005&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Mrs. BOXER:&lt;/STRONG&gt;&amp;nbsp;Mr. President, I have asked for this time so I could talk about the issue that is really hanging over the head of the Senate, as Senator Baucus said when he gave his support to the highway and transit bill:&amp;nbsp;What we can do when we work together. What we can do when we set aside the partisanship. What we can do when we work for our people, rather than make up a phony crisis about the courts and threaten to change more than 200 years of tradition and threaten a nuclear option--which was named by the Republicans, by the way, when they thought about it because it is so vicious, it hurts so hard, it has such fallout that it will change the very nature of the Senate. But more importantly, it will change the way we now can protect the people of the United States of America.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is a very simple chart. It shows the numbers 208 to 10; 208 represents the number of judges President Bush has been able to get voted into office as a result of actions of this Congress since he got into power. Two hundred eight of his judges have gone through. This Senate has stopped 10, 10 of his nominees. Actually, some of my colleagues remind me now it is really only five because some of them are no longer up for judgeships or we have relented on a couple of them, but I am going to be fair to my colleagues on the other side of the aisle and paint the worst possible picture in terms of the number we have stopped--10.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is a 95-percent success rate. I ask the people of this country to think about what it would mean in their lives if they got 95 percent of what they wanted. If their child came home on a regular basis with 95 percent from school? That is an A+. If their spouse said, ``Honey, I agree with you,'' 95 percent of the time and you got your way 95 percent of the time, you would be smiling.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;When you went to work and you had a pretty tough boss, and your boss called you into the office and he said, ``You know, you are a fine worker, Barbara. You are a great worker. As a matter of fact, I have looked over your work, and I have agreed with you 95 percent of the time,'' I think that is the moment I would ask for a raise.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you get what you want 95 percent of the time, you should have a broad smile on your face. You should feel good about yourself. You should feel great about yourself.&amp;nbsp; &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;But you know what, if you wanted 100 percent all the time, if you never wanted to give 1 inch of space, if you demanded that your child get 100 percent every time, you would not be happy. I call it the arrogance of power.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What we are seeing in the United States of America is an arrogance of power. My colleagues--and particularly the White House--are not happy getting 208 of their judges but not getting 10 of their judges; they are not happy with 95 percent results. What do they do? They say: We want to change the rules of the Senate. All right, what are the rules of the Senate? The rules of the Senate say on a nomination as important as a judge, which is very key, following the Constitution, which says a President must take the advice and get the consent of the Senate, there can be extended debate on that judge. To stop that extended debate, it requires not 51 votes; it is 60 votes. That is how we have operated for a very long time.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By the way, it is important to note, it was even harder to get a nomination through. For a while, it was 67 votes. Before that, there was endless debate. You could never stop debate, ever. We have eased that rule.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We believe it is important for a lifetime appointment to the courts--and these are very important positions. They are paid a lot of money. They get a great retirement, not like United Airlines, they will get their retirement. We believe they ought to be terrific--mainstream, at least. And to stop extended debate, they have to pass a little bit of a higher threshold: 60 votes. Some of these nominees are so outside the mainstream they cannot get 60 votes. So the Republicans said: We will just change the rules. They looked in their little rule book, and they found it takes 67 votes to change the rules of the Senate, and they said: My goodness, we do not have that. Maybe we have 51 with the Vice President voting with us--he votes on a tie vote--but we do not have 67 votes. So let's go about it in a way that no one would ever expect. We will raise what we call a point of order, have a ruling of the Chair, and the Chair will rule--and it will be Dick Cheney--that the Senate can no longer filibuster judges. Then we will have a little disagreement over that. They are getting 51 votes, they think. Maybe not. We do not know.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is the nuclear option. A lot of my colleagues on the Republican side are nervous about it, and they will wind up, if they get 51 votes, changing the rules of the Senate without the 67 votes.Imagine what would happen at a baseball game if in the middle of the game someone said there is no such thing as a home run, or it is an out if the ball bounces first and you throw the person out at first base. People would go nuts. You do not change the rules in the middle of the game. That is not the American way. And you do not do it in a backdoor effort. I have voted to change the rules, but I do not try a sneaky way. I said you have to get 67 votes to do it. If you do not get the 67 votes, the rules are the same.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I take my time on this because it is important the American people understand what the Republican leadership is trying to do. They tried to change the rules in the House because they did not want to investigate Tom DeLay, who is the leader over there. They changed the rules. It was so shocking, they backtracked after months of the American people saying: That is not the American way. The people of the United States of America are saying it today. They are saying it by 60 to 70 percent of the vote: Do not change the way the Senate has done its business.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Anyone who saw the movie ``Mr. Smith Goes to Washington'' knows that Jimmy Smith in that film was able to stand on his feet and be heard for a righteous and just cause. A little bit later, I will show an example of a judge we stopped and why it was important to stop her.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let the American people and my colleagues understand. Here is what is important. This should not be about political parties, folks. When Franklin Delano Roosevelt was President--as we all know, a Democrat, considered one of the greatest Presidents ever--he made a huge mistake in his Presidency. He wanted to pack the Supreme Court. He did not like their decisions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;At the time, the Democrat party had 74 seats in the Senate. They could have done it in a heartbeat. All they needed was just a few to peel off, they had it. What did they do? Democrats in those days, colleagues, stood up to the most popular President in history. He had gotten more than 60 percent of the vote. They said: Mr. President, we think you are great, but we are not going to pack the courts just because you feel they are not upholding all of your New Deal. It is not fair. We need a check and balance.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I know young people watching or listening to this debate understand what we are talking about. The checks and balances built into our Constitution--the courts check the legislature and the courts check the executive branch. What my colleagues on the other side of the aisle, save a few, want to do is take away that check and balance, have one party rule. And, oh my goodness, they did not get enough of what they want--208 to 10--and they are throwing a fit and trying to change the rules of the Senate. That is wrong and doing it in a way that is absolutely contrary to what we say has to be done to change the rules, which is 67 votes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, the next thing they will say is there have never been any judge filibusters until the Democrats. We have never done that, say the Republicans, we are so good we have never done it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let me tell the truth, the facts. Who started the filibuster in recent times? The Republicans. In 1968, Abe Fortas, to be Chief Justice of the Supreme Court--Democrats' choice--he did not get the required two-thirds at that time. They need 67 votes of Members supporting Abe Fortas. Republicans started it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;Then we had a filibuster for a while against William Rehnquist, but it was dropped; Stephen Breyer to be judge on the First Circuit Court of Appeals in 1980; Harvie Wilkinson to be judge on the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals in 1984; in 1986, Sydney Fitzwater to be a judge; in 1992, Edward Earl Carnes; in 1994, Lee Sarokin; and in 1999, Brian Theodore Stewart. In 2000, two Californians were filibustered by my Republican friends: Richard Paez and Marsha Berzon. When we hear the Republicans say, we have not been, ever, for a filibuster, just say, you are making it up. They are making it up. Here they admit to a filibuster. Here is Bob Smith, Republican Senator, March 7, 2000:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;
&lt;P dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;... it is no secret that I have been the person who has&amp;nbsp;filibustered these two nominations, Judge Berzon and Judge&amp;nbsp;Paez.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So when the Republicans say there has never been a Republican filibuster, they are making it up. Of course there has been.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By the way, that was their right.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Orrin Hatch:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Indeed, I must confess to being somewhat baffled that,&amp;nbsp;after a filibuster is cut off by cloture, the Senate could&amp;nbsp;still delay a final vote on the nomination.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Senator Orrin Hatch at that time, I believe, was the chairman of the committee.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Again, Senator Bob Smith:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So don't tell me we haven't filibustered judges and that we&amp;nbsp;don't have the right to filibuster judges on the floor of the&amp;nbsp;Senate. Of course we do. That is our constitutional role.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here we have a Republican Senator leading a filibuster against two of President Clinton's nominees and saying the filibuster is the constitutional role, and now we have Republicans saying: We have never, ever been involved in a filibuster.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will talk about one of the nominees the Democrats have filibustered. I need to explain to my colleagues, and hopefully to others, how out of the mainstream some of these folks are who George Bush has nominated. Remember, we stopped 10. This is one of the 10.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Janice Rogers Brown--way outside of the mainstream to the extreme. &lt;BR&gt;This is one of her comments:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Where government moves in, community retreats, civil&amp;nbsp;society disintegrates, and our ability to control our own&amp;nbsp;destiny atrophies. The result is: Families under siege; war&amp;nbsp;in the streets; unapologetic expropriation of property; the&amp;nbsp;precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of&amp;nbsp;corruption; the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is what she thinks of our great Nation because we have a Government that does build the roads, that does help people out when they are in a bad situation, that may come in and say, yes, it is not a good idea to sell cigarettes to a kid who is 13. This is terrible. This is awful.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The "precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The result is a debased, debauched culture which finds&amp;nbsp;moral depravity . . . A virtue.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, I don't know about you, but I think the minimum wage is a part of America. Colleagues could decide they do not want to raise it for a couple of years. Right now, sadly, it hasn't been raised for a very long time, but I think most Americans think we are protected by the minimum wage.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is what she said about the minimum wage, Janice Rogers Brown. I take a minute to say Janice Rogers Brown has served in the California Supreme Court since 1996. Her life story is amazing. It is remarkable. What I don't like is what she is doing to other people's lives. Her story is amazing, but for whatever reason, she is hurting the people of this country, particularly, right now, in my State. Of course, the President wants to move her over to Washington, DC, court.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She calls Supreme Court decisions upholding protections like the minimum wage and the 40-hour workweek ``the triumph of our own socialist revolution.'' I don't know or understand how anybody could think the 40-hour workweek or the minimum wage is socialism. She obviously does. She obviously would overturn it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She accuses senior citizens of--and I hope everyone over the age of 55 will listen to what Janice Rogers Browns thinks of people over 55--she accuses senior citizens of ``blithely cannibalizing their grandchildren because they have a right to get as much free stuff'' as the political system permits them to extract. Free stuff? Is she talking about Social Security? That is not free. People pay into Social Security, and they deserve to get their monthly check. Free stuff. Senior citizens ``blithely cannibalize their grandchildren.'' I resent those comments as a grandmother. I would walk off a bridge for my grandson--and he knows it. I resent her painting of senior citizens.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is why we held her up. That is why she is not sitting on the court today. Now, she may get there if my colleagues have their way. Let them explain why she would rule to overturn the minimum wage and the 40-hour workweek and overturn Social Security. It will be on their backs. We have stopped this woman from going further because of her decisions.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She declares:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Big government is . . . The drug of choice for&amp;nbsp;multinational corporations and single moms, for . . . rugged&amp;nbsp;Midwestern farmers and militants senior citizens.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She is back to that again. What is she afraid of--that some senior citizen will attack her? The crime rate among senior citizens is pretty low. Militant senior citizens? Give me a break. And we get accused of holding up decent people? This goes on.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I will go on with the story of Janice Rogers Brown--way outside the mainstream to the extreme. She argued a law that provided housing assistance to displaced elderly, disabled, and low-income people was unconstitutional. Her dissent said, because the city of San Francisco had a law that helped these disabled, elderly people, she said that "private property . . . is now entirely extinct in San Francisco."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What world does she live in? Has she tried to buy a house in San Francisco? It is the hottest real estate market in the country. But she says private property is entirely extinct. Let her go try to find some private property to buy in San Francisco. This woman is living on another planet, and we were right to stop her from getting on the bench. Whether it takes 60 votes or 51 votes to stop her, we are going to try to stop her.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let's go on with more of her record. How about this? She said that a manager could use racial slurs against his Latino employees. Now, I say to every human being out there: What do we know about the workplace? We know people should feel OK about themselves in the workplace, that we work better together when we respect each other. Janice Rogers Brown said a manager could use racial slurs against his Latino employees--extreme in the main.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She argued that a message sent by an employee to coworkers criticizing a company's employment practices was not protected by the first amendment. In other words, you can't use your e-mail to write anything about your employer to other employees, although she said the corporations can say whatever they want any time of the day.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;You know now why we have stopped Janice Rogers Brown. But we have more reasons, if you are not convinced.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Even when it comes to protecting shareholders, she is not fair. Anyone who owns a share of stock, listen to this one. She argued that a company could not be held liable for stock fraud by its employees who were offered a stock purchase plan since the stock was traded between third parties on the open market. So she comes out against the shareholders and protecting the companies.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is the amazing thing. Let me reiterate about Janice Rogers Brown. She serves on the California Supreme Court. There are six Republicans on the court--she is a Republican--and one Democrat. She dissented more than a third of the time. You would think she would have been happy to be with colleagues of her own party. She stood alone 31 times. And when you hear these cases, you will be amazed at where she stood. In other words, she went against five Republicans and one Democrat 31 times, and stood alone.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Let's check those cases out. How about this one: Rape victims; she was the only member of the court to vote to overturn the conviction of a rapist of a 17-year-old girl because she believed the victim gave mixed messages to the rapist. She stood alone on the side of a rapist, alone as a woman on a court that has six Republicans and one Democrat. Here is another case where she voted alone, the only member of the court to oppose an effort to stop the sale of cigarettes to children. It was a case where the supermarkets didn't want to be responsible. If somebody came up, maybe 13, maybe 12, maybe 11, maybe 14, I want a pack of cigarettes, she ruled against an effort to stop the sale of cigarettes to children. What planet is she living on now? If it was in the 1800s and we didn't know about cigarettes and what they do to you is one thing. But now is another thing. She stood alone.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I talked about senior citizens. I told you she is afraid of militant senior citizens. That is what she calls them. I told you that she said they cannibalize their grandchildren. Well, she was the only member of the court to find that a 60-year-old woman who was fired from her hospital job could not sue. This is the amazing thing she said, as she stood alone in this decision. A 60-year-old woman was fired from her hospital job. She said she has no right to sue based on age discrimination. This is her comment:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;[D]iscrimination based on age does not mark its victims&amp;nbsp;with a stigma of inferiority and second class citizenship.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Really? How do you think you would feel if you were fired because you were too old and suddenly that stigma was attached to you and you lost our livelihood because maybe you had to work at age 60, as you waited for our Social Security check, which is a whole other issue. We hope we win that battle, too. But let me tell you, it makes it hard to win the battle of Social Security if you have on the court someone who calls senior citizens militant. It is going to be tough. That is why we have held her up.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;By the way, her position in this case is contrary to both State and Federal law. This is one of the people we have stopped.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Just think about what we have been trying to protect the American people from. How about this? This is a woman who not only voted with a rapist against a 17-year-old girl, she was the only member of the court who voted to strike down a State antidiscrimination law that provided a contraceptive drug benefit to women. She was the only one. The State of California had required an equal health benefit to women and said: Your insurance will cover contraception because--guess what they decided. They decided it was better to avoid abortion, to cut down abortion, to make abortion rare. So they said they would give a benefit of contraception. She stood alone and tried to strike that down. Imagine.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She has been bad for workers. She was the only member of the court who voted to bar an employee from suing for sexual harassment because she signed a standard worker's compensation release form. Now, all of you probably know what that means. If you go for a job, you are usually covered by workman's compensation. But this woman had signed a waiver and said: I won't file a worker's comp claim. She didn't file a worker's comp claim, but she did file a sexual harassment claim because she was being sexually harassed. Every member of the court stood with the woman who was sexually harassed but Janice Rogers Brown. Six Republicans, one Democrat, and she stood alone again against a worker who was facing sexual harassment. The whole rest of the court agreed with the worker.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She was the only member of the court to find that a disabled worker who was the victim of employment discrimination did not have the right to raise past instances of discrimination that occurred. In other words, there was a disabled worker who filed a lawsuit, had a big story to tell about the past. She was the only judge to say: I don't agree with the worker; I agree with the company.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is another one. Janice Rogers Brown, bad on discrimination, the only member of the court to find that a State fair housing commission could not award certain damages to housing discrimination victims. She stood alone again.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Domestic violence: The Republicans want to put on the court a woman who stood alone 31 times against her fellow Republicans in cases like this--the only member of the court to find that a jury should not hear expert testimony in a domestic violence case about battered women's syndrome. We all know about battered women's syndrome, where a woman is beaten senseless by a boyfriend--in this case, probably a spouse--and later minimizes what he did to her. And the law in our State says it is valid evidence. If she reached out and she did something to prosecute this attacker, an explanation about battered women's syndrome will help her.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;She was the only one who stood alone and said: I don't want to hear any expert testimony on this. She stood alone.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I ask unanimous consent for an additional 30 minutes.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;The PRESIDING OFFICER:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Without objection, it is so ordered.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;Mrs. BOXER:&lt;/STRONG&gt; Here is one. I want us all to remember the Enron case, a case where counties and cities and individuals were ripped off and went into debt--in our State, billions of dollars--by Enron, Enron who said they would deliver electricity and then made believe there was a shortage and jacked up the price billions of dollars. People went bankrupt and counties went bankrupt and the State went in the hole $9 billion. She was the only member of the court to find that a county could not sue a utility company for illegal price fixing that had substantially increased the county's costs for natural gas.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So here she is again hurting consumers, hurting local government, and standing alone in the process.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here she is on a right to a fair trial. This is interesting. The courts have ruled over and over that when a criminal defendant comes into court before there is a verdict of guilt, you can't bring that criminal defendant in in shackles and in a prison uniform because you put in the jury's mind that the person is guilty. So you give the chance to the person to come in dressed as a civilian, then you find out the details and you find them guilty or innocent.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In this case, she was the only member of the court to find nothing improper about requiring a criminal defendant to wear a 50,000-volt stun belt while testifying, the only member of the court. That is how outside the mainstream she is.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we could put back up the 208-to-10 number while I give the rest of my remarks, that would be fine.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What do we have here? We have a circumstance that 10 times out of 218, Democrats believed the President's choices were really harmful to the American people, would really be harmful to them, whether it is their minimum wage, whether it is their 40-hour workweek, whether it is the ability of all of us to protect our kids from cigarettes, whether it is to protect victims of violence, it goes on and on. You have seen just a handful of the cases.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So when somebody says to you: Well, those Democrats, they are blocking everybody--and if you listen to my Republican colleagues, that is what you would think--no, we have blocked 10. We have approved 208. In reality, now the number is 5, but circumstances have changed. I will lean over backwards to be fair and say it is 10. That is 95 percent. In each case of these 10 you will find out why we have done it. It is because these nominees are so outside the mainstream that they will hurt the people we represent.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Why is it important to say that a judge needs to have a 60-vote threshold to end extended debate? It is because it is a lifetime appointment. The President is supposed to work with the Senate before choosing a nominee, which he has not done, not on our side of the aisle. I tried hard with Mr. Gonzales when he was White House counsel. I met with him on numerous occasions, and he said: Senator Boxer, give me some names of Republicans. I gave him so many names of good Republicans for the Ninth Circuit.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I said: Look, these people are mainstream Republicans. They will fly right through here.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;No, they couldn't be bothered with that. I know Senator Feinstein has done the same, given them the names of people who would be quite acceptable. Who do they send us? People such as Janice Rogers Brown, people who are so outside the mainstream that we don't deserve to be here if we don't raise the arguments.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Now, what you are also going to hear is the Republicans have called this the nuclear option. They have renamed it the constitutional option. That is humorous--if you want to find humor in any of this. That is like saying that clock over there is a table. I suppose if I told you that often enough, maybe you would believe me that once upon a time that clock was a table. But the clock is a clock and the nuclear option is the nuclear option. It was named by the Republicans. But it is not popular out there because of the connotation, so they are trying to change it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The ``constitutional option'' is the reverse of the truth. In the Constitution, it says nothing about guaranteeing a vote. It says the Senate shall write its own rules. Well, the Senate wrote its own rules and the Senate said it takes 67 votes to change our rules. Our colleagues don't have 67 votes to change the rules, so they are trying to do this sneaky parliamentary move to change the rules. What a way to govern because you didn't get 100 percent of what you want; you got 95 percent. I don't feel sorry for any President who gets 95 percent of what he wants.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I am telling you, Democratic or Republican Presidents have to work with the Senate and the House and they have to compromise. So it is very important to note that when you hear the Republicans saying all we want is the constitutional option, you say, where in the Constitution does it give you this right? Nowhere.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Then they will say this: Everybody deserves an up-or-down vote. Everybody. I don't know how many times we have given Janice Rogers Brown a vote. We gave Janice Rogers Brown a vote here once, and Priscilla Owen got a vote four times. Yes, the vote required 60 as the threshold to end extended debate, but they got their vote. Now, when you go back to Bill Clinton, 61 times his nominees got stuck in committee; 61 of Bill Clinton's nominees never got to have a cloture vote. They never got a vote. They were pocket-filibustered in committee. We have never done that. Every single Bush nominee who has come to the floor has had their vote. I know of none who have not had a vote. They just didn't meet the 60-vote threshold.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;That is the second thing you are going to hear: All we are asking for is an up-or-down vote. They had that, but they had to meet the 60-vote threshold to end extended debate. Why? Because they are lifetime appointments, we are checking and balancing the power of the executive by saying don't send us people such as Janice Rogers Brown, who is so out of the mainstream. She sees a military uniform on every senior citizen and says senior citizens want to cannibalize their grandchildren. Excuse me? She says there is no private property left in this country. That is outside the mainstream to the extreme.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we Democrats have the courage of our convictions to say no 10 times, give us a little respect; don't try to change the rules in the middle of the night. Do what the Democrats did in the 1930s. Think how good you would feel if you stood up to the President of your own party and said: Mr. President, we will follow you anywhere; we think you are terrific, and we support you in Iraq and on privatizing Social Security, and we support you in your huge deficits; we support you in these trade agreements, we support you this way and that way; but we don't think packing the courts is a good idea. Therefore, we are going to join with the Democrats and say no to this plan. It is very dangerous.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I want people to understand. The point of my discussion here today is to put a human face on these judges. This isn't about just numbers, although the numbers tell a heck of a story. The Republicans get 208 and not 10 and they are crying and doing this in a sneaky way, without getting 67 votes to do it. That alone is wrong. It is not playing fair, it is not the American way, it is not playing by the rules. The American people want to know it. If you want to fight with us, we will have a debate, but stick with the rules. Get your 67 votes so you can have the arrogance of power. Get your 67 votes so you can tread all over us. But don't do it in this sneak attack, challenging the Parliamentarian, and then having the Senator in the chair say, you know what, it is over; no more filibusters on judges.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If you do that, you are hurting the American people. Some people say it is about the traditions of our country, the right to unlimited faith, freedom of speech, ``Mr. Smith Goes to Washington,'' I will stand on my feet, that is my God-given right for my State to do that, and that is all true. But for me personally, as a Senator from the largest State in the Union, with 36 million people, I want to protect them. I want to protect the 17-year-old who got raped and not have her come before Janice Rogers Brown and have her stand alone and rule against her. I want to protect the worker who wrote a little e-mail to another worker and said I don't think the boss is being so fair, what do you think? They said we had 2 weeks vacation and now they are counting that day off as one of those days and it is not right, and have to be before Janice Rogers Brown who says the corporation can write anything they want, but you are too lowly. I don't want to have the American people subjected to a judge such as Janice Rogers Brown, who said any city that helps a disabled elderly person get housing is wrong and is destroying private property. I don't want to have my kids in a circumstance where they have to see their grandmother called a "cannibal." I don't want to have a judge who overturns Social Security, who overturns the minimum wage, who overturns the 40-hour workweek.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The point is, I want to protect the people I represent. So if I don't stand up strongly against a judge such as her, I don't deserve to be here. The people of my State would be upset with me.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;The right I have in this magnificent Senate today is the right of the minority. We have 45 Democrats here and 55 Republicans. I am counting Jim Jeffords as a Democrat for the purpose of discussion because he votes with us. So it is 55-45. Jim Jeffords is an Independent, but he votes with us. By the way, in the recent polls, the Independent voters are for the filibuster; 54 percent are for the filibuster. I want to protect the people I represent, because Janice Rogers Brown has been nominated for the DC Circuit Court, meaning one step below the U.S. Supreme Court. So she is going from the California Supreme Court, where she has dissented in a third of the cases, in a court that has--and you may be interested in this--six Republicans and one Democrat. Janice Rogers Brown has dissented 31 times. This is how out of the mainstream she is. I think it is important to note.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;In the DC Circuit, there is a whole other area of the law that was protested--your right to breathe clean air, your right to drink clean water. This is important for us because environmental laws protect our health, and if we have someone in the court there who doesn't think Government has any right--and she obviously doesn't--to do anything because--what is it she said about Government? If you could put that chart up again. Whenever Government gets involved, this is what she predicts happens. We will show you the quote. Obviously, she doesn't think there is anyplace for Government because she says: ``Where government moves in''--I would say in a circumstance such as the Clean Air Act, where we tell folks you have to make sure the air is kept clean--``community retreats, civil society disintegrates, and our ability to control our own destiny atrophies . . . families are under siege.''&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I don't know what country she is living in. She says: "... unapologetic expropriation of property; the precipitous decline of the rule of law; the rapid rise of corruption, the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit."&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;What an optimist. Why are we promoting someone who has this negative view of America? Doesn't she know this is a government of, by, and for the people? That is what we are about. Do we make mistakes sometimes? Yes. Do we have to make sure we fix our laws so they work better? Yes. But to say whenever Government moves in, community retreats, I wonder what she thought of the highway bill we just passed. She probably thinks it is awful because we take the gas taxes and we build highways, and we build transit systems because we think it is important for economic growth. But she says when Government moves in, community retreats, civil society disintegrates, and the result is families are under siege and there is war in the streets.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;So, yes, I am here to say I did stand up against Janice Rogers Brown, and whether she has to meet a 60-vote threshold, which she has been unable to get, or a 51-vote threshold, I will be fighting against this nominee because she is way out of the mainstream. She walked away from judges in her own political party and stood alone 31 times. That is why we have said to the President: Why don't you talk to us about these nominees? We could have told you this one would have trouble. We would have given you the names of some fine conservative Republicans. But not someone who has this wonderful life story, but has a view of America that is amazing.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Here is what she once said in a speech:&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;BLOCKQUOTE dir=ltr style="MARGIN-RIGHT: 0px"&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Most of us no longer find slavery abhorrent. We embrace it.&amp;nbsp;We demand more. Big Government is not just the opiate of the&amp;nbsp;masses; it is the opiate.&lt;/P&gt;&lt;/BLOCKQUOTE&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Her point is we are slaves to our Government. Well, again, I don't know what country she is living in. We are not slaves to our Government. We run the Government. We get to vote the people we want in and we get to vote them out. If we don't like what they do, we will let them know. She is out of step, calling senior citizens militant, saying they are taking all of the goodies and free stuff. She doesn't like the minimum wage, doesn't like the 40-hour workweek, doesn't like senior citizens. She never protected women. She doesn't protect our children. She doesn't protect our consumers. She doesn't protect our workers. Why do we want someone such as that to get a promotion?&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Therefore, the Democrats have said to the President, through our voice in the Senate: Send us someone else and we will be delighted to work with you. We have worked with you 208 times, Mr. President, and 10 times we said no.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We said you are out of the mainstream, and the response of a 95-percent success record by the Republicans--and a few are not going along with it, and bless them for that--is: We will take away your right, Democrats, to stand up for the things you think are important. We will take away your rights by changing the rules in the middle of the game, by skirting a 67-vote requirement for changing the rules. We will do it.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;There is politics being played. The majority leader talked about this in a speech in a political way, which was wrong. He has not agreed to a compromise. Senator Reid has offered several. The fact is, people have to know what is at stake.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I hope everyone within the sound of my voice will know the reason why Democrats have stood so firmly against the nomination of Janice Rogers Brown. It is because we care about the people we represent, and we care about mainstream judges, and we do not want to see such a radical individual get this position and begin to whittle away at the rights our people have won, at the fairness our people have won.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;This is very important. This vote is going to change the Senate forever. But more than that, it will impact the lives of the people. Changing the Senate, changing tradition, changing the role of the minority to make a difference, to be heard, freedom of speech--these are all important. But at the end of the day, it is about our kids, our grandkids, our seniors, our families, our workers, the air we breathe and the water we drink, and this is all connected to the judges. This is not disconnected. This is the brilliance of our Founders who said the judicial branch, the judges, shall make sure that everything we do in the legislative branch and in the executive branch is constitutional, is right, is reasoned.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;If we have people on the bench who believe that anything we do disintegrates our family; that anything we do, such as the highway bill, for example, turns into an expropriation of property and the rapid rise of corruption and the loss of civility and the triumph of deceit--this belongs somewhere else, not in the courts.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;Mr. President, I thank you for your patience. I thank my staff who has done an extraordinary job for me in analyzing these decisions. This is not easy to do because you have to go line by line. I know the Presiding Officer knows these cases can be very long and confusing. My staff are attorneys. They are also very smart attorneys, and they were able to get to the point of these cases and bring home this message to people that when we fight against 10 judges out of 218, it is for a reason. It is not because we want to be difficult. It is because we believe when the Constitution says the Senate has the right to advise and consent on judges, it does not mean when the President feels like it. It does not mean between the hours of 11 and 1 on Wednesday. It means every time he sends a nomination to us, he should have, in fact, sought the advice and consent of the Senate.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;We have a big debate coming up tomorrow. I just wanted to give a little reality check so people understand for what we have been fighting.&lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;I thank the Chair.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0015</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer's hold another hitch in Bolton vote</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 14 May 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0009</link>
    <description>&lt;STRONG&gt;Senator seeks access to papers, calls White House uncooperative&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Edward Epstein&lt;BR&gt;San Francisco Chronicle&lt;/EM&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer of California has erected a roadblock against John Bolton, President Bush's embattled nominee for U.N. ambassador, in a fight with the administration over access to documents. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer said Friday she would lift her hold on the nomination if the administration provided the additional information she was seeking. Boxer took her action to slow Bolton's nomination after the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on Thursday sent Bolton's name to the full Senate without a recommendation. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The move by Boxer is the latest twist in a nomination battle that has become increasingly bitter. Democrats say Bolton -- a State Department official who has long been an outspoken critic of the United Nations -- is arrogant and undiplomatic and has tried to force intelligence analysts to twist their findings to suit his preconceived conclusions. Republican supporters say Bolton is just what the United States needs at the U.N., a diplomat who will force changes in an organization hamstrung by waste, corruption and an inability to take decisive action. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"I said at the committee meeting that I was going to do everything I could to get the information I've asked for, and I did,'' Boxer said Friday in an interview. "It's a way to bring attention to this matter.'' &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer's move, which the Republican Senate majority could overturn by getting 51 votes in favor of a motion to proceed despite her hold, could further raise the partisan temperature in a body already fighting over Republican efforts to curb the Democratic minority's power to filibuster Bush's judicial nominees. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer and the other Democrats on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee said the Bush administration had failed to turn over documents in three areas: notes and drafts of a Bolton speech on Syria's military capabilities, private business records of Bolton's assistant Mathew Friedman and information from the National Security Agency and other spy services about whether Bolton tried to get the names of American officials whose communications were intercepted. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"These records may show something, or nothing,'' Boxer said. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer said Secretary of State Condoleezza Rice and the White House have promised complete cooperation with the committee, but so far they haven't delivered. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Bush spokesman Scott McClellan again said Friday that the administration had cooperated with the Senate. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"The administration has been very responsive to the needs of the Senate, to make sure that they have the information they need to do their job,'' said McClellan. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;McClellan accused Boxer of playing politics with the nomination. "I think that this is more just a delaying tactic just to try to draw this out," he said. "The Senate needs to move forward on this nomination, so that (Bolton) can get in there and get about the important work that needs to be done. And I would hope that Democrats wouldn't try to play politics with this nomination.'' &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If the Democrats don't get the information they want in the Bolton matter, they could try to filibuster the nomination. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;State Department spokesman Richard Boucher said that while the department had tried to comply with the Democrats' requests, "there are certain kinds of requests that we don't feel comfortable producing, because of the chilling effect on deliberative materials, materials exchanged within this department at lower levels in particular that relate to how people commented or thought or worked on various pieces of a speech or a statement.'' &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"We don't think anything further is required before a floor vote,'' Boucher added. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer said McClellan's statement wasn't true. "How do they say they gave us everything when our request for more information is still outstanding? Just because you say something doesn't make it true,'' she said. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;If Republicans try to bring the nomination to the floor without reaching a settlement with Boxer and the committee's ranking Democrat, Sen. Joe Biden of Delaware, Boxer could tie up the Senate by demanding endless procedural votes. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Holds on nominations aren't that rare. In April, Boxer briefly put a hold on the president's nomination of Stephen Johnson as head of the Environmental Protection Agency because of an EPA program in Florida that paid families up to $1,000 to track their infant children's exposure to pesticides. She dropped the hold after Johnson, who subsequently was confirmed, said the program would end. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;When President Bill Clinton was in office, Sen. Jesse Helms, R-N.C., blocked several nominations for State Department posts. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;So far, the Democrats have failed to kill Bolton's nomination. But they were heartened by Republican Sen. George Voinovich's pointed comments at Thursday's committee vote. The Ohio Republican tore into Bolton's record and demeanor and said that while he would allow the nomination to go to the full Senate, he would vote against him on the floor. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"I don't know if the Republicans have the votes to confirm him,'' Boxer said. "A lot of colleagues say they're open on this and want to see all the information.'' &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer's move is the latest high-profile jab she has thrown at the Bush administration since she was re-elected last November to a third six-year term. In January, she held up Bush's formal re-election by a joint meeting of Congress for several hours when she objected to certifying the disputed election results from Ohio. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Later in January, she tangled with Rice at the secretary of state's Foreign Relations Committee confirmation hearing, and in April she sparred with Johnson. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer said she wasn't going out of her way to take a more confrontational approach as Bush launched his second term. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"I haven't changed at all," she said. "These issues just cry out for attention. It's my job. It's what I get paid to do.'' &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/05/14/MNGE8CP85U1.DTL" target=_blank&gt;http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cgi?file=/chronicle/archive/2005/05/14/MNGE8CP85U1.DTL&lt;/A&gt; </description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0009</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Democrat puts 'hold' on Bolton nomination to UN</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0001</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;AFP News Article&lt;/em&gt;&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;WASHINGTON&amp;nbsp;-- A Democratic senator placed a 'hold' on the
nomination of John Bolton as US ambassador to the United Nations, in a
fresh bid to derail efforts to appoint him to the position.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Senator Barbara Boxer "put a hold on the nomination" late Thursday afternoon, said Boxer's spokeswoman Natalie Ravitz.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The
announcement came after a Senate panel took the rare step Thursday of
refusing to endorse Bolton, President George W. Bush's nominee for US
ambassador to the United Nations, but nevertheless sent the nomination
to the full Senate for confirmation.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bolton's nomination
apparently was saved by a deal in which several Republicans agreed to
forward his nomination for the UN post, but refrained from giving him
their explicit backing.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The move was a blow to the White House,
which had hoped that Bolton would receive the seal of approval of the
committee's 10 Republicans, whose backing would have improved his odds
for success in the full Senate.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In placing the hold on the
nomination, Boxer seeks to prevent the issue reaching the Senate floor.
The move could be used to negotiate, or perhaps ultimately as a barrier
to the nomination.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Ravitz did not specify how long the measure might be used to hold up the nomination process.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050513/pl_afp/usunboltoncongress_050513055225" target="_blank"&gt;http://news.yahoo.com/s/afp/20050513/pl_afp/usunboltoncongress_050513055225&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0001</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Democrats move to slow action on Bolton</title>
    <pubDate>Fri, 13 May 2005 00:00:00 -0700</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0003</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Barry Schweid&lt;br&gt;Salon.com&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Democrats opposed to
the appointment of John R. Bolton as U.N. ambassador said Friday they
will slow down the Senate's consideration of the embattled nominee as
they try to build their case against him.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer,
D-Calif., said Friday that she will use procedural delays as they
continue seeking information about Bolton from the State Department and
other agencies. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"It is not fair to bring this nomination to
the floor for debate and a vote until all the information has been
delivered," Boxer said in an interview. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said Democrats
want information on whether President Bush's choice for ambassador
sought the names of U.S. officials whose communications were
intercepted by U.S. intelligence. They also want details on the private
business activities of a Bolton assistant, Mathew Friedman, and on
Bolton's speeches on Syria. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The Foreign Relations Committee
voted 10-8 Thursday to send Bolton's nomination to the full Senate
without an endorsement. Usually, Senate committees endorse the
nominations they approve. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer notified Sen. Joseph Biden,
D-Del., who is leading the fight against Bolton, that she was putting a
"hold" on the nomination. That means she will force numerous procedural
votes before the Senate can even begin debating the nomination. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Asked
to assess Bolton's chances of being confirmed, Boxer said: "I think we
can definitely beat John Bolton because, I think, the American people
are going to weigh in and make their views known." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She said
she would halt the procedural delays when Democrats receive the
requested information. But, she said, "all options are on the table,
including a filibuster." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A filibuster is a parliamentary delay that can kill a nomination unless 60 of the 100 senators vote to move ahead. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Republicans
have a 55-44 Senate majority, plus one Democratic-leaning independent.
Democrats hope to gain support from enough Republicans to defeat the
nomination, though that is expected to be difficult. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;One of
the 55 Republicans, George Voinovich of Ohio, kept the committee from
recommending approval of Bolton and said he would vote against
confirmation. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Even so, the White House assumed a positive stance on Bolton's chances. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We
believe there is a majority of the Senate that agrees with the
president that John Bolton is exactly the person we need at the United
Nations during this critical time of reform," spokesman Scott McClellan
said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;At a minimum, in playing for delay, the Democrats are
making the White House squirm while renewing accusations that Bolton
was overly aggressive as the State Department's top arms-control
official, pushing his views and trying to damage the careers of
officials who disagreed with him. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Biden, the leader of the fight against Bolton, suggested Bush "would be better served by bringing the nomination down." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"It does not appear that Mr. Bolton has the confidence of a majority of the members of the Senate," Biden said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If
Bolton survives the bruising Senate fight, he will take with him to New
York the scorching criticism of Democratic senators, the doubts of
Voinovich and criticism even from Sen. Richard Lugar, R-Ind., who is
managing the nomination. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"His blunt style alienated some colleagues," Lugar acknowledged. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., called Bolton "a loose cannon." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Voinovich's
doubts helped delay the vote for more than three weeks. In an
impassioned and conflicted statement that electrified the committee's 5
1/2-hour meeting, he questioned the impact on the United Nations of
naming an ambassador "who himself has been accused of being arrogant,
of not listening to his friends, of acting unilaterally and of bullying
those who do not have ability to properly defend themselves." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"These are the very characteristics that we are trying to dispel," Voinovich said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Lugar,
taking a contrary tack, said if Bolton goes to the United Nations and
helps achieve reform, the U.N. will gain in credibility, especially
among the American people. "Secretary Bolton has become closely
associated with the United States' efforts to reform the U.N.," the
chairman said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bush, aware of Voinovich's reservations,
telephoned him Wednesday, a day before the vote. McClellan said Friday
he was the only senator the president called. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Voinovich, in
laying out a case against Bolton, called the nominee "the poster-child
of what someone in the diplomatic corps should not be." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yet,
Voinovich said Bolton should be commended for his achievements. The
senator cited Bolton's work in countering anti-Semitism, on a treaty to
reduce stockpiles of U.S. and Russian nuclear weapons, and on a U.S.
program designed to curb the spread of weapons technology. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;After
weeks of deliberation by the committee, interviews with 29 past and
present U.S. officials and examining thousands of pages of documents,
"I have come to the conclusion that the United States can do better
than John Bolton," he said in a low voice. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then Voinovich
hesitated, put his prepared statement aside, and changed course enough
to keep the nomination alive and possibly ensure its approval by the
full Senate. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Mr. Chairman," he said, "I am not so arrogant to
think that I should impose my judgment and perspective of the U.S.
position in the world community on the rest of my colleagues. We owe it
to the president to give Mr. Bolton an up-or-down vote on the floor of
the U.S. Senate." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The committee, he said, should move it along
but without a recommendation to approve Bolton. "Let the Senate work
its will," he said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2005/05/13/bolton/" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.salon.com/news/wire/2005/05/13/bolton/&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0003</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Barbara Boxer: Rice Hearings and the 2004 Vote</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 10 Feb 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0011</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;Fresh Air from WHYY&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer (D-CA)
recently made headlines with her tough questioning of Condoleezza Rice
during her confirmation hearings for Secretary of State. Boxer was also
the only senator to object to the certification of Ohio's electoral
votes, bringing about a two-hour debate on the matter.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4493675" target="_blank"&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Listen to Barbara's interview with Terri Gross here (34 minutes).&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0011</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer's Bout with Rice Draws Notice</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0012</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;All Things Considered&lt;br&gt;National Public Radio&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Sen.
Barbara Boxer (D-CA) had tough questions for Secretary of State
Condoleezza Rice during confirmation hearings for the post. She says
she will continue to speak out when she believes something is wrong.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;strong&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.npr.org/templates/story/story.php?storyId=4471105" target="_blank"&gt;Listen to the January 29th broadcast of&amp;nbsp;&lt;em&gt;All Things Considered&lt;/em&gt; here.&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0012</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Sen. Barbara Boxer Steps Into Spotlight</title>
    <pubDate>Sat, 29 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0004</link>
    <description>
&lt;strong&gt;Sen. Barbara Boxer, Loudspeaker for the Left, Steps Into Spotlight; Blogs Pick Her for President&lt;/strong&gt; &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;em&gt;By Erica Werner&lt;br&gt;Associated Press&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Sen.
Barbara Boxer has always spoken up, but the California Democrat seems
to have gotten a lot louder lately. Her opposition to Condoleezza
Rice's secretary of state nomination was so combative that it was
parodied on Saturday Night Live. That came on the heels of her decision
to sign onto a House member's complaint about Ohio voting problems,
forcing Congress to debate them before certifying President Bush's
re-election victory. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She's being touted on liberal blogs as
the Democrats' best hope for president in 2008. Conservatives are
excoriating her as in House Minority Leader Tom DeLay's phrase the
leader of the "'X-Files' wing" of the Democratic Party. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Boxer says she is just standing up for what she believes. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I've
always been this way," she says, "and I'm trying to figure out exactly
why people suddenly find this to be interesting, you know. Somehow I
have touched something inside people, and I have not ever had this
happen before. The only thing I can think, after reading what people
said, is a feeling that I'm asking the kind of questions and saying the
kind of things that they are feeling."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe she's becoming a
spokeswoman, or even a symbol, for voters who oppose the Iraq war or
feel shut out by the Bush administration. Maybe, with the Democratic
Party at sea after November's election losses, some people sense a
leadership void and are looking to her to fill it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Maybe it's
not that Boxer's gotten louder but that other Democrats can barely be
heard at all. At least, that's what some of her supporters are saying. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Whatever
the explanation, Boxer, 64, has never been more in the spotlight. At a
time when Republican dominance of Washington politics is nearly
complete, a Marin County liberal who drives a hybrid car and opposes
almost everything the GOP does has become a newly prominent face of the
Democratic Party. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"She seems to be assuming the position of
being an outspoken voice for, as someone else said, the Democratic wing
of the Democratic Party," says Los Angeles Democratic strategist Darry
Sragow, echoing a phrase adopted by former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"In
the wake of the losses in November ... there is a vacuum, there's
handwringing, there's self-reflection, and she seems to have pretty
sure footing as a determined, committed spokesperson for the liberals
in the party," Sragow says. "Part of the handwringing will be over
whether that's a good thing or a bad thing." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barely five feet
tall, Boxer must stand on a box which she sometimes refers to as "the
Boxer Box" to see over the podium at press conferences. Fond of gold
jewelry and colorful, occasionally mismatched outfits, she's energetic
and aggressive, given to dressing down government officials at
hearings, especially when reporters are within earshot. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;That
rankles Republicans, who say she's more show horse than work horse in
the Senate. But sometimes, she can make even fellow Democrats squirm. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In
the ongoing Democratic debate about how to effectively oppose the
Republicans, Boxer represents a solution not everyone can embrace: She
simply opposes, often without bothering to compromise. To some, she's
too extreme and risks alienating moderate voters without producing
legislative results. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska, perhaps the
most conservative Senate Democrat, is diplomatic in describing Boxer's
role in the party: "You don't get a center if you don't get a left or
right." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Sen. Mark Dayton of Minnesota, a fellow liberal who
stood with Boxer in opposing Rice, criticized her on the Senate floor
over her decision to bring the November election certification to a
halt. He called it "seriously misguided." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But the combative qualities that turn some people off endear her to others. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Democrats
are so afraid of being criticized, or so afraid that they'll be accused
of being too liberal, that they don't really act with the courage of
their convictions. And then comes Barbara Boxer," says Madeleine Begun
Kane, a writer from Queens, N.Y., who created a "President Boxer" blog.
"She's been a shining light during an otherwise very depressing
period." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;For the record, Boxer says she has no interest in
running for president. But she's gratified by the blogs and the Boxer
for President bumper stickers selling for $3.95 on the Internet. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;If she did ever want to try for president, she could point to some compelling evidence of electability. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In
winning her third Senate term in November, Boxer was the nation's
third-highest vote-getter, behind only Bush and Democratic presidential
nominee John Kerry. She squashed Republican opponent Bill Jones by 20
percentage points, scoring a bigger share of the electorate than Dianne
Feinstein, the state's other Democratic senator, got in her last
election. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since she left the House to run for Senate,
Republicans have targeted Boxer as too liberal for California. She had
tough races in 1992, when she beat a conservative television
commentator by 5 percentage points, and 1998, when she defeated a
former state treasurer by 10. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Republicans talked tough about
taking her on in 2004 as well, but in the end they hardly even tried.
Jones, a social conservative and former California secretary of state,
was endorsed by Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger; but he ran a weak campaign
and never raised enough money to air a single television commercial. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"It's
impossible for my opponents to say, 'Well she just squeaked by, she
doesn't really represent a lot of people, she's a fluke.'" Boxer says.
"Which is what they said the first two times." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Since Boxer and
Feinstein joined the Senate in 1992's Year of the Woman, Feinstein has
been the more prominent. Although they have cooperated on initiatives
and vote together more often than not, they do not have a close
relationship and part ways on some issues, including the Iraq war and
the Rice nomination. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Republicans say they can work with
Feinstein. Her advice and endorsement are courted by Schwarzenegger and
others on issues while Boxer, whom they generally despise, is left on
the sidelines. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I don't think attack dogs are ever useful,"
said Rep. Darrell Issa, R-Calif., who lost a 1998 GOP primary election
for the chance to run against Boxer. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But lately it's been
Boxer in the headlines, sought out by reporters from The New York Times
and Rolling Stone, and parodied on SNL. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In the skit that aired
Jan. 22, Boxer, as portrayed by actress Amy Poehler, used a series of
props to interrogate Rice among them a packet of baloney, a poster of
the number zero (representing weapons of mass destruction found in
Iraq), and a bar graph with one barely visible bar ("the truth") and
another bar stretching the length of the chart ("what you say"). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer,
who did arm herself with several enlarged maps and quotations during
Rice's confirmation hearing, loved the skit. "They really nailed me,"
she says. "It was the funniest thing I've ever seen." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Leading
the charge for the opposition isn't new for Boxer. As a Brooklyn
newlywed, she once organized fellow apartment building tenants to
petition for carpeting. As a House member in 1991, she led fellow
congresswomen up the steps of the Senate to demand hearings into Anita
Hill's sexual harassment claims against Clarence Thomas. She led recent
opposition to drilling in the Arctic National Wildlife Refuge
(successfully), and against the ban on what opponents call partial
birth abortion (unsuccessfully). &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Some Republicans have
suggested that Boxer should have accepted Bush's re-election victory as
a sign of acceptance for his secretary of state nominee, and kept her
mouth shut on the Rice nomination. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;She's in no danger of doing that on any issue. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Bush
got 60 million votes plus and Kerry got 57 million votes plus, so you
can't say it isn't a sizable portion of the country that doesn't
deserve to be heard," Boxer said. "They do deserve to be heard; and
even if they are far left, they deserve to be heard."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=453853" target="_blank"&gt;http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/wireStory?id=453853&lt;/a&gt; </description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0004</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Thank you so much</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0014</link>
    <description>&lt;EM&gt;Senator Boxer's blog post on DailyKos.com&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;I can't thank all of you enough -- the Daily Kos community, and the blogosphere as a whole -- for all of your effective work during the recent debate over Condoleezza Rice's nomination. Your support and participation in this critical debate meant so much to me. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;More than 94,000 Americans from across the country signed my petition and stood together to demand the truth from Condoleezza Rice. It was truly an overwhelming response -- much more than I could have anticipated. You helped to get our message out to millions of Americans -- I couldn't have done it without you. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;And you made a difference.&lt;/STRONG&gt; You gave me the voice I needed to ask the tough questions during Dr. Rice's confirmation hearings. And you gave the entire United States Senate the voice it needed to take its "advice and consent" responsibility seriously. In fact, Condoleezza Rice received 13 votes against her confirmation -- the most votes against any Secretary of State's nomination since 1825. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/1/27/124226/410" target=_blank&gt;Read Senator Boxer's full post -- and the DailyKos community's responses here.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt; </description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0014</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer Rebellion Spreads</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0006</link>
    <description>
&lt;p&gt;&lt;em&gt;By John Nichols&lt;br&gt;The Nation&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Give Barbara Boxer
credit for sparking the most engaged debate that the Senate has yet
seen over the Bush Administration lies that led the United States into
the quagmire that is Iraq. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer, the California Democrat who
has been increasingly vocal in her objections to the Administration's
reign of error and excess, seized the opening provided by President
Bush's nomination of Condoleezza Rice to serve as Secretary of State to
try and force a necessary discussion about the misstatements,
misconceptions and misdeeds that Rice and others in the Administration
used to make the "case" for the invasion and occupation of Iraq. And,
to the surprise even of some war foes, she got it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Yes, of
course, Rice's confirmation was certain. In a Senate where the balance
is now tipped 55-45 toward a Republican caucus that for the most part
puts party loyalty above duty to country, and where there are still too
many Democrats who continue to preach the failed
"can't-we-all-just-get-along" mantra that has relegated the party to
minority status, there was never any chance that the national security
advisor's record of failure and deception would prevent her from taking
charge of the State Department. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But Rice's road to Foggy
Bottom proved to be far rockier than had been expected. Tuesday's
Senate debate on her nomination was one of the most charged that the
chamber has seen in recent years, and while Rice survived, she did not
finish the day unscathed. Senator after Senator rose to recall what
Senator Edward Kennedy, D-Massachusetts, described as Rice's "false
reasons" for going to war, and to charge, as Kennedy did, that had Rice
told the truth "it might have changed the course of history." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Though
he and others were eloquent in their critique of Rice on Tuesday, the
person who changed the course of history with regard to the debate over
the Bush Administration's nominee for Secretary of State was not
Kennedy, nor West Virginia's Robert Byrd, nor any of the other more
senior senators who ripped Rice. Rather, it was Barbara Boxer, the
diligent if not always prominent senator from the Golden State. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When
Rice appeared on January 18 before the Senate Foreign Relations
Committee on which Boxer sits, it was the California Senator who did
the heavy lifting. She began by announcing that, "I will...not shrink
from questioning a war that was not built on truth." And she then
detailed the role that Rice played in creating the foundation of lies
for the war. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Perhaps the most well known statement you have
made was the one about Saddam Hussein launching a nuclear weapon on
America, with the image of a 'mushroom cloud.' That image had to
frighten every American into believing that Saddam Hussein was on the
verge of annihilating them if he was not stopped," said Boxer, who then
announced that, "I will be placing into the record a number of other
such statements which have not been consistent with the facts nor the
truth." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Then Boxer hammered home the point that really mattered: That when Rice and her team lied, people died. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"This
war was sold to the American people--as Chief of Staff to President
Bush Andy Card said--like a 'new product.' You rolled out the idea and
then you had to convince the people, and as you made your case, I
personally believe that your loyalty to the mission you were given
overwhelmed your respect for the truth," Bixer calmly declared. "That
was a great disservice to the American people. But worse than that, our
young men and women are dying. So far, 1,366 American troops have been
killed in Iraq. More than 25 percent of those troops were from
California. More than 10,372 have been wounded." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;When Boxer
read out the statistics, it was a devastating moment -- and a rare one.
Seldom do Senators accuse prospective Cabinet members of lying. Rice
knew she was taking a harder hit than anyone had expected. The nominee
tried to get the upper hand with classic Washington spin. "Senator,"
Rice whined, "I have never, ever lost respect for the truth in the
service of anything. It's not in my nature. It's not in my character.
And I would hope we could have this conversation...without impugning my
credibility or my integrity." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Rice's problem was that her
credibility and integrity had been impugned--not by Boxer but by the
nominee herself. All Boxer did was bring Rice's deceptions to light
and, perhaps most significantly, to link them to the continuing crisis
in Iraq. In so doing, she shamed a number of her fellow Democrats into
joining her in opposition not just to Rice but to the Administration's
entire approach to the war. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Tuesday's Senate debate was
distinguished by the bluntness of the criticism of Rice's record. "She
exaggerated and distorted the facts," said Michigan's Carl Levin, the
ranking Democrat on the Senate Armed Services Committee. Minnesota
Democrat Mark Dayton announced that he was opposing Rice's nomination
in order to hold the Administration accountable for its lies. "I don't
like impugning anyone's integrity," Dayton said. "But I really don't
like being lied to--repeatedly, flagrantly, intentionally." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"My vote against this nominee is my statement that this administration's lies must stop now," the Minnesotan explained. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Other senators were equally pointed in their condemnations of the nominee. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Dr.
Rice is responsible for some of the most overblown rhetoric that the
administration used to scare the American people," thundered West
Virginia's Byrd, who argued that, "Her confirmation will most certainly
be viewed as another endorsement of the administration's
unconstitutional doctrine of preemptive war, its bullying policies of
unilateralism, and its callous rejection of long-standing allies." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Byrd
remarks were, as always, historically rich and intellectually powerful.
But the dean of the Senate did not hesitate to give credit where credit
was due. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Recalling the Senate Foreign Relations Committee
session at which his colleague from California had grilled Rice, the
senior Senator said, "I was particularly impressed by Senator Boxer,
who tackled her role on the committee with passion and
forthrightness..." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Expressing his dismay with Republicans who
have accused Senate Democrats of engaging in "petty politics" by
demanding a debate on Rice's nomination, Byrd argued that, "Nothing
could be further from the truth. The Senate's role of advice and
consent to presidential nominations is not a ceremonial exercise." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Byrd
was right to assert that the Senate's constitutionally dictated "advice
and consent" duty "is not a function of pomp and circumstance" and that
senators must never "acquiesce mutely to the nomination of one of the
most important members of the President's Cabinet." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;He was
equally right to recognize the critical role that Boxer played in
assuring that so many Democratic senators recognized their
responsibility to assume that the consideration of Rice's nomination
was something more that "a ceremonial exercise." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&amp;amp;pid=2148"&gt;http://www.thenation.com/blogs/thebeat?bid=1&amp;amp;pid=2148&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0006</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer takes center stage</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0007</link>
    <description>
&lt;em&gt;By David Whitney&lt;br&gt;The Sacramento Bee&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/em&gt;Just a few weeks into the new congressional session, many are beginning to wonder aloud: "What's up with Barbara Boxer?" &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The
first week of the session, Boxer led the Senate challenge over
certification of the Ohio presidential vote, citing irregularities.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In
the end, it was she alone standing against certification, with 74 of
her colleagues -- including Sen. Ted Kennedy of Massachusetts, Sen.
Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York and 33 other Democrats&amp;nbsp;--
favoring the count. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;And last week, Boxer was all over
Condoleezza Rice at her confirmation hearing to be President Bush's new
secretary of state. Boxer all but called Rice a liar over her
statements leading up to the war in Iraq as Bush's national security
adviser. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Repeatedly, Rice appealed to Boxer to turn down the attacks. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"We
can have this discussion in any way that you would like," Rice said.
"But I really hope that you will refrain from impugning my integrity." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer
never relented, and she and Sen. John Kerry of Massachusetts, the
Democrats' nominee against Bush in November, cast the only votes
against sending Rice's nomination to the Senate floor. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer said in an interview last week that she is not the new diva of demagoguery. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I was just doing my job, like I've always done it before," she said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But rarely has Boxer made so many headlines so quickly in a congressional session and in fights against such overwhelming odds. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Many
see in this a skilled politician, freed however temporarily from
election worries of her own, rising up as the leading voice of
Democrats who believe Bush should be challenged in every step of his
second term as president. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer was elected in November with
57.8 percent of the vote, collecting a million more votes than
Democratic Sen. Dianne Feinstein garnered in her 2000 re-election as
the state's senior senator. Boxer's office said the 6.9 million votes
she received are the most any senator in any state has ever received. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Boxer is now gaining steadily as the voice of unyielding Democratic opposition. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"This
allows Barbara Boxer to carve out a forum for herself among the
liberals in the Senate," said Claremont College political scientist
Sherry Bebitch Jeffe. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"Could she be positioning herself to
become what Ted Kennedy is now _ the voice of the liberal wing within
the Democratic Party?" she asked. "She's got a lot of time. She's got
six more years to develop that." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Bruce Cain, head of the
Institute for Government Studies at the University of California,
Berkeley, said California Democrats have a tremendous appetite for what
Boxer has to offer on the national stage. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"There are a lot of
Democrats who think Ohio was a fraud," he said. "There is no scientific
evidence for it as far as we can tell, but they just believe it in
their hearts. We've seen that these people have money, and they get
organized, and so you can't just ignore the progressive wing of the
party." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;This is a role for which Boxer is well suited and
which she has played many times before, Cain said. But that part of the
Boxer persona has not been in evidence in recent years because of the
demands of electoral politics. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"After her initial election (in
1992), there was a lot of speculation about whether she would be a
one-shot senator," he said. But Cain said that by steering clear of
major controversies, particularly in the last couple of years, "she
wasn't giving Republicans anything to run against." &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Indeed,
since the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks on New York City and
Washington, Boxer was a strong voice for improving national security
and intelligence gathering. She has been a leading advocate for
equipping civilian aircraft to defeat shoulder-fired missiles and voted
for the Patriot Act. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Barbara Sinclair, a political scientist
at the University of California, Los Angeles, said that as long as the
Democratic Party dominates in California elections, Boxer is well
suited to serve as the political counterpoint for a huge slice of them.
&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"There is a sense among a lot of Democrats that it is very important not to give Bush a free ride, at any point," she said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;In
the interview, Boxer said she doesn't believe her November election
margin changes anything, except to give her another Senate term that,
as it happens, won't end until two years after Bush is out of office. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"I don't believe in mandates," she said. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;"But
what I do believe in is keeping promises to the people," she said. "I
told them election night&amp;nbsp;-- and I didn't know how prophetic this
was&amp;nbsp;-- that if I had to stand alone, I will do it. I am not
afraid."&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;a href="http://www.sacbee.com/24hour/opinions/story/2042590p-10093565c.html" target="_blank"&gt;http://www.sacbee.com/24hour/opinions/story/2042590p-10093565c.html&lt;/a&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0007</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer the new Wellstone</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0013</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;Markos Moulitsas Zuniga&lt;BR&gt;DailyKos.com&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;Is there any doubt that Barbara Boxer is moving aggressively to fill the void left behind by Wellstone's tragic death? It's as if her easy reelection victory (she got the most votes of anyone in 2004 not named Bush or Kerry) gave her the confidence to be more aggressive. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Her protest of the Ohio electoral votes and her grilling of Condi Rice gave her instant visibility. She granted an interview to our very own Armando and DavidNYC, showing that her communication people were stepping up their outreach efforts. Her PAC has become more aggressive, using Blogads and viral marketing to garner petition signatures opposing Rice. &lt;/P&gt;
&lt;P&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.dailykos.com/story/2005/1/25/135942/557" target=_blank&gt;Read more of Kos's January 25, 2005 blog post here.&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/STRONG&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0013</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Senator Boxer packs a mean, partisan punch</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 25 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0008</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Peter S. Canellos&lt;BR&gt;Boston Globe&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;Two Washington rituals occurred last week -- the presidential inauguration and the confirmation hearings of a high-profile nominee. Like solidly constructed plays, these D.C. dramas offer predictable thrills. But they are worth watching to see any new wrinkles the players can bring to their roles.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;President Bush's manifesto of an inaugural address, calling for freedom with more repetition than Aretha Franklin, dominated the pageantry of Inauguration Day. Earlier in the week, the Senate Foreign Relations Committee hearings into Condoleezza Rice's nomination as secretary of state were marked by the sharp confrontation between Rice and Democrat Barbara Boxer of California, who seemed to take the whole committee by surprise with her forceful questioning.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer's was the strongest voice in hearings that are usually dominated by the committee's long-serving foreign-policy grandees -- such as the Republican chairman, Richard G. Lugar of Indiana; ranking Democrat, Joseph R. Biden Jr. of Delaware; and Democrat John F. Kerry of Massachusetts. Boxer served notice that, having just been elected to a third term with her highest percentage so far, she is eager to fill the role of the Senate's most outspoken Democratic partisan.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The fact that the new Democratic bullhorn hails from California -- rather than Massachusetts, New York, or some other corner of the Northeast -- signals just how much the Golden State has changed since the '70s and '80s, when it was often Republican territory. Bush's values-based conservatism may have solidified his party's base in the South and Sunbelt, but it handed the biggest state to the Democrats.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer began her term by offering to be the first senator to refuse to ratify the results of the Electoral College and force a debate on the presidential election. In 2001, Democrats in the House could not get a Senate sponsor to open debate on the 2000 election -- a scene dramatized in Michael Moore's documentary "Fahrenheit 9/11." This year, Boxer's vote to open up debate made her vilified as an ally of Moore, whose tactics many critics viewed as unfair.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;But Boxer seemed unbothered, explaining she only wanted to give voice to those complaining about a lack of voting machines in urban areas of Ohio. And immediately afterward, she began setting her sights on the Rice nomination.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Rice, of course, is one of the Bush administration's stars. She is fluid and telegenic, and aware that Senate hearings are usually a performance for viewers at home, rather than an exercise in fact-gathering. So when Kerry introduced the subject of the fruitless six-nation talks on North Korean disarmament, Rice offered a perky reiteration of the aims of the process ("It has the advantage of having the parties in the region work together on a serious security problem . . ."), rather than discuss ways to curb North Korea's nuclear ambitions.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Kerry did not let her off the hook, but much of his questioning -- like that of Biden, who might have been secretary of state if Kerry were president -- came in the form of a foreign-policy tutorial. Conveying both disagreement with the administration and awareness of the complexities of America's challenges, the two senators sometimes seemed to be talking to themselves more than to Rice. They came off like members of the tenure committee at an out-of-the-way college.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer was on the attack from her opening statement, accusing Rice of misleading the country into war and then fecklessly blaming the CIA.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"I . . . will not shrink from questioning a war that was not built on the truth," Boxer declared. "Now, perhaps the most well-known statement you've made was the one about Saddam Hussein launching a nuclear weapon on America with the image of quote, quoting you, 'a mushroom cloud.' That image had to frighten every American into believing that Saddam Hussein was on the verge of annihilating them if he was not stopped. And I will be placing into the record a number of such statements you made, which have not been consistent with the facts."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Rice deftly changed the subject, accusing Boxer of questioning her character. "Senator, I have never, ever lost respect for the truth in the service of anything. It's not in my nature. It's not in my character. And I would hope we could have this conversation . . . without impugning my credibility or my integrity."&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;This was probably the type of rebuke that many of the men on the panel were fearing if they had attacked Rice too vigorously. But Boxer kept on punching.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;In the process, she gave the Democrats a bitter partisan as relentless and unyielding as Republicans Tom DeLay of Texas in the House and James M. Inhofe of Oklahoma in the Senate.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Old-fashioned political meanness is relatively rare on the left these days. Senator Russell Feingold of Wisconsin is far more liberal than most of his colleagues, but he puts his causes ahead of attacking his opponents. Edward M. Kennedy of Massachusetts and Hillary Rodham Clinton of New York are the Republicans' favorite whipping boy and girl, but they are primarily deal-makers, more popular with their GOP colleagues than the grass roots of either party would believe possible.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer is something else again. And this month, she has been living up to her name.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/01/25/senator_boxer_packs_a_mean_partisan_punch/" target=_blank&gt;http://www.boston.com/news/nation/washington/articles/2005/01/25/senator_boxer/&lt;/A&gt;&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0008</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Boxer's rebellion</title>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0005</link>
    <description>&lt;STRONG&gt;As the GOP celebrates, the junior senator from California emerges as a fierce -- and lonely -- voice of opposition.&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;EM&gt;By Tim Grieve&lt;BR&gt;Salon.com&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;/EM&gt;To the victors go the spoils, and the Republicans were counting on collecting some of theirs this week. Condoleezza Rice, the president's secretary of state nominee, would cruise through a quick confirmation hearing, and then the Senate would vote to confirm her in a process so fast that it could be squeezed in between Thursday afternoon's inaugural ceremony and Thursday night's inaugural balls. So confident of the outcome, the White House had Colin Powell deliver his farewell address in advance. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The Republicans didn't count on Barbara Boxer. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;For the second time this month, California's junior senator has thrown a wrench into the works of the second-term White House machine. She did it two weeks ago, when she was the only senator to object to the certification of electoral votes from Ohio. And she did it this week, on the eve of George W. Bush's second inauguration, when she put hard questions to Rice and then cast a committee vote against her confirmation. Ohio's electoral votes were eventually counted, and Rice will eventually be confirmed. But largely because of Boxer, the road has been rockier than the White House had expected; the vote on Rice's confirmation will be delayed until next week so Senate Democrats can have time to debate it. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer may have a reputation for tilting at windmills, but she bristles at the thought that she is engaging in protests that only delay the inevitable. "This isn't a protest," she told Salon Wednesday as she described her decision to confront Rice. "I'm just doing my job of&amp;nbsp;'advice and consent.'" &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Not all Democrats see it that way. Boxer's colleague from California, Sen. Dianne Feinstein, has already lined up behind Rice, saying that Americans can "rest easy" if Rice's "past performance is any indication." And while most of the Democrats and several of the Republicans on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee questioned Rice sharply this week on the administration's handling of Iraq, only Boxer and John Kerry voted against Rice's confirmation when the committee met Wednesday morning. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Boxer's in-your-face approach has given some comfort to Democrats around the country who feel defeated as the Republicans celebrate inauguration week. Boxer says it's all part of a long process, one that will someday see the Democrats in control again. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"I've been here a long time, and I've seen inaugurations come and inaugurations go," said Boxer, who had a surprisingly easy road to reelection&amp;nbsp;for a third term last November. "The issues are the things that touch the American people, and they want to know that we're here fighting for them." &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;"Here" is Washington, where Boxer spoke with Salon Wednesday. She'll stay in the capital Thursday for Bush's swearing-in ceremony then catch a flight back home to California before the inaugural balls begin. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;You're in the news today for your vote against the confirmation of Condoleezza Rice. Two weeks ago, it was because you joined Ohio Representative Stephanie Tubbs Jones in objecting to the certification of Ohio's electoral votes. You're taking an approach to the second Bush term that is different from the one many of your Democratic colleagues have chosen.&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I was exercising my responsibility to take a deeper look at what happened in Ohio. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;Did it work? Because you provided a Senate objection, Democrats were able to devote two hours in Congress to the issue of electoral reform. But will your objection ultimately lead to anything more substantive than that?&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I can't tell you what's going to happen in Ohio per se. That's up to the people in Ohio and what happens in their courts. But what I can tell you is that my leader [Senate Minority Leader Harry Reid] has told me that one of the first pieces of legislation that will be [introduced] will be our bill on electoral reform. I can't say that will happen just because I did what I did. But I called attention to the fact that we've got a lot of work to do to make sure our elections are better, to make sure that people will have confidence in the process. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;What about the Condoleezza Rice hearing? Despite your questioning of her, despite your decision to vote against her, she's still going to be confirmed when the full Senate takes up her nomination.&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I think we shed the light of truth on the war in Iraq, which really had to be done. Fifty-eight percent of the American people are unhappy with the direction the administration is taking in Iraq. This was an opportunity to speak to the person who was one of the main architects and chief salespersons of the war, and it was an opportunity I could not let go. It's my job. I believe in accountability. I was able to take the issues that we had delved into -- the aluminum tubes, the claims about [Saddam Hussein] having a nuclear weapon within a year, the claims that he had ties with al-Qaida -- and give her a chance to set the record straight. To me, she didn't set the record straight. She answered every question, but she didn't get to the point that I was making. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;Rice told you not to "impugn" her "integrity" or her "credibility," but that was exactly what you meant to do, wasn't it? You had questions about whether she had spoken truthfully about Iraq before and after the war began.&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I was very honest about it. I told her, "I'm worried about your lack of candor" -- I wasn't denying that -- "and I'm giving you a chance to set the record straight." But she actually made the record murkier, especially on torture. She opened up a whole new front on the lack of credibility. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;STRONG&gt;If people were looking for some sense of a fresh start with the beginning of the second Bush term, they wouldn't have seen it at the confirmation hearing.&lt;/STRONG&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;The beat goes on. But I think that's where the people come in. We live in a democracy. This isn't a monarchy. The people's opinion is very important here, and right now 58 percent of them are worried about the way this war is going. And so many people watched the hearing. I was very happy to get thousands and thousands of phone calls and e-mails and the rest. And that's what saves the country many times, the people of this country. If we start abusing power, they catch you. That's what I want to do, keep the people engaged. I was really pleased with the breadth and the depth of the questions that were asked, and I like to think that I had something to do with that. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;The questions were asked, but at the end of the day, most of your Democratic colleagues on the Senate Foreign Relations Committee cast their votes for Rice.&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Many of my colleagues have different rules when it comes to voting on Cabinet members. I set a bar that's very high because I think these positions are very powerful, and others set them lower because they think the most important thing is that the president gets who he wants. I take "advice and consent" very seriously, perhaps more seriously than others. That's their choice. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;Senator Feinstein actually introduced Rice to the Foreign Relations Committee, and she didn't say a word about the problems that occurred on her watch as the president's national security advisor.&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Senator Feinstein is going to fight in her own way. I think she has been eloquent on the issue of intelligence reform, for example. I think she will continue to fight in the same way. We're not joined at the hip. We're not in agreement all the time. That's fine. There's nothing wrong with that. Everyone fights in his or her own way. She chooses her way, and I have my way, and Senator [Joseph] Biden [D-Dela.] has his way. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;Biden lambasted Rice for "parroting" false statements from the Pentagon, but then he voted in favor of her confirmation anyway. With so many Democrats choosing that kind of path, what's the value in the confrontational approach you've taken?&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;America cares. They're watching, and it's an opportunity to lay out the issues, to send a message that you're going to be watching, and I think that was achieved. At the end of the day, we achieved that. Here's the thing, a lot of the people in the media -- and I'm talking about the more conventional media -- all they care about is the score. They don't care about the process. But the beauty of our country is that there is this process called democracy, and it's just as important as the end result. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;Your critics would say -- and, in the context of the protest of the electoral vote, they did say -- that &lt;I&gt;you're&lt;/I&gt; the one who has trouble understanding democracy. Bush was reelected in November, and he says his reelection was an "accountability moment" in which the American people ratified his decisions about Iraq.&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;That's what George Bush said, and I don't agree with that at all. We're all responsible for our actions in our lives, and we all have to be held responsible and accountable for things that will happen when we're no longer in office, too. I mean, if we cast a vote for Social Security [reform] so that we end up with senior citizens walking around garbage cans looking for food, it doesn't matter if that happens a year from now or 40 years from now. We're responsible. There's no statute of limitations on bad judgment. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;B&gt;And it's not as if the judgments that the administration made about Iraq during the first Bush term cease to have repercussions during the second Bush term.&lt;/B&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;They said they were "rolling out a new product." Remember, [White House chief of staff] Andy Card said that. And they did, and the product they rolled out was a war. If it had been a can opener or a new shoe or some product that didn't hurt anybody, fine. But it's a war. And if they "roll out" another "product" like this, we have to make sure that all the mistakes and the misstatements that were made about this one -- we have to make sure that people are aware of it next time. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I think people paid attention to this. I don't think the Bush administration thought people would pay so much attention to this, but they did. I feel really good about it. The process in a democracy is as important as the outcome. You have to make sure that everyone in this country feels represented. And I would bet that, today, everybody in this country feels represented, whether it was me or Senator Biden's questions or Feingold's questions or Dodd's or Chafee's or Lugar's or whatever. They feel represented today.&lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;A href="http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/01/20/boxer/" target=_blank&gt;http://www.salon.com/news/feature/2005/01/20/boxer/&lt;/A&gt; </description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0005</guid>
  </item>
  <item>
    <title>Opening Statement of Senator Boxer at Dr. Rice's Confirmation Hearing</title>
    <pubDate>Tue, 18 Jan 2005 00:00:00 -0800</pubDate>
    <link>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0010</link>
    <description>&lt;P&gt;I'd like to begin by welcoming Dr. Rice to this committee hearing. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;It is my hope that today, we will have a candid discussion, Dr. Rice, because I believe it is crucial that a Secretary of State speak openly and honestly with the American people and with Congress.&amp;nbsp; Frankly, this issue of candor is where my concern lies. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Since 9/11, we have been engaged in a just fight against terrorism. I voted to use force against Osama bin Laden and the terrorists in Afghanistan, and I assumed that we would focus on that challenge, not stopping until we got bin Laden, dead or alive, and broke the back of al Qaeda. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;However, instead, with you in a lead role Dr. Rice, we went into Iraq. I want to read you one paragraph that best expresses my views, and the views of millions of Californians, on the impact of the Iraqi war on the war against terrorism. It was written by one of the world's experts on terrorism and foreign policy, Peter Bergen, five months ago. He wrote: &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;&lt;EM&gt;"What we have done in Iraq is what bin Laden could not have hoped for in his wildest dreams: We invaded an oil-rich Muslim nation in the heart of the Middle East, the very type of imperial adventure that bin Laden has long predicted was the United States' long-term goal in the region. We deposed the secular socialist Saddam, whom bin Laden has long despised, ignited Sunni and Shia fundamentalist fervor in Iraq, and have now provoked a "defensive" jihad that has galvanized jihad-minded Muslims around the world. It's hard to imagine a set of policies better designed to sabotage the war on terrorism."&lt;/EM&gt; &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;This conclusion was reiterated last Thursday by the National Intelligence Council, the CIA Director's think tank, which released a report saying that Iraq has replaced Afghanistan as the training ground for the next generation of "professionalized" terrorists. NIC Chairman Robert L. Hutchings said that Iraq is "a magnet for international terrorist activity." &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;These quotations are significant to this hearing, Dr. Rice, because as a major proponent and spokesperson for the war in Iraq, and as someone who was asked by the President to make the case for this war to the American people, and as the person in charge of the reconstruction effort -- you have many questions to answer to the American people. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;This war was sold to the American people -- as Chief of Staff to President Bush, Andy Card said -- like a "new product." You rolled out the idea and then you had to convince the people, and as you made your case, I personally believe that your loyalty to the mission you were given overwhelmed your respect for the truth. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;That was a great disservice to the American people.&amp;nbsp; But worse than that, our young men and women are dying. So far, 1342 American troops have been killed in Iraq. More than 25 percent of those troops were from California. More than 10,000 have been wounded. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I don't want their families to think for a minute that their lives and bodies were given in vain.&amp;nbsp; Because when your commander in chief asks you to sacrifice yourself for your country, it is noble to answer the call. I am giving their families all the support that they want and need, but I will also not shrink from questioning a war that was not built on the truth. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;Perhaps the most well known statement you have made was the one about Saddam Hussein launching a nuclear weapon on America, with the image of a "mushroom cloud." That image had to frighten every American into believing that Saddam Hussein was on the verge of annihilating them if he was not stopped. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I will be placing into the record a number of other such statements which have not been consistent with the facts nor the truth. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;As the nominee for Secretary of State, you now must answer to the American people through the confirmation process. &lt;BR&gt;&lt;BR&gt;I continue to stand in awe of our founders, who understood that ultimately, those of us in the highest positions of our government, must be accountable to the people we serve.&lt;/P&gt;</description>
    <guid>http://www.barbaraboxer.com/news?id=0010</guid>
  </item>


</channel>

</rss>
